Report into Leinster House bike shed found OPW failed to carry out 'value-for-money' assessment
A new report outlines the OPW did not conduct a value-for-money assessment for the bike shelter project in advance of the work taking place.
External auditors Deloitte found the Houses of the Oireachtas Commission, which oversees Leinster House, was not informed of the potential cost of the project ahead of construction beginning.
Deloitte found in April 2023, the OPW estimated the bike shelter project would cost €350,000, but these costs were never provided to the commission.
While it states some standard practices were followed by the OPW in the project, others were not.
The audit reads: 'Our internal audit review has identified the absence of some fundamental good practices in how certain elective capital works (including the bike shelter) below the €500K threshold are being initiated, approved, managed, and delivered.
The most fundamental of these control gaps is the absence of a value-for-money assessment which would have allowed informed OPW personnel to evaluate the cost-benefit of building a covered bicycle shelter in the requested location within the Leinster House campus.
'Where there is a lack of oversight of projects, there is a risk that these projects may not represent value for money or may not deliver to exact requirements in an efficient and effective manner.'
While the OPW was primarily focused on delivering the project, pricing options for the bike shelter should have been documented in a value-for-money assessment as part of a 'robust options appraisal process', the audit said.
The report also found the high cost of the shelter was due to the alignment of the project with 'the fabric of existing structures'.
However, it states regardless of the reasons, a value-for-money assessment should have been carried out, alongside other lower-cost alternatives.
These alternatives should have included the option of doing nothing, which was not presented to the Houses of the Oireachtas Commission, as required by the Public Spending Code.
'Approval to proceed with the project should only have been formalised when these evaluations were complete,' the audit report reads.
The report also found there was some paperwork related to the bike shelter that was 'not signed or dated by the individual completing the form'.
Among the recommendations from Deloitte include the overhaul of project management rules for any OPW project that costs less than €500,000, including the need for value-for-money assessments.
In particular, this includes the establishment of a mechanism to 'oversee and review elective capital projects with an estimated budget of below €500K'.
These mechanisms should include value-for-money assessments, project option appraisals, and expenditure monitoring.
Deloitte has also recommended all cost estimates should be 'communicated to all relevant parties before elective projects are approved'.
It also adds the option of doing nothing must be presented to stakeholders in advance of approval.
In its response to the audit, the OPW has opted to accept all recommendations from Deloitte for future projects with the Houses of Oireachtas Commission and others.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
01-08-2025
- Irish Times
Are consultants really an utter waste of time and money?
Journalists , telemarketers and used- car salespeople can console themselves that there is one profession even more widely detested: consultants. After all, most people have had at least one direct or indirect interaction with the professional class of pseudo-managers churned out by business schools and hoovered up by the likes of McKinsey, Deloitte or BCG – and most of them unpleasant, frustrating or simply baffling. Sure, sometimes they get involved in high-profile projects like ambitious mass relocation programmes or daring pharmaceutical sales initiatives. But most of the work seems to revolve around 30-something MBAs too dim for private equity being parachuted into multinational businesses or sprawling government departments to tell the bosses what they should already know. And that seems to be a generous interpretation. Nonetheless, it is estimated that consulting globally generated revenues of about $400 billion (€346 billion) last year. How can something so widely mocked as an utter waste of time and money be so profitable? READ MORE As it happens, three academics have recently had a stab at measuring whether consultants actually add any value, which the National Bureau of Economic Research published this month . And lo: 'We document that consulting take-up is concentrated among large, high-labour-productivity firms. For TFP [total factor productivity] and profitability, we find a U-shaped pattern: both high and low performers hire consultants. 'New clients spend on average 3 per cent of payroll on consulting, typically in episodic engagements lasting less than one year. 'Using difference-indifferences designs exploiting these sharp consulting events, we find positive effects on labour productivity of 3.6 per cent over five years, driven by modest employment reductions alongside stable or growing revenue. Average wages rise by 2.7 per cent with no decline in labour's share of value added, suggesting productivity gains do not come at workers' expense through rent-shifting. 'We do observe organisational restructuring with small increases in dismissal rates, and higher services procurement but reduced labour outsourcing. Our heterogeneity analysis reveals larger productivity gains for initially less productive firms, suggesting improvements in allocative efficiency.' How did the three authors – Gert Bijnens of the National Bank of Belgium, Princeton University's Simon Jäger and Benjamin Schoefer of Berkeley – calculate this? Through a pretty nifty data set. They combined two decades worth of granular value-added-tax data from the Belgian tax authorities, confidential and anonymised firm-level data provided by the National Bank of Belgium and public financial accounts to create what they reckon is 'the first comprehensive data set of major strategy consulting relationships in an entire economy'. [ McKinsey sheds 10% of staff in 2-year profitability drive Opens in new window ] The tendency of consulting work to be episodic – typically lasting for about a year and a half – allowed them to examine the subsequent impact on employment, wages and productivity. To focus squarely on classic consulting, Bijnens, Jäger and Schoefer excluded the 'Big Four' accountancy firms Deloitte, EY, KPMG and PwC, where most of the revenues come from audits and tax advice. Lots of fancy equations later, and they found that: 'Consulting events are associated with labour productivity growth, appearing to stem from mild reductions in employment against mildly growing revenue and value added. We find positive effects on average wages, no effect on the labour share, and a reduction in a proxy for outsourcing and, if anything, a shift towards managerial labour. [ Consultants face a many-sided crisis Opens in new window ] 'We find a mild increase in dismissals, against an overall modest or insignificant employment effect, consistent with some restructuring activities that, overall, increase productivity. Hence, overall, our findings point towards consulting being associated with positive or neutral outcomes for firms and, arguably and in a more complex picture, workers. 'On average, our results are more in line with a productivity-enhancing view of consulting and reject a view of consulting as a rent-shifting institution. We do not find strong profitability effects – perhaps in part because the moderate productivity effects are 'eaten up' by wage boosts (although we cannot rule out compositional effects driving both margins).' This probably won't assuage the baying hordes of management consultant critics, nor is the report glowing enough to constitute a full-throated endorsement of the consulting business model. But it was interesting enough to warrant a midweek post in late July. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Irish Times
31-07-2025
- Irish Times
Would you like to work on the Connemara coast where Patrick Pearse spent his summers?
