logo
Google's new Genie 3 could be a watershed moment for AI and gaming — here's why

Google's new Genie 3 could be a watershed moment for AI and gaming — here's why

Tom's Guide5 days ago
Generative AI has come a long way. In the past few years, we have learned to generate images, poems, videos, and even entire apps and websites. However, the next wave could be the most impressive. Google DeepMind recently released its latest tool, Genie 3. Google describes this as a "world model." What that means more specifically is a tool that can generate entire digital worlds from a single prompt.
Imagine being able to create an entire explorable world from a single prompt. This could change the world of gaming, education, movies, and more.
While this isn't the first version of the tool — hence the 3 in the name — it is the first time the tool has reached a level where it could have genuine use cases out in the real world.
So what exactly is this tool, and what does it mean for the future of AI?
Genie, or its less catchy name, Generative Interactive Environments, is a world model tool that lets a user generate and then explore virtual worlds.
It is trained on internet videos, and, like other generative AI tools, simply requires a worded prompt to get started.
The first version of Genie was limited. It could generate worlds, and allowed for frame-by-frame interaction from the user. However, it was primarily operating in 2D game-like environments and didn't offer anywhere near the quality that is available now.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Then, Deepmind came out with Genie 2. It scaled the tool to offer immersive 3D environments, improved control and a noticeable improvement in real-world physics and graphics.
Now, Genie 3 has gone a step further. Worlds are generated at 720p resolution and play in 24 frames per second and a huge amount of work has gone into making the explorable worlds even more interactive.
What is important to note about the advancement through these models is that going from Genie 1 to 3 only took about a year and a half. In other words, the next version of Genie is unlikely to actually take a very long time.
Once you give Genie 3 a prompt, what will it actually generate? Effectively, Genie is creating a "world." You can control it with a keyboard or a touch screen, and the world can stay coherent for a few minutes. It even remembers off-screen objects that you've moved away with for up to a minute, with any changes you've made to them staying intact.
These worlds generate on the fly. That means that, in theory, they are infinitely explorable, with new parts loading as you move around them. However, the limit is how long the model can keep things consistent and in memory.
The details will begin to drift and fall apart after a few minutes. In other words, this would better apply to small regions like a house, instead of entire explorable worlds and cities.
An important feature that DeepMind has explored with Genie 3 is how editable these worlds are. You can trigger world events mid-play, adding objects or changing weather, and the model should, in theory, keep up with the change.
DeepMind has indicated that one of the key differences in this model is its understanding of real world physics. It can generate vibrant eco-systems and can replicate animal behavior and intricate plant life.
There are still plenty of limitations here. Genie 3 can't always simulate real-world locations with absolute accuracy. It also struggles with creating text in these worlds and accurately recreating more complicated events in the world continues to be a struggle.
However, seeing the progress through the Genie models shows that these challenges are likely temporary, with improvements happening quickly.
Currently, Genie 3 is only available to certain developers for testing. However, DeepMind sees multiple uses for the technology.
One of the more obvious uses is in game generation, since Genie 3 is able to quickly and effectively generate large, detailed worlds that are interactive. However, this could be used in other areas too.
DeepMind explains how it could be used to train robots on factory floors, something that is becoming more and more common. This kind of technology could create environments for them in which they could be trained effectively.
Outside of these areas, Genie 3 could make training programs more interactive on a more affordable level. Or a much more simple use, allowing people to explore the world virtually.
This technology could generate historical landmarks that are no longer around, or recreate cities historically for different time periods. Currently, the technology isn't capable enough for these tasks, but it does mark a huge jump towards them.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Made by Google: How to watch the Pixel 10 launch
Made by Google: How to watch the Pixel 10 launch

The Verge

time16 minutes ago

  • The Verge

Made by Google: How to watch the Pixel 10 launch

Google is set to reveal its new flagship Pixel hardware at a Made by Google event today at 1PM ET / 10AM PT, when we'll find out exactly what the company has in store with its expected Pixel 10 phones, Pixel Watch 4, and Pixel Buds 2A. Will they include Qi2 magnetic charging? Is the 10 Pro Fold going to be the first IP68-rated foldable phone? And why on Earth has Google seemingly changed the Pixel Watch 4 to charge on its side? I've already run through everything we expect Google to launch at the event, along with a deep dive on the most convincing leaks and rumors about the Pixel 10 phones. My colleague Allison has argued that Google has to convince us to actually care about all the AI appearing on our phones. All that's left is to watch the show. Thanks to a recent ad, we know the event will feature appearances from celebrity guests, including Jimmy Fallon, Steph Curry, Lando Norris, and the Jonas Brothers, so it sounds like Google won't just be rattling through hardware specs the whole time. We've embedded the stream right at the top of the page, though you can always watch it directly on YouTube. Google is also providing official streams in German, Spanish, and American Sign Language. Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Dominic Preston Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Audio Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Foldable Phones Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Gadgets Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Google Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Google Pixel Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Headphones Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Mobile Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All News Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Phones Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Smartwatch Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Wearable

