
Loved-up Jordon Hudson posts cryptic Instagram story with Bill Belichick amid bitter feud with his ex
Jordon Hudson is making it clear that North Carolina head football coach Bill Belichick is her man as she continues to hash it out with the former New England Patriots coach's ex-girlfriend.
Hudson and Boston news anchor Linda Holliday have been launching not-so-subtle digs at each other in private messages which have since become public after the Daily Mail exclusively revealed them last week.
In the latest post to her Instagram story, Hudson appeared to mark her territory by sharing a cryptic snap.
The story features a single photo of Hudson seemingly holding hands with the 73-year-old coach while lounging outdoors.
While the photo was shown, Hudson sound tracked it with the Tom Petty song 'Wildflowers'.
Specifically, the lines 'I have seen no other / Who compares with you' accompanied the image.
It's been revealed that Belichick and former flame, Boston news anchor Linda Holliday (seen together above in 2008), broke up a year before their separation had been officially revealed
It's not exactly clear where this image was taken - with only the sky, some trees, and power lines seen in the background.
This comes after recent reports suggest that Belichick and Holliday actually broke up about a year before their separation was announced.
Their relationship has been brought back into the limelight in recent days after Hudson brutally ripped Holliday in a private Instagram exchange.
As Daily Mail revealed, Hudson called Holliday 'pathetic' and 'delusional' after discovering a personal email she sent to Belichick during their 16-year relationship.
Belichick and Holliday, 62, broke up in September 2023 after 16 years together. He met Hudson on a flight from Boston to Florida in 2021.
There has been speculation over the timeline of Belichick and Hudson's relationship but a new report in People has alleged his relationship with Holliday had long been over when he started dating Hudson.
'Many assumed that Bill had cheated on Linda through 2022 and 2023, but they were broken up by September 2022,' a source said.
Belichick's new flame Jordon Hudson brutally ripped Holliday in a private Instagram exchange
'Linda was still pretending they were together after the breakup, and Bill played along so she could transition with the least amount of public humiliation and avoid abrupt displacement.
'Bill moved into a hotel nearby Gillette Stadium in September and allowed Linda to continue to stay in his homes.'.
Another source added that they had 'been pretty separate for a while' and they were dealing with problems that were 'not new' when they finally went their separate ways.
Tensions between Hudson and Holliday have been high for months. The two are said to have had a feisty exchange at a Christmas event in Nantucket towards the end of last year.
It ramped up last week though when Hudson engaged in the testy Instagram exchange after being called a 'gold digger' by a user she believed was Holliday's close friend.
Hudson claimed that she 'found' the letter at Belichick's home near Boston, and sent a picture of it to her supposed friend, insisting that Holliday should 'burn it.'
Neither Hudson nor Holliday responded to the Daily Mail's request for comment.
However, Hudson and Belichick emerged over the weekend at the Nantucket Film Festival, according to Page Six.
A source told the publication that Hudson and the 73-year-old coach 'partied all night with festival attendees.'
The likes of Ben Stiller and Christine Taylor were also at the event.
Belichick has been embedded in the Nantucket community dating back to his years with the Patriots, and his past and present collided in May when Holliday reportedly confronted Hudson and her friend at an event there.
According to an incident report filed by an employee at a Christmas party - which was obtained by TMZ - Holliday was enraged by Hudson's presence at the December 6 event, which Holliday's daughters were DJing at.
The incident report said that Holliday thought Hudson being there was 'inappropriate, since the event was widely advertised as a party headlined by her daughters.'
The report claims that at 9:30pm, Holliday approached the member of staff and asked her to remove Hudson from the party.
Hudson, who was at the event with fellow pageant contest Melissa Sapini, eventually agreed to leave the event - but told a staffer that Holliday threatened her friend while they were still on the dance floor.
It was claimed Holliday told Hudson's friend that if she 'valued her current title, she should think twice about who her friends are' and that she 'had many powerful friends in the pageant organization.'
Hudson branded a personal letter from Holliday to Belichick as 'pathetic' and 'embarrassing'
Belichick and Hudson are gearing up for the start of UNC's football season in September
Thus, it's not wholly unsurprising that Hudson would have choice words for Holliday months later after being prodded in a direct message exchange with a purported friend of Holliday's.
