logo
Judith Butler breaks down why people fear gender

Judith Butler breaks down why people fear gender

CBC28-01-2025

Judith Butler's first book, Gender Trouble, argued that gender is performative — and solidified Butler's position as an important gender and political theorist in modern times.
Butler's theory and writing is now often assigned in university, which is where Bookends host Mattea Roach first encountered it.
"Their seminal book, Gender Trouble, is an examination of gender categories that really spoke to me as a young person, trying to figure out how to show up authentically in the world," said Roach in the introduction to their conversation with Butler on Bookends.
Since Gender Trouble came out in 1990, Butler, based in California, has written several more books including Bodies That Matter, Power, Excitable Speech and The Force of Non-Violence and has published editorials and reviews in many journals and newspapers.
Butler's latest book, Who's Afraid of Gender?, discusses why people are so afraid of the discourse surrounding gender in our polarized world. On Bookends, Roach and Butler dove into this new book and why the term "gender" is so hard to define.
Mattea Roach: What does gender mean to you? When you're doing work in gender, what are you talking about?
Judith Butler: I'm going to sound like a true academic. What I mean by that is a term like gender has a long history and it has shifting meanings. So if I am interested in the history of gender, I can't give you a single definition and say this is what gender is.
I can only say, "Well, it's been seen that way and it's been seen this way. And a lot of people use it in the following way. It's come to be accepted in certain social movements or in certain academic settings as a term that can be interpreted in the following six ways."
If I were to give you a single definition and say this is the right one, then I would be faking a dogmatic position to make things easier for you.
I understand that people need to know "What is this gender anyway? Maybe Butler can tell us." But my job is to raise questions about how it's used and what it's being used for, but also what its history is and how we've forgotten that.
What its place is in progressive social movements. How it's figured in a phantasmagoric (having a deceptive appearance) way by right-wing movements and sometimes by feminists who are opposed to trans-affirmative health care or legislation. But if I were to give you a single definition and say this is the right one, then I would be faking a dogmatic position to make things easier for you.
MR: You've said before that you wrote Who's Afraid of Gender? out of a sense of obligation. Obligation to whom? And what brought about that feeling of obligation?
JB: We're all very mindful right now of scholars and artists and public intellectuals who are being attacked for expressing political views or they're being regarded as embodying certain political or social movements. And there's a question that gets posed for each of us who are attacked or censored or even lose a job or an important employment opportunity. And that is, do we take this personally?
In other words, is it about me? Do we become more individualistic or do we look around and see who else is being attacked in this way?
In my case, I'm being attacked, as I was in Brazil in 2017, because I represent something called gender ideology. And I was considered to be diabolical, like an actual incarnation of the devil. So when right-wing Christians tried to do harm to me physically or chased me from the country, they were actually trying to expiate the notion of this diabolical presence.
Now, I could have just collapsed and said, "I was badly attacked," and go to a therapist and work it out, which is important to do, by the way. But it seemed important to find out what was happening in Brazil, like who else is being attacked? And what about my colleagues in the queer and trans movements who are facing this every day?
It's important to link one's own situation to what other people are experiencing. And I'm an extremely privileged person from the global North and I can be attacked. Nothing protects me from violence. But the likelihood of that is diminished for someone in my position, because I can, to a large extent, determine the conditions of my protection.
But a lot of people have no such power. It's important for me to think about what's happening on the ground so I started to investigate again. Who are these people? What is this thing called the anti-gender ideology movement?
It turns out to be a concerted, highly-organized group that was convened at various world congresses, on the family and on religion, and whose media presence is amplified by various groups in Spain and elsewhere that have elaborate ways of using the Internet to reach a large number of people. I started to do a history of that movement, and I found along the way that there were a number of contradictory ways that the people who were opposing gender, especially on the Christian right, were conceiving of gender.
Sometimes it was a devil, a demonic force, sometimes it was likened to the Ebola virus or nuclear war or Hitler Youth. Sometimes it was associated with totalitarianism, indoctrination, child seduction, pedophilia. Other times it was hyper-capitalism and imperialist imposition from the global North.
I just looked at this bag full of accusations, not all of which were consistent with one another and had to ask myself what is happening here? And what I ended up concluding was that the anti-gender ideology movement gathers and incites a wide range of anxieties people have about their lives, about the durability and persistence of their way of life. I think actually that their lives are being threatened by capitalism and climate destruction and war and new ways of devastating unions and labour conditions.
We can name many reasons for why people are living with such a radical sense of instability. But these right-wing movements appeal to those anxieties and fears. They also stoke and strengthen those anxieties and fears. And they give people a way to blame migrants or critical race theory or gender ideology for their felt sense of insecurity and fear.
We can name many reasons for why people are living with such a radical sense of instability. - Judith Butler
So I tried to come up with some account for why people were drawn to that: why they could be mobilized by it, and how it has ended up becoming a movement that calls for the reversal of enormously important progressive legislation on gay and lesbian rights, on women's rights to reproductive freedom and justice, to trans people's rights.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