How would you like to work on the rugged Connemara coast where 1916 Easter Rising leader Patrick Pearse spent his summers? Well, the Office of Public Works (OPW) is extending that opportunity to suitably qualified catering professionals, as it has put out a call for applications to run the cafe at Ionad Cultúrtha an Phiarsaigh until the end of the year, with the chance to extend the contract for another two years. The government agency's request for tender invites suppliers to provide catering services, under a catering services concession, for tea rooms or a cafe. Pearse built his cottage at Ros Muc as a retreat and spent his summers there from 1903 to 1915. It is said he drew inspiration from the surrounding landscape for his poems and short stories, and operated a summer school there for his students from St Edna's, the Irish-language school Pearse founded in Dublin in 1908. READ MORE Patrick Pearse's cottage in Ros Muc. Photograph: Fáilte Ireland Bedroom at Pearse's cottage. Photograph: Kitchen at Pearse's cottage. Photograph: The whitewashed cottage has been maintained as Pearse left it in 1915, sparsely furnished with mahogany pieces, with a quintessential kitchen hearth. A short walk from the cottage is the contemporary visitor centre – home to the cafe – where the exhibition explores what drew Pearse to Connemara: from its unique landscape to its local culture and use of the Irish language. Ionad Cultúrtha an Phiarsaigh visitor centre. Photograph: OPW Ionad Cultúrtha an Phiarsaigh visitor centre. Photograph: OPW Cafe space at the visitor centre. Photograph: Ionad Cultúrtha an Phiarsaigh is located an hour from Galway city and is on the Wild Atlantic Way. The site has increased its visitor numbers in recent years, welcoming 19,952 visitors in 2024, up from 17,399 in 2023, according to the OPW. Interested parties can find information on how to apply on the OPW website , but they will have to act fast as the closing date for applications is 12pm on Thursday, July 31st. 'We are looking to get someone in situ as soon as possible after the closing date as the cafe is currently closed. This is a busy time for the centre, with bus and cycling tours along with passing tourists and local regulars,' a spokeswoman for the OPW said.
Irish Times
30-07-2025
- Irish Times
OPW spent €17,000 on consultants for committee hearings, more than any other State body
The Office of Public Works ( OPW ) spent more on external consultant advice preparing for Oireachtas committee hearings last year than any other State body or government department has since 2021, according to new data. The total spend of €17,211 came as the OPW faced rolling controversies over the €336,000 Dáil bike shed, the €1.4 million security hut at the Department of Finance and a €490,000 bill for rebuilding a wall outside the Workplace Relations Commission . Figures released to Social Democrats TD Aidan Farrelly show that in total, public bodies spent €155,532 to outside firms helping to prepare them for visits to Oireachtas committees between 2021 and earlier this month – with a handful of consultancies getting the lion's share of the spending. The OPW outlay was the highest single-year spend by any body covered by the data released. It was split between two communications specialist firms – €3,731 for RGH Consultancy and €13,480 for Gibney Communications. RGH Consultancy is led by Gerard Howlin, who is an Irish Times contributor. READ MORE Mr Farrelly said he was not surprised to see the OPW top of the list given the controversies it has faced. He criticised the use of outside consultants, saying: 'The witnesses are all seasoned officials and should be well able to respond openly to elected representatives without third-party interventions.' The OPW faced four committee hearings in 2024 – three of which occurred after the cost of the bike shed emerged in September. The OPW said in a statement that it has a wide remit and an annual budget of €700 million, dealing with a large volume of projects across flood-relief management, heritage and managing 2,500 State properties. It said staff appearing at committees 'are expected to succinctly address a wide range of topics, including all information relating to the OPW's expenditure, as well as detailed accounts of the significant variety of projects under its remit'. The OPW said the spend was on 'communication support' for staff appearing before committees rather than assisting with further queries or correspondence. The next highest annual cost for external advice was for the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform (DPER), which purchased general training from PR firm The Communications Clinic to the value of €16,950 in 2022 – although this covered training for officials from other departments as well. The OPW also had some of the highest bills in previous years, including another €9,610 to Gibney Communications and €610 to RGH Consultancy in 2022 – again for general training. Overall, it spent €28,489 on external consultants, making it one of the highest-spending bodies overall, as well as having the single most expensive year. DPER had the highest overall spending across the period covered by the data, spending €31,220 in total – although again, some of that picked up the tab for civil servants in other departments. Horse Racing Ireland spent €12,950 for advice in advance of visits to the Public Accounts Committee and agriculture committees, with consultancy firms Teneo and Vulcan Consulting, led by former minister for European affairs Lucinda Creighton , providing services. Pobal , the social inclusion agency, spent €12,764 preparing to face TDs and senators, all to Dublin firm MKC Communications across 2021-2024. Pobal said the work related to four committee appearances covering training for nine senior managers and strategic preparation for the hearings. Meanwhile, the Financial Services and Pensions Ombudsman spent €10,612 preparing for various committees in 2023 and 2024. The data show that two firms accounted for the majority of the spend by state bodies preparing to visit Leinster House committee rooms: Gibney Communications, which was paid a total of €46,902 across the period concerned, and The Communications Clinic, which was paid €51,254.
