Green council ditches plan to collect black bins once a month
Bristol council launched a six-week consultation, which included the option of switching from bin collections every two weeks to monthly in order to save more than £2 million a year and boost recycling rates.
Both Labour and the Conservatives had proposed motions calling on the council to rule out switching to four-weekly bin collections, and more than 12,000 people signed a petition opposing the plan.
Benjamin Elks, the grassroots development manager at the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: 'Bristolians are sick to the back teeth of their council's hare-brained schemes.
'Residents shouldn't have to put up with overflowing bins and filthy streets just because the council is more interested in virtue-signalling than doing its job.'
Following the backlash, the Green Party administration announced it would not be supporting the move.
Martin Fodor, a Green councillor who chairs the cross-party environment and sustainability committee, said: 'The four-weekly option was put in the consultation as an outlier for modelling purposes, and I made clear it was always unlikely to go ahead.
'And so based on what we've heard and the strength of feeling that this has generated across the city, the Greens will not be supporting any proposals put forward to move to four-weekly collections at this time.
'The full results of the consultation will be presented to a cross-party group to decide on any changes to our waste and recycling services.
'I would like to thank everyone who made the time to make their voice heard. The Greens aim to be as collaborative and transparent in our decision making as possible.
'While other parties consult on pre-made decisions, the views of Bristol will always be taken into account under this administration.'
The city's recycling rate is at around 45 per cent, and the Green Party has previously pledged to increase it.
Last year, the recycling collected earned the council £4.5 million in revenue, while disposing of it would have cost the city £8.3 million to process.
Cllr James Crawford, who also sits on the environment and sustainability committee, said: 'There are many changes that we need to make as a city to improve our recycling rate.
'I look forward to seeing the full results of the consultation and working cross-party on what measures we can take to improve recycling for Bristol.'
A number of authorities have switched to monthly collections, including Fife council and Conwy County borough council.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Revealed: The area where parents would pay £81,000 MORE to buy a home near a good school
Parents are willing to pay tens of thousands of pounds extra for a home in the catchment area of a top state school - and Labour's VAT hike on private school fees is driving up competition. According to Santander, parents would pay an average of £45,000 extra to secure a home in the catchment of an Ofsted-rated 'good' school. Almost three in four parents say they would be willing to pay over the odds to live in an area where their children would be prioritised for a place at such a school. On average, parents would be willing to pay 15 per cent more to live within 'good' catchment boundaries, some £44,736 extra on top of the Halifax House price index's average price tag of £298,237. School catchment areas are the geographic areas around a school and children who live in that area are usually considered first when it comes to places. Some 73 per cent are willing to pay a premium to secure a spot in one of these areas - and this has jumped compared to 63 per cent last year as competition heats up for state school spots. Private school fee hike drives up competition Places in top state schools are the latest hot commodity after January's VAT hike of as much as 20 per cent on school fees. VAT had never before been charged on private school payments, but Labour's manifesto revealed it would scrap the exemption for private schools, which previously saw them free of the 20 per cent tax. This came into force in January of this year in a bid to bolster the Treasury's dwindling coffers. And competition for state school spots is only set to get hotter, as 21 per cent of parents say they plan to pull their children out of private schools in the wake of the higher fees. Of this group, some 69 per cent say they would relocate to get their children into the best state school catchments, Santander says. David Morris, head of homes at Santander, says: 'Parents are understandably digging deep into their financial and emotional reserves to give their children a great education. 