
'Malaysia Madani: Rakyat Disantuni' needs to include mental health
'Rakyat Disantuni' or 'People Cared For' calls us to a national ethos of compassion, inclusivity and shared progress for all Malaysians, reflecting the spirit of unity, care and responsibility for the nation's citizens.
In that light, there is no better time to focus on an area that too often remains in the shadows: mental health.
Being civilised and caring
A truly Madani (civilised) nation is one that nurtures both the minds and hearts of its people.
Mental health is not a luxury.
It is a cornerstone of personal dignity, family resilience and national productivity.
Yet, for far too long, mental health in Malaysia has been sidelined, misunderstood, or worse, stigmatised.
The recent surge in reported mental health issues, particularly among our youth, the elderly and marginalised communities, reflects a deeper societal strain.
From academic pressure and workplace burnout to loneliness, economic insecurity and the lingering psychological aftermath of the Covid-19 pandemic, Malaysians are quietly suffering.
The Malaysia Madani vision challenges us to no longer accept this as the norm.
To 'menyantuni' someone is to treat them with gentleness, empathy and dignity.
It is not mere charity or tolerance. It is deep, human-centred engagement.
Applying this spirit to mental health means listening without judgment to those who are struggling and normalising help-seeking behaviours, so that no one feels ashamed for reaching out.
Ultimately, we should aim to build workplaces, schools and public institutions that are psychologically safe.
The Madani Mental Health System should also incorporate a human rights-oriented approach to mental health, one rooted in the Madani promise of fairness and access to a redressal mechanism.
A recent headline in an online news portal, 'Parent calls for private care home oversight, citing legislative gaps', is an indication of significant human rights abuses in private mental health facilities.
This calls for the establishment of an ombudsman-like pathway to investigate allegations of human rights violations against persons with psychosocial disabilities.
The time is ripe for us in Malaysia to emulate such systems in other countries if we are to truly walk the talk of being a caring society.
Unity in identity
As we celebrate National and Malaysia Days, we are reminded that the essence of our nation is not merely in the grandeur of our celebrations, but in the deep and enduring connection we share as Malaysians.
National identity is more than a concept.
It is the heartbeat of our collective spirit; the soul that binds us together across diverse cultures, languages and beliefs.
During the Covid-19 pandemic, we also saw how our national identity became a beacon of hope and solidarity.
The phrase 'Kita Jaga Kita' resonated across the nation, reminding us that in our unity, we find strength.
This sense of collective responsibility helped manage the crisis and played a crucial role in maintaining our mental well-being.
The knowledge that we are part of something greater – a nation united in its diversity – offers comfort and a sense of purpose that can protect against the despair of isolation and fear.
However, the relationship between national identity and mental health is not always positive.
A rigid or exclusionary national identity can lead to marginalisation, discrimination and mental health challenges for those who do not fit the dominant national narrative.
For example, in Britain and Australia, the rise of nationalist sentiments has led to increased xenophobia and racism, particularly against immigrants and ethnic minorities.
This has caused severe psychological distress and a sense of alienation among minority communities.
In the name of national identity, xenophobia has raised its ugly head in the form of hate crimes against selected minority groups in these countries.
In one of the countries in our region, people have faced extreme persecution, partly due to their exclusion from the national identity as defined by their government.
The denial of citizenship and fundamental rights has not only led to a humanitarian crisis, but has also inflicted profound psychological trauma on this group of people, many of whom suffer from severe mental health issues due to the violence and displacement they have endured.
When identity is challenged
In Malaysia, as we celebrate our unity, we must also confront the challenges that threaten it.
A national identity that excludes or marginalises certain groups can become a source of deep psychological harm.
The mental health impact of feeling excluded from the national narrative is profound, leading to feelings of alienation, anxiety and depression.
The tragic memory of May 13, 1969, serves as a stark reminder of the dangers of allowing ethnic and religious tensions to overshadow our shared identity.
Much has been done to heal those wounds, but the scars remain.
Therefore, we must ensure that our national identity embraces all Malaysians, regardless of their background.
The ongoing struggles of the Orang Asli communities are a poignant example.
These indigenous peoples have often felt sidelined in the national narrative, likely leading to mental health challenges within their communities.
As Malaysians, it is our responsibility to ensure that our national identity is inclusive, one that honours and uplifts every community within our borders.
Every Malaysian has the right to be part of our shared destiny.
As we look to the future, we must also recognise that our national identity is evolving in a rapidly-globalising world.
The younger generation of Malaysians is increasingly connected to global cultures and identities, and while this broadens their horizons, it can also create conflicts with traditional national identities.
