logo
Indus pact on hold, Govt plans monthly flushing of Salal and Baglihar dams

Indus pact on hold, Govt plans monthly flushing of Salal and Baglihar dams

Indian Express15-05-2025
WITH the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) in abeyance and the government having already carried out the first flushing exercise at Baglihar and Salal — its two run-of-the-river hydroelectric projects on the Chenab River in Jammu and Kashmir — the Central Water Commission (CWC) has now recommended that such flushing become a monthly routine, The Indian Express has learned.
As first reported by The Indian Express on May 4, NHPC and the Jammu & Kashmir administration have begun flushing the Salal and Baglihar reservoirs to clear out sediment that hinders power output. This is the first such exercise since Salal was built in 1987 and Baglihar in 2008-09, after Pakistan's repeated objections under the IWT had previously blocked these works.
Sources said the flushing that began in early May removed just over 7.5 million cubic metres (MCM) of sediment from the 690 MW Salal and 900 MW Baglihar reservoirs.
'The CWC has now recommended that forced flushing be carried out monthly for both projects, and an SOP (standard operating procedure) will be issued shortly,' a senior official said.
Flushing involves releasing stored water to remove sediment build-up — sand, silt and clay — that settles in reservoirs over time. Sediment reduces reservoir capacity and hampers hydropower output. By regularly flushing these particles out, operators restore storage space and improve turbine efficiency, ensuring reliable power generation and prolonging the life of hydroelectric plants.
However, Pakistan has routinely objected to this exercise given that flushing, the release of stored water to remove sediment, can temporarily boost downstream flow. And recharge, the reservoir's replenishment by closing of gates, can reduce the volume available for later release.
Making flushing a monthly exercise is part of the government's short-term plan to utilise Indus waters after the treaty was placed in abeyance following the Pahalgam terror attack.
As a further short-term measure, India will neither share hydrological data with Pakistan nor inform it of these flushing operations. For the medium and long term, India plans to fast-track hydroelectric projects stalled by Pakistan's objections under the treaty, consider diverting some Indus flows, and explore building new projects, a senior official said.
'For any new project under the treaty, India had to inform Pakistan six months in advance. We are under no such obligation now,' the official added. Among the hydroelectric projects the government will expedite are Pakal Dul (1,000 MW), Kiru (624 MW), Kwar (540 MW) and Ratle (850 MW), all on the Chenab River.
The Indus Waters Treaty was signed on September 19, 1960, after nine years of negotiations between India and Pakistan. It has 12 Articles and eight Annexures (A to H). Under its provisions, all the water of the 'Eastern Rivers'—Sutlej, Beas and Ravi—shall be available for the 'unrestricted use' of India; Pakistan shall receive water from the 'Western Rivers'—Indus, Jhelum and Chenab.
India paused this treaty 'until Pakistan credibly and irrevocably abjures its support for cross-border terrorism.' It formally informed Pakistan of this decision by letter dated April 24; Pakistan recently replied signalling its willingness to discuss Delhi's concerns and suggested a date in May for that discussion.
This offer is especially significant because, despite two prior notices—in January 2023 and again in September 2024—requesting a 'review and modification' of the IWT, Pakistan had not previously expressed explicit willingness.
It was only after India placed the treaty in abeyance with immediate effect following the April 22 terrorist attack in Pahalgam that Pakistan signalled its readiness.
Ritika Chopra, an award-winning journalist with over 17 years of experience, serves as the Chief of the National Bureau (Govt) and National Education Editor at The Indian Express in New Delhi. In her current role, she oversees the newspaper's coverage of government policies and education. Ritika closely tracks the Union Government, focusing on the politically sensitive Election Commission of India and the Education Ministry, and has authored investigative stories that have prompted government responses.
Ritika joined The Indian Express in 2015. Previously, she was part of the political bureau at The Economic Times, India's largest financial daily. Her journalism career began in Kolkata, her birthplace, with the Hindustan Times in 2006 as an intern, before moving to Delhi in 2007. Since then, she has been reporting from the capital on politics, education, social sectors, and the Election Commission of India. ... Read More
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India warns Pakistan of ‘painful consequences' to any misadventure
India warns Pakistan of ‘painful consequences' to any misadventure

