Manchester: Domestic abuse pilot scheme 'saved woman's life'
A domestic abuse victim said a new type of order designed to protect victims from violent partners may have saved her life. Anne, which is not the woman's real name, said she had suffered physical and emotional abuse at the hands of her partner. But he was then made subject of a Domestic Abuse Protection Order (DAPO)as part of a pilot in Bury, Wigan and Manchester. The orders can run for any length of time and those who breach them can face up to five years in prison.
About 60 DAPOs have been issued across the three pilot areas since November. A DAPO can be granted for any length of time and can be enforced by police, a third party or even victims themselves without the need to attend court.
Anne said she would often have bruises on her arms and her hair would be pulled.She said: "As the relationship went on, it got more and more degrading, more abusive."The police officers said we are going to be carrying you out."Her partner would be arrested, but then Anne would drop the charges. He later received a DAPO order from Greater Manchester Police.
Det Supt Keith Galley, of Greater Manchester Police, said: "As long as we can ensure there has been some kind of abuse, even if it is physical or mental in that relationship then we can apply for these orders, and it really opens up the scope of which victims we can help now."Anne said she was "getting there slowly but surely"."I think there are still going to be hurdles but I know I have got the DAPO team and support of my friends to get me through it," she added.The Home Office said it would be monitoring the progress of the pilot scheme.
If you have been affected by the issues raised in this article, help and support is available via BBC Action Line.
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Manchester on Sounds and follow BBC Manchester on Facebook, X, and Instagram and watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Police must 'do their bit' on funding, minister warns
The science and technology secretary has urged police to "do their bit" to "embrace change" as the Home Office and the Treasury continue negotiations over this week's Spending to the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, Peter Kyle said "every part of society was struggling" and the chancellor was facing pressure from all sectors including doctors and universities to increase funding. He said the review would boost spending for schools and scientific research but declined to rule out a squeeze on Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said he was concerned about police numbers being cut and urged the government to protect their budget. Chancellor Rachel Reeves will set out on Wednesday how much money each government department will get to spend for the next three this week, she warned not every government department will "get everything they want" and said there were "good things I've had to say no to". The BBC has been told that Home Office ministers do not believe there is enough money to recruit the additional police officers Labour promised in its manifesto. Asked about police funding, Kyle said the government had already provided an additional £1bn to the police. "We are delivering investment in the police," he said. "We expect the police to start embracing the change they need to do to do their bit for change as well.""Money is part of how we change our country for the better. And reform – modernisation, using technology, doing things in the way that people would expect our public services to be doing in the 2020s – is the other part."Last month, five police chiefs, including Sir Mark Rowley, head of the Metropolitan Police, said years of cuts had left forces working with "outdated" technology and warned further cuts would "bake in structural inefficiencies". Also appearing on Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, Philp said he was "very concerned that police numbers may fall". Asked how the Conservatives would find money to protect police funding, he said there were "all kinds of areas where Labour is essentially splurging money".He criticised the government for its spending on environmental projects and public sector pay rises. He also said his party would "go further on welfare reform" and pointed to its plans to cut £12bn from the welfare budget. Richard Tice, Reform UK's deputy leader, told the programme his party wanted the government and councils to "stop wasting money". Reeves's position on ruling out borrowing to fund day-to-day spending and raising taxes again has led to speculation there will be spending squeezes in the Institute for Fiscal Studies has said "relatively modest" growth rates mean "sharp trade-offs are unavoidable".Kyle said Reeves was delivering the Spending Review at a difficult time saying: "Right across our society, our economy, our public services, we get the stresses that people are under."We are the fastest growing economy in the G7 but we know that people aren't feeling it in their pockets yet."That's why what you are already hearing about the Spending Review is, that we are going to increase per pupil funding in schools to the highest it's ever been and we're going to have the largest ever increase in R&D [research and development] as a government in our history."As first reported in The Observer, the Spending Review will see schools get an additional £4.5bn to help fund pay rises for teachers and money for special needs provision.
Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
Police let neo-Nazi who radicalised teenager leave the country
British police allowed a convicted American neo-Nazi to leave the UK after grooming and radicalising the youngest girl in Britain charged with terror offences. Dax Mallaburn, who was known to police and social services for having encouraged Rhianan Rudd to look at violent material, was stopped and questioned by counter-terrorism officers at Heathrow. Despite already being suspected of radicalising and engaging in 'inappropriate behaviour' with the teenager he was allowed to board a flight to the US, from where he travelled on to Mexico. Mallaburn left Britain in October 2020, shortly before police arrested the teenager and later charged her with downloading a bomb-making manual online. The case was delayed before the charges were eventually dropped following an intervention by the Home Office, which concluded she had been a victim of trafficking who had been groomed and sexually exploited. Five months after the charges against her were dropped, Rhianan was found dead by her carer at Bluebell House, near Newark, Nottinghamshire, on 19 May 2022, aged 16. The revelations about Mallaburn's movements come as a coroner prepares to hand down her findings into the teenager's death on Monday, following a three-week inquest. Chief coroner Judge Alexia Durran's findings are likely to examine the role of counter-terror police, MI5 and social services in the events that led to Rhianan's death. The decision to allow Mallaburn to leave the UK without any further action being taken over his role in radicalising Rhianan has raised questions about possible failings by the authorities. Chesterfield Coroners Court heard that Rhianan began to show disturbing signs of far-Right radicalisation after being groomed by Mallaburn when he moved into the family home with her mother, Emily Carter, in 2017. The inquest heard that Mallaburn, who had multiple tattoos of swastikas, had served time in a US prison for possession of weapons and met Ms Carter through a pen-pal scheme for inmates. He was also found by a US Supreme Court ruling to be a member of the neo-Nazi group the Arizona Aryan Brotherhood. Derbyshire County Council social workers, who were already involved with Rhianan's care, became concerned that she was being groomed by Mallaburn after he moved into her home in Bolsover. Rhianan complained to them in 2019 that the American had touched her sexually. She had just turned 14. But when police visited the girl at her home she retracted the allegations. The inquest heard that behind closed doors, Mallaburn was teaching the troubled teenager his version of the Second World War. In the days before she took her own life, Rhianan would tell a counter-terrorism official that Mallaburn had explained to her 'what really happened', describing her mother's partner as a 'literal Nazi'. The inquest was told that Mallaburn's influence on Rhianan was 'not known' to her mother. Counter-terrorism police began investigating Rhianan in September 2020 after Ms Carter reported her concerns to Prevent, the anti-radicalisation programme, 'over her concerns about Rhianan's obsession with far-Right material, explaining how she went from an interest in the two world wars to admiring Hitler'. Carter wrote in a letter to counter-terrorism police: 'I need help with my 15-year-old daughter. She has a very unhealthy outlook on fascism – she also has massive dislikes for certain races and creeds.' The inquest was told that during his time living with Ms Carter and Rhianan, Mallaburn had put the teenager in contact with another US white supremacist, named Chris Cook, who supplied her with instructions for making homemade bombs and weapons. A child protection team from Derbyshire County Council found that both Mallaburn and Cook 'had encouraged Rhianan to look at violent material'. Counter-terrorism police passed their 'suspicion of radicalisation' of Rhianan by Mallaburn on to MI5. When the American neo-Nazi left Chesterfield and headed to Heathrow Airport on 7 October 2020 he was stopped by counter-terror police and interviewed before being allowed to board his flight. Rhianan was arrested by East Midlands counter-terror police two weeks later, on 21 October. A family friend called Ann, who had been helping Ms Carter look after Rhianan, had by now already begun an affair with Mallaburn and later travelled to Mexico to be with him. Ann, who met Rhianan through the local Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, went on to take the former convict's name when she joined him in the resort of Cancun. She acknowledged Mallaburn's far-Right links, but insisted he was no longer involved, telling The Telegraph: 'Dax has never been charged with any race crime. He was interviewed by the FBI about Rhianan and her online relationship with a man in Ohio. 'Dax returned to the USA on October 7 2020, however not before being interviewed at Heathrow by anti-terror and by Homeland Security in the USA about, not Rhianan, but her online 'boyfriend' in Ohio.' Whitehall sources said the Home Office had ' robust safeguards in place to ensure that those who intend to sow hatred and division can be refused entry to our country – and make no apology for this. The decision to prevent someone leaving the country is a police decision. They make the call on whether it is possible and appropriate to confiscate an individual's passport to prevent their departure.' The sources added: 'Our first duty is to keep the country safe and we have long been clear we will use all the powers at our disposal to do so.'
Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Asylum seeker 'who recruited child soldiers' wins appeal to stay in Britain despite being refused refugee status in France because he's an alleged war criminal
An asylum seeker who allegedly recruited child soldiers has won an appeal to stay in Britain. The Sri Lankan, who remains unnamed after he was granted anonymity by the Upper Tribunal of the Immigration and Asylum Chamber, faces claims he 'enlisted children under the age of 15' to separatist terrorist group Tamil Tigers. The tribunal also heard he was working for the Tamils Rehabilitation Organisation [TRO] - a refugee charity - but was secretly supplying information. The French Justice system previously ruled he should be denied asylum due to allegations that he was a war criminal. And the Home Office agreed, refusing the man refugee status and attempting to deport him. He then won an appeal against the decision in 2023, with a judge citing a lack of evidence to support the accusations. The Home Office has now lost an appeal of their own, meaning the asylum seeker can remain in the country. British judges stuck with the ruling two years ago and said there is not enough evidence to say the allegations are true. The Home Office's original case referred to the French asylum court's verdict that he 'ought to be excluded from a grant of asylum under Article 1F of the Refugee Convention due to his alleged involvement in war crimes in this case the alleged recruitment of children'. But a judge found that the government department 'had not shown serious grounds for concluding that [the Sri Lankan] was guilty of the war crime of conscription or enlistment of children under the age of 15 or using them to participate actively in hostilities'. The judge added: 'I am not satisfied even on the evidence of his own admissions, accurate or otherwise, to the French that this goes far enough to show that the [Sri Lankan] was effectively collecting information which he knew was going to be misused, and misused specifically for the recruitment of child soldiers under the age of 15. 'Nor am I satisfied that there are serious reasons for considering on all the evidence adduced that the [Respondent] has been shown to have knowingly materially assisted in the recruitment of child soldiers under the age of 15, by the work done by the T.R.O. in gathering information, possibly subsequently used by the L.T.T.E. for that purpose.' Home Office lawyers argued at the appeal in London that the judge had not attached enough wait to the French court's decision. But, Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Adrian Seelhoff disagreed, saying: 'The Judge assessed that evidence to see if it supported the [Home Office's] case that [the Sri Lankan], whilst working for the TRO, supplied details which the LTTE used to recruit child soldiers. '[The Home Office's] position before us was not that the Judge was bound to follow the French Court decision, but that he had not given adequate reasons for reaching a different decision or that he failed to attach weight to the decision. 'We find that the Judge did give adequate reasons for not following that decision, and for the weight he attached to it and that accordingly there is no error of law in the decision under appeal.