The challenge we face is to adapt our national identity in a way that remains true to our roots while being open to the global influences that enrich our society.
As we move forward, it is essential to cultivate a national identity that is flexible, i.e. one that allows for multiple expressions of being Malaysian, whether at home or abroad.
This inclusivity is crucial in ensuring that all Malaysians feel a deep connection to their homeland, which in turn sustains their mental well-being.
No one should feel excluded from our national identity, regardless of their location.
Tackling corruption
This column would be incomplete if the link between corruption and mental health were not highlighted.
Corruption does not just erode public trust and economic stability; it also takes a significant toll on mental health.
When people are denied fair access to essential services like education, housing or justice due to corrupt practices, it breeds chronic stress, helplessness and despair.
In societies where corruption is widespread, mental health suffers silently, reinforcing a cycle of disillusionment and social disengagement.
Addressing corruption, therefore, is not just a matter of governance.
It is an urgent public mental health priority.
I recall Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim once recited the following pantun about the true meaning of Merdeka:
'Kalau terpaksa dayung, kami dayung
'Dengan jari, kami dayung
'Namun, tolak ansur dengan rasuah dan rompakan
'Tidak sekali!'
('If we have to row, we shall row
'With our fingers we shall row
'But to tolerate corruption and robbery
'Not at all!)
This year's theme for National and Malaysia Day calls us to unite in our care for one another.
Mental health must be a part of that care.
There is no point in raising the flag and singing the national anthem without committing ourselves to building a nation where no one feels alone in their struggles.
Our national development needs to encompass not only physical and economic aspects, but also emotional and psychological ones.
That is what it truly means to care for the people.
That is the essence of 'Malaysia Madani: Rakyat Disantuni'.
Datuk Dr Andrew Mohanraj is a consultant psychiatrist and the Malaysian Mental Health Association president. For more information, email starhealth@thestar.com.my. The information provided is for educational and communication purposes only, and it should not be construed as personal medical advice. The Star does not give any warranty on accuracy, completeness, functionality, usefulness or other assurances as to the content appearing in this column. The Star disclaims all responsibility for any losses, damage to property or personal injury suffered directly or indirectly from reliance on such information.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Pfizer reports strong Q2 revenue
NEW YORK, Aug. 5 (Xinhua) -- U.S. pharmaceutical company Pfizer announced its second-quarter earnings on Tuesday, reporting a 10 percent year over year operational growth. The financial results posted by the New York-headquartered company represent revenue of 14.7 billion U.S. dollars or 0.51 dollars of earnings per share. In an upward revision of its full-year guidance, Pfizer said it now expects adjusted earnings per share for 2025 to range between 2.90 dollars and 3.10 dollars, compared to its previous forecast of 2.80 dollars to 3.00 dollars. The company maintained its annual revenue projection of 61 billion to 64 billion dollars, reflecting confidence in its underlying business performance. "Our business is performing well and I'm pleased with the progress we achieved in the second quarter," Pfizer Chairman and CEO Albert Bourla said in a statement. Pfizer's strong performance came amid mounting policy pressures from the White House. U.S. President Donald Trump has recently sent letters to 17 pharmaceutical companies, including Pfizer, demanding that they cut prices on all existing medications for Medicaid patients to levels no higher than those in Europe. During Tuesday's earnings call, Bourla acknowledged that the company received the letter from the Trump administration. However, he declined to elaborate on the policy's specific impacts, although he emphasized that discussions with the administration have been "extremely productive." Pfizer's Q2 results were bolstered by rising sales in several key product categories. Its Vyndaqel line of cardiomyopathy treatments showed solid growth, and COVID-19-related products were major contributors.


BusinessToday
7 hours ago
- BusinessToday
Health Ministry To Classify Food Nutrition From Grade A to D
The classification of food nutrition or Nutri-Grade under the Health Ministry's (MOH) initiative will be implemented soon, Health Minister Datuk Seri Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad said. He added that Nutri-Grade will be used to categorise food products sold in supermarkets so that it is easily understood by consumers, and its implementation is aimed at increasing healthy nutrition literacy among Malaysians. 'When we introduce Nutri-Grade, we will find that the category of food begins from Grade A: the best, to Grade D: should not be advertised at all. 'We will categorise which are unhealthy, we box it up in Grade D, which has unhealthy (contents) so people know and avoid it if possible,' he said, Such an approach has to be implemented following National Health and Morbidity Study 2024 findings that show a lack of nutrition among Malaysians. 'The challenge still falls on us as health managers to ensure healthy nutritional practices continue to be implemented, including those related to malnutrition, especially among teenagers and children,' Dr Dzulkefly said, adding that his ministry was open to having engagement sessions with social media influencers to assist in realising the healthy dietary agenda in the country. The study that involved 5,400 households revealed that 78 per cent of teenagers and 74 per cent of adults lack sufficient vitamin A due to a lack of vegetable and fruit intake, and 98 per cent of teenagers and 96 per cent of adults are calcium-deficient due to a lack of intake of dairy products. Meanwhile, two out of three teenagers and one out of two adults' sugar intake exceeded 37.5g (7.5 teaspoons), a day, and three out of four adults consume an average of 7.3g (1.5 teaspoons) of salt a day, exceeding the World Health Organisation's recommended 5g (one teaspoon) daily intake.


