logo
Trump administration ordered to retract 'sham' rationale for firing workers

Trump administration ordered to retract 'sham' rationale for firing workers

Reuters21-04-2025

April 21 (Reuters) - A U.S. judge has ordered the Trump administration to put in writing that thousands of federal workers were not fired over their performance as agencies had claimed in terminating them en masse.
U.S. District Judge William Alsup in San Francisco late Friday said, opens new tab claims by six agencies that nearly 17,000 probationary workers were fired in February because of their individual performance was "a total sham" that could hobble their careers.
Alsup in March had ordered the agencies to reinstate the workers, but the U.S. Supreme Court paused that ruling earlier this month. On Friday he declined a request by a group of unions and the state of Washington to order reinstatement a second time.
The judge ordered the agencies to provide workers with written statements by May 8 stating that their terminations were not based on performance or fitness but were made as part of a government-wide mass termination.
Probationary employees typically have less than one year of service in their current roles, though some are longtime federal employees, and are easier to fire than career civil servants.
The White House and the office of Washington Attorney General Nicholas Brown did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Monday.
The lead plaintiff in the case is the American Federation of Government Employees, which represents more than 800,000 federal workers. AFGE President Everett Kelley in a statement praised the ruling for "dismantling the false narrative that these employees were terminated for poor performance when no such thing occurred."
The mass firings were part of a broader effort by President Donald Trump, a Republican, and billionaire Elon Musk to drastically shrink the federal bureaucracy and slash government spending, which has invited a series of legal challenges.
The plaintiffs in the case before Alsup claim that the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, which manages the federal civilian workforce, unlawfully directed firings by agencies and falsely stated that they were for performance reasons.
Alsup, an appointee of Democratic former President Bill Clinton, had found in March that OPM improperly ordered the firings. He ruled on behalf of nonprofit groups that had also sued, but did not address claims by the unions and Washington at the time.
The Supreme Court on April 8 put Alsup's ruling on hold pending further litigation, saying the nonprofits likely lacked standing to sue. The order applies to the Defense, Treasury, Energy, Interior, Agriculture, and Veterans Affairs departments.
A judge in Maryland in March had separately ordered 18 agencies — including five of the six subject to Alsup's order — to reinstate about 25,000 probationary employees. That ruling has been put on hold by an appeals court.
Alsup on Friday said there was now much less need for an order reinstating the workers because OPM in response to his March ruling had told agencies that it was not requiring them to fire any employees.
But he said the workers' records should not reflect that their firings had anything to do with their performance.
"Countless high-performing employees ... were terminated through a lie," Alsup wrote. "The stain created by OPM's pretense will follow each employee through their careers and will limit their professional opportunities."
The judge said the order does not prohibit the agencies from terminating employees "so long as the agency makes that decision wholly on its own."
The case is American Federation of Government Employees v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 25-cv-1780.
For the plaintiffs: Danielle Leonard and Stacey Leyton of Altshuler Berzon
For the government: Kelsey Helland of the U.S. Department of Justice
Read more:
US Supreme Court halts reinstatement of fired federal employees
US appeals court sides with Trump, clears way to fire thousands of federal workers
US judges order Trump administration to reinstate thousands of fired workers
Trump administration reinstating almost 25,000 fired workers after court order
Trump takes challenge to judge's federal worker rehiring order to Supreme Court
US judge halts Trump administration's calls for mass firings at agencies
Trump poised to launch new round of layoffs despite setbacks in court
US agencies face Thursday deadline to submit mass layoff plans

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rogue state Iran plans terrifying response to Israel blitz from immediate counterstrikes to secret NUKE as tensions boil
Rogue state Iran plans terrifying response to Israel blitz from immediate counterstrikes to secret NUKE as tensions boil

Scottish Sun

timean hour ago

  • Scottish Sun

Rogue state Iran plans terrifying response to Israel blitz from immediate counterstrikes to secret NUKE as tensions boil

