
Millions of New Yorkers Warned Over Health Insurance
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Millions of New Yorkers are at risk of losing their health insurance coverage, Governor Kathy Hochul warned this week as the fallout from President Donald Trump's recently signed One Big Beautiful Bill Act begins to take shape.
Hochul said the legislation would slash $3 billion from New York's health care system, triggering major cuts that could leave more than 2 million residents without their current coverage. Of those, an estimated 1.3 million could lose access to Medicaid because of new eligibility requirements and verification hurdles included in the law.
Why It Matters
Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act into law on July 4, with cuts to Medicaid among the legislation's controversial provisions.
New York runs one of the largest Medicaid programs in the country, leaving the state particularly vulnerable to the bill.
New York Governor Kathy Hochul taking part in the 2025 NYC Pride March along Fifth Avenue, New York, on June 29.
New York Governor Kathy Hochul taking part in the 2025 NYC Pride March along Fifth Avenue, New York, on June 29.
Anthony Behar/Sipa USA/AP
What To Know
On Thursday, Hochul convened a Cabinet meeting to outline the sweeping consequences of the newly signed One Big Beautiful Bill Act, warning it would leave millions of New Yorkers vulnerable to losing health coverage and food assistance while straining the state's finances for years to come.
According to new estimates from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the bill will cut about $1.1 trillion in health care spending and result in 11.8 million people losing Medicaid health insurance over the next decade.
One of the most consequential elements of the federal law restricts which immigrant populations qualify for Medicaid coverage under the Essential Plan. Only green card holders and immigrants from a limited list of countries—including Cuba, Haiti and some Pacific Island nations—will remain eligible.
In New York, the governor warned, the changes could be especially devastating.
The change is expected to strip coverage from about 500,000 immigrants in New York, leaving the state with an estimated $3 billion annual bill if it opts to maintain their insurance. Hochul said the administration was evaluating a potential legislative response in light of a 2001 state court ruling that requires the state to provide Medicaid coverage to some immigrants excluded from federal programs.
"We're having discussions now internally, but also will be engaging the leaders of the Legislature during this time," she said.
Hochul also warned that the federal health care cuts would hit rural hospitals especially hard. "Most of our state is rural," she said. "If we start closing these hospitals, you'll have to drive great distances—and that's dangerous."
Although the governor said her team anticipated some federal cuts—prompting a $400 billion reduction in projected state spending and the downsizing of a planned inflation rebate from $300 million to $200 million—the scope of the new law exceeds what the state had prepared for.
Like Medicaid, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program is also set to undergo funding changes. Under the new law, the federal government plans to continue funding SNAP, but states now have to share some of the cost if their payment error rate is 6 percent or higher, beginning in 2028—two years after the next midterm elections.
Beginning in October 2027, New York would be required to fund 15 percent of all SNAP benefits—a projected $1.2 billion annual cost. At the same time, the federal government's share would drop from 50 percent to 25 percent.
The state would have to pay an additional $36 million annually, while counties and New York City would shoulder an extra $168 million.
According to New York officials, up to 3 million residents may see their food benefits jeopardized as a result of the changes.
Hochul has also said the bill will cost New York $750 million this year and $3 billion next year alone.
What People Are Saying
New York Governor Kathy Hochul said in a news release on Thursday: "While Republicans in Washington callously slash funding for vital programs across the country, my administration is standing up for New Yorkers to soften the blow of these cuts amidst an affordability crisis.
"President Trump's devastating 'Big Ugly Bill' will inflict harm across the state, leaving detrimental gaps in funding and families without the crucial benefits and coverage that they need. New York State remains laser-focused on ensuring New Yorkers have access to resources and support necessary to uplift them and their families."