For David A. Robertson, stories are at the heart of reconciliation
For David A. Robertson, stories are at the heart of reconciliation

CBC

time30-05-2025

  • CBC

For David A. Robertson, stories are at the heart of reconciliation

Social Sharing Through his books and public speaking, David A. Robertson has dedicated his career to sharing stories about Indigenous people. Robertson began publishing books in 2010 and has since released 33 titles, including picture books, graphic novels, fiction and memoir. With each of his stories, the Winnipeg author delves into hard truths, always with a gentle touch and a profound sense of hope. His recent book, 52 Ways to Reconcile, is a guide for both Indigenous and non-Indigenous people who want to take action when it comes to reconciliation — and shows how we can work together on the long road ahead. "I really do think it's a community movement and it's not good enough for one [group] to understand the other," he said on Bookends with Mattea Roach. "It's for us to do the work to talk with each other. I can't stress that enough." A two-time Governor General's Literary Award winner and a member of the Norway House Cree Nation, Robertson shared his approach to building community between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people — and why the term "reconciliation" might not be the right word for it. Mattea Roach: I think reconciliation entered the vocabulary for a lot of people when the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was established back in 2008. But that wasn't the first time the word reconciliation was used to talk about Indigenous peoples and their relationship with Canada. What does the word reconciliation mean to you? David A. Robertson: I've been lucky enough to go to schools across Canada to speak to kids, teachers and adults all over the place. As I've done this work, I've come to a better understanding of what we're trying to do. I do think that reconciliation, in the broad sense that people think about it, is a misnomer because we're not trying to return to anything. We're not trying to fix something that was not broken before. The relationship between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Canada has always been broken. So it's not exactly the right word, I don't think. I used it, but I just want people to think critically about everything — so we think critically about this word. What we're trying to do, it's building relationships, it's building community. It's doing that through mutual understanding and respect. What we're trying to do, it's building relationships, it's building community. It's doing that through mutual understanding and respect. - David A. Robertson So we're not trying to build or return to anything. We're trying to build something for the first time. If we keep that in mind, I don't care what you call it, as long as we're doing things properly and with the right kind of vision. I think that conversation hopefully focuses that vision onto the right kind of goals we need to have. You've said that you see reconciliation as a verb. Can you talk more about that concept? It is an action, it is intentionality. We need to continue to think about the actions that we can take in our own capacities and have a long-term view and know that we need to continue to act into the future. My dad used to say that — I'll probably mention my dad every single answer I give — if he did things the right way, he won't see the results of the actions that he's taken in his lifetime. I was given this amazing reminder of that when, after he died, I was giving a personal development session to Indigenous teachers at the Canadian Human Rights Museum in Winnipeg. My dad worked in Indigenous education and after the session, the teachers came up to me and told me that a lot of them were there because of my dad. I saw what he meant there and I wish he was there to see that, but he knew he didn't have to be, he wouldn't be. We have a long road to go and a lot of actions need to be taken and will need to be taken for the foreseeable future. - David A. Robertson It's a continual action and keeping in mind as well that we're still trying not only to heal from what's happened, but we'll be trying to heal from what is happening now for a long time. We still have colonial systems in this country that are doing damage. That means that the clock hasn't started ticking yet to when we need to start healing as a whole. The foster care system, the education system, justice, all of these systems are still in place that are doing harm. So we have a long road to go and a lot of actions need to be taken and will need to be taken for the foreseeable future. If we take them with intentionality and with the knowledge that we all do have a role and we all can take an action and we should take an action, that's when we change this word into a verb. And that verb is a motivational factor for us to continue to do the work together as a community. You say that stories are at the heart of reconciliation. Why is that for you? Reconciliation is inexorably linked with truth. You can't get healing, whatever way you want to talk about it, without truth. And the truth lies in the stories that we tell. My dad and I used to talk about reconciliation as a conversation. It's not a one way conversation. It's like what we're doing now, sitting across the table and talking to each other and listening, really listening to each other and working to understand each other and come to respect through understanding. That's what it is. Then, through that, we see two things. One of them is that we're all people. We share the human condition. And the other thing is that the things that set us apart, the differences, make us stronger as a community. There's a teaching of non-interference in the Cree culture and that is that you don't interfere with how someone else lives. You try to model a good life through how you live. I think that's a really good way to go about anything.

