THC seltzers rise in popularity: What to know about the drinks
THC-infused beverages, sometimes referred to as "gardening drinks" on social media, are catching the eyes of consumers looking for alternatives to alcoholic beverages.
The THC beverage industry is expected to be a $4 billion industry by 2028, according to Euromonitor International, a London-based market research company.
Here is what to know about the increasingly popular drinks.
THC, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, is a psychoactive compound found in marijuana, according to the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration.
THC seltzers are made by infusing THC into carbonated drinks, creating a new subcategory of seltzers and a new means of cannabis consumption.
The drinks come with different percentages of THC per serving.
Marijuana comes from the Cannabis sativa plant which contains many chemical compounds known as cannabinoids. The most well-known cannabinoid is THC, recognized for causing feelings of euphoria or intoxication. Cannabis plants with less than 0.3% THC are classified as hemp, while those with higher levels of THC - the compound responsible for marijuana's psychoactive effects - are considered marijuana.
In 2018, President Donald Trump signed the 2018 farm bill into law, which legalized industrial hemp.
Under the law, products containing cannabis byproducts, such as cannabanoid oil, must be below 0.3 percent THC. The law also moved the regulation and testing of industrial hemp to states.
Not your recess refreshment: New SunnyD Vodka Seltzer draws in nostalgic appeal and new criticisms
Currently, only 18 states have regulations on hemp, many of which are similar to regulations on alcohol, according to Diana Eberlein, chair of the Coalition of Adult Beverage Alternatives, an advocacy organization that includes hemp beverage manufacturers, partners and alcohol retailers and distributors.
Eberlein told "Good Morning America" the coalition is working to put regulations in place across more states.
Consuming THC produces a psychoactive effect, according to the DEA.
THC seltzers are sold in a wide range of potencies -- ranging from 2.5 MG to 100 MG -- that can affect different people in different ways, according to Staci Gruber, Ph.D., director of the Cognitive and Clinical Neuroimaging Core and the Marijuana Investigations for Neuroscientific Discovery program at McLean Hospital in Massachusetts.
CBD hit the mainstream as a trendy sleep aid, but does it work?
In states where there are no regulations, THC seltzers may be found on store shelves next to non-THC seltzer drinks and energy drinks.
Gruber, also an associate professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, noted that side effects of drinking THC seltzers may include increased heart rate, nausea and feelings of anxiousness and paranoia.
According to the DEA, side effects of THC also include feelings of relaxation and disinhibition, as well as increased appetite, sedation, increased sociability, difficulty in thinking and problem-solving, hallucinations, impaired judgment, reduced coordination and distorted perception.
Experts advise that if you are going to consume THC seltzers, start with a low dose and take it slow.
THC seltzers rise in popularity: What to know about the drinks originally appeared on goodmorningamerica.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Trump claims Powell 'hurting' the housing industry in latest attack on Fed chair
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell is "hurting" the housing industry "very badly" and said he should cut interest rates. Trump has repeatedly urged Powell to cut interest rates while also sharply criticizing Powell. "Could somebody please inform Jerome "Too Late" Powell that he is hurting the Housing Industry, very badly? People can't get a Mortgage because of him. There is no Inflation, and every sign is pointing to a major Rate Cut," Trump wrote on Truth Social. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Japan's Nikkei to ease off record peak as trade honeymoon fades: Reuters poll
By Rocky Swift TOKYO (Reuters) -Japan's Nikkei share average will likely ease off recent record highs toward year-end, according to strategists in a Reuters poll, though much depends on a fragile trade agreement with the United States. Japan's benchmark stocks index last week surpassed its previous intraday record, and traded as high as 43,876.42 this week. The index is up more than 9% so far this year, but is forecast to slip back to 42,000 at the end of December, according to the median estimate of 18 analysts polled August 8-18. The Nikkei joined global equity bourses in a steep dive in April after U.S. President Donald Trump announced sweeping tariffs on imports. As Trump backed down on deadlines and his administration worked out bilateral trade deals, many benchmarks recovered. Japanese equities jumped around 11% after the U.S. agreed last month to reduce tariffs on Japanese auto imports to 15% from 27.5%, though a timeframe for the change and other details remain nebulous. "The 15% tariff is relatively low compared to the one on China, so Japanese