logo
Woman brought rolling pin to bed to fight off rapist husband

Woman brought rolling pin to bed to fight off rapist husband

A woman who brought a rolling pin to bed with her because she was in fear of her estranged husband later used that rolling pin to fight him off as he raped her.
The 43-year-old man had pleaded not guilty to two charges of rape at their Tipperary home on dates in April and May 2022. A Central Criminal Court jury later convicted the man on one charge of rape but failed to reach a verdict on the first incident of alleged rape.
Mr Justice Paul Burns imposed a sentence on the man of seven years with the final year suspended.
A local investigating detective told Michael Hourigan SC, prosecuting, that the couple had been married since 2010 and had a daughter together. The marriage had run into difficulties after the woman said he was drinking to excess.
She said he also caused bruises on her arms and legs by 'pulling, pushing and grabbing' her strongly on regular occasions. In 2015, she applied for a divorce but the man seemed to be in denial. They were sleeping separately and at the time of the rape had not had sex in over a year.
The Irish Mirror's Crime Writers Michael O'Toole and Paul Healy are writing a new weekly newsletter called Crime Ireland. Click here to sign up and get it delivered to your inbox every week
The detective said in April 2022, the woman later told gardaí that she woke up to find the man raping her. She then began to regularly lock her bedroom door. This was the charge that the jury failed to reach a agreement on.
Mr Hourigan said the Director of Public Prosecutions has directed that this charge will not be tried again before a jury and a nolle prosequi was entered, meaning the man no longer faces prosecution for this charge.
The detective said that on May 15, 2022 the woman had an argument with the man and described the atmosphere in the house as 'not good'.
She did not lock her bedroom door that night but the detective agreed with Mr Hourigan that she 'thought it prudent to bring a rolling pin to bed with her'.
She woke up that night to find the man raping her. She struck him twice with the rolling pin before he stopped raping her.
The woman reported the rape to the gardaí and they arrived at their home to arrest the man. He was considered too drunk to be interviewed at the time but was later questioned six times. He denied any wrongdoing.
The detective read the woman's victim impact statement into the record. She said since the rape her life has 'extremely changed' mentally, physically and financially.
'I could not cope with what had happened,' she said as she described experiencing nightmares, anxiety and PTSD. She said she was not eating, not sleeping and suffered a mental breakdown.
The woman said she had no happiness and began drinking heavily.
The woman said she does not know how she will cope financially in the future. She can no longer work and has unpaid bills, including her mortgage.
Colman Cody SC, defending, said although his client made no admissions and does not accept the jury's verdict he was co-operative with the garda investigation.
He said his client was aware of the issues the woman has been experiencing financially but is not in a position to assist with this because of the fact that he is in custody and is unable to work.
Mr Justice Burns noted the couple had been separated but still shared a home due to their financial circumstances. He said the accused had broken trust and taken advantage of the woman being asleep, with the violation occurring in her own bed. He also noted the prior relationship between them was an aggravating factor.
He set a headline sentence of eight years, before noting in mitigation the man's lack of prior convictions, work history, co-operation with gardai and that he was a good father. Mr Justice Burns imposed a sentence of seven years with the final year suspended for three years.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man who caused blaze at estranged father's home appeals sentence
Man who caused blaze at estranged father's home appeals sentence

