House subcommittee votes to subpoena Justice Department for Epstein files
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
41 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Ms. Rachel Won't Work With People Silent About Gaza
Ms. Rachel (full name Rachel Accurso) is a children's YouTube personality with over 15 million subscribers, merchandise in stores like Target, and a Netflix deal. Rachel's reach is massive, and most recently, she's gone viral for using that reach to speak up for the children of Gaza, even if it's considered a risk to her career. Speaking with NPR, she said there has been pushback from her financial backers for her stance, but she's willing to risk it all. "I would risk everything, and I will risk my career over and over to stand up for them. It's all about the kids for me." The Associated Press reported that the Gaza Health Ministry, which is part of the Hamas-run government and staffed by medical professionals, said 80 children have died from starvation since the beginning of the war. The U.N. World Food Program claims that 100,000 women and children are suffering from severe acute malnutrition within Gaza. Note: These claims from the Gaza Health Ministry on the conditions for starvation are not independently verifiable, as mentioned in the AP of June 11, AP reported that the Palestinian death toll from the Israel-Hamas war passed 55,000 according to the Gaza Health Ministry. While the ministry doesn't distinguish between civilians and combatants, they claim women and children make up more than half of the 55,000 dead. Israel has stated they don't target civilians, and the deaths are due to Hamas hiding among civilians in populated areas. Given these statistics and Rachel's stance on speaking up for the children of Gaza, it's only expected that she would hold her collaborators to a certain standard. Here's the real: Ms. Rachel won't work with anyone who doesn't speak out about Gaza. In a July 24 Instagram post, she shared a post that read, "To anyone asking to with work with me who hasn't spoken out about Gaza: Thank you for the request. I'm not comfortable working with anyone who hasn't spoken out about Gaza. Much love and God bless, Rachel." In the caption alongside the post, Rachel elaborated on why she had made this decision. "I will always choose kindness, but I will never understand your silence," she began. "I want people around me whose hearts break for every child - not just when it's convenient, not just when it's easy, not just when it's not controversial, not just when the child looks like you or is born in an 'acceptable' place," she continued. "I especially can't understand those with so much privilege - the uncancelable - who still remain in the shadows," Rachel added. Rachel ended the caption referencing the time she had accusations lobbed at her for her stance on the suffering children of the Israel-Hamas war. "I want the light. And I see those of you who risk everything to hold it. I'm in awe of you." Thousands of people supported Ms. Rachel after she shared this post, praising her for "choosing humanity." Earlier in the week, Rachel shared another post clarifying that her stance is solely based on her condemnation of all violence against humans. In the caption, she wrote, "I'm a kind, empathetic educator who sees all the world's children as I see my own. I don't see one group of children or people as more equal or worthy than another. This is a beautiful, strong, wonderful thing. This is a brave thing. This is a good thing. I'm proud of it. You can't tell me who I am because I know who I am. God knows who I am." The caption continued, "Some of us want all children to be protected. We want all children's rights to be respected. We don't want any civilians to suffer. We want international law to be followed. We want the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child to be followed. We want kids in school, learning and playing. We don't want violence against anyone." What do you make of Ms. Rachel's stance? Let's talk about it in the comments.
News24
an hour ago
- News24
‘Be more creative': South Africans weigh in on names to cancel after US bans 11 baby names
Be among those who shape the future with knowledge. Uncover exclusive stories that captivate your mind and heart with our FREE 14-day subscription trial. Dive into a world of inspiration, learning, and empowerment. You can only trial once. Start your FREE trial now Show Comments ()
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Plane Passenger Who Refused to Do This Common Airport Favor Says They Got 'Stink Eye' — But Were They Wrong?
A Reddit user broke down the incident in a viral post and divided the comment section A plane passenger is asking if they were really in the wrong for refusing a favor to a fellow flyer They took to the popular "Am I the A------?" Reddit on July 18 to air their grievances about a fellow traveler who asked what they felt was a 'big favor:" to watch her bags in the boarding area while she used the bathroom. The original poster (OP) claims they were made into the 'bad guy' for saying no to the common request. 'Yesterday I was sitting next to a woman with a young son who needed to go to the bathroom (10 minutes before boarding started),' the OP writes. 'She turned to me and asked… could I watch her bags while she took her son to the bathroom?' The OP replied, 'I'm not really supposed to." The poster claims the mom gave a 'stink eye' before another woman nearby offered to watch the luggage. They explain their technically sound reasoning in the post: 'Not only is this a safety issue (probably not in this case, but in theory), but also I wouldn't have wanted to miss my boarding group." In U.S. airports, TSA announcements regularly warn passengers to keep their belongings with them at all times, not to leave luggage unattended and not to accept any items from strangers. The mother and son returned in time to make it on the plane, but not before boarding started. Part of the reason for their refusal, the OP claims, is that this wasn't the first time they had been asked for the same favor — and had a different outcome. They detailed another experience where they allege they were 'bawled out' by a gate agent when they offered to watch someone's bag. They claim the gate agent overheard and interrupted, saying it wasn't allowed. The situation divided Redditors, who sounded off in the comments. 'If the woman and son were your wife and child, you'd be the [a------],' someone quipped in the comments. 'Otherwise you're good.' Another said: 'I'm more surprised that she trusted a stranger enough to watch her bags.' Others discussed the possible safety concerns. 'You're never supposed to take responsibility for someone else's bags [because] you don't know what could be in them,' someone explained. 'May sound crazy considering it's a lady and a kid but you never know and that's what airports advise.' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from juicy celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Though, not everyone was convinced. 'I guess it might be situational but do you really think a woman with a young child has packed contraband and gotten through security? And somehow you'll be blamed for it?' one commenter asked. 'It's not your bag.' They added: 'You can say 'I'll try to stop anyone from taking it,' but what the woman is really asking is 'Would you be okay if I leave my bag so I don't have to deal with that and a fussy toddler in the bathroom?' " Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword
