UN Mandela Prize 2025: Makhzen's Nomination, A Moral and Political Farce
Moroccan human rights activists and journalists considered their country's nomination for the 2025 United Nations Nelson Mandela Human Rights Prize a 'moral and political scandal and an official whitewash of its dark criminal record.'
They called for the nomination to be withdrawn to preserve the credibility of the UN international institution.
In an article titled 'Morocco's Nomination for the Mandela Prize… When the Executioner Demands the Victim's Medal,' Moroccan blogger and human rights activist Mohamed Kandil said, 'Morocco's nomination for this prize is yet another farce added to the archive of official impudence of the Makhzen regime.'
He added, 'When Morocco nominates itself for the Nelson Mandela Prize, it's as if the Makhzen is asking the world to believe that mass graves, secret prisons, and torture chambers are merely transient human rights violations.'
He emphasised in this context that 'the National Council for Human Rights in Morocco, whose president, Amina Bouayach, was nominated for this prize, has become nothing more than a human rights polishing arm for the repressive apparatus. How can it now be presented to the world as the face of human rights in Morocco after all that it has done to the Rif movement, journalists, and political prisoners?' He emphasized that 'the Makhzen regime does not represent the people or the victims, but rather is merely a security institution adept at public relations at international forums.'
He explained in this context that 'Amina Bouayach is neither an activist nor an independent woman, but rather a mere intelligence agent, recruited within the official propaganda network, called upon when necessary to endorse the crimes of the Makhzen state, distort the reports of international organizations, and cover up the various forms of torture in the country.'
He asked sarcastically, 'Who's the Mandela that Morocco wants to emulate? Is he Mandela, who spent 27 years in prison for defending dignity and freedom? Or the Mandela of the Makhzen, who imprisons activists on 27 fabricated charges in a 27-minute sham trial?'
The Moroccan human rights activist believes that Morocco's nomination for this prize is a 'moral and political scandal,' adding, 'Awarding Morocco this prize is an official whitewash of a dark record and a slap in the face of every prisoner of conscience, every mother who lost her son under torture, and every Moroccan who was displaced or persecuted for daring to say no to injustice, tyranny, and corruption.'
For his part, Moroccan writer and journalist Ali Lahrouchi wrote in an article that 'Morocco's nomination for this prize is an insult to United Nations institutions, as the Nelson Mandela Prize is a global recognition of human commitment to principles, values, and ethics, the prioritization of the public interest over personal interest, transcending vengeful thinking, and remaining patient and steadfast in adhering to principles…'
Ali Lahrouchi asserted that Morocco 'is still living in the Middle Ages,' asking, 'What has changed in Morocco for Amina Bouayach to be nominated for the prize of Nelson Mandela, the courageous fighter?'
In this regard, he emphasized that 'everyone who criticized, opposed, or commented on the backward practices in Morocco was subjected to assassination, kidnapping, torture, arrest, marginalization, and retaliation through the use and subjugation of all relevant institutions, starting with the intelligence, security, gendarmerie, judiciary, and prisons, to silence all voices opposing or criticizing the dictatorial policies pursued in Morocco.'
Hence, he confirmed, 'Morocco's history is replete with all forms of human rights violations and abuses, and its mere nominating it for this prize is an insult to the freedom fighter Nelson Mandela.' He warns that Morocco's victory 'will be the last nail in the coffin of the United Nations and its institutions, which will never receive any respect.'
In turn, human rights activist and former prisoner Saida el-Alami wondered, 'Morocco is submitting its nomination for the Nelson Mandela Human Rights Prize? What rights exactly, when Moroccan citizens enjoy no political, civil, or economic rights?'
In her remarks, el-Alami addressed the suffering of the Moroccan people due to the Makhzen's policies in various sectors and their lack of the most basic rights that guarantee a decent life. She highlighted the worsening deterioration of human rights in the Kingdom, in light of the judiciary's use of retaliation against opponents, fabricating charges against human rights activists, and violating the rights of detainees in police stations and prison cells.
The Moroccan human rights activist concluded her remarks by saying, 'I don't understand the basis on which Morocco was nominated for this prize. If Nelson Mandela were alive, he would have cancelled this award as long as the enemies of humanity continue to nominate it.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
El Chorouk
21-05-2025
- El Chorouk
The crisis with Algeria will continue, and memory file may be the key to the solution
The French historian, Benjamin Stora, who heads the joint memory committee alongside historian Mohamed Zeghdidi, expects the tension that characterizes relations between Algeria and France to continue, but he does not see this tension reaching the point of a diplomatic break in its classical sense (closing embassies in both countries), and called for playing the memory file as a card that can alleviate the tension between the two countries. Benjamin Stora, who serves as an advisor to French President Emmanuel Macron on memory affairs, is considered one of the few voices calling for calm, and does not hesitate to criticize hostile stances towards Algeria by some French politicians, such as Bruno Retailleau, the Minister of Interior in François Bayrou's government. In an interview with Agence France-Presse (AFP) on Wednesday, Benjamin Stora said: 'We need strong initiatives, especially regarding the issue of French colonialism in Algeria in the 19th century. But today, in my opinion, considering the possibility of launching initiatives on memory may be an alternative to resuming political relations,' which is 'necessary to resolve issues of immigration or visas.' The historian calls for continuing this work related to memory in order to achieve calm, and emphasizes the importance of building on previous initiatives, referring to France's recognition of responsibility for the assassination of Algerian politicians and activists by the French army during the Liberation Revolution, such as the French activist for the revolution, Maurice Audin, the revolution's lawyer Ali Boumendjel, and the martyr Larbi Ben M'hidi. These initiatives came in a piecemeal manner without reaching the basic demand of Algerians, which is the recognition of its colonial crimes, which stripped those initiatives of their value. Stora believes that working on the memory file 'constitutes a possible way out of the crisis, and is indispensable in any case, and necessary in any case, because we cannot (…) consider that this Algerian history is like all other histories,' due to the heavy burden of the colonial past from its very beginnings until the Liberation Revolution, which witnessed brutal massacres against Algerians. He added: 'We cannot resolve relations that lasted 132 years with one speech or one initiative. It is a very long period, 132 years. It spans more than six generations,' and these facts have made relations between the two countries more complex, saying: We must remember that the relationship between France and Algeria has always been full of troubles and fluctuations, and a lot of tensions and detentes. Therefore, he does not see a way out of the crisis in the short term, even if France agrees to new initiatives on the memory level, due to the level the current crisis has reached, for which the French side is responsible, as it was the party that initiated the provocation when it decided to support the Moroccan regime's plan in Western Sahara, despite its awareness of the risks of such a decision on bilateral relations. It is known that the work of the mixed committee in charge of the memory file has been suspended since last summer, following the French President's decision to change his country's position on the Sahrawi issue, and this committee was about to resume its activity last April after the visit of the French Foreign Minister, Jean-Noël Barrot, to Algeria, but the action of suspicious parties in Paris to arrest an official at the Algerian consulate in Paris outside of norms, law, and diplomacy, brought the crisis back to its beginnings. Stora says: 'This time, the crisis is absolutely unprecedented,' which may prolong its life for a long time, and he warned that this problem is worsening more and more, because in France, as in Algeria, there are 'people and organizations who have an interest in things not always going well.' Stora did not rule out that Algeria could be a subject of the next presidential campaign in two years, as was the case in 2007. Nicolas Sarkozy 'campaigned heavily on the basis of French Algeria.'
El Chorouk
19-05-2025
- El Chorouk
Bruno Retailleau, Leader of a Party That No Longer Makes Presidents in France
French Interior Minister Bruno Rotailleau has assumed the leadership of the right-wing Republicans (LR) party, with his sights set on winning the Élysée Palace in the 2027 presidential election. However, this party, which has produced several presidents in the past, is no longer capable of making presidents in France. This politician's rise to the leadership of the right-wing party coincided with a severe political and diplomatic crisis with Algeria. Many moderate politicians in Algeria and France view him as the cause of the deepening impasse in Algerian-French relations since last summer, which saw French President Emmanuel Macron's decision to distort his country's position on the Western Sahara issue by blatantly siding with the Moroccan regime. Many observers have discussed Bruno Rotailleau's political ambitions and their repercussions for relations with Algeria, pointing to the possibility of running for the French presidential election. However, this possibility remains highly unlikely, according to observers, given the weakness of his party, which came in fourth place in the last legislative elections, with only 46 seats in the French National Assembly (the lower house of parliament). This is compared to the left-wing movement, known as the 'New National Front,' which won 182 seats. The right-wing movement in France, both traditional and extreme, currently consists of four parties: the National Rally (RN), a descendant of the far-right National Front, founded by Jean-Marie Le Pen, the third-largest political party based on the results of the recent legislative elections; the Republicans (LR); the Union of the Right for the Republic, founded by Éric Ciotti, the former president of the Republicans; and another small party, the Reconquest Party (Reconquéte), founded by the Jewish extremist Éric Zemmour. For the Algerian diplomat Mustapha Zeghlache, Bruno Retailleau's ascension to the Élysée Palace remains extremely difficult, given the fragmentation of the right-wing and far-right movements, as well as the decline of the 'Republicans' LR party in the French political scene due to the divisions it has experienced, the most recent of which occurred last summer, when its former president decided to split and form an alliance with the extremist 'National Front' party. Retailleau's first statement after his victory in the Republicans' presidential election was to emphasise that his primary focus would be on unifying the right-wing faction. However, the contradictions on the ground appear far greater than he imagined, making this task difficult, if not impossible. In a statement to Echorouk, Zeghlach explained, 'Even though it's too early, and the possibility of Retailleau running for the presidency and winning is disturbing to Algeria and its interests, it will be extremely difficult to achieve his dreams, because the political landscape in France has changed significantly, and his party is no longer as popular as it once was.' It is well known that the Republicans party, formerly known as the Union for a Popular Movement (UMP) before changing its name in 2015, which embodies Gaullist values, of which only the name remains, has brought numerous presidents to the Élysée Palace, such as General de Gaulle, Jacques Chirac, and most recently Nicolas Sarkozy. However, today it has not even been able to secure second or third place in legislative or local elections, underscoring the difficulty Bruno Retailleau faces in relying on this party to achieve his dreams. The former diplomat spoke about the inevitability of alliances in winning the French presidency. He also noted that the presence of right-wing figures with significant political ambitions, such as Jordan Bardella, leader of the National Rally party, following Marine Le Pen's barring from running, would complicate Retailleau's task, as he will face a left-wing alliance with which he has considerable animosity and hostility.
