
Analysis: A weakened Tehran lashes out against US airbases to save face
An empty base as a target, with many hours warning, and a limited number of missiles fired at some of the best air defense systems in the world. Iran's retaliation for the US's weekend strikes on three of its nuclear facilities can only have been designed to deescalate.
The US-run Al Udeid airbase in Qatar had been evacuated days earlier, with satellite images showing the departure of planes and personnel widely publicised in the media. It is the most important US military airbase in the region, the home of Central Command. It even launched the drone that killed Iran's top military personality, General Qasem Soleimani, in 2020, Iranian state media said in the hours after 'Operation Glad Tidings of Victory.' The Monday strike against Al-Udeid had close to zero chance of American casualties – and provided the perfect moment of quasi-absurd face-saving for Iran.
The first hint of a possible strike came when the US Embassy in Doha, Qatar, issued an emergency 'shelter in place' order for US citizens. As if to remove any doubt, Qatar closed its airspace about an hour prior to the launch of what appears to have been close to a dozen missiles by Iran. Adding to the favourable conditions of the launch for Iran's dwindling arsenal, Qatar is close enough to permit the use of shorter-range missiles, stocks of which have not been as depleted as the medium-range missiles used to hit Israel over the past week.
To pour water on anything resembling a flame, Iran's National Security Council said moments after the attack the number of missiles fired had been 'as many as the number of bombs used in the attack on Iranian nuclear facilities.' Packaging the barrage as the definition of a proportionate response, the Iranian statement went on to insist the attack posed 'no dangerous aspect to our friendly and brotherly country of Qatar and its noble people.'
Tehran's method of retaliation-without-fangs has been successfully tried and tested. After Soleimani was killed, Iran's retaliatory missile attack against the US's Al Asad airbase in Iraq was reportedly telegraphed to Baghdad beforehand, possibly helping reduce the level of US injury suffered to mostly concussions. Iran's response to Israel's assassination of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in July 2024 in the heart of Tehran heavily telegraphed in advance.
'We knew they'd retaliate. They had a similar response after Soleimani,' a senior White House official said Monday night.
A playbook appears to be forming. But it is one that compounds Iran's military weakness each time it is employed. In 2020, the Islamic Republic lost its pre-eminent military personality – an Iranian hardline hero. In 2024, it showed that valuable allies were not safe in central Tehran. This year, the regime has lost control of its own airspace to the point of previously unthinkable strikes on their prized nuclear facilities by both Israel and the US.
This is stark testament to the differing powers on display. Iran has to feign its strength in a managed presentation of restrained and muted anger. The US and Israel get to break taboos daily, shattering Iran's long-held position as a regional power in under ten days, and perhaps ending its ambitions to be a nuclear power.
There is now only one real red line left for the United States or Israel to cross, and that is to directly target Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. But that may seem ill-advised, given the likelihood this octogenarian theocrat would be replaced by a younger hardliner who is keener to flex Iran's muscles of deterrence. Better to accept toothless retaliations amid Tehran's slow decline.
Each expression of Iran's anger has confirmed its slow erosion of power. An angry fledging nuclear power would have accelerated its race to an atomic bomb. That may still happen. But it looks more likely that Iran is desperately hoping its performative lashing out can sate what remains of its hardliners, decimated by Israeli strikes. It may even hope to shuffle back to diplomacy, with talks to contain a nuclear program and ballistic missile stockpile likely severely depleted to shadows of what they were merely ten days ago.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
11 minutes ago
- Axios
Iran ceasefire upends congressional fight to limit Trump's war powers
President Trump's abrupt announcement Monday that a ceasefire in the Iran-Israel war is imminent threatens a congressional effort to limit his power to initiate unilateral military strikes on Iran. Why it matters: The lead House Republican on the push is getting cold feet, but non-interventionist Democrats still want to have the vote in order to send a broader message about congressional war powers. "We may ... have a conflict in the future, and we need to be on record saying no offensive war in Iran without prior authorization," Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) told Axios. It may be a moot point: House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) had signaled plans to use a procedural work-around to block rank-and-file members from forcing a war powers vote. The latest: House Foreign Affairs Committee ranking member Greg Meeks (D-N.Y.) is introducing his own war powers resolution, Axios has learned. His two-page measure would direct Trump to "remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran," according to a copy obtained by Axios. The measure is also sponsored by Reps. Adam Smith (D-Wash.) and Jim Himes (D-Conn.), the top Democrats on the House Armed Services and Intelligence committees. Driving the news: Trump said in a post on Truth Social that Israel and Iran had agreed to a "Complete and Total CEASEFIRE ... in approximately 6 hours from now." Trump said the ceasefire will last for 12 hours, "at which point the war will be considered, ENDED!" The ceasefire was mediated by Qatar and the U.S. after Iran sent the White House a message saying no further strikes would follow its attack on a U.S. base in Qatar, Axios Barak Ravid reported. What they're saying: "If there's a ceasefire, we don't need to withdraw from a war," Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), the lead Republican on the war powers resolution, told reporters after Trump's announcement. The libertarian Kentuckian said he told Johnson he "wouldn't push" the resolution "if the ceasefire holds." Massie has been locked in an increasingly adversarial relationship with Trump — with the president's political operation even launching a PAC to defeat him in his GOP primary. Yes, but: Khanna told Axios "we still need" a vote, arguing a ceasefire "makes it probably an easier vote for people to do, just to get it on record for Congress to take back its authority." Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.), another supporter of the resolution, similarly told Axios: "I still think we need to do it."