'There is good news for parents however, as a record number of properties coming to the market, combined with stabilising interest rates and improved affordability, will hopefully help some of them bag an outstanding home in their dream catchment area.' What's the good school premium in YOUR area? London parents willing to pay an extra 15 per cent to buy their home would have to fork out an extra £81,000 on the average house price, bringing the total to £620,901. In the south east it's a £58,239 hike to £446,499, while in the east of England it's a £50,174 jump to £384,668. In the east midlands, parents could pay £36,777 more, in the west midlands it's a £39,040 premium while in the southwest parents are happy stumping up £45,346 more. For the north west the premium works out at £36,344, in Yorkshire and the Humber it's £32,330, while in Northern Ireland it's £32,225. For Scottish homes, a 15 per cent premium is an extra £32,286 while for Welsh homes it's £34,189. The lowest premium is on homes in the north east homes where a 15 per cent premium works out at £26,588, hiking a home's price tag to £203,839. Such is the clamour for a place at a top school, that some parents say they would be willing to pay an extra 25 per cent on top of the average home's price tag. That's an extra £74,559 on the typical property, which hikes the purchase price to £372,796. NOT all state schools have catchment areas Parents should do their research before they decide to move to a particular area, however, as not all state schools have catchment areas. Admissions could instead be based on entrance test results, so it is vital to check the school's criteria. Even if a school does have catchment area, living in one doesn't guarantee a child's place in a school. The school could be oversubscribed, or prioritise applicants within the catchment area based on test scores. Catchment areas can also change, so there's no guarantee if you buy a house now that your child will later be admitted to the school of your choosing. And not only could that derail any plans for younger children to attend that school, it could cause your house price to take a tumble when it's time to sell as demand falters. But the fight for a spot in a hot catchment area is doing more than just squeeze the finances of these parents. One in three parents say the stress of not getting the desired catchment led to them considering home schooling. Meanwhile three in ten parents have lost friends in the fierce competition for a place in a top school and one in six have had sleepless nights. The new research shows families would also be willing to uproot and move an average of 31 miles to bag a place in a top-tier school, which is nine miles further than a year ago. > Are you pulling your child out of private school? Email Best mortgage rates and how to find them Mortgage rates have risen substantially over recent years, meaning that those remortgaging or buying a home face higher costs. That makes it even more important to search out the best possible rate for you and get good mortgage advice, whether you are a first-time buyer, home owner or buy-to-let landlord. Quick mortgage finder links with This is Money's partner L&C > Mortgage rates calculator > Find the right mortgage for you To help our readers find the best mortgage, This is Money has partnered with the UK's leading fee-free broker L&C. This is Money and L&C's mortgage calculator can let you compare deals to see which ones suit your home's value and level of deposit. You can compare fixed rate lengths, from two-year fixes, to five-year fixes and ten-year fixes. If you're ready to find your next mortgage, why not use This is Money and L&C's online Mortgage Finder. It will search 1,000's of deals from more than 90 different lenders to discover the best deal for you.
Daily Mail
32 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
It's not our fault! Ministers try to dodge blame as number of small-boat migrants to reach Britain since Labour came to power hits 50,000
Ministers tried to dodge the blame yesterday after the number of small-boat migrants reaching Britain under Labour passed 50,000. Keir Starmer was slammed for 'incompetence' over the handling of the Channel crisis, with the soaring figure a clear indication of the lack of a plan since he axed the Tories ' Rwanda deportation scheme on his first day in power. Remarkably, former Labour home secretary Jacqui Smith blamed the Tories, claiming: 'What is happening is the result of the last government.' Yesterday, large groups of migrants were seen sprinting into the surf off Gravelines beach, between Calais and Dunkirk, to board a boat to Britain. At first light, as French police stood and watched and a navy boat patrolled nearby, scores waded into the water to clamber on to a taxi boat that appeared just off shore. Only a few of them wore life jackets for the perilous crossing. The Government's 'returns deal' with France appears to have done little to deter those determined to get to Britain, with the latest total including more than 1,500 arrivals in the seven days since the 'one in, one out' scheme launched. Official figures revealed there were 474 arrivals on Monday alone, bringing the total since the general election on July 4 last year to 50,271, despite the Prime Minister's promise to 'smash the gangs' behind the trafficking trade. The milestone was passed seven months earlier than under his Conservative predecessor, Rishi Sunak. It does not include hundreds brought into Dover by Border Force vessels yesterday after being picked up mid-Channel, with the number to be confirmed today. Baroness Smith – who is now an education, women and equalities minister under Sir Keir – said: 'It is a completely legitimate claim to say that what is happening is the result of the last government that chose to focus on gimmicks with the Rwanda scheme.' Asked if the crossings were not Labour's fault, she insisted that the Government was taking responsibility now, but added: 'I don't believe it is our fault that it was enabled to take root in the way in which it has done by a government who failed to do what was necessary at that point. 