Replying with a blistering and sarcastic retort she wrote: 'Hey babes! Since you are tight with Ms Holiday (sic), could you please ask her what she would like me to do with this letter I found from 2015?
'Due to its pathetic and embarrassing content, I imagine she wants it back,' she wrote, referring to the private email.
She later continued: 'She should make the point to burn it so she continue to live in delusional denial (that her relationship with BB wasn't doomed yeaaaaars prior to him finally dumping her)' she continued.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Queen Elizabeth II's take on Meghan Markle laid bare in telling new memoirs
Queen Elizabeth II, who reigned from 1952 to her death in 2022, wanted to know about Meghan Markle's wedding address ahead of the ceremony with Prince Harry - but Meghan didn't tell her anything Queen Elizabeth II"was not at all content" with the "Megxit" debacle, extraordinary new notes reveal. The late monarch often confided in Lady Elizabeth Anson, her cousin and trusted aide, about Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. The explosive disclosures have now been made public and shed a fascinating light on the late Queen's views on the couple, who quit royal duties for a new life in Calfornia in 2020. Sally Bedell Smith, a royal biographer, had interviewed Lady Elizabeth and subsequent notes are now online, as part of the writer's blog called Extra Substack. One passage reads: "She (Queen Elizabeth II) said she was not at all content." Another says: "Harry was rude to her for ten minutes." There was also friction around Harry and Meghan's wedding in 2018. It is understood the Duchess of Sussex "wouldn't tell" the Queen anything about her dress, a Givenchy number which featured an open bateau neckline and three-quarter length sleeves. It is said the late Queen eventually found the dress "flamboyant" and thought it wasn't fit for a divorcee. Before her relationship with Prince Harry, Meghan had been married to Trevor Engelson. In Ms Smith's newly released notes, she said Lady Elizabeth told her: "Meghan wouldn't tell her (Queen Elizabeth II) about the wedding dress". The Queen's cousin, who was a party planner, also declared: "The jury [was] out on whether she likes Meghan." The sequence goes onto detail the tension around "Megxit," the term used for Harry and Meghan's departure to the US. The situation left Prince Harry's grandmother upset, according to the royal writer. Lady Elizabeth told Ms Smith: "I was shocked when the Queen told me this, how she was so saddened." The Queen regularly used Lady Elizabeth as a sounding board until the latter's death in November 2020, aged 79. Her interview with Ms Smith came in her final months, shortly after the Duke and Duchess quit royal duties for their new life in the US. But in recent weeks, there have been hints the couple may be eyeing a return to the royal fold. One of these - the inclusion of the titles HRH (His /Her Royal Highness) as well as the surname Sussex on passport applications for little Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet - did, though, leave royal sources "utterly bewildered" last month. Yet, Richard Eden, a royal reporter with the Daily Mail, wrote: "The suggestion gives the biggest hint yet that they're hoping to mend fences. "And it raises the question: Could the Sussexes, who chose to give up boring old public duties to seek their fortune in the US, stage a return to the royal fold via their children?"


