Melissa Hortman was a climate and clean energy champion for Minnesota
Former Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman is being remembered by advocates and lawmakers as one of the most important climate and clean energy leaders in the state's history.
From the state's trailblazing community solar program to the flurry of energy and environmental laws adopted during Democrats' 2023 trifecta, Hortman had a hand in passing some of the country's most ambitious, consequential state-level clean energy policy during her two-decade legislative career.
Hortman, who was a Democrat, and her husband Mark were shot and killed in their suburban Minneapolis home Saturday in what authorities say was a politically motivated assassination. The alleged gunman, Vance Boelter, is also charged with attempted murder for shooting Democratic Minnesota state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife Yvette.
Hortman, who was 55 years old, twice tried for a state House seat before finally winning in 2004. Moving through the ranks of House leadership, the attorney served as speaker pro tempore, deputy minority leader, and minority leader before becoming speaker in 2019 and serving in that role for three legislative sessions.
'Clean energy was her first love,' said Michael Noble, who worked with Hortman for more than 20 years during his time as executive director of the Minnesota-based clean-energy policy advocacy organization Fresh Energy. 'She really mastered the details and dug deep into climate and clean energy.'
Hortman chaired the House Energy Policy Committee in 2013, a standout year for solar policy in which she helped pass legislation establishing one of the country's first community solar programs, and also a law requiring utilities to obtain 1.5% of their electricity from solar by 2020, with a goal of 10% by 2030.
'That was the year we put solar on the map,' Noble said.
Community solar advocate John Farrell recalled answering Hortman's questions in detail concerning the benefits and drawbacks of community solar during meetings. She was preparing to defend the bill and convince others, even Republicans, that it could be something they could support.
'She wasn't going to tell them something untrue,' said Farrell, who directs the Energy Democracy Initiative at the Institute for Local Self-Reliance, an advocacy group. 'She was going to seek reasons why this policy might be something that they would care about or that it might align with their values.'
Nicole Rom, former executive director of the Minnesota-based youth climate advocacy group Climate Generation, said Hortman was committed to educating herself on climate issues. Hortman attended the United Nations' Conference of the Parties (COP) climate conferences and was part of the University of Minnesota's delegation at the 2015 Paris climate talks, where her vision for more ambitious state climate goals and policy may have begun to percolate, Rom said.
The result was the strong climate legislation Minnesota accomplished in 2023, Rom said.
'If she never served a day before or a day after the 2023 session, she would still go down in history as an incredible leader,' said Peter Wagenius, legislative and political director of the Sierra Club's Minnesota chapter.
After Democrats won control of the state House, Senate, and governor's office in the 2022 election, Hortman understood the trifecta was a rare opportunity that may not arise for another decade, he said.
The following year, Hortman combined her skills and experience as a legislator, committee chair, and political leader to push forward an agenda that would fundamentally transform clean energy and transportation in Minnesota while solidifying her reputation as one of the legislative body's greatest leaders.
The session's accomplishments included a state requirement of 100% carbon-free electricity by 2040, along with more than 70 other energy and environmental policy provisions that created a state green bank, funded renewable energy programs, supported sustainable building, and increased funding for transit. Other laws passed that year required the state to consider the climate impacts of transportation projects, provided electric vehicle rebates, revised the community solar program to focus on lower-income customers, and improved grid-interconnection bottlenecks.
When the trifecta arrived, she ensured her colleagues were 'ready to move on a whole list of items in an unapologetic way,' Wagenius said. Hortman also practiced 'intergenerational respect' by elevating and helping pass laws proposed by first- and second-term legislators, he said.
Democratic Rep. Patty Acomb said Hortman empowered others within the party, made legislators feel they were 'like a team,' and had a habit of never taking credit for legislative success. 'She shied away from that,' Acomb said.
Acomb, who began serving in 2019, became chair of the House Climate and Energy Finance and Policy Committee four years later. She credits Hortman with that opportunity and with making Minnesota a national leader in clean energy.
'In so many ways, she was a trailblazer,' she said.
Gregg Mast, executive director of the industry group Clean Energy Economy Minnesota, said Hortman followed up on the historic 2023 session with a 2024 legislative agenda that built upon the previous year's success. The Legislature made the permitting process for energy projects less onerous while passing a handful of other measures promoting clean buildings and transportation.
'She knew that ultimately, to reach 100% clean energy by 2040, we actually needed to be putting steel in the ground and building these projects,' Mast said.
Ben Olson, legislative director for the Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, first met Hortman 20 years ago while lobbying for an environmental bill. He found her to be kind, witty, and pleasantly sarcastic, the kind of legislator who asked questions, closely listened to responses, and offered sage advice. 'Everyone liked her, and she was close to everybody who had spent time with her,' he said.