IRAN could be spurred on to rush the creation of a nuclear weapon if Israel unleashes an attack, an ex-military intelligence agent warns. Israel's top brass are understood to be poised to blitz the rogue nation within days without the backing of the US. Advertisement 7 A missile launches from an undisclosed location in Iran Credit: EPA 7 Satellite picture shows Iran's nuclear site in Isfahan, Iran, in April 2024 Credit: AP 7 It comes as Donald Trump's 60-day deadline to thrash out a deal with Tehran over its nuclear programme last night expired. Senior military and political sources in Tel Aviv told The Sun back in April how Israel was plotting to strike Iran's nuke sites within weeks. A senior diplomatic insider, speaking in Jerusalem, said Tehran's nuclear programme should have been dealt with "a long time ago". Israel hoped to coordinate an attack with the US, but Benjamin Netanyahu's ex-advisor last week told The Sun how the prime minister was mapping out a plan to bomb Iran without Trump. Advertisement And now US officials have been warned Israel is ready to unleash strikes on the rogue nation, sources have revealed. In a telling sign, the US has scaled down its presence in the Middle East and removed non-essential staff from its embassy in Baghdad, Iraq. Trump alluded to potential conflict last night as he said: "They are being moved out because it could be a dangerous place and we'll see what happens. "They can't have a nuclear weapon, very simple, they can't have a nuclear weapon, we're not going to allow that." Advertisement Netanyahu has been making preparations behind the scenes to swiftly blitz Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities as he deems the country "enemy number one". Trump, however, had firmly insisted Israel take no action that could jeopardise his administration's efforts to thrash out a deal with Iran. Israel MUST defy Trump and strike weakened Iran to neutralise nuclear threat But Netanyahu appears on the brink of giving the green light to strike as a sixth round of talks tentatively set for Sunday in Oman looms. Iran's furious Revolutionary Guard commander vowed Tehran would respond in a "more forceful and destructive way" to Israel than in past offensives. Advertisement It comes as the UN nuclear watchdog found Iran is not complying with its nuke obligations amid alarming reports that the Islamist state has stepped up secret plans to build nuclear weapons Raz Zimmt, who spent more than two decades in the IDF's military intelligence, said Iran is likely to immediately retaliate with a huge missile blitz if Israel launches missiles as its turf. But the veteran Iran-watcher warned it could spur Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei to continue his warped nuke scheme with no oversight - or even break out a nuclear weapon. He told The Sun: "We have to make a distinction between two concerning scenarios in the day after an attack whether it's an Israeli or an American attack. Advertisement "The immediate retaliation would probably be the launching of long-range missiles from Iran against Israel if that's an Israeli attack. "I assume that if it's just an Israeli attack Iran will not take the risk of engaging the United States into a military confrontation with Iran by targeting US forces or US bases in the region. Iran's breaching nuclear rules IRAN has been declared as in breach of its nuclear rules for the first time in two decades. The UN's atomic watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, passed a resolution on Wednesday condemning Tehran's "lack of co-operation". It is the culmination of several stand-offs between the Vienna-based IAEA and Iran since Trump pulled the US out of a nuclear deal between Tehran and major powers in 2018 during his first term, after which that accord unravelled. Tehran said it "has no choice but to respond to this political resolution", and said it would launch a new enrichment site "in a secure location". The state said: "Other measures are also being planned and will be announced subsequently." An IAEA official said Iran had given no further details such as the location of the site. It comes as US and Iranian officials are due to hold a sixth round of talks on Tehran's accelerating uranium enrichment programme in Oman on Sunday. The Trump administration has been trying to secure a deal with Tehran aimed at curbing Iran's nuclear programme. Donald Trump is said to be in advanced talks with Iran over a preliminary agreement that could include provisions on uranium enrichment - terms Israel finds unacceptable. "In that case, we'll probably see more or less what we saw in early October. "Perhaps more than that Iran is still equipped with