Bayer says legal woes could force it to pull weedkiller
The Leverkusen-based group has said that after rumbling on for years, it has the aim of "significantly containing litigation by the end of 2026".
"The status quo is not an option," said Anderson, while the stakes for the chemicals and pharmaceuticals producer were "really high".
Bayer has been dogged by lawsuits linked to Roundup since it acquired the US manufacturer Monsanto in a blockbuster deal in 2018.
Claimants have alleged that glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, causes blood cancers but Bayer says scientific studies and regulatory approvals show that the weedkiller is safe.
Bayer has battled to draw a line under Roundup litigation, spending more than $10 billion (8.8 billion euros) to date to settle suits alleging that Bayer failed to disclose health risks.
Earlier this month, Bayer said it would launch another appeal to the US Supreme Court to rule on the Roundup case, its third such attempt.
After being twice rebuffed by the court, Bayer is hopeful of more success following rulings by federal appellate courts, which the German group said support its case.
The renewed request for the Supreme Court to intervene is the first since Anderson took the reins at the chemicals group in 2023.
But Anderson's late arrival has not insulated the American manager from the criticism of shareholders, who voiced their impatience at the meeting.
Bayer has asked investors to approve a capital increase through the issuance of new stock to cover potential legal costs related to Roundup.
Shareholders were being asked to "pay the price" for Roundup's issues, Deka Investment manager Ingo Speich said, describing the move as a "bitter pill to swallow".
"Why should everything be different this time and the wave of lawsuits stopped with more money?", Janne Werning of Union Investment said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
7 hours ago
- LeMonde
Japan's SoftBank to invest $2 billion in Intel
Japan-based tech investor SoftBank Group said on Tuesday, August 19, that it will invest $2 billion in Intel, as the US government reportedly considers taking a 10% stake in the troubled US chip giant. The move is the latest in SoftBank's succession of investments and business deals in the United States as its charismatic founder, Masayoshi Son, aggressively courts US President Donald Trump. "This strategic investment reflects our belief that advanced semiconductor manufacturing and supply will further expand in the United States, with Intel playing a critical role," Son said in a joint press release with Intel announcing the deal. SoftBank will pay $23 per share of Intel common stock. SoftBank's move came as the Trump administration discussed taking a stake of about 10% in Intel to boost the chipmaker and the American semiconductor sector, according to US media, including Bloomberg News and the Wall Street Journal. Since Trump's return to the White House, Son has already announced other investment plans in the United States, including its leading role in the $500-billion Stargate project to build AI infrastructure there along with cloud giant Oracle and ChatGPT-maker OpenAI. Son stood beside the US president and fellow investors to announce the Stargate project at the White House in January. Lip-Bu Tan, Intel chief executive officer, said in the statement that the latest deal demonstrates its close ties with SoftBank. It is "a company that's at the forefront of so many areas of emerging technology and innovation and shares our commitment to advancing US technology and manufacturing leadership," he said. Trump had pressed Tan, a Malaysian-born tech veteran, to resign "immediately," after a Republican senator raised national security concerns over his links to firms in China. But during a meeting last week, Trump praised Tan, saying in a social media post that "his success and rise is an amazing story." Trump also wrote that members of his cabinet would work with Tan and come up with "suggestions." Intel is one of Silicon Valley's most iconic companies but its fortunes have been dwarfed by Asian powerhouses TSMC and Samsung, which dominate the made-to-order semiconductor business.
LeMonde
16 hours ago
- LeMonde
Pro-Trump channel Newsmax agrees to pay $67M in defamation case over 2020 election claims
The conservative network Newsmax will pay $67 million to settle a lawsuit accusing it of defaming a voting equipment company by spreading lies about US President Donald Trump's 2020 election loss, according to documents filed Monday, August 18. The settlement comes after Fox News Channel paid $787.5 million to settle a similar lawsuit in 2023 and Newsmax paid what court papers describe as $40 million to settle a libel lawsuit from a different voting machine manufacturer, Smartmatic, which also was a target of pro-Trump conspiracy theories on the network. Delaware Superior Court Judge Eric Davis ruled earlier that Newsmax did indeed defame Denver-based Dominion Voting Systems by airing false information about the company and its equipment. But Davis left it to a jury to eventually decide whether that was done with malice, and, if so, how much Dominion deserved from Newsmax in damages. Newsmax and Dominion reached the settlement before the trial could take place. The settlement was disclosed by Newsmax in a new filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. "Newsmax believed it was critically important for the American people to hear both sides of the election disputes that arose in 2020," the company said in a statement. "We stand by our coverage as fair, balanced, and conducted within professional standards of journalism." A spokesperson for Dominion said the company was pleased to have settled the lawsuit. The disclosure of the settlement came as Trump, who lost his 2020 reelection bid to Democrat Joe Biden, vowed in a social media post Monday to eliminate mail-in ballots and voting machines such as those supplied by Dominion and other companies. It was unclear how the Republican president could achieve that. The same judge also handled the Dominion-Fox News case and made a similar ruling that the network repeated numerous lies by Trump's allies about his 2020 loss despite internal communications showing Fox officials knew the claims were bogus. At the time, Davis found it was "crystal clear" that none of the allegations was true. Internal correspondence from Newsmax officials likewise shows they knew the claims were baseless. "How long are we going to play along with election fraud?" Newsmax host Bob Sellers said two days after the 2020 election was called for Biden, according to internal documents revealed as part of the case. Though Trump has insisted his fraud claims are real, there is no evidence they were, and the lawsuits in the Fox and Newsmax cases show how some of the president's biggest supporters knew they were false at the time. Trump's then-attorney general, William Barr, said there was no evidence of widespread fraud. Trump and his backers lost dozens of lawsuits alleging fraud, some before Trump-appointed judges. Numerous recounts, reviews and audits of the election results, including some run by Republicans, turned up no signs of significant wrongdoing or error and affirmed Biden's win.
Euronews
a day ago
- Euronews
Google to pay €30M fine for anti-competition deals in Australia
Google has agreed to pay a 55 million Australian dollar (€30.1m) fine for signing anticompetitive deals with Australia's two largest telcos that banned the installation of competing search engines on some smartphones, the US tech giant and Australia's competition watchdog said. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission said in a statement it had commenced proceedings in the Australian Federal Court on Monday against the Singapore-based Google Asia Pacific division. The court will decide whether the AU$50 million (€27.9m) penalty is appropriate. Restricting competition is illegal in Australia Under the anticompetitive agreements, which were in place for 15 months until March 2021, Telstra and Optus only pre-installed Google Search on Android phones sold to customers. Other search engines were excluded. In return, the telcos received a share of the advertisement revenue Google generated from those customers. Google accepted that the agreements were likely to have the effect of 'substantially lessening competition,' the commission said. Google has also signed a court-enforceable undertaking that commits the company to removing certain pre-installation and default search engine restrictions from its contracts with Android phone manufacturers and telcos, the commission said. The tech company said in a statement: 'We're pleased to resolve the ACCC's concerns, which involved provisions that haven't been in our commercial agreements for some time.' Commissioner chair Gina-Cass Gottlieb said: "Conduct that restricts competition is illegal in Australia because it usually means less choice, higher costs or worse service for consumers.' 'Importantly, these changes come at a time when AI search tools are revolutionising how we search for information, creating new competition,' Cass-Gottlieb added. Last year, Telstra, Optus and their smaller rival TPG agreed to court-enforceable undertakings with the commission that they would not renew or make similar deals with Google to limit search options.