Ellen Anderson, a former Democratic state senator and clean energy champion, remembered when Hortman asked if she could co-teach a course with her on climate change at the University of Minnesota in 2015. Hortman came prepared for classes with notebooks of data and information. 'She was super organized,' Anderson said.
Rom thinks Hortman's love for nature drove her climate and clean energy advocacy. The legislator loved hiking, biking, gardening, and other outdoor activities.
In a blog post for Climate Generation before attending the UN's 2017 climate conference, Hortman wrote about the impact of climate change on trees and how she had planted nearly two dozen in her backyard to offset her family's carbon emissions. It was a message not lost on her two children, Colin and Sophie, who suggested in a statement that people commemorate their parents by planting a tree, visiting a park or trail, petting a dog, and trying a new hobby.
'Hold your loved ones a little closer,' they wrote. 'Love your neighbors. Treat each other with kindness and respect. The best way to honor our parents' memory is to do something, whether big or small, to make our community just a little better for someone else.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Iran air strikes: Republicans split over support for Trump and another ‘foreign war'
After returning early from the G7 summit in Canada, Donald Trump met with his national security team to be briefed on the escalating Israel-Iran conflict. It became clear that Trump was considering direct US military support for the Israelis. This has the potential to cause a split among the president's supporters between the Republican hawks (traditional interventionists) on one side and the Maga isolationists on the other. During his three presidential campaigns, Trump condemned former presidents for leading America into 'ridiculous endless wars'. This isolationist tilt won him plaudits with his base of those who supported him for his populist promises to 'make America great again' (Maga). In their work on US attitudes to foreign policy and US overseas involvement, Elaine Kamarck and Jordan Muchnick of the Brookings Institution – a non-profit research organisation in Washington – looked at a range of evidence in 2023. Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK's latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences. They found Republicans supporting less global involvement from the US had increased from 40% to 54% from 2004 to 2017. At that time only 16% of voters supported increasing US troop presence abroad, and 40% wanted a decrease, they found. They related this change in attitudes to Trump's foreign policy position. Fast forward to his second term, and many in the Maga camp are fiercely opposed to Trump's current posturing about leading the US into another conflict in the Middle East. Over the past few days the White House has doubled down on the line that Trump keeps repeating: 'Iran can not have a nuclear weapon'. As Trump edges closer to committing the US to joining Israel in air strikes on Iran, Steve Bannon, a staunch Trump ally, argued that allowing the 'deep state' to drive the US into conflict with Iran would 'blow up' the coalition of Trump support. Meanwhile, Conservative podcaster Tucker Carlson denounced those Republicans supporting action against Iran as 'warmongers' and said they were encouraging the president to drag the US into a war. Congresswoman Majorie Taylor Greene, in an unusual break with Trump, openly criticised the president's stance on the Israel-Iran conflict, writing on X: 'Foreign wars/intervention/regime change put America last, kill innocent people, are making us broke, and will ultimately lead to our destruction.' Other prominent Republican senators, including Josh Hawley and Rand Paul, have urged the president to avoid US involvement in an offensive against Iran. Another Republican congressman, Thomas Massie, has gone even further. He has joined with a coalition of Democrats in filing a House resolution under the War Powers Resolution of 1973, which would seek to prevent Trump from engaging in 'unauthorized hostilities' with Iran without Congressional consent. These Republicans may believe their views are popular with their electoral base. In an Economist/YouGov poll in June 2025, 53% of Republicans stated that they did not think the US military should get involved in the conflict between Israel and Iran. But Donald Trump does seem to enjoy widespread support in the US for his position that the US cannot allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. According to CNN data analysis, 83% of Republicans, 79% independents, and 79% of Democrats, agree with the president's position on this issue. This slightly confusing split suggests there could be US voter support for air strikes, but it's clear there would not be that same support for troops on the ground. IranInfogram Resistance from ultra-Trump die-hards, however, might put them on the wrong side of the president in the long-term. Greg Sargent, a writer at The New Republic magazine, believes that, 'people become enemies of Trump not when they substantively work against some principle he supposedly holds dear, but rather when they publicly criticize him … or become an inconvenience in any way'. So why is Trump, to the dismay of many from within the Maga faithful, seemingly abandoning the anti-war tenet of his 'America first' doctrine? Jacob Heilbrunn, editor of The National Interest magazine, thinks that 'now that Israel's assault on Iran appears to be successful, Trump wants in on the action'. The president has several prominent Republican hawks urging him to do exactly that, and order the US Air Force to deploy their 'bunker-buster bombs'' to destroy Iran's underground arsenals. One of these is Senator Lindsey Graham. Earlier this week on Fox News, he told Trump to be "all in … in helping Israel eliminate the nuclear threat. If we need to provide bombs to Israel, provide bombs. If we need to fly planes with Israel, do joint operations.' Former Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell is also advocating US military action. He told CNN: 'What's happening here is some of the isolationist movement led by Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon are distressed we may be helping the Israelis defeat the Iranians,' adding that its 'been kind of a bad week for the isolationists' in the party. The same Economist/YouGov poll mentioned earlier showed that the stance taken by these Republicans – that Iran poses a threat to the US – is a position shared by a majority of GOP voters, with 69% viewing Iran as either an immediate and serious threat to the US, or at least somewhat of a serious threat. Some believe that Trump's evolving attitude towards American military involvement