Say farewell to the AI bubble, and get ready for the crash
Say farewell to the AI bubble, and get ready for the crash

Los Angeles Times

timean hour ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Say farewell to the AI bubble, and get ready for the crash

Most people not deeply involved in the artificial intelligence frenzy may not have noticed, but perceptions of AI's relentless march toward becoming more intelligent than humans, even becoming a threat to humanity, came to a screeching halt Aug. 7. That was the day when the most widely followed AI company, OpenAI, released GPT-5, an advanced product that the firm had long promised would put competitors to shame and launch a new revolution in this purportedly revolutionary technology. As it happened, GPT-5 was a bust. It turned out to be less user-friendly and in many ways less capable than its predecessors in OpenAI's arsenal. It made the same sort of risible errors in answering users' prompts, was no better in math (or even worse), and not at all the advance that OpenAI and its chief executive, Sam Altman, had been talking up. 'The thought was that this growth would be exponential,' says Alex Hanna, a technology critic and co-author (with Emily M. Bender of the University of Washington) of the indispensable new book 'The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech's Hype and Create the Future We Want.' 'Instead, Hanna says, 'We're hitting a wall.' The consequences go beyond how so many business leaders and ordinary Americans have been led to expect, even fear, the penetration of AI into our lives. Hundreds of billions of dollars have been invested by venture capitalists and major corporations such as Google, Amazon and Microsoft in OpenAI and its multitude of fellow AI labs, even though none of the AI labs has turned a profit. Public companies have scurried to announce AI investments or claim AI capabilities for their products in the hope of turbocharging their share prices, much as an earlier generation of businesses promoted themselves as 'dot-coms' in the 1990s to look more glittery in investors' eyes. Nvidia, the maker of a high-powered chip powering AI research, plays almost the same role as a stock market leader that Intel Corp., another chip-maker, played in the 1990s — helping to prop up the bull market in equities. If the promise of AI turns out to be as much of a mirage as dot-coms did, stock investors may face a painful reckoning. The cheerless rollout of GPT-5 could bring the day of reckoning closer. 'AI companies are really buoying the American economy right now, and it's looking very bubble-shaped,' Hanna told me. The rollout was so disappointing that it shined a spotlight on the degree that the whole AI industry has been dependent on hype. Here's Altman, speaking just before the unveiling of GPT-5, comparing it with its immediate predecessor, GPT-4o: 'GPT-4o maybe it was like talking to a college student,' he said. 'With GPT-5 now it's like talking to an expert — a legitimate PhD-level expert in anything any area you need on demand ... whatever your goals are.' Well, not so much. When one user asked it to produce a map of the U.S. with all the states labeled, GPT-5 extruded a fantasyland, including states such as Tonnessee, Mississipo and West Wigina. Another prompted the model for a list of the first 12 presidents, with names and pictures. It only came up with nine, including presidents Gearge Washington, John Quincy Adama and Thomason Jefferson. Experienced users of the new version's predecessor models were appalled, not least by OpenAI's decision to shut down access to its older versions and force users to rely on the new one. 'GPT5 is horrible,' wrote a user on Reddit. 'Short replies that are insufficient, more obnoxious ai stylized talking, less 'personality' … and we don't have the option to just use other models.' (OpenAI quickly relented, reopening access to the older versions.) The tech media was also unimpressed. 'A bit of a dud,' judged the website Futurism and Ars Technica termed the rollout 'a big mess.' I asked OpenAI to comment on the dismal public reaction to GPT-5, but didn't hear back. None of this means that the hype machine underpinning most public expectations of AI has taken a breather. Rather, it remains in overdrive. A projection of AI's development over the coming years published by something called the AI Futures Project under the title 'AI 2027' states: 'We predict that the impact of superhuman AI over the next decade will be enormous, exceeding that of the Industrial Revolution.' The rest of the document, mapping a course to late 2027 when an AI agent 'finally understands its own cognition,' is so loopily over the top that I wondered whether it wasn't meant as a parody of excessive AI hype. I asked its creators if that was so, but haven't received a reply. One problem underscored by GPT-5's underwhelming rollout is that it exploded one of the most cherished principles of the AI world, which is that 