companies may be able to gain a competitive advantage," said Masayuki Kubota, chief strategist at Rakuten Securities. "However, there is growing uncertainty about whether President Trump will actually uphold this agreement." Japan's economy remains largely reliant on exports. Data last week showed that the country's gross domestic product, the fourth biggest globally, grew much faster than expected in the second quarter. GOVERNANCE PUSH A major theme behind the Nikkei's gains in recent years has been the Tokyo Stock Exchange's push to boost corporate governance. Under pressure to improve returns and corporate value, companies have bought back shares in droves, and go-private deals have proliferated. The Nikkei early last year finally broke through the key high of 38,957.44 that had stood since 1989 during Japan's heady bubble economy. The gauge of blue-chip shares went on to set an intraday high of 42,426.77 on July 11, 2024, before the momentum petered out. With the tariff turmoil diminishing and the domestic economy resilient, nine of 12 analysts in the Reuters poll expect Japanese corporate earnings to be higher in the second half of 2025 than the first. "If the U.S. economy is solid, it becomes easier for Japanese firms to raise prices for their exported goods to cover the cost of the tariffs," said Yugo Tsuboi, chief strategist at Daiwa Securities. "That will underpin corporate earnings." Median forecasts predict the Nikkei will trade at 43,000 by mid-2026 and 45,500 by end 2026. Improving domestic wages, along with looser monetary policy by the U.S. Federal Reserve, will continue to make Japan a destination for foreign investors, said Oanda senior market analyst Kelvin Wong. "An increase in global liquidity due to a weaker U.S. dollar and an impending dovish Fed pivot is likely to trigger a positive feedback loop back into the Japanese stock market," said Wong. BOJ AND POLITICS Within the country, the major events investors are looking out for are a long-delayed rate hike by the Bank of Japan and the potential for political upheaval. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba is under pressure to step aside after an electoral drubbing last month. Expectations that his replacement will be more fiscally expansive have added to tailwinds for stocks, said IG analyst Tony Sycamore. "We do see the market continue to run higher into year-end, and then after that I'd expect to see a pullback as we get close to the BOJ rate-hiking cycle taking effect," he added. (Other stories from the Reuters Q3 global stock markets poll package)
Los Angeles Times
2 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump is undermining California's EV goals. The state has a new plan to fight back
From Donald Trump's first day back in office, he vowed to unravel California's sway over the nation's auto-emission standards by eliminating the state's progressive zero-emission mandates. He made good on that promise within the first several months of his second term. After a series of controversial congressional votes in May, Trump signed legislation that effectively nullified several of California's auto-emission standards, including the state's landmark regulation to ban selling new, gas-only cars statewide by 2035. Several weeks later, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed an executive order reaffirming California's commitment to its emissions goals, and effectively sending state agencies back to the drawing board in light of a newly antagonistic federal government. Their task: to reassert California's climate leadership and identify policies to boost zero-emission vehicle sales. At stake isn't just sales numbers for car and truck manufacturers, but California's ambitious climate agenda and the health of millions of its residents. Without the federal rebates and subsidies to support widespread adoption electric vehicles, the state will almost surely fall short of its greenhouse gas reduction targets and remain in violation of federal air quality standards. Unless, that is, Sacramento steps in, in a big way. On Tuesday, state officials delivered an eight-page report to the governor's office detailing several strategies to do just that. It focuses on boosting zero-emission vehicle adoption and reducing tailpipe emissions in communities dealing with some of the nation's worst air quality and most rapidly intensifying effects from global warming. In Southern California, alone, about 1,500 residents die annually due to exposure to unhealthy levels of air pollution, according to Liane Randolph, chair of the California Air Resources Board, one of the agencies that authored the report. 'Clean air efforts are under siege, putting the health of every American at risk,' Randolph said. 'California is continuing to fight back and will not give up on cleaner air and better public health. We have a legal and moral obligation.' The report comes amid a statewide slump in electric vehicle sales, expiring federal clean-vehicle subsidies and widespread economic uncertainty from Trump-imposed tariffs. In the document, California officials argued that one of the most important ways to counteract federal actions is to find state funding to restore subsidies for zero-emission vehicles. Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' will end federal tax credits for zero-emission vehicles — up to $7,500 for car buyers — on Sept. 30. Because electric vehicles generally cost more than their gas-powered counterparts, government incentives were critical in encouraging Americans to buy cleaner cars. Not long after Trump's election, Newsom committed to restore funding for a state rebate program if Trump eliminated the federal tax credit. The previous state program, which ended in 2023, provided $1.49 billion in funding for more than 594,000 electric, hydrogen or plug-in hybrid vehicles, according to the state Air Resources Board. That offered thousands of consumers up to a $7,500 rebate for purchasing or leasing a new zero-emission vehicle or plug-in hybrid, and the initiative prevented drivers from burning more than 456 million gallons of fuel, according to estimates. A new round of state subsidies for zero-emission vehicles would likely require state lawmakers to introduce new legislation or to create a specific allocation for that purpose in California's budget bill next year. Daniel Villasenor, a spokesperson for Newsom's office, said the state's cap-and-trade program — the state's leading climate program that generates $4 billion annually — could be the source of new zero-emission vehicle incentives. 'The Governor and his team are reviewing the recommendations set forth in the report,' Villasenor said. 'As the Governor said when he signed the executive order, California will continue our world-leading transition to cleaner cars.' Last year, more than 1.75 million new cars were sold in California; over 25% of those were zero-emission or plug-in hybrids, according to state data. As of June 30, about 900,000 cars have been sold in 2025, and 22.3% are zero-emission or plug-in hybrids. Tesla registered only 76,000 new cars statewide, well off its pace last year, when it sold around 200,000. Adrian Martinez, director of the nonprofit Earthjustice's 'Right To Zero' campaign, said government subsidies are critical for California to not only meet its clean air and climate goals, but to also stay economically competitive. 'It's smart for California to think about how they can [counteract] some of the reckless behavior of the federal government,' Martinez said. 'It's incredibly important right now, because there's huge environmental need for these zero emission vehicles. But there's also huge economic benefits from facilitating and advancing electric vehicles, including a lot of jobs in California.' State officials have advised the governor's office to consider other financial inducements to zero-emission drivers, such as free or reduced costs to drive in lesser-congested toll lanes on California highways. Electric car owners, who are permitted to drive alone in carpool lanes with a state-issued decal, are poised to lose privileges on Sept. 30 without federal authorization. The report calls on the California Public Utilities Commission to explore financial incentives to make electric-vehicle charging less expensive as electricity prices have risen substantially. It also broadly proposes expanding and maintaining the state's electric-vehicle charging networking, which has been plagued by broken charge ports, long wait times and too few stations. In addition, state officials stressed the need to lead by example. The state operates a fleet of more than 35,000 vehicles, and it is essential, the report says, that new vehicles purchased be zero-emissions. 'One of the opportunities is whether or not the state fleet might be able to move even faster [than our requirements],' Randolph said. 'I think it's a wonderful opportunity for sate fleets to show how zero-emission vehicles can be deployed.' Beyond incentives and demonstrating its own purchasing power, environmental advocates say California and local regulators must continue to adopt innovative regulations within their own authority. California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta sued the federal government moments after Trumped signed legislation that overturned California's auto emissions standards, including the Advanced Clean Cars II — the regulation that which would have banned the sale of new gas-only cars by 2035. As Bonta continues to fight for the landmark rule, Newsom's executive order in June instructed the California Air Resources Board to begin drafting the state's next major regulation in the coming months: Advanced Clean Cars III. There aren't specifics, at this point, so it's unclear if it is intended to build on existing regulation or act as an alternative measure if Trump succeeds in defeating Advanced Clean Cars II. In either case, state officials are signaling that California does not intend to shelve its environmental agenda. 'The world is accelerating forward toward cleaner vehicle technologies, and is going to watch the U.S. fade into the rearview mirror because this administration is choosing to quit the race,' Randolph said. 'This report shows California is still going to keep up the momentum.'
