Trump gives his verdict on ‘sloppy' Brexit
Trump praised Sir Keir Starmer, noting he made a "good trade deal" with the US despite being a "liberal".
Trump is scheduled for a second state visit to the UK from 17 to 19 September, where he will be hosted at Windsor Castle and meet King Charles and Sir Keir.
He expressed no disappointment about not addressing MPs and peers during his visit, stating he just wants "a good time" and to "respect King Charles".
Trump voiced frustration with Vladimir Putin over stalled efforts to secure a peace deal in Ukraine, threatening "very severe tariffs" on Russia if an agreement is not reached within 50 days.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Immigration crackdown causing ‘Trump slump' in Las Vegas tourism, unions say
The Trump administration's immigration policies are affecting workers and driving, in part, a decline in tourism, including international tourists, to Las Vegas, according to workers and the largest labor union in the state of Nevada. Visitors to Las Vegas overall dropped 11.3% in June 2025, compared to the same month last year. According to the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority, international visitors to one of the world's largest tourist destinations dropped 13% in June. 'A lot of departments are having a lot of layoffs,' said Norma Torres, a housekeeper for eight years at Mandalay Bay and a member of the Culinary Union, who has worked in the hospitality industry since she was 18 years old. 'In the housekeeping department, the people on call are barely called into work.' Canada is Nevada's largest international market. Flair Airlines, a Canadian airline, reported a 55% drop in passengers compared to last year. Air Canada reported a 13.2% drop in passengers from May to June this year to Las Vegas, and one third lower compared to last year. Trump administration officials have reportedly pushed for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) agents to arrest 3,000 people a day as part of their anti-immigration agenda. They have subsequently denied that those quotas exist. But they have continued to revoke immigration statuses, delayed action for childhood arrivals, and other humanitarian immigration programs. 'If you tell the rest of the world you're not welcome, they are going to listen. Our members are telling us that they're quite nervous, and that's why they're calling it a Trump slump,' said Ted Pappageorge, secretary treasurer of Culinary Workers Union Local 226. But the Ice raids, trade wars with trading partners and fears that rising tariffs will hit the finances of potential visitors are all having an impact on Sin City tourism. 'You have Canadians that have said, 'We're going to go elsewhere.' Some of our best customers are Mexican tourists. But the biggest one is southern California and visitation is down because they're nervous about raids, the tariffs, the economy riled up,' added Pappageorge. 'The way these kind of chaotic immigration policies have been handled have a direct impact, we think, on what's happening with this slowdown in Las Vegas and our members are quite concerned.' The union noted its members come from 178 different countries and speak 40 different languages. The union represents 60,000 workers in Las Vegas and Reno, and 45% of its members are immigrants. Nearly a quarter (24%) of Nevada's workforce are immigrants, and an even higher share of Nevada's leisure and hospitality industry are immigrants. Immigrants contribute an estimated $20.2bn to Nevada's economy annually. Norma Torres, who was born in Mexico, currently has Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (Daca) immigration status, a policy enacted in 2012 for immigrant individuals brought to the US as children. Torres explained she is worried about how the Trump administration will impact her immigration status. 'Before I had a Daca, I was living in fear. Since I've had DACA, I've been living free, I've been working, I've been having the best life with my daughters, but now with this administration that we have going on with Daca and TPS, they are in danger and again I'm living in fear,' said Torres. 'I can be driving on the street, they can pull me over. I can be separated from my daughters, they are US citizens who were born here and just thinking about that makes me afraid. For me and my family, we live in fear now.' Nery Martinez, a bartender at Caesar's Palace in Las Vegas and Culinary Workers Union Local 226 member for 10 years, has been in the US for decades under temporary protected status from El Salvador and is worried about the push from the Trump administration to revoke TPS for thousands of immigrants from El Salvador and other countries. 'That would be devastating, not only for me but for thousands of families,' said Martinez. 'After 25 years in this place, what would I do if they separate me from my children, from my wife, from my life I had built from scratch? Those things hurt not just me and people like me, but also hurt citizen children, the community and the economy we help sustain.' He said he loves working in Las Vegas, working alongside others from all around the world and interacting with tourists from abroad and throughout the US, but emphasized he now worries about what is going to happen to his immigration status. 'We are working people with families who love this country. We don't want privilege, just that we are allowed to stay here legally as we have done for decades. Our families are American, I also feel part of this nation. Taking away TPS (temporary protected status) would be tearing away my life. I can't have a nice night, go to bed, wake up the next day, because every night I have those thoughts about what's going to happen.' Ted Pappageorge noted that for 20 years the culinary union has secured in their contracts that any worker who has their immigration status removed or expired is able to maintain their job, seniority, and pay until they get their status resolved, a support mechanism he argues should be legally provided to all workers. 'The idea that you're bringing in Marines and arresting dishwashers or landscapers, people that actually contribute to society, pay taxes, that go to our churches, their kids go to our schools, they're neighbors, is just crazy. This is just chaos what's going on here,' concluded Pappageorge. 'There needs to be a complete 180 course correction on this damage being done to the travel, tourism, and hospitality industry, that's ground zero here in Las Vegas.' The Nevada governor's office did not respond to multiple requests for comment.
