Israel and Iran trade attacks as war intensifies
Israeli emergency teams work at the site of an Iranian missile strike in a residential area in Ramat Gan, central Israel, on Thursday, June 19, 2025. Photo by Abir Sultan/EPA-EFE
June 19 (UPI) -- Iran and Israel traded attacks early Thursday as their war continued to intensify nearly a week after it began.
Tehran's missiles struck several regions throughout Israel, the Israeli military said in a statement, adding the largest southern hospital was hit. It later published photos to its X account showing several buildings damaged in Ramat Gan, a city in the Tel Aviv District.
Israel's national emergency service Magen David Adom said medics were providing care to those injured at several locations.
At least three people were reported in serious condition, including a man in his 80s and two women in their 70s. Two people were listed in moderate condition and 39 were listed as lightly injured. They suffered shrapnel injuries, the agency said.
An MDA spokesperson said in a statement that intensive care buses have been prepared to receive patients for evacuation to medical centers.
Israel has accused Iran of targeting the hospital, posting a video showing the damage incurred by the medical facility.
Iran's elite Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps said this was the 12th wave of retaliatory strikes as part of Operation True Promise III, which began Friday in response to Israel's attack on Tehran's nuclear facilities.
The statement, carried by the semi-official Tasnim News Agency, states the IRGC warned Israel and its citizens that "the thunderous missiles of the IRGC Aerospace Force will not allow you a single moment outside underground shelters."
"Rest assured, the sound of red alert sirens will not cease for a moment."
Israel said 40 of its fighter jets attacked dozens of military targets in Iran with more than 100 munitions, including the Arak heavy water reactor.
"The attack was carried out against the component intended for producing plutonium, thus preventing its ability to be reused to produce nuclear weapons," the IDF said.
A second site, in the Natanz area, was also struck, with the IDF claiming it was used to develop nuclear weapons.
"The fighter jets also attacked military production sites of the Iranian regime, including factories for producing raw materials, components used to assemble ballistic missiles and sites for creating Iranian air defense systems and missiles," it added.
Iran does not have a nuclear weapon, but its nuclear enrichment capabilities have greatly advanced since U.S. President Donald Trump imposed sanctions on Iran and unilaterally withdrew the United States from a landmark multinational nuclear accord aimed at preventing Tehran from securing a nuclear weapon.
Trump, who failed during his first term to bring Iran to the negotiating table on a new deal, was in talks with Tehran, which fell apart last week when Israel attacked Iran.
Israel's defense minister, Israel Katz, on Thursday said that he and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had instructed the IDF to increase "the intensity of attacks" targeting government facilities in Tehran "in order to remove threats to the State of Israel and undermine the ayatollahs' regime.
He also accused Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei of launching missiles at Israel's hospitals and residential buildings while hiding an a fortified bunker.
"These are war crimes of the most serious kind -- and Khamenei will be held accountable for his crimes," he said.
Netanyahu identified the hospital hit that was hit as Soroka Hospital in Beersheba.
"We will exact the full price from the tyrants in Tehran," he said.
Iran and Israel have been in a proxy war for years, which exploded into the open on Oct. 7, 2023, when Gaza-based Hamas, an Iran-backed militant organization, attacked Israel, killing 1,200 Israelis and sparking the ongoing war in the Palestinian enclave.
Israel has responded by devastating Gaza, killing more than 55,000 Palestinians and injuring nearly 130,000 more.
