logo
Alabama gender-affirming care ban lawsuit abruptly dismissed

Alabama gender-affirming care ban lawsuit abruptly dismissed

Yahoo05-05-2025
Protestors hold a flag in New Orleans on March 31, 2023 as part of the International Transgender Day of Visibility. (Greg LaRose/Louisiana Illuminator)
The high-profile lawsuit challenging Alabama's 2022 law banning gender-affirming care for transgender youth under 19 has been dismissed by all parties involved.
Neither the plaintiffs – transgender youth and families challenging the ban – or the Alabama attorney's office filed an official explanation for the move or a suggestion of a settlement with the court. In separate statements, the plaintiffs said they would continue to fight for access to the care, while Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall declared it a total victory for the state and a vindication of their position.
'The shutting down of medical care in Alabama has forced our plaintiffs and other Alabama families to make heart wrenching decisions that no family should ever have to make, and they are each making the decisions they need to make that are right for them,' said Scott McCoy, deputy legal director of inclusion and anti-extremism litigation team at the Southern Poverty Law Center, in a joint statement from organizations representing the plaintiffs. 'We salute the courage of these plaintiffs and we will continue fighting to ensure families across the country have the freedom to get their transgender children the proven medical care that enables them to thrive.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Marshall declared the dismissal a decisive victory for the state and claimed in a statement that a 'court-ordered discovery' uncovered what he described as 'medical, legal, and political scandal that will be studied for decades.'
'We uncovered the truth,' the statement said. 'We exposed the scandal. We won. Alabama led the way, and now all families are safer for it.'
Messages were left with the Attorney General's office seeking clarification. According to the statement, the discovery process in the case revealed that 'key medical organizations misled parents, promoted unproven treatments as settled science, and ignored growing international concern over the use of sex-change procedures to treat gender dysphoria in minors,' but does not state how.
The statement also alleged that internal communications showed the 'standards of care' were legally and politically crafted but does not provide specifics.
The law, known as the Vulnerable Child Compassion and Protection Act, made it a felony for medical providers to prescribe puberty blockers or hormones to transgender minors, carrying a potential prison sentence of up to 10 years. The law did not ban the use of puberty blockers to treat precocious puberty in cisgender children.
It also prohibited gender-affirming surgeries for individuals under 19, though health care providers have repeatedly testified such surgeries are not performed on minors.
The legislation led to immediate legal action after being signed into law by Gov. Kay Ivey in April 2022. Initially, a federal judge blocked the ban on medications, citing interference with parental rights and a lack of evidence demonstrating harm from the treatments. But that decision was overturned in August 2023 by a three-judge panel of the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, which stated that there was no fundamental right to gender-affirming care.
U.S. Circuit Judge Barbara Lagoa, writing for the majority, cited the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which struck down federal abortion protections and ruled that abortion was not a right 'deeply rooted in the nation's history and tradition.' Lagoa wrote that gender-affirming care had no historic grounding in the law.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Abbeville's district map battle continues
Abbeville's district map battle continues

