Man accused of grabbing colleague by throat and using homophobic slur loses unfair dismissal case
Workplace Relations Commission
(WRC).
Seamus Behan lost his job of 12 years as a van driver for Liberties Recycling Development and Training CLG in February of last year following the altercation with another worker just before Christmas 2023.
At a hearing of Mr Behan's complaint under the Unfair Dismissals Act 2014, Liberties Recycling told the WRC his behaviour on December 20th, 2023 amounted to gross misconduct.
The company said the finding was arrived at after what it described as a fair investigation and disciplinary process.
READ MORE
Company manager Adam Moloney said 'multiple' statements from staff recounted 'off the charts' behaviour from Mr Behan towards the other worker, Mr A.
Mr Moloney said workers told him Mr Behan was 'verbally abusive, behaving aggressively, and damaged company property' during the incident.
He said it 'wasn't clear' from the statements what had first happened other than that the two men 'pushed each other'.
Mr Moloney said Mr Behan was at reception in the depot 'shouting abuse' at Mr A, would not leave when asked and 'kept trying to go at him'.
Management tried to persuade gardaí to come, but there was no response by closing time. A duty manager suspended Mr Behan and Mr A and sent them away via separate exits.
The complainant's representative, Thomas Behan, argued that witness statements had been 'handpicked' to support a case that his client was 'violent' and that CCTV had been 'purposely left out' of the investigation.
The company said any footage of the incident was taped over during the Christmas break, so it was not available when the investigation began in the new year.
The tribunal was told the row followed a complaint made by Mr A about Mr Behan's alleged conduct towards him six days earlier. It was alleged the complainant on that occasion grabbed Mr A's hand and squeezed until Mr A asked him to let go. Mr Behan then turned to another worker and allegedly said: 'Watch how I shake a real man's hand.'
Mr Behan said he knew nothing of this informal complaint until after the incident on December 20th, with his representative arguing any difficulties between the men ought to have been addressed sooner by management.
Mr Behan said Mr A was 'an hour late' returning with a van for a shift handover on December 20th and he was 'in a hurry to get out' so as to avoid working late without pay.
'I went to your man ... he was just numb about everything. Because I didn't know anything about the 14th, I was at the van, and he was at the van. He started mumbling stuff about something, and then he got aggressive towards me,' he said.
'This guy pursued me, I went away from the van, he's aggressive, in my face, spitting in my face,' Mr Behan said, adding that the spitting was not 'intentional'.
'He's giving me lackery about Pope John Paul, lackery about my religion. He deeply upset me,' he said.
The complainant said he 'wouldn't repeat' his colleague's remarks during the disciplinary process that followed because it was 'filthy' and 'vulgar' language.
Mr Behan denied using a slur toward Mr A in the course of the altercation, as had been indicated in statements gathered by the company. 'I don't even use the word 'f****t',' he said. 'Everyone's twisting and turning statements.'
He said a female supervisor was standing between him and Mr A, so it would have been 'impossible for me to grab the man by the neck'.
He told the tribunal Mr A pushed him as the altercation continued and that the CCTV footage 'would prove that as well'.
He said he was 'well warmed up' by his colleague by the time he reached the office.
'I raised my voice. Is that a sacking offence?' he said. 'No one wanted to investigate my statement ... My statement is the truth, on my religious beliefs.'
In her decision, WRC adjudicator Eileen Campbell stated: 'Taking all the circumstances into account I find, as a matter of probability, the complainant's actions on the day and his behaviour on the day to be aggressive, uncontrolled and unacceptable.'