Irish Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Irish Daily Mirror

Man who caused blaze at estranged father's home appeals sentence

An arsonist who set a fire at an apartment leaving its residents, including his estranged father, "with nothing" has launched an appeal against his eight-and-a-half-year sentence, arguing part of it should have been suspended to facilitate his rehabilitation. Jason Hughes (21) of Bawnlea Green, Tallaght, Dublin 24, pleaded guilty to one count of arson at Pairc Na Greine, Tallaght, on December 9, 2022. The offence carries a sentence of up to life in prison. Jailing Hughes for eight and a half years at Dublin Circuit Criminal Court on October 27, 2023, Judge Martin Nolan said there could have been a "significant chance of fatalities" if one of the occupants of the apartment he attacked hadn't been awake to raise the alarm. He said Hughes' "reckless act" had endangered the apartment, the lives of its occupants and the health of other residents of the complex. The court heard that €80-90,000 in damage was caused during the attack and the victims, which included the defendant's father, were "left with nothing". A female occupant of the apartment told gardai that she was in the sitting room of her home at the Pairc Na Greine complex in the early hours of the morning when she heard a loud bang. She looked outside and saw a fire in a corner of the balcony near to the apartment complex's main door. The court heard the woman saw the glass smash inwards and she got pushed against a wall. Scared by the speed of the fire, the woman took a young child who was sleeping in the apartment outside. She then went back inside to ensure that her partner had also left and shouted and made noise to alert her neighbours. Both the apartment and its contents were severely damaged. CCTV footage from the area showed Hughes walking towards the complex, before climbing over the balcony's railings. He left shortly afterwards and two minutes later, flames became visible. Launching an appeal against his conviction at the Court of Appeal today, defence counsel Giollaíosa Ó Lideadha SC argued that the 12-year headline sentence was too high, that the sentencing judge failed to properly consider Hughes' personal circumstances, and that a portion of the sentence should have been suspended to incentivise rehabilitation. The Irish Mirror's Crime Writers Michael O'Toole and Paul Healy are writing a new weekly newsletter called Crime Ireland. Click here to sign up and get it delivered to your inbox every week He said the offence should have been placed in the middle of the mid-range, attracting a headline sentence of between five and 10 years. A discount should have been applied thereafter, counsel said, and a further portion of the sentence should have been suspended to incentivise rehabilitation. Counsel said that whilst there was no doubt this was "a very serious case" where a custodial sentence was required, the court was bound to take into account the fact that Hughes was a very young man, aged just 19 at the time, who had lived a "chaotic life" and who had made a serious suicide attempt on the same day as this incident occurred. He noted Hughes has ADHD and other cognitive difficulties and had witnessed domestic violence. Mr Ó Lideadha said Hughes's parents had separated when he was eight and the death of another "father figure" in his life had a "devastating effect" on Hughes leading to him going "totally off the rails". "His offending and his drug activity and suicide attempts occurred in those circumstances of extreme adversity," he said. The barrister said one of the victims in the case was Hughes' estranged father and noted the appellant's brother had died in a fire before he was born. Counsel said there was evidence in the psychological report that Hughes felt "aggrieved" by his estrangement from his father and had stated he would never have committed the offence if he had been sober. Mr Ó Lideadha said the trial judge had made a specific error in stating that an accelerant was used. He said the evidence indicated that Hughes set something on the balcony on fire. He said Hughes is clearly someone who "needs residential treatment" and who has "work to do" in terms of his own life and taking responsibility for his actions. He said it was "in the public interest" that a portion of the sentence ought to have been suspended to incentivise rehabilitation. Aoife McNickle BL, for the Director of Public Prosecutions, noted the injured parties in this case were present in court for the appeal hearing. Ms McNickle contended that the circumstances of this case brought the offence into the upper band. She noted the fire was set at a residential property in the early hours of the morning and Hughes was aware the property was occupied by his father and others at the time. She said but for the fact one of the residents happened to be up at the time and noticed the blaze, the alarm would not have been raised as quickly as it was. The barrister said the fire could be seen on CCTV within two minutes of Hughes leaving the scene and burned "ferociously enough" to blow in the windows of the sitting room. She said it could be inferred from the psychological report that Hughes's motivation was due to "some animosity or anger" towards his father. In relation to the argument put forward that part of the sentence should have been suspended, Ms McNickle said there was nothing put before the court that would have obliged the sentencing judge to suspend any portion of the jail term. She said the judge had taken the relevant mitigating factors into account in discounting three and a half years from the headline sentence. Mr Justice Patrick McCarthy said the three-judge court would reserve judgement and deliver its decision at a later date.

