Aitana Bonmati reveals England's mistake and the quality to define Euro 2025 final
Across sport, and certainly in football, It is rare to come across examples of the best in the world calmly articulating the little moments that separate their genius from the rest. But Bonmati is an exception in many respects and, at 27, the midfielder's awareness of space and her ability to exploit it is what defines her generational talent.
England already have a painful example of how Bonmati's reading of the game proved to be the difference in a final of small margins; Olga Carmona's goal won Spain their first World Cup two years ago but it was the trap Bonmati laid for Lucy Bronze that triggered the counter-attack. Bonmati's intelligence to close the pitch and block the pass to Ella Toone created the critical turnover that England will be out to avenge in Basel on Sunday.
If Spain are in need of another defining moment, it will likely come from the vision and mind of their No 6, who has gone from spending four days in a Madrid hospital to the Euro 2025 final in the space of four weeks. It is no coincidence that Bonmati pointed to her head after appearing to defy physics with the goal that sent Spain through to the final.
As Barcelona and Spain have led the way, Bonmati has emerged as their leading star. She has embodied the skill that has flowed through the best two teams in the world, as well as their determination to leave the game in a better place. It is a quality she inherited from birth. When Bonmati won her first Ballon d'Or after Spain's World Cup triumph, she thanked her parents for the 'fight and resilience in my blood' - they were both teachers of languages and Catalan culture, as well as socialists and campaigners for Catalonian independence.
Her parents, Rosa Bonmatí Guidonet and Vicent Conca i Ferràs, also fought to change a Spanish law that stated children had to take their father's name first and their mother's name second. Two years after Bonmati was born, they won. As it is, she takes her first surname, Bonmati, from her mother, and her second surname, Conca, from her father, and was one of the first children in Spain to have her surnames in that order.
There was a sense of deja vu in the Spanish camp when Bonmati was admitted to hospital with viral meningitis in the week before the Euros, having missed their friendly against Japan. It came three years after Alexia Putellas, then the Ballon d'Or holder, suffered an anterior cruciate ligament injury in training on the eve of Euro 2022, forcing her to miss the tournament completely. The shock, though, wore off as Bonmati posted a positive update from hospital and was later discharged, but she still began Spain's first two games of the tournament on the bench and with some doubts over her fitness.
In her place, there was the romantic story of Putellas coming back to her best, making up for lost time with three goals and four assists during the group stage as Spain cruised into the quarter-finals. Alongside her, there has also been the triumphant return of Patri Guijarro, who sat out of the last World Cup in protest of unequal conditions and sacrificed herself as Spain defied their own federation to claim a historic victory. Guijarro has resumed her integral role in the base of Spain's midfield, adding to their control with her calm, forceful presence.
But they may not be in the final were it not for Bonmati. After starting in Spain's final group game, a 3-1 win over Italy as coach Montse Tome made several changes to her side, Bonmati has stepped up in the knockout stages and when a moment of inspiration has been required. In the quarter-finals, there was her back-heel flick on the edge of the box to release Athenea del Castillo for Spain's breakthrough against Switzerland. Then, in the semi-finals, Bonmati split the narrow gap between Ann-Katrin Berger and her near post to send Spain through.
