
Don't let deep sea become 'wild west', UN chief tells world leaders
World leaders are attending the UN Ocean Conference in Nice as nations tussle over contentious rules on mining the seabed for critical minerals and the terms of a global treaty on plastic pollution.
US President Donald Trump has brought urgency to the debate around deep-sea mining, moving to fast-track US exploration in international waters and sidestepping global efforts to regulate the nascent sector.
The International Seabed Authority, which has jurisdiction over the ocean floor outside national waters, is meeting in July to discuss a global mining code to regulate mining in the ocean depths.
Guterres said he supported these negotiations and urged caution as countries navigate these "new waters on seabed mining".
"The deep sea cannot become the wild west," he said, to applause from the plenary floor.
Many countries oppose seabed mining, and France is hoping more nations in Nice will join a moratorium until more is known about the ecological impacts of the practice.
French President Emmanuel Macron said a moratorium on deep-sea mining was "an international necessity".
"I think it's madness to launch predatory economic action that will disrupt the deep seabed, disrupt biodiversity, destroy it and release irrecoverable carbon sinks - when we know nothing about it," the French president said.
The deep sea, Greenland and Antarctica were "not for sale", he said in follow-up remarks to thunderous applause.
Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva called for "clear action" from the seabed authority to end a "predatory race" among nations seeking critical minerals on the ocean floor.
"We now see the threat of unilateralism looming over the ocean. We cannot allow what happened to international trade to happen to the sea," he said.
WAVE OF COMMITMENTS
Macron said a global pact to protect marine life in international waters had received enough support to become law and was "a done deal".
The high seas treaty struck in 2023 requires ratifications from 60 signatory countries to enter into force, something France hoped to achieve before Nice.
Macron said about 50 nations had ratified the treaty and 15 others had formally committed to joining them.
This "allows us to say that the high seas treaty will be implemented," he said.
Other commitments are expected on Monday in Nice, where around 60 heads of state and government have joined thousands of business leaders, scientists and civil society activists.
On Monday, the United Kingdom is expected to announce a partial ban on bottom trawling in half its marine protected areas, putting the destructive fishing method squarely on the summit agenda.
Bottom trawling involves huge fishing nets indiscriminately dragging the ocean floor, a process shockingly captured in a recent documentary by British naturalist David Attenborough.
Macron said on Saturday that France would restrict trawling in some of its marine protected areas, but was criticised by environment groups for not going far enough.
WORDS INTO ACTION
On Sunday, French environment minister Agnes Pannier-Runacher hinted at "important announcements" in Nice about the creation of new marine protected areas.
Samoa led the way this past week, announcing that 30 per cent of its national waters would be under protection with the creation of nine marine parks.
Just 8 per cent of global oceans are designated for marine conservation, despite a globally agreed target to achieve 30 per cent coverage by 2030.
But even fewer are considered truly protected, as some countries impose next to no rules on what is forbidden in marine zones or lack the finance to enforce any regulations.
Nations will face calls to cough up the missing finance for ocean protection.
Small island states are expected in numbers at the summit to demand money and political support to combat rising seas, marine trash and the plunder of fish stocks.
The summit will not produce a legally binding agreement at its close like a climate COP or treaty negotiation.
But diplomats and other observers said it could mark a much-needed turning point in global ocean conservation if leaders rose to the occasion.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNA
6 hours ago
- CNA
Russia says talks on Ukraine's security without Moscow are a 'road to nowhere'
MOSCOW: Russia said on Wednesday (Aug 20) attempts to resolve security issues relating to Ukraine without Moscow's participation were a "road to nowhere", sounding a warning to the West as it scrambles to work out guarantees for Kyiv's future protection. Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov particularly criticised the role of European leaders who met United States President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the White House on Monday to discuss security guarantees for Ukraine that could help to end the three-and-a-half-year-old war. Lavrov said Russia was in favour of "truly reliable" guarantees for Ukraine and suggested these could be modelled on a draft accord that was discussed between the warring parties in Istanbul in 2022, in the early weeks of the war. At the time, Kyiv rejected that proposal on the grounds that Moscow would have held effective veto power over any military response to come to its aid. "We cannot agree with the fact that now it is proposed to resolve questions of security, collective security, without the Russian Federation. This will not work," Lavrov told a joint news conference after meeting the foreign minister of Jordan. "I am sure that in the West and above all in the United States they understand perfectly well that seriously discussing security issues without the Russian Federation is a utopia, it's a road to nowhere." Lavrov's comments highlighted Moscow's demand for Western governments to directly engage with it on questions of security concerning Ukraine and Europe, something it says they have so far refused to do. Moscow this week also restated its categorical rejection of "any scenarios involving the deployment of NATO troops in Ukraine". "CLUMSY" EUROPEANS Lavrov accused the European leaders who met Trump and Zelenskyy of carrying out "a fairly aggressive escalation of the situation, rather clumsy and, in general, unethical attempts to change the position of the Trump administration and the president of the United States personally ... We did not hear any constructive ideas from the Europeans there". Trump said on Monday the US would help guarantee Ukraine's security in any deal to end Russia's war there. He subsequently said he had ruled out putting US troops on the ground in Ukraine, but the US might provide air support as part of a deal to end the hostilities. Lavrov said the proposals discussed between Russia and Ukraine in Istanbul in 2022 were a "very good example" of a possible security blueprint, noting that they would also have required Ukraine to become a neutral state and give up its ambition to join NATO. Under the draft discussed then, Ukraine would have received security guarantees from a group of countries including the five permanent members of the UN Security Council - China, Russia, the United States, Britain and France. A partially agreed draft said the guarantor states - including Russia - would respect and observe Ukraine's independence and sovereignty and refrain from the threat or use of force against it. Ukraine wanted the guarantors, if it came under attack, to provide assistance that could include "closing airspace over Ukraine, providing necessary weapons, using armed force in order to restore and subsequently maintain the security of Ukraine as a permanently neutral state". But Russia insisted any decision must be agreed by all guarantor states - meaning Moscow would have a veto.