Judith Butler breaks down why people fear gender
Judith Butler breaks down why people fear gender

CBC

time28-01-2025

  • CBC

Judith Butler breaks down why people fear gender

Judith Butler's first book, Gender Trouble, argued that gender is performative — and solidified Butler's position as an important gender and political theorist in modern times. Butler's theory and writing is now often assigned in university, which is where Bookends host Mattea Roach first encountered it. "Their seminal book, Gender Trouble, is an examination of gender categories that really spoke to me as a young person, trying to figure out how to show up authentically in the world," said Roach in the introduction to their conversation with Butler on Bookends. Since Gender Trouble came out in 1990, Butler, based in California, has written several more books including Bodies That Matter, Power, Excitable Speech and The Force of Non-Violence and has published editorials and reviews in many journals and newspapers. Butler's latest book, Who's Afraid of Gender?, discusses why people are so afraid of the discourse surrounding gender in our polarized world. On Bookends, Roach and Butler dove into this new book and why the term "gender" is so hard to define. Mattea Roach: What does gender mean to you? When you're doing work in gender, what are you talking about? Judith Butler: I'm going to sound like a true academic. What I mean by that is a term like gender has a long history and it has shifting meanings. So if I am interested in the history of gender, I can't give you a single definition and say this is what gender is. I can only say, "Well, it's been seen that way and it's been seen this way. And a lot of people use it in the following way. It's come to be accepted in certain social movements or in certain academic settings as a term that can be interpreted in the following six ways." If I were to give you a single definition and say this is the right one, then I would be faking a dogmatic position to make things easier for you. I understand that people need to know "What is this gender anyway? Maybe Butler can tell us." But my job is to raise questions about how it's used and what it's being used for, but also what its history is and how we've forgotten that. What its place is in progressive social movements. How it's figured in a phantasmagoric (having a deceptive appearance) way by right-wing movements and sometimes by feminists who are opposed to trans-affirmative health care or legislation. But if I were to give you a single definition and say this is the right one, then I would be faking a dogmatic position to make things easier for you. MR: You've said before that you wrote Who's Afraid of Gender? out of a sense of obligation. Obligation to whom? And what brought about that feeling of obligation? JB: We're all very mindful right now of scholars and artists and public intellectuals who are being attacked for expressing political views or they're being regarded as embodying certain political or social movements. And there's a question that gets posed for each of us who are attacked or censored or even lose a job or an important employment opportunity. And that is, do we take this personally? In other words, is it about me? Do we become more individualistic or do we look around and see who else is being attacked in this way? In my case, I'm being attacked, as I was in Brazil in 2017, because I represent something called gender ideology. And I was considered to be diabolical, like an actual incarnation of the devil. So when right-wing Christians tried to do harm to me physically or chased me from the country, they were actually trying to expiate the notion of this diabolical presence. Now, I could have just collapsed and said, "I was badly attacked," and go to a therapist and work it out, which is important to do, by the way. But it seemed important to find out what was happening in Brazil, like who else is being attacked? And what about my colleagues in the queer and trans movements who are facing this every day? It's important to link one's own situation to what other people are experiencing. And I'm an extremely privileged person from the global North and I can be attacked. Nothing protects me from violence. But the likelihood of that is diminished for someone in my position, because I can, to a large extent, determine the conditions of my protection. But a lot of people have no such power. It's important for me to think about what's happening on the ground so I started to investigate again. Who are these people? What is this thing called the anti-gender ideology movement? It turns out to be a concerted, highly-organized group that was convened at various world congresses, on the family and on religion, and whose media presence is amplified by various groups in Spain and elsewhere that have elaborate ways of using the Internet to reach a large number of people. I started to do a history of that movement, and I found along the way that there were a number of contradictory ways that the people who were opposing gender, especially on the Christian right, were conceiving of gender. Sometimes it was a devil, a demonic force, sometimes it was likened to the Ebola virus or nuclear war or Hitler Youth. Sometimes it was associated with totalitarianism, indoctrination, child seduction, pedophilia. Other times it was hyper-capitalism and imperialist imposition from the global North. I just looked at this bag full of accusations, not all of which were consistent with one another and had to ask myself what is happening here? And what I ended up concluding was that the anti-gender ideology movement gathers and incites a wide range of anxieties people have about their lives, about the durability and persistence of their way of life. I think actually that their lives are being threatened by capitalism and climate destruction and war and new ways of devastating unions and labour conditions. We can name many reasons for why people are living with such a radical sense of instability. But these right-wing movements appeal to those anxieties and fears. They also stoke and strengthen those anxieties and fears. And they give people a way to blame migrants or critical race theory or gender ideology for their felt sense of insecurity and fear. We can name many reasons for why people are living with such a radical sense of instability. - Judith Butler So I tried to come up with some account for why people were drawn to that: why they could be mobilized by it, and how it has ended up becoming a movement that calls for the reversal of enormously important progressive legislation on gay and lesbian rights, on women's rights to reproductive freedom and justice, to trans people's rights.