Woman requests to meet attacker to ask how he could have been 'so cruel'
Woman requests to meet attacker to ask how he could have been 'so cruel'

RTÉ News​

time2 hours ago

  • RTÉ News​

Woman requests to meet attacker to ask how he could have been 'so cruel'

A Spanish tourist who was raped in Dublin city centre during New Year's Eve celebrations has said she wants to meet her attacker in a safe space and ask him how he could have been so cruel. The prosecution will now look into providing restorative justice for the complainant to allow her to do this, with the court hearing that it is rarely utilised for victims in rape cases before the Central Criminal Court. Christopher O'Grady, formerly of Muirhevnamor, Dundalk in Co Louth, was found guilty of one count of raping the then 19-year-old woman on 1 January 2019 following a trial last March. He was homeless at the time. In her victim impact statement, which was read out by prosecution counsel Tony McGillicuddy SC, the woman said: "I don't know why, but I want to meet him in a safe space and look him in the eyes and ask him what reason would anyone have to be so cruel to a young woman." She said she wants "to know if he believes his own lies", adding "I want him to truly see me and be forced to see himself as monstrous as I saw him". She outlined the effects the rape has had on her, saying O'Grady turned her life upside down. "He didn't see the person behind the body," she said. She described how she can no longer socialise or dance like she used to, is fearful of walking alone at night and is hypervigilant of other young women who are out at night. Padraig Dwyer SC, defending the 33-year-old O'Grady, submitted his client was guilty of rape on the basis that he was reckless as to whether the young woman was consenting or not. He said O'Grady now accepts his guilt and wishes to apologise to the victim for the hurt and pain he caused her. After some consultation with both O'Grady and the complainant, the court was told they are both willing to engage in restorative justice. Ms Justice Caroline Biggs warned O'Grady that this does not mean he will not serve a custodial sentence for his offending. She noted that any restorative justice process would need to be managed by appropriate individuals, given the effects of the crime on the complainant. Mr McGillicuddy said he had some knowledge of restorative justice but was "not aware of it being used for an offence of this nature". "I'm not sure how developed that system is or which agency would be appropriate to do it," he said. Ms Justice Biggs adjourned the case to 24 July to give the prosecution time to look into the issue. 'Like a doll' The trial heard the woman had been in the city centre to watch the New Year's Eve fireworks that night when she got separated from her friend and came into contact with O'Grady outside a shop. She told the court she was trying to find a bar to meet her friend and O'Grady walked her through the city centre to a car park area, where the alleged rape occurred. The woman said she felt "like a doll" and did not have any strength in her body during the alleged incident. Afterwards, the court heard she walked with O'Grady back through the city centre for about 40 minutes, where she then spoke to a couple - a man and woman - outside a shop and parted ways with O'Grady. The woman ended up in a B&B with the second man after the woman went home, where they had anal sex before the woman went home to her accommodation. She told the court that it was painful and she persuaded the man to stop. The trial was played CCTV footage of the encounter, which occurred in the hallway of the B&B. Ms Justice Biggs warned the jury that they may find the footage "intrusive" and "distressing", but added she had made the decision that it needed to be shown in court as O'Grady had a constitutional right to put the evidence before them. When the complainant woke up the next morning, she told the court she "realised I had two rapes and there might be a medical issue with that". She then went to hospital. The court heard no charge was brought against the second man, who gave evidence in the trial. Sergeant Eoghan Kirwan told the court that O'Grady has 65 previous convictions, including public order offences, criminal damage, drugs and theft. He took a bench warrant while on bail for this offence and has been in custody since August 2024. The defence counsel said O'Grady was living a "shambolic" lifestyle at the time of the offence, that he was homeless, begging on the streets and doing drugs.