in the worsening crisis in the Middle East, however, is not a volte-face on isolationism, or an ideological pivot to the virtues of attacking Iran. Ross Douthat of the New York Times has observed that Trump 'has never been a principled noninterventionist' and that 'his deal-making style has always involved the threat of force as a crucial bargaining chip'. It is always difficult to fully determine what Trump's foreign policy doctrine actually is. It is useful, however, to reflect on some of the president's overseas actions from his first term. In April 2018, following a suspected chemical weapons attack by the forces of Syrian president Bashar al-Assad in a Damascus suburb, Trump ordered US air strikes in retaliation for what he called an 'evil and despicable attack' that left 'mothers and fathers, infants and children thrashing in pain and gasping for air'. This led the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic magazine, Jeffrey Goldberg, to describe Trump as 'something wholly unique in the history of the presidency: an isolationist interventionist'. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. Richard Hargy does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mapped: Where Iran and Israel's missiles have struck as Tehran hits major hospital
Iran and Israel are a week into their worst-ever conflict, with hundreds dead and fears growing of a wider regional war in the Middle East. In the latest round of missile attacks, dozens of Israelis were wounded as Iranian missiles struck the main hospital in the south of Israel, causing 'extensive damage'. A high-rise apartment building in Tel Aviv and other sites in central Israel were also hit. Israel, meanwhile, carried out strikes on Iran's Arak heavy water reactor, its latest attack on Tehran's sprawling nuclear program. Iranian state television said there was 'no radiation danger whatsoever' and that the facility had been evacuated before the attack. The seventh day of conflict came a day after Iran's supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, rejected US calls for surrender and warned that any military involvement by the Americans would cause 'irreparable harm'. Trump responded by flirting with the idea of joining Israel in its attacks on Iran. 'I may do it, I may not,' he said from the White House lawn. The conflict began last Friday after Israel launched missiles at Iran, saying it was targeting its nuclear and military infrastructure in a 'pre-emptive' move to stop the country developing a weapon. Iran launched retaliatory strikes, which saw air sirens wail across the Tel Aviv region on Friday night as smoke rose above the city. They have continued every day since. Iran has fired around 400 missiles at Israel, some 40 of which have pierced air defences, killing 24 people, all of them civilians, according to Israeli authorities. Iran has reported at least 224 deaths in Israeli attacks, mostly civilians, but has not updated that toll for days. US-based Iranian activist news agency HRANA said 639 people had been killed in the Israeli attacks and 1,329 injured as of 18 June. Operation Rising Lion – the official name for the IDF's offensive in Iran – has mainly targeted nuclear sites, including destroying the above-ground section of the country's main Natanz nuclear base. The Institute for the Study of War, a US-based think tank tracking the war in the Middle East, has recorded 235 air strikes and explosions across Tehran in the past week, 116 of which have been confirmed. More than a dozen military leaders and nuclear scientists have also been killed by Israeli strikes. A military official on Saturday said Israel had caused significant damage to Iran's main nuclear facilities at Natanz and Isfahan, but had not so far damaged another uranium enrichment site, Fordow. The United Nation's nuclear watchdog recently said they were 'seriously concerned' about Iran's enrichment of uranium, much of which is taking place at Fordow, deep underground. Israel has also claimed air superiority over Iran, meaning it has been able to cross into Iranian airspace and launch missiles at targets across the country. Below, you can see an updated list of everywhere there has been reported strikes in Iran. Iran's religious ruler, Ali Khamenei, issued a televised address from an unknown location on Wednesday declaring that Tehran would not be forced into surrendering to Israel. Tehran followed that up with massive strikes on central and southern Israel on Thursday, injuring at least 40 people after missile struck a medical facility. Horrifying footage throughout the week has shown Iranian missiles slamming into residential areas in Israel. Explosions have also been heard over Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. Several residential buildings in a densely populated neighbourhood of Tel Aviv were destroyed in a strike that blew out the windows of hotels and other nearby homes just a few hundred meters from the US Embassy branch in the city. Civilians in Arab-majority towns have also been killed. Yemen's Iran-aligned Houthis said on Sunday they had also targeted central Israel's Jaffa with several ballistic missiles in the past 24 hours, the first time an ally of Iran has joined the fray. On Friday, missiles hit the central Israeli city of Rishon LeZion , south of Tel-Aviv, killing two people and injuring dozens more. The map below shows some of the locations where the strikes took place. Hossein Salami, the leader of Iran's Revolutionary Guard, was among the senior Iranian figures reportedly killed in Israel's initial overnight strikes, along with the heads of the branch's airspace and intelligence units. Mohammad Bagheri, the chief of staff of Iran's armed forces and Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's second in command, was also killed, along with the armed forces' deputy commander Gholamali Rashid, and air defence commander Davood Sheikhian. An Israeli official said it had 'eliminated the highest commanders of their military leadership' and had killed nuclear scientists who 'were main sources of knowledge, main forces driving forward the [nuclear] programme'. But civilians in Iran have also borne the brunt of the attacks. On Saturday, Iran's state TV reported that around 60 people, including 20 children, had been killed in an Israeli attack on a housing complex in Tehran. Both Israel and Iran have vowed to continue their respective attacks on each other. Iran has also warned the US not to get involved as Trump has publicly flirted with the idea. The US has a military presence across the major oil-producing region, with bases in Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates. Iraq, a rare regional partner of both the US and Iran, hosts 2,500 US troops, although Tehran-backed armed factions are linked to its security forces.


