logo
Former CNOOC executive sentenced to 14 years for corruption, Chinese state media reports

Former CNOOC executive sentenced to 14 years for corruption, Chinese state media reports

Reuters2 days ago
Aug 5 (Reuters) - Former deputy Party secretary and general manager of China National Offshore Oil Corporation, Li Yong, was sentenced on Tuesday to 14 years in prison for corruption, state media CCTV reported.
Li, who retired in December 2023, and was found to have illegally accepted property worth more than 67.94 million yuan ($9.45 million), either directly or through others, according to the report.
Another retired senior executive at CNOOC, Guangyu Yuan, was expelled from the Communist Party and placed under investigation for serious violations of Party discipline and the law, the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection announced on July 31.
($1 = 7.1864 Chinese yuan renminbi)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hong Kong activists in Britain should be able to rely on police protection
Hong Kong activists in Britain should be able to rely on police protection

The Guardian

time15 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Hong Kong activists in Britain should be able to rely on police protection

The UK has become a hunting ground for authoritarian regimes targeting dissidents, journalists and students. It is appalling that Hong Kong activists who sought refuge here met fear, harassment and intimidation from the government they had escaped, only to receive inadequate protection and little coordinated response (Hong Kong democracy campaigner accuses UK police of asking her to 'self-censor', 1 August). Amnesty International has repeatedly documented the Chinese government's transnational repression, including the surveillance and intimidation of students and activists here in the UK. This includes an alarming escalation in threats against the Hong Kong community, with bounties placed on the heads of UK-based pro-democracy activists. Last week, parliament's joint committee on human rights issued a report exposing major gaps that are putting Hong Kong and Chinese activists' freedom at risk, including the lack of a clear definition of transnational repression, patchy police responses, no dedicated reporting mechanism, and failure to collect even basic data on the scale of the threat. Initial steps taken by the government to address transnational repression are welcome, but the recent police response, as illustrated by your report, exposes the huge gap between policy and practice. The police must be given more extensive and consistent training to increase their awareness of these incidents and must act to protect Carmen Lau and other activists' right to free speech – they must not be complicit in silencing them. The government must now act on the above recommendations from the committee's report. Protections must be real, visible and trusted by those they are supposed to serve. It must work with affected activists and communities to define transnational repression, track it and confront it, before silence becomes the new RydkvistHong Kong programme director, Amnesty International UK Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

Diver rescued after surviving for 5 DAYS in underwater cave.. and had incredible first request after being saved
Diver rescued after surviving for 5 DAYS in underwater cave.. and had incredible first request after being saved

The Sun

time4 hours ago

  • The Sun

Diver rescued after surviving for 5 DAYS in underwater cave.. and had incredible first request after being saved

A DIVER was miraculously rescued after five days trapped in an underwater cave. Wang, from Hunan province in central China, was pulled from the water seemingly unscathed but had one very specific request. 2 2 Buried nine metres below the surface, the 40-year-old diving enthusiast lived off a diet of raw fish before he was astonishingly rescued. He survived thanks to an air pocket that allowed him to breathe in the water. His first words to his rescuers were: 'Do you have a cigarette?' He reportedly went missing just five minutes after plunging into the river with a friend, where he became trapped in the water's complex network of caves. Cops immediately launched a search operation with the help of Xiangxi Shuguans Rescue team and special police forces, South China Morning Post reports. A specialist team carried out two initial deep dives when they heard what sounded like someone knocking on the rocks. They switched off the boat engines to get a better listen but the sound didn't return. On their third dive, they spotted Wang - whose oxygen supply had dropped to just four per cent at this point - who lunged into the water waving his flashlight. Tian Yanglin, the captain of the rescue team, said 'that moment was his last chance." Wang didn't sustain any injuries and even walked to the ambulance. His story has sparked widespread discussion online with many calling his rescue a "miracle". Tourist found dead in jaws of shark with arm ripped off as another diver drowns after being swept away from scuba group One person said: 'Nine metres underwater, pitch black, survived for five days. Unbelievable. A true miracle. His mind did not collapse. What incredible willpower!' 'To survive five days and still be in good condition, he is not just lucky, he is superhuman,' said another. While a third asked: 'It must have been pitch black in that cave. I am really wondering, how did he manage to catch fish?' This isn't the first time a diver has been rescued alive from perilous waters. In 2016, a terrified scuba diver was found after being lost at sea for more than 14 hours in shark-infested waters. Incredible footage showed the 68-year-old being tossed around in the waves off the coast of Australia before he is winched to safety. He had been exploring wreck of the SS Yongala alone in the Coral Sea before he failed to return. The diver was eventually found by a search helicopter off the coast of Queensland more than 30 miles away from the shipwreck.

Why did Ghislaine Maxwell do what she did?
Why did Ghislaine Maxwell do what she did?

The Guardian

time5 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Why did Ghislaine Maxwell do what she did?