Spectator
4 minutes ago
- Spectator
How Russia is preparing for Putin's meeting with Trump
Amidst contradictory leaks and rumours coming from the US administration, no one is quite sure what to expect when Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin meet in Alaska on Friday – not even the Russian press. Nonetheless, they seem rather less convinced that Trump is about to stitch up the Ukrainians than the Western media. Of course, there is satisfaction at the prospect of Putin's first visit to the US since 2015. Facing a campaign intended to try and isolate Russia, Putin had just sent troops into Syria to reverse what seemed then the imminent collapse of the Assad regime, and with US assets also deployed in the area, then-president Barack Obama had had no choice but to meet his Russian counterpart on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly. The scenes of a clearly uncomfortable US president were met with delight by the Russian nationalists. One hawkish university professor even had a picture of it in his office, and when asked why, he grinned and told me: 'That was a meeting Obama didn't want to have, but we made him. We showed him that Russia could not be ignored.' There is a similar sense among the Russian media that for Putin simply to meet Trump is already a win for Russia. However, there is distinctly less triumphalism over the prospects of a deal to end the war and a sense that they are not getting a clear steer from the Kremlin. As usual, when the Russian press is faced with a politically sensitive topic without such guidance, they fall back on selectively picking from foreign press reports and experts to allow them to write something without actually hanging their own editorial hats on their positions. There are times when this is harder than others, and then all kinds of fringe YouTubers and similar random commentators are pressed into service to make the 'right' point safely. Thus, the most upbeat predictions are attributed to foreign commentators. Nezavisimaya Gazeta, for example, finds some suitable American professor willing to say that 'everyone knows' Zelensky will have to surrender territory, as he has no choice given Ukraine's 'lack of manpower, weapons, strategy, finances and fighting spirit'. (Most Russians at the front line might question that assessment, especially of fighting spirit.) In Vzglyad, the leader of the marginal French Eurosceptic Patriots party, Florian Philippot, is quoted as saying that 'the Europsychos are hysterical at the sight of approaching peace'. By contrast, editorial comment tends to be much more cautious. The business newspaper Vedomosti warns that 'immediate results and breakthroughs, especially in the Ukrainian direction, should not be expected yet'. Western readers might be surprised to read that while their media is focusing on the 'will they/won't they' drama of a potential deal over Ukraine, though, in Russia this is not necessarily being treated as the main story. Indeed, the nationalist Tsargrad news outlet cites a pundit claiming that '99 mper cent of the time, the conversations will not be about Ukraine at all.' Instead, Fyodor Lukyanov, one of Moscow's main foreign policy interpreters, focuses in the government newspaper Rossiiskaya Gazeta less on what the summit may mean for the war, and more on what it says about Russia's renewed standing as a great power. He examines the prospects for a new relationship with Trump's America, as the two leaders meet in isolated Alaska, 'removed from third parties… one on one, the rest of the world watching the stage from the auditorium, spellbound'. Even so, on every side there are cautions not to expect miracles. In Izvestia, Andrei Kortunov, one of the dwindling band of relatively liberal foreign policy academics, warned that 'the anti-Russian consensus in the United States remains broad and relatively stable' so that expectations ought to be moderated. To him: The value of the planned summit probably lies not in reaching some specific fateful agreements but in giving a new impetus to bilateral relations. In other words, to set in motion the heavy gears of cumbersome state mechanisms, which without such an impetus will not budge on their own. In other words, this is just the start of a process, at best, and one which many will be eager to derail. As a commentator notes in Rossiiskaya Gazeta, in Alaska, there may be 'no British spies, Ukrainian agents or European 'well-wishers' eager to disrupt the dialogue'. Nevertheless, the Russian press is united in highlighting the degree to which 'Russophobes' in Kyiv, in Washington, in London and in the European Union are briefing against the meeting now and will seek to undermine any outcomes they don't like after. The overall sense is far from the jubilation assumed in much Western coverage. On Ukraine, there is cautious optimism, but also an awareness that even if a deal is struck in Alaska, there are still many obstacles to the kind of peace that would be a victory for Russia. Of course, there is also an awareness that even if a deal is derailed by Kyiv, that is advantageous for Moscow as a chance to frame Kyiv and the Europeans as the warmongers. Yet there is a wider hope, quite possibly unrealistic, that regardless of that, some kind of new relationship, perhaps built on sanctions relief in return for privileged access to the Russian market and natural resources, can begin to be built with the US. And as for the Kremlin, it seems to be keeping its cards close to its chest, not even showing them to its tame newspapers.
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
Chagos deal to cost UK ‘10 times more than claimed'
A deal to transfer the Chagos Archipelago to Mauritius, while retaining control of the Diego Garcia military base, is projected to cost the UK £34.7 billion over 99 years. Conservative Dame Priti Patel has accused ministers of attempting to "cover up" the true cost of the agreement, alleging an "accountancy trick" was used to present the figure as £3.4 billion. The higher £34.7 billion figure, released by the Government Actuary's Department, is a nominal amount, which, when adjusted for inflation, is estimated to be around £10 billion in today's money. The government reportedly used a "social time preference" principle, in use since 2003, to reduce the figure by between 2.5 per cent and 3.5 per cent per year. Dame Priti criticised Labour figures, including Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, for what she called a "terrible deal".