It has also attacked Lebanon, Syria and Yemen, as well as Iran and Gaza, amid the war.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US spies said Iran wasn't building a nuclear weapon. Trump dismisses that assessment
WASHINGTON (AP) — Tulsi Gabbard left no doubt when she testified to Congress about Iran's nuclear program earlier this year. The country was not building a nuclear weapon, the national intelligence director told lawmakers, and its supreme leader had not reauthorized the dormant program even though it had enriched uranium to higher levels. But President Donald Trump dismissed the assessment of U.S. spy agencies during an overnight flight back to Washington as he cut short his trip to the Group of Seven summit to focus on the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran. 'I don't care what she said,' Trump told reporters. In his view, Iran was 'very close' to having a nuclear bomb. Trump's statement aligned him more closely with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has described a nuclear-armed Iran as an imminent threat, than with his own top intelligence adviser. Trump met with national security officials, including Gabbard, in the Situation Room on Tuesday as he plans next steps. Administration officials downplayed the inconsistency between Trump and Gabbard, saying that enriching uranium can put Iran on track to having a nuclear weapon. Gabbard blamed the media for misconstruing her earlier testimony, asserting that 'President Trump was saying the same thing that I said." 'We are on the same page," she told CNN. Asked for comment, Gabbard's office referred to those remarks. In her March testimony to lawmakers, Gabbard said the intelligence community 'continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003.' She also said the U.S. was closely monitoring Iran's nuclear program, noting that the country's 'enriched uranium stockpile is at its highest levels and is unprecedented for a state without nuclear weapons.' Gen. Erik Kurilla, who leads U.S. forces in the Middle East, recently testified to Congress that Iran could produce enough nuclear material for 10 weapons in three weeks. However, he did not say how long it would take to assemble the pieces into a bomb. A senior intelligence official said Trump was right to be concerned because its uranium enrichment far exceeds what would be needed for domestic purposes. Another senior administration official said Iran was as close to having a nuclear weapon as it could be without having one. Both spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive issues. Trump's contradiction of Gabbard echoed his feuds with U.S. spy leaders during his first term, when he viewed them as part of a 'deep state' that was undermining his agenda. Most notably, he sided with Russian President Vladimir Putin in 2018 when asked if Moscow had interfered in the 2016 election, saying Putin was 'extremely strong and powerful in his denial.' The latest break over Iran was striking because Trump has staffed his second administration with loyalists rather than establishment figures. Gabbard, a military veteran and former Democratic congresswoman from Hawaii, was narrowly confirmed by the Republican-controlled Senate because of her scant experience with intelligence or managing sprawling organizations. Gabbard, who left the Democratic Party in 2022 and endorsed Trump in last year's election, testified Tuesday before the Senate Appropriations defense subcommittee in a closed session that had been previously scheduled about the budget. Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, who is the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee but isn't on the budget panel, said he's unaware of any new information that would change the assessment of Iran's nuclear capabilities. 'Director Gabbard stated publicly in March that the Iranians were not actively pursuing a bomb,' Warner said. 'I've seen nothing in recent intelligence that contradicts what Director Gabbard said.' The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency has repeatedly warned that Iran has enough enriched uranium to make several nuclear bombs if it wants to. Iran maintains its nuclear program is peaceful. An earlier intelligence report, compiled in November under then-President Joe Biden, a Democrat, also said Iran 'is not building a nuclear weapon.' However, it said the country has 'undertaken activities that better position it to produce one, if it so chooses,' such as increasing stockpiles of enriched uranium and operating more advanced centrifuges. The report did not include any estimates for a timeline for how quickly a bomb could be built. Trump's immigration agenda is another place where he's split with intelligence assessments. He cited the Alien Enemies Act, a 1798 wartime law, to deport Venezuelan migrants, which he justified by claiming that the Tren de Aragua gang was coordinating with the Venezuelan government. However, an intelligence assessment in April found no evidence of that. Gabbard fired the two veteran intelligence officers who led the panel that created the assessment, saying they were terminated because of their opposition to Trump. In response to those reports, the White House released a statement from Gabbard supporting the president. 'President Trump took necessary and historic action to safeguard our nation when he deported these violent Tren de Aragua terrorists,' the statement said. 'Now that America is safer without these terrorists in our cities, deep state actors have resorted to using their propaganda arm to attack the President's successful policies.'