What Happens Next
Medicaid's funding changes under the new law are not scheduled to take effect until 2028.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
17 minutes ago
- Newsweek
South Korea's Population Crisis Shrinks Military Amid Threat From North
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. South Korea's military is 20 percent smaller than it was six years ago as the world's lowest birth rate shrinks the pool of men available for enlistment, according to a new report from the country's defense ministry. Why It Matters South Korea's fertility rate—the world's lowest—stood at 0.75 births per woman in 2024, well below the 2.1 rate needed to sustain a population. That same year, the share of the population aged 65 and older passed 20 percent, making the nation as a so-called "super-aged" society along with Japan. These demographic shifts are expected to have far-reaching effects not only on world's fourth-largest economy and but also security amid flaring tension with nuclear-armed North Korea. Newsweek reached out to the South Korean Embassy in Washington by email for comment. What To Know South Korea's active-duty force now numbers 450,000, down by about 110,000 from 2019, with 17 divisions having been disbanded or merged. The figures come from a joint report by the Defense Ministry and the Military Manpower Administration, shared with the media by Choo Mi-ae, a lawmaker on the South Korean parliament's judiciary committee. The army has been the most affected, losing more than 100,000 soldiers over that six-year period. Meanwhile the percentage of applicants who become career officers is about half the previous rate. The defense ministry has said the military is 50,000 troops shy of the minimum level considered sufficient to maintain defense readiness. Officials have cited the nation's record-low birth rate as the driving factor. The number of 20-year-old men—the primary age for conscription—has fallen 30 percent since 2019 to about 230,000. Some analysts have pointed to the role technology could play to reduce the streamline the modern standing armies. "In Japan's case or in South Korea's case, I think that the fact that they're facing a much more urgent shortage of people to serve in the military there, it's driving them to invest more in especially labor-saving technologies," Andrew Oros, professor of political science and international studies at Washington College, said during a June 2024 interview with the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank. Others are less optimistic. "There are limits to replacing people with technology, especially when facing a heavily armed adversary right across the border," the Korea Times quoted one senior defense ministry official as saying. North Korea, despite being technologically inferior, maintains more than twice as many active-duty troops, an estimated 6,000 artillery units within range of South Korean population centers, and continues to expand its ballistic missile and nuclear weapons programs. What Happens Next South Korea has spent more than $200 billion on pro-natal programs, from fertility treatments to housing subsidies, since 2008. Births rose in 2024 for the first time in 10 years amid a wave of marriages among women in their early to mid-30s, members of what's been dubbed Korea's "second baby boomers," but it remains to be seen whether the trend will hold longer term.


Newsweek
19 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Satellite Photo Shows Israel Military Buildup Near Gaza
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. New satellite imagery reveals a significant buildup of Israeli troops and military equipment near the Gaza border, signaling preparations for a major ground offensive in the Palestinian enclave. The deployment comes after Israel's security cabinet approved a plan to seize control of Gaza City, raising the stakes in an already volatile conflict and intensifying fears of a broader and more destructive escalation. Newsweek has reached out to the U.S. State Department and Israel's Foreign Ministry. Why It Matters The buildup highlights an intensifying Israeli military posture amid a fragile and volatile situation in Gaza. Israel's plan to take over Gaza City likely will require a large-scale ground offensive that has alarmed stakeholders in the region. The trajectory of the yearslong conflict now points to a potentially broader and more destructive phase, which could escalate humanitarian suffering and complicate diplomatic relations with Israel's allies including the United States. Imagery dated August 7, 2025, and released by the Chinese satellite firm MizarVision shows the buildup of Israeli military forces at the Karni crossing near northeastern Gaza. Imagery dated August 7, 2025, and released by the Chinese satellite firm MizarVision shows the buildup of Israeli military forces at the Karni crossing near northeastern Gaza. MizarVision What To Know Imagery released this week by a Chinese satellite firm MizarVision showed a growing concentration of Israeli military hardware at the Karni crossing into northeastern Gaza on August 7. The photo appeared to show movements and formations that were consistent with preparations for a significant ground assault. Israeli forces have been conducting ground operations in Gaza since late October 2023, after Hamas militants inflicted the deadliest attack on Israel in its history. There have been occasional pauses for ceasefires, but the new buildup shows Israel is gearing up to seize territory and target Hamas strongholds. A Palestinian boy pushes a cart loaded with jerrycans of water after collecting it at a camp for displaced people in Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, Saturday, July 19, 2025. A Palestinian boy pushes a cart loaded with jerrycans of water after collecting it at a camp for displaced people in Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, Saturday, July 19, 2025. Abdel Kareem Hana/AP Photo Israel's Plan Israel's security cabinet approved a plan to take control of Gaza City early Friday, according to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office. While the plan does not extend to full occupation of the Gaza Strip, it marks a strategic escalation aimed at weakening Hamas's hold over the area. Israel closed the Karni crossing in 2011 and completed the final phase of demolition work in 2022. It had been a terminal for goods and humanitarian aid into Gaza but now forms part of the Iron Wall, further tightening the blockade around the small Palestinian territory. Netanyahu has outlined a vision to dismantle Hamas and establish a security perimeter around Gaza rather than govern the enclave directly. Speaking on Fox News, Netanyahu said, "We intend to, in order to assure our security, remove Hamas there, enable the population to be free of Gaza and to pass it to civilian governance that is not Hamas and not anyone advocating the destruction of Israel." Discord Between U.S. and Israel The military buildup comes amid disagreements between the Israel and the its strongest international backer the United States. NBC News reported a recent private phone call between Netanyahu and Donald Trump, in which the U.S. president shouted at his Israeli counterpart over the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, the U.S.- and Israeli-supported relief initiative. Officials familiar with the call described the tensions as emblematic of strained relations between the two governments at a critical moment in the conflict. Trump has publicly contradicted Netanyahu's assurances about Gaza's humanitarian conditions. While Netanyahu has said there is no starvation in Gaza, Trump has stated otherwise. What People Are Saying Displaced Palestinians travel on carts and vehicles through a makeshift camp along the beach in Gaza City, Sunday, Aug. 10, 2025. (AP Photo/) Displaced Palestinians travel on carts and vehicles through a makeshift camp along the beach in Gaza City, Sunday, Aug. 10, 2025. (AP Photo/) Jehad Alshrafi/AP Photo Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu: "We intend to, in order to assure our security, remove Hamas there, enable the population to be free of Gaza and to pass it to civilian governance that is not Hamas and not anyone advocating the destruction of Israel. That's what we want to do." U.S. President Donald Trump: "I have seen images of children in Gaza who look very hungry. There is real starvation there and you can't fake that." What Happens Next With Israel's security cabinet approval and the confirmed troop buildup, the likelihood of a significant ground offensive in Gaza is increasing. The coming weeks could see intensified fighting, efforts to free hostages and mounting humanitarian challenges. At the same time, the diplomatic strains between the U.S. and Israel may influence both military and relief operations.


Politico
19 minutes ago
- Politico
Why Colorado is rethinking its AI law
AROUND THE NATION Colorado Gov. Jared Polis signed first-in-the-nation legislation to regulate artificial intelligence last year. Now the Democrat is calling state lawmakers back to Denver next week to ask them to delay for a year the law's implementation, currently scheduled for February. The big issue: the cost of implementation. But Polis is also having second thoughts about states independently regulating AI. Earlier this year, he backed a plan by Republican lawmakers in Washington to place a moratorium on new state AI laws. The Colorado legislation will bolster consumer protections when AI is used to make key health care-related decisions, and require developers and deployers to address algorithmic bias based on reproductive health, genetic information and other data. Developers must also make disclosures about AI systems that make high-risk decisions. Why it matters: The political climate for AI regulations has significantly changed from May 2024, when Polis first signed the law, our Alfred Ng reports. The Trump administration's AI Action Plan withholds federal funding from states with 'burdensome regulations,' even though Republicans ultimately decided not to include a moratorium on state AI laws in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act they passed last month. It's unlikely the Colorado law will dramatically change during the legislature's special session, but it's expected to spark another round of lobbying by tech groups that oppose the law. 'With Colorado now facing a billion-dollar budget shortfall, this is a moment when lawmakers should be inviting innovation, not driving it away from the state,' Kouri Marshall, director of state government relations for the tech industry group Chamber of Progress, said in a statement. The backstory: In the lead-up to Polis' decision, tech industry advocates pleaded with him to veto the measure. They argued the law would launch a patchwork of state rules that would make compliance difficult and that Congress is better suited to regulate. They succeeded in convincing Connecticut's Democratic governor, Ned Lamont, to oppose a similar bill his legislature had passed. At the same time, consumer advocates are concerned that AI systems could harm patients if bias is entrenched in care or if the tools make diagnostic mistakes. They have lately urged lawmakers to do more. WELCOME TO FUTURE PULSE This is where we explore the ideas and innovators shaping health care. Lithium depletion could play a role in causing Alzheimer's disease, a new study in the journal Nature says, raising hope that restoring it to the brain could stave off memory loss. Share any thoughts, news, tips and feedback with Carmen Paun at cpaun@ Ruth Reader at rreader@ or Erin Schumaker at eschumaker@ Want to share a tip securely? Message us on Signal: CarmenP.82, RuthReader.02 or ErinSchumaker.01. AROUND THE AGENCIES The National Institutes of Health official who oversaw grant review and the groups who evaluate NIH grant applications, is leaving the agency at the end of the month. NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya said Noni Byrnes, who directs the agency's Center for Scientific Review, is retiring from federal service after nearly 25 years at the agency. Byrnes had served as the center's director since 2019. During her time there, Byrnes, an expert in analytical chemistry, implemented frameworks and systems for evaluating quality, integrity and fairness in grant review. 'Most recently, she oversaw the HHS and NIH effort to centralize the peer review of applications and proposals for all the agency's grants, cooperative agreements, and research and development contracts,' Bhattacharya's announcement said. Byrnes' other efforts included expanding the advisory councils and pushing to diversify the pool of peer reviewers and study sections to include researchers of different races, genders, scientific backgrounds and experience. 'You don't want bureaucrats or government officials making these decisions,' Byrnes told Chemical and Engineering News in 2019, referring to the grant review process. Why it matters: The NIH's peer review process is in the midst of an overhaul. In March, the NIH said it would centralize what had previously been handled by subject matter experts at individual institutes and centers. This spring, the NIH moved to remove swaths of outside experts from advisory boards that evaluate agency research. And last week, President Donald Trump issued an executive order that increases the administration's control over research grants that the government funds. According to the order, agencies shouldn't fund research that uses race as selection criteria, denies that sex is binary or suggests that sex can be changed, encourages or subsidizes illegal immigration, compromises public safety or promotes anti-American values. The order tasks agency officials with defining those terms. What's next: The Center for Scientific Review's deputy director, Bruce Reed, will serve as the center's acting director.