Yahoo

time06-08-2025

  • Yahoo

Abbeville's district map battle continues

ABBEVILLE, La. () — The battle over Abbeville's district map continues. This comes amid a years-long federal lawsuit filed against the city council. The lawsuit, filed by the Vermilion NAACP and Southern Poverty Law Center, claims the city's current map does not give white and black voters equal voting powers. The city council planned to adopt either their own proposed map, or a map proposed by the Vermilion NAACP Tuesday evening. Instead, the council voted to table the vote until the next meeting to rework their own map. 'Before I get upset, I'm going to walk out of here because what you are saying is a lie,' one Abbeville resident said, storming out of the meeting, upset by the mayor's comments after a presentation by the NAACP attorney. 'The district lines should be drawn by us, by our own elected, municipal legislature, not by some outside firm with no real stake in our community,' Abbeville Mayor Roslyn White read from a prepared statement. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now The mayor made it clear she wants the city's own attorneys, engineers and officials to create the new district map, as opposed to adopting the map created by the NAACP attorney. 'You don't live in Abbeville, right? I doubt you stepped foot in Abbeville before 2022,' Mayor White said. 'This council is capable of doing the job they were elected to do.' After the meeting, other Abbeville residents and Vermilion NAACP members voiced their frustration that it's taking the city council years to make a decision. 'That's crazy. You're spending money from the city. Why not do the right thing from the beginning? What's wrong with these council people? It doesn't make any sense. They're not using their brains. Use your brain!' Vermilion NAACP Secretary Marilyn Mitchell said. 'The man got the maps right. I don't care if he's from New Orleans. He's just representing the city.' 'Even though our attorney may be from New Orleans or whatever the case may be, that should have no reflection as to his not being from Abbeville. That has nothing to do with nothing at all,' Vermilion NAACP President Linda Williams Cockrell added. SPLC and NAACP attorney Ahmed Soussi says their proposed map unpacks the districts when it comes to black voters. He says the city's proposed map does not. 'We're happy they didn't pass their map. We've shown objectively on hard numbers that it's not a proportional map. It does not create equal representation, and it still packs black voters,' Soussi told said. The city council's time to decide on a map is running out. They must submit an approved map to the Secretary of State by Dec. 17. Latest news Abbeville's district map battle continues LCG Parish Council discusses tax renewals, Northeast Regional Library at meeting Raw milk tied to over 21 illness cases, 7 hospitalizations in Florida Lafayette luncheon honors law enforcement's community impact Ali Angelle wins 2026 Louisiana Teacher of the Year award Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Slave descendants still fighting for Georgia court to hear discrimination claims from 2023
Slave descendants still fighting for Georgia court to hear discrimination claims from 2023

Yahoo

time18-07-2025

  • Yahoo

Slave descendants still fighting for Georgia court to hear discrimination claims from 2023

Gullah-Geechee-Land Protections DARIEN, Ga. (AP) — Black landowners from a tiny island community returned to a Georgia courtroom Friday urging a judge to let them move forward with a lawsuit that accuses local officials of illegally weakening protections for one of the South's last Gullah-Geechee communities founded by freed slaves. Residents and landowners of Hogg Hummock on Sapelo Island have yet to see a judge weigh the merits of their discrimination case nearly two years after they first sued McIntosh County. They say county commissioners targeted a mostly poor, Black population with 2023 zoning changes that benefit wealthy white land buyers and developers. So far, the case has been bogged down by technicalities. A judge last year dismissed the original lawsuit, citing legal errors unrelated to its alleged rights violations. On Friday, a lawyer for McIntosh County asked a judge to also throw out an amended version of the suit, saying it failed to state a legal conflict within the court's jurisdiction and missed critical deadlines set by state law. Residents fear unaffordable tax increases The zoning rules being challenged doubled the size of homes allowed in Hogg Hummock, one of a dwindling number of small communities started by emancipated island slaves — known collectively as Gullah, or Geechee in Georgia — scattered from North Carolina to Florida. Scholars say these peoples' separation from the mainland caused them to retain much of their African heritage, from their unique dialect to skills and crafts such as cast-net fishing and weaving baskets. Hogg Hummock's few dozen remaining residents and their advocates say the changes will bring unaffordable tax increases, threatening one of America's most historically and culturally unique Black communities. 'We're in limbo,' said Richard Banks, who owns the Sapelo Island home of his late father, built on land passed down in his family for generations. 'You don't know what decisions you have to make in regard to your property.' The lawsuit by the Southern Poverty Law Center asks a judge to declare the zoning changes violate the landowners' constitutional rights to due process and equal protection by discriminating against them 'on the basis of race.' It also accuses the county of violating Georgia laws governing zoning procedures and public meetings. County lawyers say the lawsuit was filed too late McIntosh County's lawyers deny commissioners violated anyone's rights. But they argue the lawsuit should be dismissed without getting into those claims. They say fears of hypothetical tax increases don't present a valid legal conflict for a judge to decide. 'There's no allegation that existing businesses must close,' attorney Patrick Jaugstetter said in court Friday. 'There's no evidence that any current use of a property must cease.' Jaugstetter also said the refiled lawsuit came too late, well beyond Georgia's 30-day deadline for challenging zoning decisions and its six-month deadline for alleging violations of the open meetings law. Malissa Williams, a lawyer for the Black landowners, said those deadlines were met by the original lawsuit filed in 2023. 'They should be allowed to challenge the (zoning) amendments because they will have a ripple effect on every aspect of their lives,' Williams said. Discrimination case is one of two pending lawsuits by Black residents Senior Judge F. Gates Peed did not rule from the bench Friday. He asked both sides to submit proposed orders by the end of August. A second legal battle between Sapelo Island residents and county officials is pending before the Georgia Supreme Court. A decision is expected by mid-November on whether residents can attempt to repeal the 2023 zoning changes by forcing a special election. A scheduled referendum last fall was halted by a lower court judge, who ruled the vote was illegal. Solve the daily Crossword

