
Von der Leyen calls on Hungary to lift ban on Budapest Pride
Ursula von der Leyen has urged Hungary to allow the Budapest Pride, scheduled to take place this weekend, to "go ahead without fear of any criminal or administrative sanctions against the organisers or participants".
The appeal represents her most direct intervention in the new showdown between the government of Viktor Orbán and the European Commission.
"To the LGBTIQ+ community in Hungary and beyond: I will always be your ally. You have every reason to be proud," the president of the Commission said in a video message posted on social media on Wednesday evening.
"Europe is stronger and richer because of you. I am on your side. Today and every day."
In a highly controversial law approved in spring, the Hungarian parliament banned public events considered to be in breach of the Child Protection Act, which heavily restricted depictions of homosexuality and gender reassignment.
The text allows authorities to use facial recognition tools to identify people who organise and attend forbidden events, leading to fines of up to 200,000 Hungarian forints (€485). If not paid, the fines will be collected as taxes.
Based on the law, police later banned the celebration of the Budapest Pride, which draws thousands of visitors to the city every year.
The liberal mayor of Budapest, Gergely Karacsony, struck a defiant tone and announced the celebration of an umbrella event called "Day of Freedom" to bypass the prohibition.
"Budapest city hall will organise the Budapest Pride march as a local event on 28 June, Period," Karacsony said last week.
In her message, von der Leyen joined the cause, expressing her "full support and solidarity" to Hungary's LGBTIQ+ community.
"In Europe, marching for your rights is a fundamental freedom. You have the right to love who you want to love and be exactly who you are," she said.
"Our Union is one of equality and non-discrimination. These are our core values, enshrined in our treaties. They must be respected at all times, in all member states."
Orbán replied almost immediately to her video message.
"Dear Madam President, I urge the European Commission to refrain from interfering in the law enforcement affairs of Member States, where it has no role to play," he said.
"I also call on the Commission to focus its efforts on the pressing challenges facing the European Union—areas where it does have a clear role and responsibility, and where it has made serious mistakes in recent years, such as the energy crisis and the erosion of European competitiveness."
The Commission has not yet announced legal action against Hungary.
This is a developing story.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

LeMonde
an hour ago
- LeMonde
Europe's support for Ukraine flags after three years of war
Although European leaders have regularly reiterated their support for Kyiv against Moscow, that support now seems less resolute. Faced with a war at Europe's borders that has dragged on since February 2022, the rise of nationalist parties across Europe, numerous uncertainties tied to Donald Trump's return to the White House and increased attention on the situation in the Middle East, Ukraine is no longer the absolute priority. Still, the European Union's 27 member states can't ignore the conflict, as Vladimir Putin's expansionist aims could one day affect them as well. On Thursday, June 26, during a meeting in Brussels, European leaders want to signal their unwavering commitment to Kyiv. But for the third time since early March, they have to do so as 26, without the pro-Russian Hungary, making it a symbolic – but empty – gesture. This highlights Budapest's increasingly rigid stance, as Hungary has for three years driven a hard bargain in return for joining Europe's consensus on helping Ukraine. With a year to go before Hungary's elections, Prime Minister Viktor Orban is becoming tougher in negotiations, with some at the table fearing the consequences.


Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Flights cancelled in Brussels amid strike over proposed pension reform
Transport services were severely disrupted in Belgium as general strikes took place nationwide over the proposed federal reforms and cuts to pensions. Departure flights in Brussels Airport, also known as Zaventem, were cancelled as security and airport personnel participated in the strikes. The country's main airport only received 103 incoming flights. 261 flights were originally set to land at the airport. Further south of the city, Charleroi, a major European hub for low cost airlines like Ryanair, preventively cancelled all its flights on Wednesday, citing a lack of staff. All flights were grounded for the day. 'Passengers scheduled to fly via Charleroi on 25 June will be contacted by their airline for a rebooking or refund. We regret the impact of this national strike on our passengers' travel plans and apologise for any inconvenience caused,' said Charleroi Airport in a statement on their website. 'I have to wake up at six. I have to come here. I have to wait. I don't know what is going on. It's the first time for me, that kind of situation. And I'm a little bit shocked, to be honest,' said a traveller. The coming days are expected to be extremely busy in Brussels' two airports as airlines scrambled to rebook passengers affected by the strikes on the next flights. Zaventem airport expects to process around 90,000 passengers per day for the coming few days. 'Tomorrow will be a lot busier than initially anticipated 12,000 extra passengers and also Friday we have 2,000 more passengers than initially anticipated. So it will be busy days at the airport, also with the holiday exodus so is especially important to get to the airport on time,' said Ihsane Chioua Lekhli, spokesperson for Brussels Airport. This is the fifth major strike to take place this year to oppose what protesters called unacceptable proposed reforms to the pension bill. The federal government had planned to scrap a special pension scheme and unify retirement age for all civil servants – to 66 – to make it in line with that of the private sector. The proposal has enraged many workers and trade unions, who concurrently organised several major protests around the country. 'I feel very bad that half-way through our career they are going to reform our pension and that we are going to have less pension. And that we're probably going to buy tanks and other things to wage war with that money instead,' said a protester with the Christian union. Flemish nationalist Bart De Wever was appointed prime minister in early February after months of coalition talks following Belgium's federal elections in June of last year. The government says pension reforms are needed as the rising life expectancy is causing costs to soar in a country already grappling with a large federal budget deficit which is in violation of European Union rules. Brussels, a NATO member, has also pledged to increase defence spending to 5% of GDP by 2035, in line with the new NATO targets adopted on Wednesday in the summit in The Hague.
LeMonde
2 hours ago
- LeMonde
Fariba Adelkhah, anthropologist: 'The Western view of Iranian society is binary and ignores its increasing complexity'
The anthropologist in me – and I speak only in that capacity – is stunned by the gap between the complexity of Iranian society, which I have studied for 40 years, and the simplistic, if not ignorant, approach shown by Israeli, American, and European governments as they conduct or legitimize this war of aggression against the Islamic Republic. The confusion of the aggressors' objectives is also striking: Is their goal the destruction of the nuclear program or regime change? From the standpoint of international law, this is undeniably a war of aggression, described as "preventive," in the name of a presumed, and perhaps largely fantasized, danger. Netanyahu speaks of the "existential" Iranian nuclear threat, much as Putin invokes "Nazism" in Ukraine. As an Iranian saying goes, "When one wants to commit a crime, one puts on religious garb." And what is this "good" that is supposedly being delivered to the Iranian people, or this "evil" from which they are to be rescued? Is it worth cynically risking a nuclear accident through bombing and leaving the civilian population to suffer the consequences for decades? Does the Middle East need a Chernobyl on top of all its other misfortunes? Can democracy be imposed by foreign arms? Thus, a false dichotomy is drawn. On one hand, there's the "good" Iran – that of the "civil society," of the " Woman, Life, Freedom" movement, of the increasingly Trump-aligned opposition in exile amplified by a handful of prominent intellectuals and by most conservative media. And on the other hand, the "bad" Iran, composed of Islam, the mullahs, and the "dictatorship" of the supreme leader, who is seen as the mastermind of both repression and the nuclear program. Children of Khomeini This binary view of Iranian society ignores the ever-increasing complexity of its reality, due to its diversity, urbanization, educational level, and global reach through its diaspora. It also conceals its history. Like it or not, and whether they fought him or not, all Iranians are children of Khomeini. Most have no memory of the shah's regime and were instead shaped by an Islamic republic that molded them. This influence comes not only through coercion, but also through countless everyday interactions and ongoing co-optation within political and economic institutions. Family ties often bind people across political divides – or intensify those divisions, turning political conflicts into fratricidal ones.