Hindustan Times

time20 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

India warns Pakistan of ‘painful consequences' to any misadventure

New Delhi: India on Thursday warned Pakistan of 'painful consequences' in the event of any misadventure, responding to 'war-mongering and hateful comments' from Pakistan's civilian and military leadership—particularly army chief field marshal Asim Munir's nuclear threats. On Tuesday, Shehbaz Sharif promised to 'teach India a lesson' if it interferes with Pakistan's water supply. (Representative photo) External affairs ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal, while addressing a weekly media briefing, subtly alluded to India's military response during Operation Sindoor when commenting on recent aggressive rhetoric from Pakistan, including statements by Munir, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, and defence minister Khawaja Asif. 'We have seen reports regarding a continuing pattern of reckless, war-mongering and hateful comments from Pakistani leadership against India,' Jaiswal said. 'Pakistan would be well advised to temper its rhetoric, as any misadventure will have painful consequences, as was demonstrated recently.' He added that it is a 'well-known modus operandi of the Pakistani leadership to whip up anti-India rhetoric time and again to hide their own failures.' Since last week, Pakistan's leadership has escalated its rhetoric over issues ranging from threats to use nuclear weapons to the possibility of war if India restricts the flow of cross-border rivers amid the suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty. Munir, elevated to field marshal following four days of hostilities with India in May, reportedly told the Pakistani diaspora in the US last week that Pakistan could use its nuclear weapons to take down India and 'half the world' in case of an existential threat, and would use missiles to destroy Indian dams on shared rivers. Also read: Outcome of India-Pakistan conflict: Much to be pleased about, much to learn On Tuesday, Shehbaz Sharif promised to 'teach India a lesson' if it interferes with Pakistan's water supply. 'I want to tell the enemy today that if you threaten to stop our water, keep this in mind—you cannot snatch even one drop from Pakistan,' he said. At a related event on Wednesday marking Pakistan's response to Operation Sindoor, Sharif announced the creation of an 'Army Rocket Force Command' to enhance missile combat capabilities. A senior official told Reuters that the force, meant for conventional conflict, 'is obvious that it is meant for India.' Asif stated over the weekend that any violation of Pakistan's sovereignty would provoke a 'swift, surefire and proportionate response.' Meanwhile, former Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari described India's suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty as an 'attack,' affirming that Pakistan would not back down if forced into war. India initially responded to Munir's nuclear threats by warning that such rhetoric sparks doubts about Pakistan's nuclear command-control integrity, given its military's proximity to terrorist groups. The ministry reiterated that India will not succumb to nuclear blackmail. Also Read: Pakistan took 48 hours to admit intrusion, refused to take back body initially: BSF Following the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack by The Resistance Front (a proxy for Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba), India applied punitive diplomatic and economic measures, including suspending the Indus Waters Treaty and launching Operation Sindoor on May 7. Four days of hostilities followed, ending with a mutual understanding on May 10. Jaiswal also rejected a recent ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, which instructed India to 'let flow' waters of western rivers under the Indus Waters Treaty. 'India has never accepted the legality, legitimacy or competence of the so‑called Court of Arbitration. Its pronouncements are therefore without jurisdiction, devoid of legal standing, and have no bearing on India's rights of utilisation,' he said. He added that India rejects Pakistan's 'selective and misleading references to the so-called 'award.'' Referring to India's June 27 statement that the Indus Waters Treaty 'stands in abeyance,' Jaiswal noted it was a sovereign decision motivated by 'Pakistan's continued sponsorship of cross‑border terrorism, including the barbaric Pahalgam attack.' India has not participated in arbitration proceedings since Pakistan challenged components of the Kishanganga (330 MW) and Ratle (850 MW) hydropower projects under the treaty. While the World Bank appointed both a neutral expert and a Court of Arbitration in 2016, India only recognized and engaged with the neutral expert, rejecting the Court of Arbitration.