thousands of ballistic missiles it can use against Israel. Advertisement "Those can certainly inflict significant damage to Israel but this is only the immediate kind of retaliation. Israel of course can try to defend itself. "Israel can carry out strikes which could in a way limit the missiles capabilities in Iran." An Iron Dome operator previously told The Sun how the IDF was ready for any possible air assault from Iran. Tsgt Y said: "Fearful [of an attack from Iran]? No. We're prepared for anything that might come." Advertisement Dr Zimmt warned Israel blitzing Iran could spark weeks of military confrontation between the two nations. But he argued it could prompt a far more sinister outcome. Insiders say Iran right now has the capacity to create three to five nuclear bombs - but does not have the ability to make them explode. 7 Iran launched projectiles at Israel before being intercepted by the Iron Dome in the sky above Jerusalem in October 2024 Credit: Alamy Advertisement 7 Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei pictured last week Credit: Getty 7 "[It is possible] after an Israeli strike Iran will try to take the remnants of what is being left of its nuclear capabilities, the fissile material, the centrifuges, what will be left out of the two main enrichment facilities and try to reconstitute its nuclear programme this time without any IEA inspections," Dr Zimmt said. "And so Iran can certainly use this opportunity to make a decision to break out a weapon which will require continuous efforts by both the United States and Israel to avoid that scenario. Advertisement "So the immediate retaliation would probably be some kind of missile attack against Israel if it's only Israel. "The second kind of retaliation would be concerning Iran's efforts to rehabilitate its nuclear program and perhaps also breaking out weapons." A French government insider close to Israel said it will be imperative other countries form a deterrence coalition if Israel strikes to fend off retaliation from Iran. The source, speaking to The Sun in Paris, warned Iran "know how to fight" and are "used to long wars". Advertisement "You must have a kind of coalition against the reaction of Iran," they said. "And you have seen this small coalition immediately before, US, UK and France, and some Arab countries. "But somebody like Trump would not support that, I mean an attack from Iran. "So it must be a kind of deterrence, saying to Iran, OK, you have this strike from Israel, but you can't reply, because we are there now. So if you reply, this is an attack against us. Advertisement "That's deterrence. "If Iran tries to strike back, you will see immediately a kind of coalition against Iran. "And you will have a huge, huge political issue, because the best ally of Israel, the United States, the best ally of Iran is Russia. "So if you have a strike between Israel and Iran, the problem is between the United States and Russia." Advertisement IDF sources, speaking to The Sun at a base in Israel in April, revealed the military had been working for months to clear the path for a major strike on Iran. Three air campaigns eliminated strategic aerial defences which were 'the main obstacle' protecting Iran's nuke facilities, the insider confirmed. Vitally, this would allow Israeli aircraft to get to Iran's borders with diminished fear of being blasted. Iran's secret nuke site 'Rainbow' Exclusive by Katie Davis, Chief Foreign Reporter (Digital) CHILLING satellite pictures reveal Iran's sprawling secret nuclear site codenamed "Rainbow". Sources in the country have uncovered how the base is being used to develop nuclear-capable missiles with a 2,000-mile range - able to strike US bases in the Middle East. Tehran's tyrannical regime is using oil and chemical facilities as a cover for nuclear bases, bombshell docs shared with The Sun by the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) reveal. Haunting aerial images expose a network of clandestine sites - including "Rainbow" - used by iron-fist leaders to create terrifying nuclear weapons. A powerful nuclear blast from Iran could have disastrous consequences for the Middle East - and beyond - thanks to the capability of the warheads. Now sources inside Iran have revealed the regime's nuclear weaponisation entity, Organization of Defensive Innovation and Research's (SPND) secret project to accelerate nuclear ability. Hidden under the guise of a chemical production facility, the crowning jewel of the operation is a base known internally as the 'Rangin Kaman (Rainbow) Site". It is some distance from Iran's already known nuke bases, and is masked as a chemical production company known as Diba Energy Siba. READ MORE HERE 7