Days after Ghislaine Maxwell met with the deputy attorney general Todd Blanche, the convicted child sex trafficker and longtime Jeffrey Epstein girlfriend and procurer was moved from a women's federal prison in Tallahassee, Florida, to a so-called 'prison camp' in Texas, a dramatically more comfortable minimum-security environment with dormitory-style housing and fewer guards, sometimes called 'Club Fed'. Maxwell's new camp primarily houses nonviolent offenders, and the inmates there are reportedly livid, and probably not a little bit frightened, to be imprisoned with one of the world's most notorious sex traffickers and alleged rapists. Maxwell, too, was not initially eligible for such a transfer, due to her sex offender status; connections at the Department of Justice had to waive a procedural requirement in order for the move to go through. The transfer appears to be a reward. As Donald Trump struggles to extract himself from the continuing fallout of the Epstein scandal, Maxwell finds herself, now, in the best position that she has been in since her one-time partner Epstein died in a jail cell in 2019. Suddenly, she has something that the president wants: the ability to say, truthfully or no, that Trump had nothing to do with Epstein's sex trafficking. The president, too, has something that Maxwell wants: the ability to issue a pardon. Maxwell has always formed the dark center of the Epstein saga, a woman who appears to have been exceptionally dedicated to arranging Epstein's life, facilitating his travel, luring new victims to his homes, and coordinating his sexual abuse over the course of decades. Alleged victims of Epstein recall being recruited by Maxwell in public places – including at Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach – and through friends. They say that she inspected their bodies, brought them to Epstein's homes, talked incessantly about sex, and instructed them in Epstein's sexual preferences. They also say that Epstein and Maxwell sometimes made them available for sexual abuse by their friends. She is widely presumed to know more than she has yet been willing to tell about the extent to which Epstein's large network of powerful businessmen, politicians, and financiers knew about or participated in his rapes and trafficking of children. What is less clear, at least at first, is what motivated her to facilitate the abuse, and what kept her so loyal to Epstein over so many years. Maybe this kind of life – one spent attending to men's lesser desires – was always what Maxwell was destined for. The ninth and youngest child of a British media magnate, Maxwell was doted on by her father, the Hungarian-born Robert Maxwell, and raised in Oxford in a family as obscenely wealthy as it was darkly tragic: one of her older brothers was in a hideous car accident just days after Ghislaine's birth, and the boy lingered in a coma for years before dying before her 10th birthday. Her father financed her life as a high-class party girl – first in London, and then in New York – where she spent much of her time accompanying famous and wealthy men to the kind of rich people's social functions that have a pretext of raising money for charity. She does not seem to have had aims beyond that: despite her ample resources and encouragement, Ghislaine never showed much sign of intellectual ambition, or political interest, or business acumen, or general curiosity. (A short-lived 'ocean protection' charity that she founded accomplished little, and shut down after her arrest on sex trafficking charges.) It was not merely that Ghislaine was a product of an elite unburdened by principle, who often reduce their daughters to mere ornaments. It is that an ornament, it seems, is all that Ghislaine Maxwell ever aspired to be. It was not her charity, or her father's publishing, that were Maxwell's great passions. Her great passion appears to have been for the romantic attention of men – and specifically, her life's greatest animating goal seems to have been to achieve, and keep, the attention of Jeffrey Epstein. From those accounts we have of their relationship – and admittedly, these are not always reliable, given how intense, widespread, and prurient the attention on their activities has been – it appears that Maxwell's devotion to Epstein was intense. At her trial in 2021, prosecutors entered into evidence a photo of a cleavage-bearing Maxwell with Epstein, massaging his foot. This seems to have been her posture toward Epstein for the entire time she knew him: slavish, nearly worshipful. The pair met sometime in the late 1980s or early 1990s. Maxwell's father, Robert, died in an apparent suicide in the ocean off the coast of the Canary Islands – aboard his yacht, the Lady Ghislaine – in late 1991. Soon thereafter, it was discovered that millions of dollars were missing from pension funds that he managed; two of Maxwell's brothers were charged for their alleged role in the fraud. (They were later acquitted.) It was during this moment of rupture and imperiled status that Maxwell was romantically involved with Epstein. Her boyfriend would have served as a meal ticket as well as a source of validation: Maxwell is alleged to have received payments from Epstein totaling more than $30m; she told one of her victims that he bought her her New York City townhouse, just a few blocks from his own. By 1994, she was recruiting and grooming teenagers for his sexual abuse. Maybe Maxwell justified what she did for Epstein as kink – a kind of sexual libertinism that shrugged off the regressive, prurient mores of the lower classes. The 90s were the peak of a kind of reductive heterosexual sex-positivity: lots of women were telling themselves, and being told, that sexual submission was a mark of sophistication – that the more liberated they were, the more of men's desires they would grant. But this is all speculation: trying to provide a rationalization for Ghislaine Maxwell's actions evades the true terror of her, which is her seemingly profound and horrifying vacancy. To such a person, obedience does not require a justification. Unequal desire in love – particularly when the suffering lover is a woman – tends to elicit a kind of pity. Feminists, too, often depict women's outsized desire for men as a form of gendered victimization. Generally, it is not seen as serious – women's limerence, romantic obsession, and striving for men's attention is broadly relegated to the realm of the adolescent and the vulgar, the embarrassing and the silly. But Maxwell's case suggests such desire can breed not just frustrated vanity but also a kind of monstrousness. Untempered by principle or self-respect, it can contain in it the seed of the grotesque. In her efforts to please Epstein, and to make herself useful to him, Maxwell became something hideous and unforgivable. In her deficient, warped soul, it seems she lacked something that every woman must have: a morality that she valued more than male approval. Moira Donegan is a Guardian US columnist

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store