Freshman Rep. Gabe Evans still wears his police boots in Congress
WASHINGTON - Does Gabe Evans regret scoring a spot on the coveted House Energy and Commerce panel, now that it has seen roiling debates over Medicaid?
"No, absolutely not," said the Colorado Republican, who was a cop, a Blackhawk pilot and a state legislator before coming to Congress this year.
That helps him take on thorny problems, he said. But issues like those may not be easy to navigate in his freshman term, after he narrowly flipped his seat. About 1 in 4 people rely on Medicaid in his district, which extends north from the suburbs of Denver, and he'll have to ward off Democratic attacks as one of the House's most vulnerable members.
Evans sat down with Roll Call earlier this month, a few days before a marathon markup session where he joined fellow Energy and Commerce Republicans in advancing their portion of the party's budget reconciliation package. He talked about his "boots on the ground" experience in law enforcement and the military - and he's literally still got the boots, which he wears every day.
"These are actually my cop boots. This particular pair is on their third set of soles, and I still wear them because it reminds me why I'm here. From me being a baby patrol officer out doing the job to being in the halls of Congress, that part of my routine hasn't changed," Evans said.
This interview has been edited and condensed.
Q: How are you settling into Congress, and what's the weirdest thing you've experienced so far?
A: I spent most of my career as a cop being on body camera, knowing that everything that I did was going to be audio or visual recorded, and if not by me, by somebody with a cellphone, with somebody's security system. So I'm totally used to living under that. But it's just really unique to wake up in the morning and check the headlines and be like, "Oh, look, there's me, and there's me again, and oh, I was at that meeting."
One of the things I was most proud of during my 10 years as a cop is that I only ever got into two fights. I arrested the bad guys, but I was just really, really good at being able to talk them into handcuffs rather than fight them into handcuffs. And so I'm able to translate that skill set to politics, to build rapport and try to understand where people are at.
Q: You're one of the few freshmen in recent years to land on the Energy and Commerce panel. Do you regret getting on it now, with the hornet's nest of reconciliation and finding Medicaid cuts?
A: First and foremost, we're not cutting Medicaid. It is removing the fraud, waste and abuse from Medicaid so resources are being used efficiently and effectively, so that we actually have better access to care.
And no, absolutely not. I mean, being able to serve the community in difficult ways and being able to come up with creative solutions, that's what I did as a cop. That's what I did as a soldier, not only overseas, but in Colorado, fighting wildfires and doing search and rescues. That's why I enjoyed those jobs, because policy and procedure and SOPs only go so far, and at a certain point, you have to come up with unorthodox solutions that have the ultimate goal of making everybody's life better.
Q: What if it goes beyond what you just described? Will you oppose the final reconciliation package if it cuts Medicaid?
A: I am confident we're going to be able to do everything that we need to do and accomplish what the president said, which is protect Medicaid for lawful beneficiaries.
Q: You were homeschooled growing up. What was that like?
A: I was homeschooled all 12 years. My wife was homeschooled all 12 years. My kids have been public schooled, charter schooled and homeschooled, so they've done a little bit of everything. Right now we're in the homeschool phase, so we have the geographic flexibility to go back and forth between the district and D.C.
Everybody always asks, "Oh, were you socialized enough?" And the answer for me is yes. I was absolutely socialized enough. As a police sergeant, after we'd have a big call or a hostage situation, we would do an after action review. Interpersonal skill is critically important when you're negotiating with whoever's barricaded or talking to somebody in danger.
I would go around the circle of cops in some dark parking lot at 1 in the morning, and I would make a joke and say, "I'm so proud of the homeschooler in our midst. You did such a great job talking to people." We'd all look around like, who's the homeschooler? Oh, it's me. Did any of y'all know that? It was my self-deprecating way to just break the stereotype a little bit.
Q: You're the grandson of Mexican immigrants. More than a third of your district is Hispanic, and you sit on the House Homeland Security Committee. Are you concerned that the Trump administration's approach to deportations could backfire on Republicans?
A: [My grandfather immigrated to the U.S.] from northern Mexico, from Chihuahua. I joined the Army in the global war on terror after we lost 2,996 lives on Sept. 11, 2001. But in 2023, fentanyl killed that same number every 15 days. We know that it comes across the southern border, and it's trafficked by cartels like the Sinaloa cartel, like the Jalisco cartel, which are now designated foreign terrorist organizations, and we've seen the impact of that in my district. We've seen just tremendous strides in solving that public safety crisis in the last couple of months.
Q: But what about people being deported without due process or without clear ties to gangs?
A: Whenever we go out into the community, I ask people, "Have you heard of anybody that's been deported, and do you think there's problems associated with how that process occurred?" We have not yet identified one case in Colorado where somebody was deported in a manner that brought concern.
Once we actually talked about the issue, people would say, "Oh yeah, so and so was deported, but we all knew they were dealing drugs. Now that you mention it, they were involved with some bad stuff." And so I am confident that at least in my area, it's Tren de Aragua. It's MS-13. These are criminals, and quite honestly, the Hispanic community does not want that in their neighborhoods.
I introduced a bill that's passed out of Homeland Security, a bipartisan bill talking about transnational repression, which is when foreign governments try to use their influence on American soil to suppress dissidents. We saw that with the underground Chinese police station in New York. We're also seeing it with the Venezuelan community, where the Maduro government is trying to use and leverage Tren de Aragua. And so being able to bring the hammer down on these drug dealers, these criminals, these foreign gangs, it's actually pretty popular with the Hispanics in my district.
Quick hits
Last book you read?
The only book I really have time to read at this point is the Bible. And I am rereading "The Art of the Deal."
In politics, can the ends justify the means?
I think you have to be ethical. But ethical doesn't mean you can't be a tough negotiator.
Your least popular opinion?
I take my coffee black because I don't want to have to worry about the calories that come with better taste.
Best part of the job?
I love learning, going back to the homeschooler thing, whether we're talking about geothermal or beef processing or solar panels or how you do quality assurance testing on concrete for a new road that's been laid.
Something your friends know about you that your constituents don't?
I am a die-hard "Lord of the Rings" nerd. And by "Lord of the Rings" nerd, I mean the broader Tolkien universe. I do not mean Peter Jackson's movies. My wife is very concerned that my kids think "Lord of the Rings" mythology is actual, real history.
Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Chicago Tribune
13 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Castro to seek reelection to state Senate rather than make U.S. House bid
State Sen. Cristina Castro, D-Elgin, has announced she will seek reelection to her District 22 post rather than make a bid next year for the Congressional seat being vacated by U.S. Rep. Raja Krisnamoorthi. 'When I first entered public service, it was with a singular goal: to deliver for my community and make life better for the people of the 22nd District, who I've been lucky to call my neighbors for my entire life,' Castro said in a news release. 'Over the past eight years as state senator, I'm proud to have stayed true to that mission — delivering real results and championing the working families of my district. As I think about the future and how I can continue to make the biggest impact, that goal remains my North Star.' In addition to Elgin, Castro's district encompasses all or part of 10 communities in Cook and Kane counties. Her statement came the same week that state Rep. Anna Moeller, D-Elgin, also announced she also would seek reelection to the House instead of making a bid for Congress. Krishnamoorthi, who represents the 8th District in the U.S. House, has announced plans to run in the primary for the seat currently held by U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin, who plans to retire. Both he and Durbin are Democrats, as are two other candidates who have announced they're running for the job: Lt. Gov. Juliana Stratton and U.S. Rep. Robin Kelly, D-Matteson. Castro, elected to the state Senate in 2016, is the majority caucus whip for the 103rd General Assembly, chair of the Senate Executive Committee, and a member of the Latino Caucus, according to her website biography. She serves on the Appropriations, Energy and Public Utilities, Insurance, Labor and Revenue committees. Prior to being elected to the state Senate, she served on the Kane County Board from 2008 to 2016. Castro holds an associate degree from Elgin Community College and bachelor's and master's degree in business administration from Northern Illinois University.


Newsweek
18 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump Responds To Elon Musk's Comments About A 'New Political Party'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump weighed in Friday on billionaire Elon Musk's threat to form a new political party to challenge Democrats and Republicans. The Context Trump and Musk had a high-profile alliance during the 2024 campaign and during the first few months of Trump's second term, with Musk spending millions of dollars to help Trump get elected in November and Trump later tapping him to lead the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). But their relationship has devolved in the last several days, as Musk excoriated the Trump-backed "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" as "outrageous" and "pork-filled," adding that it's a "disgusting abomination." Trump hit back at his onetime close ally, saying Musk has gone "crazy," accusing him of having "Trump derangement syndrome" and threatening the cancel government contracts with Musk's companies. What To Know The SpaceX CEO on Thursday floated the idea of forming a "new political party in America that "actually represents the 80% in the middle." Fox News reported on Friday that Trump responded to Musk's comments in a phone call with Fox News host Bret Baier, saying he's not worried about the threat. "Trump is not interested in talking to Elon," Fox News host and Trump's former press secretary Kayleigh McEnany said on the network while summarizing the phone call. "Trump is not worried about threats of a third party ... President Trump also pointed to his favorable polls and his strong support among Capitol Hill Republicans." Fox is reporting that Bret Baier just spoke with Trump and Trump said he is not interested in speaking with Elon Musk. Trump also said: Elon Musk has totally lost it — Acyn (@Acyn) June 6, 2025 The White House confirmed Friday that Trump has no plans to contact Musk. Trump also plans to sell the Tesla he bought earlier this year, which was once showcased on the White House lawn as a symbol of the president's alignment with Musk. This story is developing and will be updated as more information becomes available.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's new approach to Russia's war in Ukraine might be his worst yet
Donald Trump and his team have spent a fair amount of time recently trying to convince the public that the president's policy toward Russia's war in Ukraine is having a positive impact. In mid-March, for example, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt boasted, 'I can say we are on the 10th yard line of peace, and we've never been closer to a peace deal than we are in this moment.' Two months later, Trump participated in a two-hour phone meeting with Vladimir Putin, and the Republican touted the discussion as a possible breakthrough. 'The tone and spirit of the conversation were excellent,' the American president declared, adding that his chat would 'immediately' lead to new diplomatic negotiations. Soon after, Kyiv came under a large-scale Russian drone and missile attack, described by Ukrainian officials as the largest aerial assault on the country since the war began. It was soon followed by Ukraine's surprise drone attack that proved disastrous for Russia, and that jolted global perceptions. This in turn led Russia to launch one of the largest barrages of missiles and drones of the war at targets across Ukraine. This does not look like 'the 10th yard line of peace.' It was against this backdrop that Trump has apparently come up with a new metaphor. The New York Times reported: As Germany's chancellor, Friedrich Merz, sat beside him watching in silence, President Trump compared Russia and Ukraine to two fighting children who needed to work out their differences for a while before anyone could intervene. 'Sometimes you see two young children fighting like crazy,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. 'They hate each other, and they're fighting in a park, and you try and pull them apart. They don't want to be pulled. Sometimes you're better off letting them fight for a while and then pulling them apart.' 'And I gave that analogy to Putin yesterday,' the Republican added. 'I said, 'President, maybe you have to keep fighting and suffering a lot, because both sides are suffering, before you pull them apart, before they're able to be pulled apart.'' So, a few things. First, comparing this conflict to a dispute among children on a playground is unhelpful, and Trump complaining about anyone engaging in juvenile behavior is unwise, given everything we know about his temperament and frequent tantrums. Second, the idea that the White House is prepared to let Russia and Ukraine 'fight for a while' overlooks the inconvenient fact that they've already been fighting for a while. Indeed, Russia invaded Ukraine back in February 2022 — more than three years ago — which Trump described at the time as 'genius' and part of a 'wonderful' strategy. But let's also not lose sight of the evolution of the American president's thinking. Trump's Plan A for the war in Ukraine was ending the conflict within 24 hours by way of a secret strategy he assured voters was real. When it became obvious that this strategy didn't actually exist, Trump moved on to Plan B: He told Russia that if it failed to end the conflict quickly, the White House 'would have no other choice' but to impose new economic sanctions. When Putin ignored those threats and Trump failed to follow through, the American president floated Plan C (international economic penalties designed to force a ceasefire), Plan D (Trump-backed bilateral talks between Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy) and Plan E (bilateral talks between Trump and Putin). Plan F — White House passivity — is now increasingly coming into focus. Trump's latest plan to end the conflict is apparently to stop trying to end the conflict. This post updates our related earlier coverage. This article was originally published on