Boeing sued by flight attendants over MAX 9 mid-air panel blowout
In separate lawsuits, they are seeking compensation for past and future economic damages, citing physical and mental injuries, emotional distress and other financial costs.
"Each of the four flight attendants acted courageously, following their training and putting their passengers' safety first while fearing for their lives," Tracy Brammeier, the attorney representing each of the plaintiffs, said.
"They deserve to be wholly compensated for this life-altering traumatic experience."
Boeing declined to comment, while Alaska Airlines did not immediately respond to Reuters' request for comment.
The lawsuits were filed on Tuesday in Seattle's King County Superior Court and accuse Boeing of negligence and failure to exercise reasonable care in the production, sale and repair of 737 MAX jets and its parts.
"Boeing knew or should have known of the quality control issues present in its production of the 737 MAX line of aircraft," the filings said.
The incident sparked a crisis for the planemaker and prompted the U.S. Justice Department to open a criminal investigation into the company and declare that Boeing was not in compliance with a 2021 deferred prosecution agreement.
Last month, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) said Boeing had failed to provide adequate training, guidance and oversight to prevent the incident.
The board criticized Boeing's safety culture and its failure to install four key bolts in the panel during production, and accused the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) of ineffective oversight.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
Sha'Carri Richardson misses out on world 200m spot a week after arrest
American sprinter Sha'Carri Richardson failed to qualify for the 200m at this September's World Championships by one-hundredth of a second. The 25-year-old has an automatic berth in the 100m as the defending world champion, but had to go through qualifying for the 200m at the US National Track and Field Championships this week. She finished fourth in her heat in Eugene, Oregon, clocking 22.56 seconds - 0.01 seconds off the time of Madison Whyte, who took the final qualifying spot. she was arrested on an alleged domestic violence charge. Richardson was arrested at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport on Sunday 27 July, after an alleged altercation with her boyfriend, sprinter Christian Coleman. Coleman 'did not want to participate any further in the investigation and declined to be a victim', the police report wrote. Richardson was detained overnight and released last Monday, and ran in the opening round of the 100m before withdrawing from the semi-finals. Coleman ran in the 100m and 200m, finishing fifth and sixth respectively in the final, and defended Richardson, telling reporters, 'I don't feel like she should have been arrested. She's a human being and a great person. She's going to bounce back because she's the best female athlete in the world.' Richardson did not answer reporters' questions after her 200m heat. 'USATF is aware of the reports and is not commenting on this matter,' USA Track and Field said in a statement after Richardson's arrest.
Daily Mail
9 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Billionaires are snapping up 'trophy homes' in this American hotspot
The ultra-wealthy are ditching their second homes in London and buying up luxury properties in a US vacation hotspot, a new housing report has found. Ultra high net worth (UHNW) individuals, people with a net worth of more than $30 million, make up an exclusive group with a population of around 480,000. Members of this elite group own an average of three properties per individual, and a report from the information services firm Altrata found that the Florida hub of Miami is the leading city for them to purchase luxury second homes. 'Miami is the most popular second-home location in the US, and globally, with a total of 13,211 UHNW second-home owners,' according to Altrata's report, Residential Real Estate 2025: Spotlight on the World's Leading Markets for the Wealthy. Notably, the Billionaire Buyers in London mid-year 2025 survey conducted by Beauchamp Estates found that over 70 percent of wealthy sellers are ditching their second homes in the UK capital and heading to cities such as Miami. Miami real estate agents told the Daily Mail they have worked with numerous international clients buying trophy homes in their city. 'We've seen some interest from London-based buyers recently, many of whom are reallocating funds from the UK market into Miami, diversifying their holdings,' said Maria Kuzina, owner of Miami Luxury Real Estate. 'London buyers currently represent, I would say, around three to five percent of all international buyers in the luxury market.' Jay Batra of the Batra Real Estate Group said: 'Miami continues to attract a diverse range of international buyers. Colombians, Brazilians, Russians, and Canadians are among the largest groups of foreign nationals investing in second homes here, drawn by the city's vibrant lifestyle and unique real estate opportunities. Miami Beach has historically seen 70 to 75 percent of its homes owned as second or third properties by buyers from across the US and around the globe.' He said driving factors bringing the ultra-rich to The Magic City include the warm weather, sandy beaches and low taxes. 'Miami has experienced strong growth of its wealthy second-home population over the past five years,' Altrata's report said. 'The city has long been a popular location for wealthy buyers seeking an additional residence, attracted by Florida's favorable tax regime, warm climate and coastal setting.' Kuzina said her clients are drawn to Miami because 'it strikes a perfect balance between lifestyle and investment opportunities'. 