Daily Mail
43 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Twisted secret behind Spotify's biggest new band... as fans and artists boycott the music service
Spotify is facing boycotts from both artists and subscribers over its move into AI. Not only is the streaming service facing backlash for its ties to an AI military startup, one of the biggest new bands on the site is rumored to be AI generated. The band, named The Velvet Sundown, already have over 550,000 million monthly listeners despite only debuting on the service in early June. Promotional images of the band all appear to be AI generated, and the credits on their music has no writers, producers or musicians listed. There's also no live performances or interviews of the band anywhere to be found, and none of the four members have any kind of internet presence. The band also has barely any social media followers, with just 322 on Instagram and 47 followers on X. Despite this, The Velvet Sundown have been featured on multiple popular Spotify playlists. After various media outlets reported that The Velvet Sundown may be AI-generated, the band hit back in a series of posts on X - yet offered no proof to disprove the claims. 'Absolutely crazy that so-called 'journalists' keep pushing the lazy, baseless theory that The Velvet Sundown is 'AI-generated' with zero evidence,' they wrote. 'Not a single one of these "writers" has reached out, visited a show, or listened beyond the Spotify algorithm,' they continued. 'This is not a joke. This is our music, written in long, sweaty nights in a cramped bungalow in California with real instruments, real minds, and real soul. Every chord, every lyric, every mistake — HUMAN.' They added, 'Just because we don't do TikTok dances or livestream our process doesn't mean we're fake.' And despite their miniscule following on social media, the band said that they had to 'lock down' all of their accounts 'due to harassment'. However, none of their accounts are officially verified by any site outside of Spotify, and none of their social media accounts have been set to private either. On Deezer, where The Velvet Sundown's music also appears, there's a warning from the streamer stating, 'some tracks on this album may have been created using artificial intelligence'. has contacted The Velvet Sundown for comment. Back in 2017, Spotify was forced to deny reports that they had created 'fake' artists to fill up their playlists, presumably in a bid to reduce royalty payments. 'We do not and have never created 'fake' artists and put them on Spotify playlists. Categorically untrue, full stop,' they said at the time. 'We do not own rights, we're not a label, all our music is licensed from rights holders and we pay them - we don't pay ourselves.' Meanwhile, allegations of AI artists isn't the only issue that Spotify is dealing with right now. The streaming service is currently facing boycotts from a handful of fans and artists after a venture capital firm founded by Spotify CEO Daniel Ek contributed 600 million euros ($693.6 million) to German military tech startup Helsing. According to the Financial Times, the company is producing drones, aircraft and submarines, and developing a system to create AI fighter pilots. Ek told the publication, 'There's an enormous realisation that it's really now AI, mass and autonomy that is driving the new battlefield'. Ek's involvement in military technology has caused a number of artists to pull their music from Spotify, including indie band Deerhoof and Amsterdam label Kalahari Oyster Cult. 'We don't want our music killing people,' Deerhoof said in a statement. 'We don't want our music tied to AI battle tech'. Others have decided to cancel their Spotify accounts. 'Cancelled my subscription and never going back. should've made the move ages ago as it's been red flags for a long time,' wrote one user.


Auto Blog
an hour ago
- Auto Blog
Fast and Furious' Brian O'Conner to return in final film, Vin Diesel says
A Return To Form For Franchise's Final Film, Diesel Said Brain O'Conner, the cop-turned-outlaw played by the late Paul Walker, will return for the final Fast and Furious movie, franchise star Vin Diesel said Saturday at the Fuel Fast event in Los Angeles. In a short speech that's made the rounds on social media, Diesel said that, when asked by Universal Studios to lock in a release date of April 20, 2027, for the Fast and Furious finale, he responded with three conditions. One was a return to Los Angeles, the second was a return to the street racing that was the focus of the first film. 0:07 / 0:09 2026 Audi A6 Avant debuts to fight BMW 5 Series Touring Watch More 'The third thing was reuniting Dom and Brian O'Conner,' Diesel said, referring to his own character Dominic Toretto. 'That is what you are going to get in the finale.' Digital Effects And A Sibling Stand-In Could Make It Happen Walker starred opposite Diesel in the first six Fast and Furious movies before he was killed in a car crash on November 30, 2013. Filming of Furious 7 was already underway at that time, so things were changed to write O'Conner out of the franchise. That included a final scene in which Walker's brother Cody stepped in as O'Conner, with digital effects to make the switch less obvious. Cody Walker stood next to Diesel during the announcement, along with Tyrese Gibson, who plays Roman Pearce in the franchise. Diesel didn't elaborate on how the production team would accomplish his wish list, but digital effects to change an actor's appearance, including superimposing the likenesses of dead actors onto living ones, has only become more common since the release of Furious 7. So it's not difficult to imagine Brian O'Conner making his return this way. Photo by Tony Gough/Newspix/Getty Images A Long Road The upcoming movie will be the 11th in the main Fast and Furious storyline, not including the 2019 spinoff Hobbs & Shaw. Expected to be Called Fast X Part Two (as it picks up on the storyline from 2023's Fast X) its scheduled release date will be 26 years after the 2001 release of The Fast and the Furious. That's an impressive record for any movie franchise, and explains the eagerness to bring back Brian O'Conner for one last ride. About the Author Stephen Edelstein View Profile