The Hill
23 minutes ago
- The Hill
To fulfill their promises to voters, Republicans must govern like Democrats
Say this about Democrats: They know how to pass their agenda much faster than Republicans. Four-and-a-half months into the second Trump administration, Republicans have achieved next to nothing legislatively, despite its total control of Washington. Sure, President Trump has issued a slew of executive orders, but all of them will be repealed the moment a Democrat wins the White House. Laws are what really matter and stand the test of time. And despite endless talk about the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' Republicans are still weeks away from passing it. There's a decent chance they won't even be able to do it. Compare this Republican failure to Democratic success exactly four years ago. By this point in the Biden administration, he and Democratic majorities in Congress had already passed a major bill on a much faster timeline. The American Rescue Plan was a $1.9 trillion monstrosity that rewarded leftist special interests, trapped millions of people on welfare and stifled a stronger economic comeback — all while making America's mountain of debt even higher. Democrats showed the same speed the last time they controlled the White House and Congress. In 2009, they passed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act — another pork-barrel, debt-heavy, anti-growth monstrosity — within a month of President Obama's inauguration. And that's just one of many big laws they had passed by this point. Democrats clearly felt the need to act — to show voters they would do what they promised. What are Republicans waiting for? Unlike Democrats, they have the benefit of supporting an agenda that will strengthen America. They want to cut taxes for families and job creators, spurring a new era of entrepreneurship and growth. They want to cut spending and reform entitlements like Medicaid and food stamps, connecting welfare to work. And they want to secure the southern border, protecting Americans from crime while restoring the all-important rule of law. It's the understatement of the year to say these policies are urgently needed. They should have been passed yesterday — or perhaps Jan. 21, the day after Trump returned to the White House. But Republicans in Congress are too busy bickering. The infighting is coming from multiple sides. On the one hand are conservative purists who say that Congress isn't cutting spending or taxes enough. On the other side are moderates who want less aggressive cuts and more carveouts for issues like state and local tax deductions. Neither camp is huge, but both have enough members to stop legislation in its tracks. After months of squabbling, it's an open question whether the GOP can make everyone happy and pass their bill. In the first Trump administration, the answer was no. Their bill to repeal and replace ObamaCare — the party's signature policy — was in limbo through July. And when it finally came to the Senate floor for a vote, the Republican majority still couldn't pass it. Imagine if that happened again — if the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' goes down to defeat in a month or two, killed by the party that authored it. Guess what: Democrats have the same kind of divide, between relative moderates who want a slightly bigger government and wacko leftists who want outright socialism. But they still find a way to get bills across the finish line. In 2021, they had basically the same slim majority that Republicans do now, but they papered over the differences to move America dramatically to the left. Republicans are shooting themselves in the foot. I personally tend toward the conservative purist position. But you know what I like better than a perfect bill? A bill that can pass. A bill that moves America in the right direction. Tax cuts, spending cuts and welfare reforms that are good enough. I recognize that they can be improved, and hopefully will be improved the next time Republicans are elected. By any stretch of the word, Republicans have an exceptional bill. It does so much of what they want — so much of what America needs. Perhaps most important, it keeps so many promises to the American people. Voters aren't stupid. When they vote for change, they want to see change. And in 2024, they voted for an enormous change. Halfway through 2025, voters are still waiting for Republicans to keep their promises. They can certainly be pleased with much of what Trump has done unilaterally. But they're still waiting for the important reforms — the kind that only Congress can pass. Democrats govern when they get the chance, even if they move the country in the wrong direction. If Republicans don't get their act together, and fast, it may be a long time before the American people trust them again. John Tillman is CEO of the American Culture Project.