Tourist rape victim wants to meet attacker 'to ask how he could be so cruel'
Tourist rape victim wants to meet attacker 'to ask how he could be so cruel'

Irish Daily Mirror

time3 hours ago

  • Irish Daily Mirror

Tourist rape victim wants to meet attacker 'to ask how he could be so cruel'

A Spanish tourist who was raped in Dublin city centre during New Year's Eve celebrations has said she wants to meet her attacker in a safe space and ask him how he could have been so cruel. The prosecution will now look into providing restorative justice for the complainant to allow her to do this, with the court hearing that it is rarely utilised for victims in rape cases before the Central Criminal Court. Christopher O'Grady (33), formerly of Muirhevnamor, Dundalk, Co Louth, was found guilty of one count of raping the then 19-year-old woman on January 1, 2019 following a trial last March. He was homeless at the time. In her victim impact statement which was read out by prosecution counsel, Tony McGillicuddy SC, the woman said: 'I don't know why, but I want to meet him in a safe space and look him in the eyes and ask him what reason would anyone have to be so cruel to a young woman.' The Irish Mirror's Crime Writers Michael O'Toole and Paul Healy are writing a new weekly newsletter called Crime Ireland. Click here to sign up and get it delivered to your inbox every week '...I want to know if he believes his own lies. I want him to truly see me and be forced to see himself as monstrous as I saw him.' She outlined the effects the rape have had on her, saying O'Grady turned her life upside down. 'He didn't see the person behind the body,' she said. She described how she can no longer socialise or dance like she used to, is fearful of walking alone at night and is hypervigilant of other young women out at night. Padraig Dwyer SC, defending O'Grady, submitted his client was guilty of rape on the basis that he was reckless as to whether the young woman was consenting or not. He said O'Grady now accepts his guilt and wished to apologise to the victim for the hurt and pain he caused her. After some consultation with both O'Grady and the complainant, the court was told that they are both willing to engage in restorative justice. Ms Justice Caroline Biggs warned O'Grady that this does not mean he will not be serving a custodial sentence for his offending. She noted that any restorative justice process would need to be managed by appropriate individuals, given the effects of the crime on the complainant. Mr McGillycuddy said he had some knowledge of restorative justice but was 'not aware of it being used for an offence of this nature'. 'I'm not sure how developed that system is or which agency would be appropriate to do it,' he said. Ms Justice Biggs adjourned the case to July 24 to give the prosecution time to look into the issue. The trial heard the woman had been in town to watch the New Year's Eve fireworks that night when she got separated from her friend and came into contact with O'Grady outside a shop. She told the court she was trying to find a bar to meet her friend and O'Grady walked her through town to a car park area where the alleged rape occurred. The woman said she felt 'like a doll' and didn't have any strength in her body during the alleged incident. Afterwards, the court has heard she walked with O'Grady back through the city centre for about 40 minutes, where she got talking to a couple – a man and woman - outside a shop and parted ways with O'Grady. The woman ended up in a B&B with the second man after the woman went home, where they had anal sex before the woman went home to her accommodation. She told the court it was painful and she persuaded the man to stop. The trial was played CCTV footage of this encounter, which occurred in the hallway of the B&B. Ms Justice Biggs warned the jury that they may find this footage 'intrusive' and 'distressing', but she said she had made the decision that it needed to be shown in court as O'Grady had a constitutional right to put the evidence before them. When the complainant woke up the next morning, she told the court she 'realised I had two rapes and there might be a medical issue with that'. She went to hospital. The court heard no charge was brought against the second man, who gave evidence in the trial. Sergeant Eoghan Kirwan told the court that O'Grady has 65 previous convictions, including public order offences, criminal damage, drugs and theft. He took a bench warrant while on bail for this offence and has been in custody since August 2024. Defence counsel said O'Grady was living a 'shambolic' lifestyle at the time of the offence, that he was homeless, begging on the streets and doing drugs.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store