'scaling up' — endowing the technology with more computing power and more data — would bring the grail of artificial general intelligence, or AGI, ever closer to reality. That's the principle undergirding the AI industry's vast expenditures on data centers and high-performance chips. The demand for more data and more data-crunching capabilities will require about $3 trillion in capital just by 2028, in the estimation of Morgan Stanley. That would outstrip the capacity of the global credit and derivative securities markets. But if AI won't scale up, most if not all that money will be wasted. As Bender and Hanna point out in their book, AI promoters have kept investors and followers enthralled by relying on a vague public understanding of the term 'intelligence.' AI bots seem intelligent, because they've achieved the ability to seem coherent in their use of language. But that's different from cognition. 'So we're imagining a mind behind the words,' Hanna says, 'and that becomes associated with consciousness or intelligence. But the notion of general intelligence is not really well-defined.' Indeed, as long ago as the 1960s, that phenomenon was noticed by Joseph Weizenbaum, the designer of the pioneering chatbot ELIZA, which replicated the responses of a psychotherapist so convincingly that even test subjects who knew they were conversing with a machine thought it displayed emotions and empathy. 'What I had not realized,' Weizenbaum wrote in 1976, 'is that extremely short exposures to a relatively simple computer program could induce powerful delusional thinking in quite normal people.' Weizenbaum warned that the 'reckless anthropomorphization of the computer' — that is, treating it as some sort of thinking companion — produced a 'simpleminded view of intelligence.' That tendency has been exploited by today's AI promoters. They label the frequent mistakes and fabrications produced by AI bots as 'hallucinations,' which suggests that the bots have perceptions that may have gone slightly awry. But the bots 'don't have perceptions,' Bender and Hanna write, 'and suggesting that they do is yet more unhelpful anthropomorphization.' The general public may finally be cottoning on to the failed promise of AI more generally. Predictions that AI will lead to large-scale job losses in creative and STEM fields (science, technology, engineering and math) might inspire feelings that the whole enterprise was a tech-industry scam from the outset. Predictions that AI would yield a burst of increased worker productivity haven't been fulfilled; in many fields, productivity declines, in part because workers have to be deployed to double-check AI outputs, lest their mistakes or fabrications find their way into mission-critical applications — legal briefs incorporating nonexistent precedents, medical prescriptions with life-threatening ramifications and so on. Some economists are dashing cold water on predictions of economic gains more generally. MIT economist Daron Acemoglu, for example, forecast last year that AI would produce an increase of only about 0.5% in U.S. productivity and an increase of about 1% in gross domestic product over the next 10 years, mere fractions of the AI camp's projections. The value of Bender's and Hanna's book, and the lesson of GPT-5, is that they remind us that 'artificial intelligence' isn't a scientific term or an engineering term. It's a marketing term. And that's true of all the chatter about AI eventually taking over the world. 'Claims around consciousness and sentience are a tactic to sell you on AI,' Bender and Hanna write. So, too, is the talk about the billions, or trillions, to be made in AI. As with any technology, the profits will go to a small cadre, while the rest of us pay the price ... unless we gain a much clearer perception of what AI is, and more importantly, what it isn't.

Google Pixel 10 launch live: all the build-up ahead of today's Made by Google event
Google Pixel 10 launch live: all the build-up ahead of today's Made by Google event

Digital Trends

timean hour ago

  • Digital Trends

Google Pixel 10 launch live: all the build-up ahead of today's Made by Google event

Today's Made by Google event is set to be a Pixel-packed offering, with a host of new phones, a new Pixel Watch, and even some new Pixel Buds all on the cards. In fact, we're expect to see four new Pixel 10 phones launched alongside the Pixel Watch 4, which are just some of the big things we expect to see today. When does the Pixel 10 launch event start? The Made By Google event kicks off at 1pm ET (10am PT) today from New York City, and you can watch the Pixel 10 launch live. Recommended Videos But stick with us here for Google's biggest hardware launch event of the year, as we bring you all the build-up as well as live reaction and analysis. Pixel 10 launch live blog Live Last updated August 20, 2025 2:32 AM The liveblog has ended. No liveblog updates yet. Load more

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store