Afterwards, Bonmati revealed how Spain had studied Berger's positioning and spotted that the goalkeeper had a tendency to step off her front post in anticipation of the pull-back. Bonmati only needed a second to recognise the situation unfolding in front of her as she let the ball run through her legs and span into the box; hurtling towards the byline, with Rebecca Knaak already committed to diving in, Bonmati did not even need to look up to know where the gap had opened up.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
a few seconds ago
- The Guardian
Gambhir's India can't escape the Fortis-verse on rain-hit day
Nothing does irony quite like Test cricket. Say what you like about the world's most desiccated, Miss Havisham-ish team sport, out there trailing around the post-colonial world still dressed in its yellowing wedding dress. It's definitely got a sense of humour. On day one of the fifth England-India Test this was expressed in cosmic terms, and a single bold and improbable dramatic arc. Talk about groundsmen a lot. Tell groundsmen they're nothing. One thing is for sure. You're going to find yourself spending quite a lot of time watching groundsmen. Or in this case watching the personage we must now refer to as controversial groundsman Lee Fortis, celebrity Oval pitch curator Lee Fortis, an otherwise peripheral figure with a name that sounds like an Anglo-Saxon burial site in Norfolk, but who was promoted in the buildup to this Test into an instrument of the sporting-political power struggle. And so it came to pass in the first two sessions at the Oval, as India and England traipsed on and off between the showers, and Fortis loomed, somehow inevitably, centre stage. Here is Lee Fortis striding about his domain in classic shorts and boots combos, like a proud, captive bear. Here is Lee Fortis tugging at a tarpaulin. Here is Lee Fortis all alone in his lime green field as the drizzle fell and the walkways around the ground took on the feel of a slowly sinking ship peopled only by pint-sozzled mariners in chino shorts, and watched from behind the plateglass by his chief adversary, India's head coach, Gautam Gambhir. In a Test series shot through with politics, rumblings and noises off, they've finally dragged in the bloke with the rake. Welcome to the Fortis-verse. It is the most unlikely turn of events. Fortis is familiar figure around here, a huge ambling man with the classic groundsman's shape, as though he's been hinged together out of sacks of cement and packed into a pair of shorts. Who thinks of the groundsman? What are they? They sit on mowers. They walk with sawdust buckets. They follow the seasons, disturbed only by their personal kryptonite, people walking near a rope, signal for instant and uncontainable explosions of boggle-eyed fury. And yet, look a little closer, squint at the magic eye picture, and something else has begun to emerge here, the groundsman as instrument of power and conspiracy. By 2pm on Thursday afternoon, 48 hours on from that unnecessary spat with Gambhir, Fortis had been memed and replicated and spun out across the global hive mind. Oval curator breaks silence. Fortis v Gambhir: the full story. Who is Lee Fortis and what does he mean? There are Fortis YouTube clips (jerky spat footage; weird ad hoc media huddle) that have been viewed two million times. Lee Fortis stuns fans with body transformation. This simple Lee Fortis trick will change your life for ever. Seventeen times Lee Fortis broke the internet (No 12 will shock you!) More fuel was added overnight as R Ashwin labelled Fortis a habitual offender. Really? It's not the first time he's yelled at people to get off his square? You shock me. Meanwhile, the groundsman community has sprung to his defence, a Facebook page speaking for this maligned minority demanding respect, understanding, a safe space for its members. What next? A Fortis spin-off vehicle. The Fortis origins story. A Fortis male grooming range. Jake Paul calls out Lee Fortis in sensational Vegas standoff. Or perhaps it won't come to that. Because this is at the same time absolutely nothing, chaff, gossip, and also a grim little episode that reflects poorly on Gambhir in particular; and perhaps also on the general power dynamics of elite cricket in its current form. The initial incident was a standard stramash over practising too close, or so Fortis said, to the square. Gambhir's response was furious. Any situation where you end up wagging a finger and shouting, 'You're nothing, you're just a groundsman, nothing beyond that,' is one that has lost any sense of scale. Later Fortis was swarmed by Indian journalists and gave the greatest no comment interview of all time, unveiling a technique that should be urgently coached to all celebrities and politicians, which basically involves just saying 'I'm not ... You're not ... I'm not really,' to every question. Sign up to The Spin Subscribe to our cricket newsletter for our writers' thoughts on the biggest stories and a review of the week's action after newsletter promotion It is a fairly simple divvying up at this