The bright lights in Port de Grave mean more than Christmas. They're also about memory and loss
The bright lights in Port de Grave mean more than Christmas. They're also about memory and loss

CBC

time10-12-2024

  • CBC

The bright lights in Port de Grave mean more than Christmas. They're also about memory and loss

On a twinkling wharf in a small Newfoundland town, a crowd of about 100 people stopped singing and chatting on Friday night to bow their heads in a moment of silence for local fish harvesters. Now in its 26th year, the boat lighting in Port de Grave, N.L., draws visitors from all over the province, but organizers have kept the town's fishers at the heart of the ceremony. The event kicks off with Christmas carols and hot chocolate, but it includes a solemn prayer for the fishers — those who died in the past year in the community from any cause, and those who continue to make it home safe while doing one of the deadliest jobs in Canada. "Any time the fishery is on the go, you have people losing their lives," said organizer Joyce Morgan. "And we're so very thankful that [while] there have been a number of accidents on the water ... everyone has come home safely." WATCH | Port de Grave's spectacle attracts tens of thousands of visitors every year during the holiday season: Christmas lights adorn boats in Port de Grave 5 years ago Duration 2:00 For twenty years in Port de Grave, Nfld., every boat in the harbour has been decked out with lights throughout the holidays. The fishing town's spectacle attracts tens of thousands of visitors. Atlantic Canada is knit together by the fisheries and, as a consequence, by a shared grief wrought by tragedy at sea. An average of 12 fishers were killed on the job each year between 1999 and 2021, according to the Transportation Safety Board of Canada. All of Newfoundland and Labrador celebrated this summer when seven men made it home to New-Wes-Valley, N.L., after a fire aboard their fishing vessel more than 220 kilometres from shore forced them to jump into the sea. They spent three days adrift in a life raft before being found. Port de Grave's boat-lighting is perhaps the most well-known in the province, but other towns have similar events. In the eastern Newfoundland town of Branch, many of the 200 residents will gather on the wharf for their own annual boat-lighting ceremony on Dec. 21, Mayor Kelly Power said in an interview. Branch's boat-lighting tradition began in 2014, in an effort to lift community spirits following a particularly hard year. Four fishermen, including a young man, had died in the community from various causes — none on the job, Power said — and people were devastated. So fishers draped their boats in Christmas lights, transforming the harbour into a glimmering refuge against the dark North Atlantic Ocean. The Branch boat-lighting ceremony is now a cherished event. "We pay tribute to today's fishermen, and we offer prayers for protection and safety to our fishermen today," Power said. "And at our service, we'll light candles in a moment of silence for those who have gone before the fishermen." Ninety-six-year-old Denis Nash, Branch's oldest resident and a lifelong fisherman, has the yearly honour of flicking the switch to turn on all the lights, Power added. Port de Grave is about 100 kilometres northeast of Branch, on the tiny Port de Grave peninsula in Conception Bay. The area is home to about 875 people, many of whom deck out their houses in brilliant, blinking Christmas displays along with their boats. One couple build a pathway on their property every year lined by more than 500 illuminated candy canes. Their place was a popular spot for pictures on Friday night. Port de Grave's event began with a single fisherman — Eric Lear — deciding to light up his boat on Christmas. It has since grown and now requires volunteers to direct cars from out of town into designated parking areas. About 50 boats were lit up on Friday, and Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Andrew Furey was even on hand — though he politely declined requests to sing carols with the band. It was the first time a premier had attended the event, organizers said. Visitors posed for pictures in front of a towering Christmas tree made of lobster traps. Others took selfies by an inflatable Santa strapped to the back of a fishing boat. The figure looked like it was waving and laughing as it was shaken by the ferocious wind. "This site has become an annual Christmas event for many and a beacon of hope and strength to all that visit," fisherman Ivan Lear told the crowd as they lifted their heads from the moment of silence. "Preparing our vessels for the boat lighting is a way for all of us to give back and to brighten up the season."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store