Air India plane crash: reactions from across the world
Air India plane crash: reactions from across the world

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

Air India plane crash: reactions from across the world

June 12 (Reuters) - Many people were killed when an Air India plane bound for London with 242 people on board crashed minutes after taking off from India's western city of Ahmedabad on Thursday, authorities said. Here's what world leaders have said so far: INDIAN PRIME MINISTER NARENDRA MODI, ON X: "The tragedy in Ahmedabad has stunned and saddened us. It is heartbreaking beyond words." "In this sad hour, my thoughts are with everyone affected by it. Have been in touch with Ministers and authorities who are working to assist those affected." BRITISH PRIME MINISTER KEIR STARMER, ON X: "The scenes emerging of a London-bound plane carrying many British nationals crashing in the Indian city of Ahmedabad are devastating." "I am being kept updated as the situation develops, and my thoughts are with the passengers and their families at this deeply distressing time." BRITAIN'S KING CHARLES, IN A STATEMENT ON X: "My wife and I have been desperately shocked by the terrible events in Ahmedabad this morning. Our special prayers and deepest possible sympathy are with the families and friends of all those affected by this appallingly tragic incident across so many nations, as they await news of their loved ones." BANGLADESH CHIEF ADVISER MUHAMMAD YUNUS IN A MESSAGE TO MODI: "We extend our deepest condolences to all the families who lost their dear ones at this tragic incident." "We stand in solidarity with the people and Government of India, and offer our full support in any form." EUROPEAN COMMISSION PRESIDENT URSULA VON DER LEYEN, ON X: "My deepest condolences to the families and loved ones grieving this terrible loss." "Dear @narendramodi, Europe stands in solidarity with you and the people of India in this moment of sorrow." RUSSIAN PRESIDENT VLADIMIR PUTIN TO MODI, IN AN OFFICIAL TELEGRAM PUBLISHED ON KREMLIN WEBSITE: "Please accept my deep condolences on the tragic consequences of the airliner crash at Ahmedabad airport." "Please convey words of sincere sympathy and support to the families and friends of the victims, as well as wishes of a swift recovery to all those injured in this catastrophe." FRENCH PRESIDENT EMMANUEL MACRON, ON X: "We have learned with deep emotion of the tragic plane crash in Ahmedabad, India. In this time of sorrow, I extend our heartfelt thoughts to the victims' loved ones and to Prime Minister @NarendraModi." AUSTRALIAN PRIME MINISTER ANTHONY ALBANESE, ON X: "The news of a passenger plane crash in Ahmedabad is absolutely devastating. In this time of tragedy, Australia's thoughts are with everyone affected." "Our government is receiving regular updates and we will continue to monitor the situation closely." IRISH PRIME MINISTER MICHEAL MARTIN, ON X: "My thoughts and prayers are with the people of India after the terrible plane crash in Ahmedabad earlier today. Thinking of the families of all those on board, along with the emergency services attending the scene." GENERAL SECRETARY OF BRITISH AIRLINE PILOTS' ASSOCIATION AMY LEVERSIDGE: "Pilots around the globe are deeply saddened by this news. Members of the British Airline Pilots' Association send condolences to all those affected. "It is vital a full and thorough investigation is now carried out without interference or unhelpful speculation about the contributory factors so that future tragedies can be avoided."