point. Gambhir was always in the wrong here. First because all groundsmen are grumpy. They have to venerate, love and fetishise this patch of green. They have the artist's temperament. They feel the hand of history. They basically just want you to stay off their square and stop playing cricket. But mainly Gambhir was wrong because of the ugliness of his choice of words, and the sense of punching down. England got to show their boorishness in Manchester. This was India's turn. India's coach is a born-to-rule type, high caste Hindu, private schoolboy, son of a wealthy industrialist, BJP politician, a Jay Shah man, a Modi guy. It sits a little uncomfortably to hear anyone with such privilege dismissing a bloke with a bucket as 'nothing', unqualified to make demands of his betters. In this context Gambhir v Fortis speaks, if you choose to see it, to the way India wields its commercial and political power in this sport; to the sense that here is an overlord nation that can basically do what it wants, that is in effect untouchable. This is the most unfavourable version of events. More prosaically Gambhir does just love a fight, is essentially a grudge in a cap, outspoken and commendably feisty. In a happier turn there was at least a kind of rapprochement at the start of play between Fortis and India's players, a little wary banter and some smiles. After which, once the showers had cleared, it was a case of the groundsman's revenge, as Gambhir got to watch India's batters sparring and hopping and nicking as the ball leapt and jagged about on Fortis' chosen strip. England's pace attack had looked rusty at the start, both Jamie Overton and Josh Tongue perhaps paying tribute the 2.5m distance rule by almost missing the cut part of the pitch. But they chipped away and found movement. Shubman Gill had batted with sculpted elegance, all perfect arms, shoulders, lines, balletic in the way he shifts his weight, then ran himself out trying to take a single to Gus Atkinson's right hand in his follow through. With India on 204 for six at the end of play the series already felt a little safer. Hopefully the age of Lee is also done. Andy Warhol would later revise his most famous line to the more depressingly accurate 'in 15 minutes everyone will be famous'. Fortis had his day in the gloom. With any luck hands will now be shaken, an unpleasant tone revised, and the whole thing can be safely packed away in the shed behind the pigeon nets.
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Josh Tongue's wild bowling breaks India but England's fifth-Test hopes hurt by Chris Woakes injury
Josh Tongue 's first ball of this fifth Test at The Oval travelled so far down the off-side it was heading for Lord's by the time it hit the boundary rope for five wides. A moment later, he sent the ball off in the direction of Eden Gardens for five more. It was one of the worst overs you're likely to see in a Test match: India hit a solitary single and jumped from 18-1 to 30-1. Tongue was unplayable, just not in the way he might have imagined. The morning's conditions had seemed like a bowler's paradise, on an unpredictable green pitch under skies so murky that groundstaff switched on the floodlights before midday. Shubman Gill lost India's 15th toss in a row in all formats – a feat with a probability of 1 in 32,768 – and England's stand-in captain Ollie Pope naturally elected to field. But England failed to take full advantage, and Tongue was not the only one with a wayward radar. Gus Atkinson, Chris Woakes and Jamie Overton all delivered erratic spells, serving up 15 wides and 30 extras, a generous chunk of India's 204-6 at stumps. Atkinson was certainly the pick of the bunch, trapping Yashasvi Jaiswal on his pads, as Pope broke his own unwanted streak of 14 failed DRS attempts and celebrated gleefully like the wicket was his own. Atkinson also pulled off the sharp run out of captain Gill, who momentarily lost his senses running for a single that was never there, before later drawing an edge from Dhruv Jurel. Woakes, who had lured KL Rahul to chop on to his own stumps, ended with disaster, tumbling over the boundary to save a four and injuring himself in the process. He yelped in pain before being attended to by medics and helped from the field, his arm in the kind of makeshift sling that tends to suggest a dislocated shoulder. With no specialist spin bowler, England's remaining three seamers face a heavy workload to finish off this Test. The bigger picture for Woakes is that his hopes of making the Ashes squad this winter are in doubt. Aged 36, there may not be many more opportunities for one of England's most reliable performers over the past decade and more. Yet no one encapsulated England's rollercoaster day more so than Tongue. His disastrous over was a tough watch as his planted foot slipped all over the crease, where a pile of sawdust failed to offer any added grip. He had the ball swinging but that was no good thing, because once it chose its rogue trajectory it was never turning back towards duped wicketkeeper Jamie Smith. But gradually Tongue steadied