Satellite photos: See aftermath of US bombing on Iranian nuclear sites
Satellite images from the aftermath of the United States' attack on Iranian nuclear facilities have emerged following the bombings.
The U.S. struck three nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan June 21 in what has been dubbed "Operation Midnight Hammer."
The effectiveness of the strikes is unclear.
Rafael Grossi, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, told CNN that there had been a strike at Fordow but that it was too early to judge how much damage it caused. The IAEA also told the network that the strikes damaged electrical infrastructure at Natanz.
The IAEA released a statement saying that so far it had not detected an increase in "off-site radiation levels," one of the feared consequences of the strikes.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth claimed Iran's nuclear ambitions "have been obliterated," however Iranian officials have downplayed the damage with Hassan Abedini, the deputy political director of Iran's state broadcaster, saying on state television the nuclear sites "didn't suffer a major blow because the materials had already been taken out," according to Al Jazeera.
Satellite images show at least six impact craters and significant discoloration of the earth around them at the Fordow facility.
40,000 reasons to worry: U.S. troops in Middle East vulnerable to counterattack
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: US strikes Iran: See satellite photos following bombing
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
10 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Turmoil will come out of Iran — but what kind?
In today's edition: Over the weekend, in the wake of U.S. military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, the Editorial Board tried to sort out what might come next. It wrote that 'Iran likely retains some ability to strike at U.S. targets in the region, particularly the 40,000 American forces stationed in various Middle Eastern countries.'
CNN
11 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: A weakened Tehran lashes out against US airbases to save face
An empty base as a target, with many hours warning, and a limited number of missiles fired at some of the best air defense systems in the world. Iran's retaliation for the US's weekend strikes on three of its nuclear facilities can only have been designed to deescalate. The US-run Al Udeid airbase in Qatar had been evacuated days earlier, with satellite images showing the departure of planes and personnel widely publicised in the media. It is the most important US military airbase in the region, the home of Central Command. It even launched the drone that killed Iran's top military personality, General Qasem Soleimani, in 2020, Iranian state media said in the hours after 'Operation Glad Tidings of Victory.' The Monday strike against Al-Udeid had close to zero chance of American casualties – and provided the perfect moment of quasi-absurd face-saving for Iran. The first hint of a possible strike came when the US Embassy in Doha, Qatar, issued an emergency 'shelter in place' order for US citizens. As if to remove any doubt, Qatar closed its airspace about an hour prior to the launch of what appears to have been close to a dozen missiles by Iran. Adding to the favourable conditions of the launch for Iran's dwindling arsenal, Qatar is close enough to permit the use of shorter-range missiles, stocks of which have not been as depleted as the medium-range missiles used to hit Israel over the past week. To pour water on anything resembling a flame, Iran's National Security Council said moments after the attack the number of missiles fired had been 'as many as the number of bombs used in the attack on Iranian nuclear facilities.' Packaging the barrage as the definition of a proportionate response, the Iranian statement went on to insist the attack posed 'no dangerous aspect to our friendly and brotherly country of Qatar and its noble people.' Tehran's method of retaliation-without-fangs has been successfully tried and tested. After Soleimani was killed, Iran's retaliatory missile attack against the US's Al Asad airbase in Iraq was reportedly telegraphed to Baghdad beforehand, possibly helping reduce the level of US injury suffered to mostly concussions. Iran's response to Israel's assassination of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in July 2024 in the heart of Tehran heavily telegraphed in advance. 'We knew they'd retaliate. They had a similar response after Soleimani,' a senior White House official said Monday night. A playbook appears to be forming. But it is one that compounds Iran's military weakness each time it is employed. In 2020, the Islamic Republic lost its pre-eminent military personality – an Iranian hardline hero. In 2024, it showed that valuable allies were not safe in central Tehran. This year, the regime has lost control of its own airspace to the point of previously unthinkable strikes on their prized nuclear facilities by both Israel and the US. This is stark testament to the differing powers on display. Iran has to feign its strength in a managed presentation of restrained and muted anger. The US and Israel get to break taboos daily, shattering Iran's long-held position as a regional power in under ten days, and perhaps ending its ambitions to be a nuclear power. There is now only one real red line left for the United States or Israel to cross, and that is to directly target Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. But that may seem ill-advised, given the likelihood this octogenarian theocrat would be replaced by a younger hardliner who is keener to flex Iran's muscles of deterrence. Better to accept toothless retaliations amid Tehran's slow decline. Each expression of Iran's anger has confirmed its slow erosion of power. An angry fledging nuclear power would have accelerated its race to an atomic bomb. That may still happen. But it looks more likely that Iran is desperately hoping its performative lashing out can sate what remains of its hardliners, decimated by Israeli strikes. It may even hope to shuffle back to diplomacy, with talks to contain a nuclear program and ballistic missile stockpile likely severely depleted to shadows of what they were merely ten days ago.
New York Times
12 minutes ago
- New York Times
Iran's Retaliation Could Be Just the Beginning
By Nicholas Kristof Produced by Vishakha Darbha In this episode, the Times Opinion columnist Nick Kristof weighs in on the uncertainties following the United States' surprise bombing of Iran and Tehran's retaliation. 'President Trump thinks that this is going to be successful and worth it, but the enemy gets a vote as well,' Kristof cautions. (A full transcript of this audio essay will be available within 24 hours of publication in the audio player above.) Thoughts? Email us at theopinions@ This episode of 'The Opinions' was produced by Vishakha Darbha. It was edited by Alison Bruzek and Kaari Pitkin. Mixing by Sonia Herrero. Original music by Carole Sabouraud and Pat McCusker. Fact-checking by Mary Marge Locker and Kate Sinclair. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The director of Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We'd like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here's our email: letters@ Follow the New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Bluesky, WhatsApp and Threads.