Focus Malaysia
10 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
Vaping in military uniform: Lessons from across the Causeway
Letter to Editor THE Straits Times recently reported that a man in Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) uniform was caught allegedly vaping on a public bus, prompting investigations by both military and civilian authorities. This happened in Singapore, a country known for strict laws and firm enforcement. Yet even someone in uniform was willing to break the rules. If such defiance can happen in a tightly regulated environment like Singapore, what more in Malaysia, where enforcement is often inconsistent and black-market activity is already widespread? This should serve as a wake-up call: a blanket vape ban may backfire. I write this letter not as a scientist or policymaker, but as a concerned Malaysian who wants to see practical solutions that truly improve public health. Like many others, I've been following the recent news about a potential nationwide ban on vapes and e-cigarettes. While I understand the concerns, especially about youth vaping and illegal products, I believe a full ban is not the answer. In fact, it may make things worse. Let's be honest. Smoking remains one of the biggest health issues in Malaysia. Every year, thousands of Malaysians die from diseases caused by cigarettes. Many smokers want to quit, but find it incredibly difficult. That's where properly regulated vape products can help. They are not risk-free, but studies have shown they are significantly less harmful than cigarettes because they don't involve combustion or tobacco smoke. If the government bans these products completely, it doesn't mean people will stop using them. Instead, it will drive consumers to the black market. Unregulated sellers will continue to operate under the radar, offering low-quality or even drug-laced products with no oversight. Just look at the headlines: the real problem lies with illicit, unregulated products, not the legal, registered ones. If we're serious about protecting our children, then enforcement not prohibition should be the priority. Let's learn from Singapore's missteps. We should go after illegal retailers, strengthen age-verification laws, and ensure that products in the market meet strict safety standards. We already have the legal framework to do that through the Control of Smoking Products for Public Health Act 2024 (Act 852). The question is: why aren't we enforcing it more effectively? A total ban would also send the wrong message to adult smokers. We would be telling them that all nicotine products are equally harmful, even though science clearly shows that's not true. By ignoring the difference between combustible cigarettes and smoke-free alternatives, we're missing a major opportunity to reduce the national burden of smoking-related diseases. Here's an analogy to consider: banning vapes because they can be abused is like banning knives because they can cause harm. Knives, when misused, are dangerous. But when used correctly, they are essential tools in every household and kitchen. The same applies to vapes. If regulated properly, they can be a powerful tool for better public health—helping smokers transition away from far more harmful cigarettes. The answer isn't to throw the knife away—it's to teach people how to use it safely and responsibly. We should also consider the people who will be directly affected by this ban. Thousands of small business owners, many of them Bumiputera and youth entrepreneurs, have invested in vape shops and legitimate distribution channels. They followed the rules and registered with the authorities. Now, their livelihoods are on the line. How is that fair? And let's not forget the economics. Banning legal vape products won't stop demand, but instead shift demand to the black market, where no taxes are paid and no safety standards are enforced. Malaysia already loses billions each year due to the illicit cigarette trade. Are we about to repeat that mistake with vapes? There is another way. Countries like the UK, Japan and New Zealand have taken a harm reduction approach. They still discourage youth use and regulate marketing strictly but they also recognise that giving adult smokers access to less harmful alternatives can lead to real public health gains. Malaysia can do the same. Let's focus on educating the public, enforcing existing laws, and ensuring products are safe and accessible only to adults. Let's treat the root of the problem, not just the symptoms. We all want a healthier Malaysia. But we must be realistic about what works and what doesn't. A blanket ban may sound decisive but in practice, it will only push the problem underground, punish responsible users and businesses, and deny smokers a better alternative. ‒ Aug 5, 2025 Hakim Idris Kuala Lumpur The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image: South China Morning Post