US trade war enters precarious slow grind: Taosha Wang
US trade war enters precarious slow grind: Taosha Wang

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

US trade war enters precarious slow grind: Taosha Wang

June 12 (Reuters) - U.S. trade negotiations have transitioned from their opening act, with its many twists and turns, into a new, protracted chapter: the Slow Grind. It may be less turbulent than this past spring's drama, but no less worrying for investors. Now that the U.S. and China have the framework for a trade agreement, attention may start to turn to the European Union, which appears next in line to strike a deal with the Trump administration. But the prospect of a swift resolution seems remote. Finding significant common ground to meaningfully reduce the EU's substantial goods surplus with the U.S., roughly $200 billion annually, presents a formidable challenge, as major avenues appear blocked. First, the EU is highly unlikely to concede on agricultural market access given the region's strong and comprehensive policy for protecting local agriculture. Large-scale aircraft deals also seem improbable given the Airbus-Boeing rivalry. The contentious issue of pharmaceutical pricing will complicate any healthcare deals. And American automakers will likely struggle to make much of a dent in the EU market given entrenched European consumer preferences and regulatory hurdles. While Europe could theoretically increase purchases of U.S. defense equipment or relax "Buy European" policies in defense procurement, the political palatability of such moves is low. Consequently, the focus may inevitably shift towards the services sector, where the EU runs an approximately $100 billion annual deficit with the U.S., driven largely by the operations of American technology giants. Here, a potential landing zone exists: the EU could conceivably ease some of its more burdensome technology regulations with limited immediate downside, offering a tangible, albeit partial, lever to address the overall trade imbalance. In fact, Section 899 in the Trump administration's proposed "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" – which threatens to increase taxes on entities from countries with "unfair foreign taxes" – appears to be aimed directly at digital taxes levied by EU countries on U.S. technology companies. This suggests that this area could be a focal point in U.S.-EU negotiations. U.S. negotiations with the EU are also occurring against a markedly different backdrop than the one that prevailed in May during the earlier round of trade talks with China. Back then, the United States was just emerging from a significant bout of financial market volatility and facing the risk of "empty shelves" if onerous tariffs on China remained in place, so both investors and business leaders were demanding urgent action. The U.S. administration is now operating under fewer acute time constraints. Importantly, EU exports to the United States are predominantly industrial and luxury goods, not the daily consumables that directly impact the average American's pocketbook. Adding to this calmer backdrop, capital markets have shown signs of adapting to the current administration's seemingly unpredictable trade tactics. The S&P 500 index (.SPX), opens new tab has rebounded 20% since its post-Liberation Day low and is only around 2% below its all-time high. One major risk, however, is that the U.S. starts taking a harder line with Europe for fear of looking weak. Central to the U.S. negotiation strategy is the perceived credibility of threats. Given the Trump administration's emphasis on the president's deal-making prowess, the U.S. fundamentally cannot afford to be seen as backing down consistently, a scenario some critics have labelled "Trump Always Chickens Out" (TACO). Being perceived as unreliable with ultimatums would critically undermine the administration's negotiating power, not just with the EU, but globally. This need to maintain a credible hard line could add friction to the process, making concessions harder to make and progress slower to achieve. Looking forward, this elevated – and likely protracted – uncertainty in trade negotiations is liable to act as a cap on near-term equity market upside on both sides of the Atlantic, particularly heading into the seasonally weaker summer period. On the currency front, the euro may continue to appreciate against the dollar – ending a more than decade-long trend of U.S. dollar strength – if wary European investors bring more capital back home. This could give the European Central Bank greater leeway to implement interest rate cuts, with less immediate concern about imported inflation. However, such euro strength has historically been negatively correlated with the performance of risk assets more broadly, adding another layer of complexity to the investment landscape. Further complicating the picture is the risk that the tentative deal just reached with China could unravel, reflecting the ongoing tug-of-war within the U.S. administration between China hawks and pragmatists. The frenetic pace of the trade war's opening chapter has given way to a more arduous phase. This "Slow Grind" promises to generate more uncertainty, testing the patience of markets and policymakers alike, with progress likely measured in inches rather than miles. (The opinions expressed here are those of Taosha Wang, a portfolio manager and creator of the "Thematically Thinking" newsletter at Fidelity International.) Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), opens new tab, your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI, opens new tab can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X., opens new tab

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store