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
"A Phone So Sh*tty You Won't Want To Use It": The Internet Is Clowning Donald Trump So Hard For His Bizarre Comments Following The Launch Of "Trump Mobile"
President Donald Trump faced ridicule on Tuesday as critics suggested he'd delivered the perfect anti-advertisement for the newly launched Trump-branded smartphone. Just hours after the Trump Organization unveiled its latest venture — 'Trump Mobile' — the president said he doesn't 'believe in telephones.' Trump made the comment while explaining to reporters on Air Force One why he cut short his attendance at the G7 summit in Canada. Trump said he left the gathering of world leaders early to return to Washington, D.C., so that he could address rising tensions between Israel and Iran. atrupar / X / Via When asked what he could do in the US capital that he couldn't do in Canada, Trump responded: 'Just be a little bit, I think, more well-versed. Not having to use telephones so much, because I don't believe in telephones. Because people like you listen to them, you know, so being on the scene is much better.' Critics highlighted the irony, noting how Trump's dismissal of telephones clashed with the announcement of the phone company. Related: "Honestly Speechless At How Evil This Is": 26 Brutal, Brutal, Brutal Political Tweets Of The Week Related: "Let Them Eat Teslas": People At The "No Kings" Protests This Weekend Brought Signs That Were So Clever I'm Still Laughing About Them implausibleblog / X / Via This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: This Conservative Said He Wears A Fake ICE Uniform For A Really, Really, Really Gross Reason Also in In the News: This Dem Lawmaker Is Going Viral For His Extremely Shady Question To Secretary Kristi Noem Also in In the News: MAGA Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really Doesn't Like This Army Vet's Now-Viral Speech
New York Post
19 minutes ago
- New York Post
What Team Trump must do to get deportations right
When it comes to illegal-migrant deportations, President Donald Trump stressed last week, 'We're going to have to use a lot of common sense.' That principle must keep guiding his team's drive to expel the millions of 'asylum seekers' the last guy waved in. In particular, Deputy White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller's demand that ICE now aim for 3,000 arrests a day is asking for trouble. Advertisement First, that's impossible if Homeland Security boss Kristi Noem's people focus mainly on the resource-intensive work of going after the worst-of-the-worst — even though those are the deportations with the most overwhelming public support. Second, hitting the quota almost requires the kind of mass roundups that are the highest-risk, public-opinion-wise. Advertisement And which are also likely to capture pre-Biden (and even pre-Obama) illegal immigrants who've managed to put down some roots — and so prompt the kind of economic troubles that Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins warned of, such as 'severe disruptions to our food supply.' But the president can't, and won't, simply abandon one of his central campaign promises —nor should he. So far, that's meant a zig-zag: 'Changes are coming,' Trump vowed, and a top ICE official then ordered a 'hold on all work site enforcement investigations/operations on agriculture,' restaurants and hotels — only for top Homeland Security brass to order a resumption of such raids Advertisement Even it out, people: Common sense, remember. First, keep pushing self-deportation, which is cheaper than arresting and removing people. Nearly 1 million have already voluntarily left under Trump, per some estimate. The president is wise to offer migrants an incentive — $1,000, a one-way flight out of the country and no black mark on your record if you seek to immigrate legally — to self-deport. Second, balance goals and resources. The Big Beautiful Bill will fund 10,000 new ICE officers and 3,000 border agents (as well as more self-deport grants ) — but until that passes, Miller's quotas are going to force ICE to focus on lower-priority targets. Advertisement Third, make it clear — to both migrants and employers — that widespread reliance on illegal labor can't continue. Since 1986, the law has required businesses to verify workers' eligibility, but enforcement's been a joke. That must change — but a gradual transition is key to minimizing economic disruptions. Bottom line: Trump won election vowing to secure the border and to deport illegal migrants; he's done the first and will keep working on the second. But as he himself acknowledged, implementation sometimes requires a scalpel, not a hammer, to avoid needless harm — and major political pain.