'Miami remains a top choice for international buyers due to its year-round sunshine, tax advantages, waterfront lifestyle, and its growing status as a global luxury hub,' she added. 'Today's buyers seek high-end, move-in-ready properties with privacy, premium amenities, and architectural distinction. Branded residences are particularly appealing as they offer world-class design, luxury services, and strong resale value.' Batra explained that his international clients are looking for properties on the water with ritzy amenities. 'Condo buyers are drawn to the stunning water views, prime locations, and vibrant lifestyle that Miami and Miami Beach offer, paired with the convenience of being steps from the beach,' he said. Miami at been at the epicenter of a condo crisis after the 2021 collapse of a condo building in Surfside led to a new law that requires condo buildings to undergo structural inspections and shore up reserves. This has meant that many HOAs have been hiking fees and doling out hefty special assessments to comply with the new rules, which has reduced demand for condos. 'In Brickell, the allure lies in luxurious high-rises with breathtaking views and top-tier amenities like pools, gyms, and more - all within close proximity to workplaces.' He added that buyers searching for houses rather than condos tend to look for properties with a type of longevity. 'For those searching for houses, priorities shift to spacious yards, waterfront properties, private pools, and a sense of privacy. Buyers also focus on neighborhoods with strong potential for long-term value and appreciation,' Batra said. 'Additionally, flexibility is key; they often seek homes that can be easily rented out for a few months to a year if needed.' Batra admitted that some buyers are wary of Florida's turbulent housing market due to soaring HOA fees, skyrocketing insurance costs, and in some cases, hefty special assessments imposed by homeowners' associations. 'Buyers, both local and international, are increasingly concerned about rising costs. High insurance premiums and common charges are climbing across the board, adding to the burden already posed by elevated interest rates,' Batra said. 'These combined expenses are making it more challenging to purchase and maintain homes.'
Telegraph
9 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump's voters stand to lose the most from his kamikaze trade policies
Teflon Don strikes again. After concluding his new trade agreement with the European Union last week, many US trading partners will now face sky-high tariffs on their exports. The president's strongarm tactics and dealmaking have led many on the Right to praise Trump's approach. Even The New York Times has claimed that Trump is 'winning his trade war'. The economic reality is that Trump isn't winning anything. He is simply reshaping US trade policy to create a lot of losers: the American people chief among them. According to modelling by the Yale University-based Budget Lab, American consumers face paying for an average tariff rate of 18.2 per cent, the highest since 1934. They project that this will raise prices by 1.8 per cent in the short term, which translates to an average loss of $2,400 per household in 2025. Accounting for expected changes in consumer behaviour in response to the tariffs (by which time consumers have already lost out by paying for goods they otherwise would not have purchased), the effective tariff rate comes to 17.3 per cent; that is still the highest since 1935. More concerning for Trump and his party, however, is the regressive distributional effects of the tariffs. The proportional impact on disposable incomes for the lowest earning American households is set to be three times as bad as it is for the top decile. Trump's electoral success has been built on voters who feel that the economy has left them behind. His message has single-handedly reshaped the American electoral map and made his party significantly more dependent on poor, working-class, and non-university educated voters than it once was. Unlike 2020, Trump won a majority of voters earning less than $50,000 per year in 2024: this was an unthinkable outcome for a Republican presidential candidate as recently as a decade ago. While his 2016 election victory was powered by poorer white voters, he has since attracted significantly more poor and working-class Hispanic votes and even moved the needle on overwhelmingly Democratic African-Americans. Make no mistake, it is these American voters who will be the major losers from these tariffs, not Europeans, Canadians, or Mexicans. It would also be wrong to expect Trump's base to enjoy the benefits of the President's protectionism. Yes, American manufacturing output is projected to expand by 2 per cent because of the tariffs, but that is because raw manufacturing output would rise by substituting high value, specialised production with lower value production. This makes the sector less efficient and productive. Some small groups of people may get jobs that otherwise wouldn't have existed, but that will be at the direct expense of far more people who will suffer from subsequent lower productivity. In any case, the positive impact of increased manufacturing production on overall economic output would be more than cancelled out by expected productivity losses in key sectors like construction, mining, and agriculture. These industries have been a fruitful source of Republican fundraising and employ plenty of Trump's core voters. But could it be that this doesn't matter? Trump is giving Americans less globalisation at the expense of their incomes: isn't that what people voted for? Perhaps, but the voters who swing US elections do so with their wallets – the opinions they state to pollsters matter much less. The reason Trump lost in 2020 and the reason why he reclaimed office in 2024 is the same: it's the economy, stupid. Trump may not have to face voters again, but his party and the long line of would-be successors should be worried.