CNA
a day ago
- CNA
Netanyahu slams Macron for fuelling 'antisemitic fire'
JERUSALEM: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused French President Emmanuel Macron of fuelling antisemitism by moving to recognise a Palestinian state, in a letter seen on Tuesday (Aug 19). The Israeli leader said antisemitism had "surged" in France since Macron's announcement last month and warned that the French move rewarded Hamas while endangering French Jews. Macron said France would formally recognise a Palestinian state during a UN meeting in September, drawing sharp criticism from Israel. By making the announcement, Paris would join a growing list of countries that have recognised Palestinian statehood since the Gaza war began nearly two years ago. A French minister hit back on Tuesday, saying that the fight against antisemitism must not be "exploited". ISRAELI CRITICISM In his letter to Macron, Netanyahu said the French decision poured "fuel on this antisemitic fire". "It is not diplomacy, it is appeasement. It rewards Hamas terror, hardens Hamas's refusal to free the hostages, emboldens those who menace French Jews and encourages the Jew-hatred now stalking your streets," he wrote. Netanyahu urged Macron to confront antisemitism directly and called on him to "replace weakness with action, appeasement with resolve, and to do so by a clear date: the Jewish New Year, September 23". FRANCE RESPONDS Benjamin Haddad, France's minister for Europe, said the country has "no lessons to learn in the fight against antisemitism". The issue, he added, "which is poisoning our European societies" must not be "exploited". France is among at least 145 of the 193 UN member states that now recognise or plan to recognise a Palestinian state, according to an AFP tally. Australia joined the list earlier this month, announcing its intention to extend recognition in September. TENSIONS WITH AUSTRALIA Netanyahu also lashed out at Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, calling him a "weak politician who betrayed Israel and abandoned Australia's Jews" in a post on his office's official X account. The comments came after Canberra cancelled the visa of far-right Israeli politician Simcha Rothman, a member of Netanyahu's governing coalition. Rothman had been scheduled to speak at events organised by the Australian Jewish Association. Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Saar then revoked the visas of Australia's representatives to the Palestinian Authority in response.


CNA
a day ago
- CNA
NATO military leaders to meet on Wednesday to discuss Ukraine
BRUSSELS: NATO military leaders are expected to meet on Wednesday (Aug 20) to discuss Ukraine and the way forward, US and NATO officials said, as Washington and European capitals work out details of what security guarantees might look like for Kyiv. Ukraine and its European allies have been buoyed by US President Donald Trump's pledge of security guarantees during a summit on Monday, but many questions remain. As military planners start to work on what options might exist for security guarantees, Trump ruled out sending US troops into Ukraine but suggested that Washington could provide some type of air support. US Air Force General Alexus Grynkewich, who oversees all NATO operations in Europe, will brief chiefs of defence on the results of Trump's Alaska meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin last week. Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone, chairman of NATO's military committee, said there would be a video conference on Wednesday. 'As diplomatic efforts to secure peace in Ukraine progress, looking forward to (Grynkewich's) update on the current security environment,' Dragone wrote on X. SECURITY GUARANTEES IN FOCUS Officials said the talks were taking place under unique circumstances and expected security guarantees to be a central issue. A US official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was expected to attend, though plans could still change. The Pentagon did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The British government said the so-called Coalition of the Willing, which met virtually on Tuesday, had agreed that planning teams would meet US counterparts in the coming days to advance security plans for Ukraine. ZELENSKIY EXPECTS PLAN IN 10 DAYS Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said after his White House meeting with Trump and European leaders that a framework for security guarantees would likely be worked out within 10 days. Earlier on Tuesday, Trump again ruled out sending US troops to Ukraine and gave no specifics about the guarantees he has previously said Washington could offer under any post-war settlement. But in the same interview with Fox News, Trump suggested that Washington could provide air support to Ukraine. 'When it comes to security, (Europeans) are willing to put people on the ground, we're willing to help them with things, especially, probably, if you talk about by air because nobody has stuff we have, really they don't have,' Trump said. He did not provide any further details. There are a wide variety of ways the US could provide air support. It could be as simple as providing more air defence systems to Ukraine or a more involved US role that includes US fighter jets enforcing some sort of no-fly zone.