El Chorouk
14-05-2025
- El Chorouk
Paris heading towards a break with Algeria… and it is the biggest loser!
It has become highly likely that Algerian-French relations are on the verge of a break, an approach that many observers are now repeating, and which is embodied by the decisions issued from time to time from the two capitals, the latest of which is the exchange of expulsion of large numbers of diplomats from both sides for the second time in just one month. Amidst this escalation, the French Foreign Minister, Jean-Noël Barrot, announced on Wednesday, May 14, 2025, that France had summoned the Algerian Chargé d'Affaires in Paris to inform him of the French authorities' protest against Algeria's decision to expel 15 employees at the French embassy, whose appointments were not in line with the relevant bilateral agreements. The head of French diplomacy explained in a talk show on 'BFM TV' that his country would respond to the Algerian authorities' decision, but he did not mention the number of Algerian diplomats concerned by the expected decision or its date, a decision that was also included in a statement issued by the French Foreign Ministry, which was circulated on the same day. Algeria had summoned the Chargé d'Affaires at the French embassy in Algiers last Sunday and informed him of the decision to expel new French officials from Algerian territory who were performing duties at the French embassy in Algiers, according to a dispatch from the Algerian News Agency, which stated that the French employees were appointed outside the agreed diplomatic norms. According to the French official, the matter concerns 'all employees holding diplomatic passports who do not currently have a visa to Algeria.' It was noteworthy in Jean-Noël Barrot's statement that the Algerian authorities' decision was not preceded by consultation with the French authorities, a statement that lacks credibility, because France was the first to prevent Algerian diplomats from entering French territory. What is interesting is that this measure, which is regulated by the bilateral agreement signed between the two countries in 2013, and which Jean-Noël Barrot claimed was violated by Algeria, had previously been confirmed by the French Interior Minister, Bruno Retailleau, that Paris would stop implementing this agreement, even though the matter does not concern him at all. Then his counterpart in the government, the Foreign Minister, comes to accuse Algeria of violating the agreement in a position that raises questions about the extent of the chaos and confusion in the French government, which is suffering from fragility that could bring it down at any moment. With bilateral relations sliding to unprecedented levels of crisis, the French side emerges as the undisputed culprit for these unexpected developments, as it was the initiator of the offense, through the 'unfriendly' decision, which is inconsistent with international laws and United Nations resolutions, which is supporting the alleged sovereignty of the Moroccan regime over the occupied Sahrawi territories. Commenting on the rapid developments between Algeria and Paris, former Algerian Ambassador, Nourredine Djoudi, holds the French authorities fully responsible, due to their hostile positions towards Algerian interests and their provocations that refuse to stop. In the opinion of the retired diplomat, who is a former director of the Africa Department at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the core of the problem lies in 'the weakness of the French government and the multiplicity of decision-making sources within it, so that a person like the Interior Minister has become involved in the affairs of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, while the Foreign Minister remains unable to put an end to his colleague's interference in the affairs of his portfolio, while the head of state (Emmanuel Macron) watches this scene.' The former ambassador believes that decision-making sources in Paris have fallen into the hands of unconstitutional forces, and he pointed here to the strong influence of the anti-Algerian Zionist lobby in France, represented by the Representative Council of Jewish Institutions in France (CRIF), on the current French authorities. Mr. Nourredine Djoudi did not rule out the possibility of bilateral relations reaching a break, but he explained that 'the biggest loser in that will undoubtedly be the French side, and the current reality confirms that. The import of grains, meat, and many other French products has stopped, while we have many alternative options to France.' He added: 'We are facing a second crisis similar to what happened in the 1970s between the late President Houari Boumediene and his French counterpart at the time, Valéry Giscard d'Estaing, against the backdrop of the latter's decision to support the Moroccan regime in its occupation of Western Sahara,' stressing that Paris will be the losing party.
