Maharana Pratap Jayanti 2025: Honouring The Unyielding Spirit Of A Rajput Legend
While his birth date is May 9 in the Julian calendar, Maharana Pratap Jayanti is traditionally observed according to the Hindu lunar calendar on Jyeshtha Shukla Tritiya, which falls on May 29 this year. The Tritiya Tithi begins at 1:54 AM and ends at 11:18 PM on this day.
Across Rajasthan and other parts of India, the day is marked by prayers, processions, and cultural events celebrating Maharana Pratap's courage and dedication to his kingdom. Social media platforms are abuzz with tributes, quotes, and images honouring his enduring legacy.
His life continues to inspire generations, symbolising the spirit of self-respect, patriotism, and resilience.
Born in the Heart of Rajasthan
Maharana Pratap was born on May 9, 1540 (Jyeshtha Shukla Tritiya 1597 Vikram Samvat), at the historic Kumbhalgarh Fort in present-day Rajsamand district of Rajasthan. Belonging to the illustrious Sisodia dynasty of Mewar, he was the son of Rana Uday Singh II, the founder of Udaipur. His early years were marked by hardship and adversity, yet Maharana Pratap remained unwavering in his commitment to self-respect and the defence of his homeland.
Unyielding Spirit Against the Mughals
After ascending the throne of Mewar, Maharana Pratap famously refused to acknowledge the authority of Mughal emperor Akbar. A staunch defender of independence, he spent much of his reign in the Aravalli Hills, leading guerrilla warfare to resist Mughal dominance. Despite ruling over Udaipur, Chittor, and nearby regions, he chose struggle over submission, becoming a lasting symbol of Rajput bravery and resilience.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
17-07-2025
- India Today
The brutal legacy of Akbar's Chittorgarh siege referenced by NCERT
The National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) has released a new Class 8 Social Science textbook that offers a revised take on Indian history from the 13th to 17th centuries. The book, part of the series Exploring Society: India and Beyond, calls Akbar's reign a mix of brutality and tolerance, referring to his massacre of 30,000 people at siege of Chittorgarh is a pivotal event in Indian history. It marks the beginning of Akbar's campaign to subdue the Rana of Mewar. Below is a detailed account based on historical sources, primarily the Akbarnama by Abu'l Fazl, of the causes, events, and aftermath of the Sisodia RajputsThe Rajputs, a warrior caste of northern India, are organised into numerous clans claiming descent from ancient Kshatriya lineages, often linked to solar (Suryavanshi), lunar (Chandravanshi), or fire-born (Agnivanshi) dynasties. The Sisodias, a Suryavanshi Rajput clan, ruled Mewar from Chittorgarh and later Udaipur. Renowned for their fierce independence, they resisted Mughal domination longer than most, notably under Rana Udai Singh II and his son Rana Pratap located in present-day Rajasthan, was a formidable hill fortress and the heart of Mewar. Sprawling over 700 acres atop a 180-meter-high hill, the fortress had a history of resistance, having faced sieges by Alauddin Khalji in 1303 and Bahadur Shah of Gujarat in 1535. Its core structure - walls, gates, and key monuments - dates back to the pre-Mughal era, with contributions from the 7th to 16th Siege of ChittorgarhBy 1567, Akbar had consolidated power over much of northern India, including Malwa and parts of Rajputana. Unlike other Rajput rulers, such as those of Amber and Bikaner, who allied with Akbar through diplomacy and marriage, Rana Udai Singh II refused to recognise Mughal overlordship. His support for rebellious Mughal vassals, like Baz Bahadur of Malwa, further provoked the October 1567, Akbar marched from Agra with 40,000 men with the objective of bringing the Rana to his knees. His large army was equipped with cannons, muskets, and siege equipment. The army set up camp at the base of the Chittorgarh hill, choking off the Chittorgarh fort, a stronghold of Rajput pride, 8,000 warriors led by Jaimal Rathore braced for the storm. Mewar's ruler Rana Udai Singh II had retreated into the Aravalli hills, leaving his trusted commander to hold the Sisodia capital against an unstoppable cannons began to roar, hurling iron at the 30-foot-thick walls of the fort. But the fort's height and defences repelled the Mughal army's efforts. Jaimal's men answered from the ramparts, targeting the Mughals with arrows, musket fire, and stones hurled from catapults. Night after night, the Rajputs struck with quick raids on Mughal by the army's failure and the Rajput resistance, Akbar asked his men to creep toward the fort in covered trenches (sabat). The Mughals burrowed beneath the fort, packing gunpowder to rip the foundations apart. But the Rajputs were watching. They dug counter-mines and fought of ChittorgarhWeeks turned into months, but the defenders stood firm. Akbar, sleepless, prowled his camp, watching the army lose patience and hope. But in February 1568, Jaimal Rathore was killed, possibly by a Mughal marksman or during a sortie (though Mughal chronicles say he was shot by Akbar himself). His death was a turning point, as it demoralised the defenders and signaled the fort's imminent defeat inevitable, the Rajput women inside the fort performed jauhar on or around February 23, 1568, to avoid capture. The men donned saffron robes and launched a final sortie against the Mughal February 23-24, 1568, after nearly four months of siege, the Mughals breached the fort's defences through a collapsed wall section. Mughal sources claim that the defenders were almost entirely killed, with estimates of 8,000-10,000 Rajput deaths. Akbar, enraged by the prolonged resistance, ordered a general massacre of the fort's non-combatant population, with estimates of civilian deaths ranging from 20,000 to 30,000. The fort, scarred and silent, stood as a hollow AftermathThe fall of Chittorgarh marked a significant victory for Akbar, weakening Mewar's resistance and sending a message to other Rajput states. The fortress was briefly occupied by Mughal forces but was not permanently garrisoned due to its remote location and the high cost of maintenance. Akbar appointed a governor to oversee the region, but Mewar's resistance continued under Rana Udai Singh's son, Pratap Singh, who later waged a guerrilla campaign against the the Rajputs, the siege became a symbol of sacrifice and defiance. The jauhar and Rajput bravery at Chittorgarh were immortalised in Rajput ballads and chronicles, celebrating the heroism of Jaimal, Patta Sisodia (another commander), and the women who performed jauhar. Rana Pratap's refusal to submit to Akbar further cemented Mewar's reputation as a bastion of Rajput fort still exists and retains significant elements of its pre-1568 structure, such as its gates, towers, and major palaces, reminding visitors of the siege, the massacre, and the unyielding spirit of the Ranas of Mewar.- EndsMust Watch