'The last government enabled this hideous criminal activity to really get its roots into Europe. There was a lengthy period at the time in which the criminal gangs... behind this had the opportunity to have this operation set up and really embedded. 'And that's the task that this Government now has – to deconstruct that.' However, her attempt to evade responsibility was met with incredulity. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: 'The Government has confirmed 50,000 illegal immigrants have crossed the Channel in Labour's short time in power – the worst crisis in our history. 'Labour has surrendered our borders, and the consequences are being felt in our communities, from rising crime to shocking cases of rape and sexual assault by recent arrivals. Labour has scrapped Conservative deterrents and created the conditions for chaos, leaving the British people to foot the bill.' Labour scrapped the Tories' Rwanda asylum deal – designed to deter migrants from crossing – as one of its first acts, pledging instead to 'smash the gangs' by boosting law enforcement. However, small boat numbers are soaring, with 27,029 arrivals this year, up by 47 per cent on the same point last year and 67 per cent on the same point in 2023. Since the start of the crisis in 2018, 178,167 migrants have reached Britain, with only about four per cent of them removed. Yesterday, Tory leader Kemi Badenoch insisted she would reduce migrant crossings to zero if the Conservatives regained power. She added: 'Labour's plan to smash the gangs was just a slogan. Things are so much worse since Labour came into office. 'Their one in, one out scheme isn't going to work, and what we're seeing is a lot of local communities having to pay the price and bear the brunt of the Government's incompetence.' Asked if the Tories would cut the number of crossings to zero, she replied: 'I think we can. It wouldn't happen straight away, but it would happen quickly. 'My team are looking at what we can do in terms of detention centres. But stopping people from coming here in the first place – if they think they're going to be sent to Rwanda and not get here, get a free hotel, get benefits, then they won't come here.' It emerged yesterday that a woman drowned off the French coast as she tried to board a traffickers' dinghy on Monday. Thought to be a Somali in her late twenties, she was reportedly unable to get aboard and went into the sea off Dunkirk at 4am. She was brought back to the beach but could not be revived, making her the 19th small-boat migrant to die this year. The 'one in, one out' deal involves small-boat arrivals being sent back to France, with the UK accepting in return an equal number who have legally applied to come through official channels.
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Labour are no closer to ending rank unfairness of working people paying for the 8million on Universal Credit
Welfare weight That is up by a million since Labour came to power. 1 Worse, around half of claimants — 3.4million, which is more than the population of Wales — don't have to make any effort at all to find a job. Such a massive increase in the jobless and the hopeless only adds to Britain's soaring welfare bill. Labour did have modest plans to cut spending on benefits. They didn't go nearly far enough, but would have been something. But instead the reforms were botched and Keir Starmer gave in to protest from his left-wing MPs. Since then there has been no sign of any new plan. And in the meantime the benefits gravy train continues for some. A chronic lack of assessment means many hundreds of thousands of claims are never properly checked. The Universal Credit figures are yet more dreadful news on the economy for Chancellor Rachel Reeves — much of it self-inflicted. Her National Insurance rise on business has seen companies cut thousands of jobs, adding to the benefits mountain. Keir Starmer 'to BACK DOWN' on benefits cuts as he faces major revolt from MPs And with a £50billion black hole to fill, more tax rises are coming in the autumn. It seems Labour are no closer to ending the rank unfairness of a smaller number of working people paying for millions to sit at home and do nothing. No wonder the anger of hard-grafting families is growing. A grim toll ON a day when Labour reached the 50,000 illegal immigrants toll, you might have expected a bit of contrition. Instead of accepting that shocking failure, minister Jacqui Smith banged on about the Rwanda scheme. That was a deterrent option which may have worked, but we'll never know because Labour foolishly scrapped it on day one. Since then, the Government has served up a string of short-term plans which will either have a limited effect or be doomed to total failure. A little more recognition of voter anger over the issue wouldn't go amiss. Lost treasures ONE pub a day is closing its doors forever in the UK. But punters are desperate to see their locals survive, with polls showing they would back measures in the next Budget aimed at saving the trade. energy costs and crippling business rates.