Slave descendants still fighting for court to hear discrimination claims from 2023

time18-07-2025

Slave descendants still fighting for court to hear discrimination claims from 2023

DARIEN, Ga. -- Black landowners from a tiny island community returned to a Georgia courtroom Friday urging a judge to let them move forward with a lawsuit that accuses local officials of illegally weakening protections for one of the South's last Gullah-Geechee communities founded by freed slaves. Residents and landowners of Hogg Hummock on Sapelo Island have yet to see a judge weigh the merits of their discrimination case nearly two years after they first sued McIntosh County. They say county commissioners targeted a mostly poor, Black population with 2023 zoning changes that benefit wealthy white land buyers and developers. So far, the case has been bogged down by technicalities. A judge last year dismissed the original lawsuit, citing legal errors unrelated to its alleged rights violations. On Friday, a lawyer for McIntosh County asked a judge to also throw out an amended version of the suit, saying it failed to state a legal conflict within the court's jurisdiction and missed critical deadlines set by state law. The zoning rules being challenged doubled the size of homes allowed in Hogg Hummock, one of a dwindling number of small communities started by emancipated island slaves — known collectively as Gullah, or Geechee in Georgia — scattered from North Carolina to Florida. Scholars say these peoples' separation from the mainland caused them to retain much of their African heritage, from their unique dialect to skills and crafts such as cast-net fishing and weaving baskets. Hogg Hummock's few dozen remaining residents and their advocates say the changes will bring unaffordable tax increases, threatening one of America's most historically and culturally unique Black communities. 'We're in limbo,' said Richard Banks, who owns the Sapelo Island home of his late father, built on land passed down in his family for generations. 'You don't know what decisions you have to make in regard to your property.' The lawsuit by the Southern Poverty Law Center asks a judge to declare the zoning changes violate the landowners' constitutional rights to due process and equal protection by discriminating against them 'on the basis of race.' It also accuses the county of violating Georgia laws governing zoning procedures and public meetings. McIntosh County's lawyers deny commissioners violated anyone's rights. But they argue the lawsuit should be dismissed without getting into those claims. They say fears of hypothetical tax increases don't present a valid legal conflict for a judge to decide. 'There's no allegation that existing businesses must close,' attorney Patrick Jaugstetter said in court Friday. 'There's no evidence that any current use of a property must cease.' Jaugstetter also said the refiled lawsuit came too late, well beyond Georgia's 30-day deadline for challenging zoning decisions and its six-month deadline for alleging violations of the open meetings law. Malissa Williams, a lawyer for the Black landowners, said those deadlines were met by the original lawsuit filed in 2023. 'They should be allowed to challenge the (zoning) amendments because they will have a ripple effect on every aspect of their lives,' Williams said. Senior Judge F. Gates Peed did not rule from the bench Friday. He asked both sides to submit proposed orders by the end of August. A second legal battle between Sapelo Island residents and county officials is pending before the Georgia Supreme Court. A decision is expected by mid-November on whether residents can attempt to repeal the 2023 zoning changes by forcing a special election.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store