Time of India
13-07-2025
- Time of India
Revamp plans spark displacement fears at rechristened Jagdishpur
Bhopal: The land demarcation exercise at Jagdishpur village (Islamnagar Fort) has caused unease among the local population. The move comes about a month after MP directorate of archaeology, archives and museums revealed plans in May for adaptive utilisation of the heritage location. According to sources, a survey is being carried out on instructions that were issued on July 3 by Huzur Naib Tehsildar Circle 1 to the chief executive officer of janpad panchayat Phanda regarding land demarcation at Jagdishpur (Islamnagar Fort). The initiative, focused on state-protected monument preservation, has identified 165 residential structures within the fort premises for potential relocation. However, SDM has classified this as a standard procedure, dismissing suggestions of immediate displacement. The village houses multi-generational families, with several residents having ancestral connections spanning three to four generations. "Several families in Jagdishpur have been residing here for three to four generations. Local villagers say that earlier, their homes were made of mud, and as their financial conditions improved, they built concrete houses on the same plots. Homeowners also possess the necessary permissions issued by the Gram Panchayat," said a local resident, seeking anonymity. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is it legal? How to get Internet without paying a subscription? Techno Mag Learn More Earlier in May, MP directorate of archaeology, archives and museums revealed plans in May for alternative utilisation of the historical Jagdishpur location. Current conservation efforts centre on two principal structures: Chaman Mahal and Rani Mahal, which have suffered prolonged deterioration. Located approximately 15 kilometres from Bhopal, the site is under consideration for a preservation-focused development scheme. The fort, established in 1715 by Sardar Dost Mohammad Khan, served various functions including royal accommodation and burial grounds for two Nawabs. Its Mughal Gardens and architectural elements combining Mughal, Rajput, and Malwa influences showcase its historical significance, complemented by continuous water access from Lower Lake. Indications are Jagdishpur—renamed from Islamnagar in 2023—is located approximately 15 km from Bhopal, along the route to Sanchi. With MP Tourism advancing redevelopment through a public-private partnership, a master plan has emerged to position the village within a larger heritage circuit. Recent administrative orders suggest efforts to revitalize the area, though concerns remain about their potential impact on long-established local communities. Earlier in 2023, another restoration initiative, supported by a Rs 1.33 crore budget, encompassed exterior improvements and illumination enhancements. The conservation strategy for the Heritage Core Zone incorporates guided visits, exhibitions, and strategic lighting arrangements. The peripheral areas are allocated for traditional markets, cultural activities, and community gatherings to revitalise the location as an active public venue.
Time of India
02-07-2025
- Time of India
NHAI removes inaccurate plaques near Haldighati
1 2 3 Jaipur: National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) Tuesday removed four plaques installed along a 6-km stretch near the historic Haldighati battlefield in Rajasthan's Rajsamand district after they were found to contain inaccurate and conflicting information about the 1576 battle between Maharana Pratap and Mughal emperor Akbar's forces. The action came in response to a TOI report published on June 19 titled "Haldighati Plaques Omit Key Historical Facts, Spark Uproar". Among the misrepresentations were conflicting timelines of the battle, which was alternatively described as lasting three hours, three days and June 18–23 across different plaques. The inscriptions also omitted key historical figures, notably Mirza Raja Man Singh of Amber, who led the Mughal forces in Haldighati. Following the report, several cultural and historical organisations expressed outrage and demanded immediate removal of the misleading plaques. Chandra Shekhar Sharma, professor of history at Meera Girls College in Udaipur, who flagged the issue, criticised the language and content of the plaques: "Not only were the facts incorrect but the diction and Hindi grammar seemed as if the text was lifted straight from a WhatsApp forward. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is it better to shower in the morning or at night? Here's what a microbiologist says CNA Read More Undo by Taboola by Taboola Authorities must be more cautious — the people of Mewar are highly sensitive when it comes to the legacy of Maharana Pratap." Pratap Singh Jhala, coordinator of Mewarjan—an Udaipur-based organisation dedicated to preserving Mewar's cultural heritage—confirmed that he submitted historically accurate content to NHAI so that corrections could be made. "They (NHAI authorities) accepted the revised text and we expect the corrected plaques to be installed soon," he said. NHAI officials are said to have conveyed to Jhala that their initial intention was to place a basic plaque featuring just a headline. "However, detailed information was later added by the field staff without formal review or approval, leading to the discrepancies," Jhala said.