She added that, on balance, the company's version of events was 'more convincing than that of the complainant' and there were 'substantial grounds' justifying Mr Behan's dismissal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Suspected sex offender used 27 aliases in UK and France before arriving in Ireland
A suspected sex offender with an unconfirmed identity used 27 aliases in the UK and France before arriving in Ireland, where he attempted to impersonate a minor, a court has heard. The man, who claims to be in his 30s and from Syria , has been in the country for at least a year. He was charged on Wednesday with failing to tell authorities his address under the Sex Offenders Act. He was held pending his appearance at Cloverhill District Court, where Judge Patricia Cronin heard that gardaí remain uncertain about the latest name he has given. He has been linked to various other identities used abroad. Garda Patrick Watson told a contested bail hearing the man was arrested in Dublin but would not give his name, resulting in extensive inquiries at national and international level. READ MORE The Garda National Immigration Bureau (GNIB) had no record of him under the name he had given. Colleagues in Cork indicated that the accused was known there under a different name. Extra inquiries were made with Interpol, revealing the accused had six separate identities in France and 21 in the UK, and another four in Ireland. Garda Watson said the man, who cannot currently be named for legal reasons, was also subject to the obligations of the sex offenders register. The court heard gardaí have yet to establish exactly how long the man, who has no passport, has been in the State. The court heard that at one stage he contacted Tusla , claiming to be a minor. The child and family agency 'carried out tests and established that this was not the case'. The court heard he never presented to the GNIB or international protection services. Garda Watson maintained the accused, who did not address the court, was elusive when asked to give his background information. The defence stressed the man denied being the person named on the charge sheet, but the prosecuting garda replied: 'The fingerprints say otherwise.' His barrister submitted the accused still enjoyed the presumption of innocence, and would obey strict bail conditions and lodge €500, all his money. The offence carries a maximum 12-month sentence. He was remanded in custody with consent to bail and will appear again next week to formally enter a plea and have a later hearing date set if he contests the charge.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Beauty salon must pay €1,500 to Traveller mother and daughters for discrimination
A beauty salon has been ordered to pay a Traveller woman and her daughters €500 each in compensation for discrimination after insisting they pay cash up front for their treatments. The Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) upheld complaints under the Equal Status Act 2000 by the family against the unidentified beauty salon. In evidence, the mother, Ms A, said she and her daughters went to the salon as a 'birthday treat' for one of the girls and on arrival was told by a hairdresser that the business would 'only accept cash'. She said she asked about the full cost then the owner called her to the counter and showed her a sum on a calculator. Ms A said she asked for an itemised breakdown of the figure, upon which the owner became 'infuriated'. READ MORE Ms A said the owner struck the counter with two hands and said 'something to the effect' of 'Do you want it for free? Are you trying to rob me?'. The complainant said the owner also threatened to call the police and continued to be 'rude and aggressive' to the point that one of her daughters became upset and suggested they leave. Ms A said it was made clear she would have to pay up front for all the procedures and that one of the hairdressers also suggested she 'run across the road to the ATM'. She said that before she went out the hairdresser told her the reason the owner had behaved as she had was because a group of girls had been in the week before and failed to pay for procedures. The hairdresser said this group were 'also Travellers', Ms A said. Ms A said that, having paid up front as requested, other customers in line behind her were served before her. It was 'so obvious' this was happening that another customer noticed one of her daughters was 'visibly upset' and offered to let the girl go ahead, Ms A said. 'Other customers who were not members of the Traveller community were not asked to pay for their treatments up front,' Ms A said, adding two other customers confirmed this to her. Adjudication officer Orla Jones noted the failure of the business's management to attend a hearing on the case last February. In her decision published on Thursday, Ms Jones said she was satisfied Ms A and her daughters were subjected to less favourable treatment at the salon due to their membership of the Traveller Community. She upheld the three complaints, awarding Ms A and daughters Ms M and Ms K compensation of €500 each. Ms Jones anonymised all three of her decisions on the cases, also redacting the name of the business, to protect identities of the two underage complainants. In a statement afterwards from the Free Legal Advice Centres , Ms A welcomed the decision, saying she and he daughter 'did not take these cases for money'. 'As a mother, I want my girls to know that people cannot and should not treat them badly because they come from the Traveller community,' she said . FLAC chief executive Eilis Barry said: 'The family showed great bravery and resilience in taking these complaints. 'Unfortunately, there is no legal aid for victims of discrimination who take cases to the WRC. This means it is impossible for many people to challenge discrimination and to access compensation for its effects.' Ms Barry called for the removal of the 'blanket ban on legal aid for cases heard by tribunals like the WRC' and more support for legal services for the Travelling community and 'other groups with high levels of legal need'.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Forensic results awaited in case of man accused of setting fire to vehicles near Cork Airport
A man has appeared in court charged with causing more than €100,000 of damage after he allegedly set fire to vehicles at Cork Airport Business Park. Mateusz Stula (32), of Orchard Road in Blackpool, Cork city, appeared before Cork District Court on Thursday accused of three counts of arson. Sergeant John Kelleher said forensic analysis was ongoing in relation to the incidence of arson at the business park this summer. A file is being prepared for the Director of Public Prosecutions. Eddie Burke, defending, said his client – who appeared by video link – consented to a two- or four-week adjournment of the case. READ MORE Judge John King further remanded Mr Stula to appear before Cork District Court via video link on September 3rd. It is alleged that Mr Stula entered the grounds of Cork Airport Business Park shortly after 1am on June 10th and set fire to three vehicles parked there. A Swissport Airline waste removal tanker was valued at €100,000. A second vehicle was privately owned and had been parked at the business park while the owner was out of the country. A third vehicle was a privately owned animal transporter truck which had been dropped to the business park for repairs. Detective Sgt Pat Lyons previously objected to the granting of bail in the case, citing the seriousness of the charges and the strength of the evidence against the accused. CCTV footage was checked in the aftermath of the incident. Mr Burke previously told the court his client was drinking alcohol while on prescribed medication and required inpatient treatment. He said Mr Stula had worked at a premises in the airport business park before the incident. Mr Burke said the matter before the court was not a case of Mr Stula going to the airport to carry out this damage. 'For whatever reason, he left his place of work and went to where these vehicles were,' he said.