CPI(M) cracks down on members who publicly criticised Health Minister
CPI(M) cracks down on members who publicly criticised Health Minister

The Hindu

timean hour ago

  • The Hindu

CPI(M) cracks down on members who publicly criticised Health Minister

Over a month after two Communist Party of India (Marxist) [CPI(M)] members in Pathanamthitta publicly criticised Health Minister Veena George in the wake of the collapse of a building at the Government Medical College Hospital in Kottayam, the party has initiated disciplinary action against them. Party sources said here on Thursday that the Eraviperoor area committee has recommended to the district committee that former Child Welfare Committee (CWC) chairman N. Rajeev be demoted to the Vallamkulam local committee for his remarks about the Minister. P.J. Johnson, a member of the Elanthoor local committee, has been suspended for three months. The action against Mr. Johnson has been initiated soon after his social media post criticising Ms. George. In the case of Mr. Rajeev, the district committee is expected to make a decision soon, a party source said. Mr. Rajeev had earlier been removed from the District CWC chairman post in connection with an alleged attempt to sabotage a Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) case involving a lawyer. Following this, he reportedly fell out of favour with the Minister, a party leader from Pathanamthitta. Mr. Johnson voiced his objections on social media regarding Ms. George's handling of the building collapse, writing: 'Let alone a Minister, Veena George does not even deserve to be an MLA. Nothing more to say… don't compel me to say more…' Factionalism The CPI(M) in Pathanamthitta has been fraught with factionalist tendencies with a section of the cadre voicing their resentment over various issues, including the alleged 'undue prominence' being accorded to Ms. George in the party. Following the recent reconstitution of the party State committee, veteran leader A. Padmakumar had publicly criticised the party leadership for excluding him from the committee while including Ms. George as an invitee. After intervention from senior leaders, Mr. Padmakumar softened his stance, acknowledging that taking his protest public had been a mistake. 'Not quit, but on leave' Meanwhile, CPI(M) Pathanamthitta district secretary Raju Abraham has dismissed reports claiming that the party's Ranni area committee secretary T.N. Sivankutty had resigned, clarifying that he is on leave for health reasons. 'Mr. Sivankutty had submitted a letter to the party's district committee requesting leave due to health issues. Based on this, the Ranni area committee meeting held on Wednesday assigned the temporary charge of secretary to K.P. Subhash Kumar. He will hold this responsibility until Mr. Sivankutty returns,' Mr. Abraham said.

'Never accepted legality of Court of Arbitration': India rejects Indus Waters Treaty ruling
'Never accepted legality of Court of Arbitration': India rejects Indus Waters Treaty ruling

First Post

time2 hours ago

  • First Post

'Never accepted legality of Court of Arbitration': India rejects Indus Waters Treaty ruling

India on Thursday said that the international Court of Arbitration lacks any legal authority to make pronouncements on the Indus Waters Treaty between India and Pakistan as New Delhi has never recognised the legitimacy of the court India on Thursday said that the international Court of Arbitration lacks any legal authority to make pronouncements on the Indus Waters Treaty between India and Pakistan as New Delhi has never recognised the legitimacy of the court. A ruling by the Court of Arbitration last week sided with Pakistan, stating that India must comply with the Indus Waters Treaty when designing new hydroelectric power projects on rivers flowing westward into Pakistan. #WATCH | Delhi | On a question by ANI regarding the award by the Court of Arbitration under the Indus Water Treaty, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal says, "India has never accepted the legality, legitimacy, or competence of the so-called Court of Arbitration. Its pronouncements… — ANI (@ANI) August 14, 2025 STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'India has never accepted the legality, legitimacy, or competence of the so-called Court of Arbitration. Its pronouncements are therefore without jurisdiction, devoid of legal standing, and have no bearing on India's rights of utilisation of waters,' said MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal. India also categorically rejects Pakistan's selective and misleading references to the so-called 'award'. 'As reiterated in our press release of 27 June 2025, the Indus Waters Treaty stands in abeyance by a sovereign decision of the Government of India, taken in response to Pakistan's continued sponsorship of cross-border terrorism, including the barbaric Pahalgam attack,' added Jaiswal. Pakistan had welcomed the ruling by the Court of Arbitration on the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), claiming it validates its stance on India's hydroelectric projects on the Western Rivers. The court reportedly said India must ensure unrestricted water flow to Pakistan, as per treaty terms. India, however, rejects the court's legitimacy, citing its preference for the neutral expert mechanism. New Delhi never accepted the World Bank's 2022 decision to activate both dispute resolution paths simultaneously, calling it legally flawed. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Pakistan urged India to resume IWT implementation, but India maintains the treaty remains in abeyance until Pakistan acts against cross-border terrorism. With inputs from agencies

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store