himself, and a change of ends by Pope proved wise. He started to find a dangerous length that flirted with the top of off-stump, and his pace cranked up over 90mph. His awkward technique, with a bowling arm which tilts beyond the perpendicular, was sending the ball down at devilish angles which soon brought rewards. Tongue's two wickets were almost carbon copies of one another, spearing the ball in towards the left-handers Sai Sudharsan and Ravindra Jadeja from around the wicket, before jagging it off the outside edge and into Smith's waiting gloves. It was all the more bamboozling that Jadeja's wicket came at the end of an over which began with more wild, expensive wides. Perhaps this was the most difficult part of India's day: not just the hostile batting conditions but the fact that they had no idea what was coming at them at any given moment. At least when facing Jimmy Anderson or Stuart Broad there is a rhythm, a set-up, a storyline they build using in-swingers before, plot twist, the out-swinger. There was little of that consistency here, instead a barrage of balls that were too short, too long, too wide, too bad, and all of a sudden far too good to cope with. India's resistance came from the unlikely source of Karun Nair, brought back into the side to beef up the batting in what looked like yet another unconvincing line-up by the tourists in this series, featuring two spinners on a pitch that is a seamer's dream. Nair dug in, calibrated his line of sight in the darkness and began asserting himself, bringing up a confident 50 shortly before stumps. And so a day which should have been England's felt like something of a score draw. England have six wickets, but it cost them 200 runs and a bowler's shoulder. The next time they will embark on day one of a Test match, England will be walking out at Perth for the start of The Ashes in November. With Jofra Archer rested here and Mark Wood still injured, this was a chance for the support cast to make their pitch for travelling to Australia, but perhaps only Atkinson could claim to have bolstered his case. Yet oddly, Tongue managed to turn one of the worst mornings of his career into something of a success story, taking two scalps with identical jaffas, ripping it with the sort of pace and height and angle that would come in handy in an Australian summer. About 70 yards behind the beaten batsmen, Stuart Broad nodded his approval up in the commentary box. Around the wicket to left-handers? England used to have someone very good at that.
The Sun
30 minutes ago
- The Sun
‘What's wrong with him?' – Bizarre moment Havertz fouls the WRONG Tottenham player after Arsenal star sent for a hotdog
KAI HAVERTZ was brilliantly skinned by Cristian Romero during Arsenal's friendly defeat to Tottenham. But it was Djed Spence that ended up feeling the brunt of the incident. 5 5 Tottenham beat their fierce rivals 1-0 in Hong Kong courtesy of Pape Matar Sarr's sensational 45-yard strike at the new Kai Tak stadium. During the first half, Romero embarrassed Arsenal forward Havertz. Picking up the ball virtually on his own byline, the Argentine was closed down by his German opponent. Calmness personified, Romero brilliantly skipped past Havertz. As the defender waltzed away from the challenge, Havertz went sliding into unfortunate bystander Spence. The 26-year-old caught the Spurs full-back's knee, but no action was taken by the referee. After a few moments down on the turf, Spence was able to gingerly rise to his feet and continue. The former Nottingham Forest star was one of several standout performers on the night, keeping Bukayo Saka and then Max Dowman very quiet for the Gunners. BEST ONLINE CASINOS - TOP SITES IN THE UK 5 Tottenham struck the post three times during the first half, via corners by Pedro Porro and Mohammed Kudus, then an effort by Wilson Odobert. Sarr eventually broke the deadlock on the stroke of half time, brilliantly lobbing stranded goalkeeper David Raya after dispossessing Myles Lewis-Skelly. Spurs star Pape Matar Sarr lobs Arsenal's David Raya 'playing as a centre back' from half-way line in pre-season clash Arsenal had plenty of the ball during the second half of the encounter. But even after a raft of Spurs substitutions, which included both Romero and Micky van de Ven going off, Mikel Arteta 's side were unable to break through. After the game, Tottenham boss Thomas Frank told the club's media team: "A 1-0 score against Arsenal is an absolutely beautiful score! "Yes, it is a friendly, but it's also a very competitive match. I said before the game that games against Arsenal are never 'friendly'. It means everything. "I have to give respect to both teams for their competitiveness in the game. It was very competitive. "I was extremely happy with our first half, that first half was completely even. "In many ways I loved the way the team performed, and throughout the game the defensive structure was top." Tottenham will return to action on Sunday when they take on Newcastle in South Korea, while Arsenal will be back in London for a clash with Villarreal next Wednesday. 5 5