CNBC
12 minutes ago
- CNBC
CNBC Daily Open: The strange times of missiles-led 'peace'
It's a strange thought that launching attacks on other countries could lead to peace, but that seems to be the logic behind the abrupt escalation in conflict in the Middle East beginning Saturday. And now there's talk of a ceasefire soon. Here's a quick recap. On Saturday, U.S. President Donald Trump authorized air strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, pushing America into Israel's war with Tehran. On Sunday, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tehran "reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interest, and people." On Monday, Iran launched a retaliatory strike against America, targeting a U.S. military base in Qatar. And on Monday evening stateside, Trump announced a ceasefire. Trump said on Truth Social that Israel and Iran had agreed to a "Complete and Total CEASEFIRE" that will, in effect mark "an Official END to THE 12 DAY WAR" — which began when Israel attacked Iran on June 12. There are signs this isn't the usual empty rhetoric. Iran gave the U.S. "early notice" of its attack on the military base in Qatar, according to Trump. It was a "retaliation that was expected," Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson said. Qatar also received advanced warning from Iran, according to The New York Times, which cited three Iranian officials familiar with the matter. Iran's national security council said its missile strike "posed no threat whatsoever to our friendly and brotherly nation, Qatar, or its honorable people." This, essentially, is "the peace through strength strategy," Helima Croft, head of global commodity strategy at RBC Capital Markets, told CNBC. In other words, there's a small chance tensions in the Middle East might cool down following a carefully calibrated and symbolic exchange of strikes that projects strength from all parties, while also providing Iran an off-ramp to de-escalate tension. Judging by the U.S. stock and oil markets — which rose and fell, respectively — investors are indeed hopeful the strategy of missile-led peace would work. Trump announces an Israel-Iran ceasefireU.S. President Donald Trump announced on Truth Social that Israel and Iran had agreed to a "Complete and Total CEASEFIRE" that will begin around midnight Tuesday stateside. However, neither Iran nor Israel has publicly confirmed they have accepted Trump's ceasefire timeline. Read CNBC's live coverage of the latest developments on the Israel-Iran war here. Iran strikes U.S. military base in QatarIran on Monday launched what its armed forces called a "powerful and destructive missile strike on the United States' Al-Udeid military base in Qatar." The Al-Udeid Air Base is the largest American military installation in the Middle East, with around 10,000 service members. Qatar's Defense Ministry said its air defense had intercepted the missile attack on Al-Udeid, and that there were no reported deaths or injuries. Prices of oil post a huge dropOil prices fell sharply Monday after Iran's strike on Qatar had no reported casualties. U.S. crude oil fell 7.22%, to close at $68.51 per barrel, while global benchmark Brent shed 7.18% to $71.48 during U.S. trading. Trump on Monday demanded that "everyone" keep oil prices down or they would play "into the hands of the enemy." Trump didn't specify who he was referring to, but he seemed to be addressing U.S. oil producers. Markets in U.S. rise on de-escalation hopesU.S. stocks rose Monday as investors seemed hopeful of de-escalation in the Israel-Iran war. The S&P 500 climbed 0.96%, the Dow Jones Industrial Average added 0.89% and the Nasdaq Composite gained 0.94%. Tesla shares popped 8.2% after the company launched its robotaxis in Austin, Texas, on Sunday— but regulators are looking into reports of robotaxis driving erratically. Europe's Stoxx 600 index fell 0.28%. [PRO] Wall Street's thoughts on robotaxisWall Street closely watched Tesla's robotaxi launch in Texas over the weekend. Analyst outlooks on the event vary widely. While Wedbush's Dan Ives, who rode in the robotaxis over the weekend, said it "exceeded our expectations," Guggenheim's Ronald Jewsikow called the event "baby steps." Here's what analysts think about what the robotaxis mean for Tesla's stock. Airlines divert, cancel more Middle East flights after Iran attacks U.S. military base Airlines diverted more Middle East flights on Monday after Iran's armed forces said the country launched a missile strike on a U.S. military base in Qatar, as the region's military conflict continued to disrupt airlines' operations. Dubai-based Emirates said that some of its aircraft rerouted on Monday and told customers that delays or longer flights were possible as it would take "flight paths well distanced from conflict areas," while operating its schedule as planned. Air India said it had halted all flights in and out of the region and to and from the east coast of North America and Europe "until further notice." Earlier, major international airlines including Air France, Iberia, Finnair and others announced they would pause or further postpone a resumption of service to some destinations in the Middle East.


Wall Street Journal
13 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Asian Currencies Mostly Strengthen Amid Mixed Developments
0114 GMT — Asian currencies mostly strengthen against the U.S. dollar in the morning session amid mixed developments. On the one hand, President Trump said Monday that Iran and Israel agreed to a cease-fire to begin following their final military operations. A possible cease-fire agreement could enhance the appeal of risky assets. On the other hand, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said there was no agreement on a cease-fire or cessation of military operations. The minister's comments could dent hopes for a cease-fire agreement, damping risk appetite. USD/KRW falls 0.4% to 1,365.20 and AUD/USD rises 0.3% to 0.6480, LSEG data show. (