logo
In an Attack at Sunset, Israelis Set a Palestinian Village Ablaze

In an Attack at Sunset, Israelis Set a Palestinian Village Ablaze

New York Times6 hours ago
Dusk was settling over Kafr Malik, a quiet Palestinian village in the occupied West Bank. At the Afeef family's home on the outskirts, a mother was putting her newborn to sleep in a ground-floor bedroom. Another relative was pulling up outside with her four young children in the car.
That calm was shattered soon afterward when scores of Israelis, many masked, descended on the village by foot and in vehicles, according to witnesses and local officials.
The attackers hurled Molotov cocktails and set homes and cars on fire, the witnesses and local officials said. The Israeli military said in a statement that dozens of Israeli civilians had set Palestinian property ablaze.
The violence in Kafr Malik, northeast of Ramallah, last week comes amid a sharp rise in settler attacks against Palestinians in the West Bank, where about half a million Israelis live among three million Palestinians. Settler attacks injured more than 220 Palestinians during the first five months of 2025, the highest rate in years, according to the United Nations. Settlers killed a Palestinian man on June 19, the U.N. says.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

My War Powers Vote Was No Partisan ‘Stunt'
My War Powers Vote Was No Partisan ‘Stunt'

Wall Street Journal

timean hour ago

  • Wall Street Journal

My War Powers Vote Was No Partisan ‘Stunt'

When the president considered launching strikes on targets in the Middle East without notifying or seeking approval from Congress, I challenged him. That president was my friend Barack Obama. I was new to the Senate, a member of the Armed Services Committee, the father of a Marine and representing the most pro-military state in the nation. Since then, I have argued that no president, Democratic or Republican, should have the singular authority to wage war. The Constitution grants the Legislature, not the chief executive, the power to do so.

Three Tests for the Ayatollah
Three Tests for the Ayatollah

Wall Street Journal

timean hour ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Three Tests for the Ayatollah

In your editorial 'After the 'Cease-Fire,' Tests for Iran' (June 25), you write that President Trump could 'offer two tests of the regime's willingness to change,' granting immediate access to IAEA inspectors and recognizing Israel's right to exist. Allow me to offer a third, which hearkens back to the armistice that ended World War I. In the days leading up to Nov. 11, 1918, the Allies pressed for and obtained the abdication of Kaiser Wilhelm II, ending the Hohenzollern Dynasty. Perhaps we should require something similar of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Roger H. Leemis

Hackers Are Threatening to Release Emails Stolen from Trump's Aides, Roger Stone, and Stormy Daniels
Hackers Are Threatening to Release Emails Stolen from Trump's Aides, Roger Stone, and Stormy Daniels

Gizmodo

timean hour ago

  • Gizmodo

Hackers Are Threatening to Release Emails Stolen from Trump's Aides, Roger Stone, and Stormy Daniels

Last summer, hackers believed to be associated with the Iranian military stole a trove of documents from the Trump campaign. They then proceeded to leak the docs to Biden staffers, as well as to a number of major U.S. media organizations, including the New York Times and Politico. At the time, some commentators assessed that Iran was attempting to influence the course of the U.S. presidential election. Now, those same hackers are back, and threatening to release another 100 gigabytes of stolen data. The group in question, which goes by the name 'Robert,' recently told Reuters that they have internal emails sent by some of Trump's top associates, including his chief of staff, Susie Wiles, Trump fanboy Roger Stone, Trump attorney Lindsey Halligan, and Stormy Daniels, the former porn star who claims she and the President had an affair. The hackers told the outlet that they were considering selling the emails, but didn't give much of a clue as to what the emails might say or who they might sell them to. It's obviously an interesting time for the group to resume activities, given the fact that the U.S. (under Trump's direction) just bombed Iran. That said, it stands to reason that if the group had anything truly salacious to reveal, the time to threaten the release of those materials would have been prior to the U.S.'s attack on its country, so as to give its government a bargaining chip. The Trump administration has predictably sought to downplay and discredit the group's most recent claims. 'This so-called cyber 'attack' is nothing more than digital propaganda, and the targets are no coincidence,' Marci McCarthy, director of public affairs at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), said on X. 'This is a calculated smear campaign meant to damage President Trump and discredit honorable public servants who serve our country with distinction. These criminals will be found and they will be brought to justice.' Gizmodo reached out to the White House for more information. While Iran isn't considered one of the most sophisticated cyber actors in the world (Israel, for instance, is considered to be much more formidable), the group that allegedly hacked the Trump campaign is said to employ fairly tricky tactics. Reuters previously reported that the group, which has also been given the monikers APT42 or 'CharmingKitten,' is known for placing malware on officials' phones that can record their calls and monitor their mobile activities. The group is also alleged to have previously stolen emails from officials not directly tied to the Trump campaign, including a former CIA deputy director, the former U.S. ambassador to Israel, and other high-level government officials. In September of 2024, the outgoing Biden Justice Department charged three Iranian operatives with having hacked and stolen the materials from the Trump campaign. The three hackers were said to have been in the employ of Iran's paramilitary Revolutionary Guard. The government said the hack-and-leak operation was part of an effort to 'stoke discord, erode confidence in the U.S. electoral process, and unlawfully acquire information relating to current and former U.S. officials.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store