To review reservation policy, Census data needed: Nagaland govt
Kohima, Nagaland government has expressed its inability to move forward with any review of the job reservation policy without accurate and up-to-date population data, reiterating that such a move must be based on the national census figures.
Responding to queries about demands by tribal bodies seeking a re-evaluation of the job reservation system, Nagaland government spokesperson and minister K G Kenye said, "We cannot move blindly. We need a basis—and that basis is the census".
On April 27, representatives of the five major tribes of Nagaland - Angami, Ao, Lotha, Rengma, and Sumi - submitted a letter to the chief minister giving a 30-day ultimatum to the state government, demanding immediate action on their September 2024 request to review the Nagaland job reservation policy for backward tribes.
However, talking to reporters at the state civil secretariat here on Wednesday, Kenye noted that the census process in Nagaland has been mired in legal disputes.
"Our census has been challenged. Tribal organisations have approached the high court, and now the matter has reached the Supreme Court," he said, adding that there is disagreement over which census year as to whether 2001 or 2011, should be considered valid.
"Now, we have already crossed 2021, which should be the reference for the current decade, but even the 2011 census has been challenged," he remarked.
In light of these disputes, "We've decided to hold off until the new census data is available. Only then can we address these sensitive issues," Kenye asserted.
He also clarified that conducting a census is under the purview of the Central government and not within the powers of individual states.
"Unless the Centre announces and authorises it, we cannot undertake any census independently. It is a nationwide exercise," the minister explained.
"We hope our tribal leaders and citizens understand that this is beyond the state's control. We are waiting, just like everyone else," Kenye added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
18 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Supreme Court refuses to intervene in Madras High Court order on consecration rites in Tiruchendur temple
The Supreme Court on Wednesday (June 4, 2025) refused to intervene in a plea against a Madras High Court order constituting a committee to fix the schedule for Kumbhabhishekam (consecration ceremony) for Arulmigu Subramaniya Swamy Temple in Tiruchendur, Tamil Nadu. A Bench headed by Justice P. K. Mishra however allowed the petitioner, R. Sivarama Subramaniya Sasthrigal, the Vidhayahar at the temple, to file a review plea against the High Court order. The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court had directed the constitution of a committee of experts to decide the timing for conducting the consecration ceremony at the temple. The petitioner, in the High Court, had argued that he said he had been the Vidhayahar at the temple for the past 13 years. During temple festivals and other functions he had to fix the timings for their commencement, pujas and celebrations and point out customary and Agamic practices and principles to be adopted according to the nature of the deities and the functions, he had said in the High Court. He had argued in the High Court that the date (July 7) and the timing fixed for the ceremony were not suitable for the event. The petitioner had sought a direction to the authorities to follow the ancient texts and literature and declare the consecration ceremony.
News18
25 minutes ago
- News18
Ayodhya & Beyond: How Ram Mandir Defines Modi's Civilisational Legacy
Last Updated: The prime minister's leadership shows that India can honour its traditions without being shackled by them, that it can build a modern state while nurturing its soul The air in Ayodhya bustles with a pulse—sandalwood and rosewater blended with the faint hum of anticipation—as if the city itself is holding its breath. On Thursday, the Pran Pratishtha of the Ram Darbar idols on the temple's first floor, alongside consecrations in six other shrines within its sprawling complex, marked a moment that transcends rituals. The Ram Mandir stands as a bridge between India's ancient soul and its restless modern ambitions, a monument forged from faith, sacrifice, and an unyielding will to reclaim a piece of its story. The Ram Mandir is no ordinary structure. It embodies centuries of longing and sacrifice—generations who whispered prayers for a temple to Lord Ram as their voices carried the weight of historical wounds. The site, once a battleground of competing narratives, now hosts a soaring edifice of sandstone and marble. Its gold-plated spires pierce the sky like a quiet declaration of victory. Yet, the temple's grandeur lies not just in its scale, but in its improbable speed. From the Supreme Court's 2019 verdict clearing the way to its near-completion in just five years, the Ram Mandir is a testament to what India can achieve when its heart and hands align. This breakneck pace owes much to Prime Minister Narendra Modi's resolve. He saw the temple not as a mere construction project but as a national vow. Modi's approach was surgical: he appointed Nripendra Mishra, his former principal secretary, to helm the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust. Mishra, a bureaucrat with a reputation for cutting through red tape, became the project's linchpin. Under his watch, artisans from across India carved stone with techniques passed down through generations. Modi's oversight was relentless, from securing funds to smoothing over bureaucratic hurdles, ensuring the project never stalled. The prime minister regularly reviewed the temple's progress, sending a clear message each time: this was India's mission, and it would not falter. The Mandir's rise is a mirror to India's evolving cultural narrative. For too long, parts of the nation's intellectual elite viewed overt expressions of Hindu heritage with unease, dismissing them as backward and divisive, or worse, as attempts to discount Indian 'secularism." The temple challenges that hesitance. It stands as an unapologetic embrace of India's spiritual roots, not as a rejection of modernity but as a foundation for it. The complex itself reflects this balance: alongside the Ram Darbar, temples to Shiva, Hanuman, Ganpati, Surya Dev, Mata Bhagwati, Annapurna, and Sheshavatar weave a tapestry of Sanatan Dharma's pluralism. This is not a monolithic vision of faith but a vibrant mosaic, inviting all to find their place within its fold. The Mandir's inclusivity is manifest by the fact that its doors open to every caste, creed, and community. It is a living symbol of a nation growing comfortable in its own skin, ready to assert its identity on a global stage. Yes, the Ram Mandir movement was always political. The Ram Mandir itself, apart from being a holy site of worship and a spiritual centre for Hindus, is also a living symbol of Bharat's civilisational resilience. It is a testament to Dharma always prevailing over injustice and adharma. That is truly the essence of Shri Ram himself. Even if it takes over 500 years to reestablish, the final victory of right over wrong is a given. In this case, the wrong was the demolition of the original Ram Mandir by Babur and his army of marauders. It was an out and out act of adharma. The realisation of the Ram Mandir dream in Ayodhya marks the arrival of the 'political Hindu". This is a Hindu who no longer accepts marginalisation in the name of vote bank politics. This is a Hindu that knows how to take what rightfully belongs to them. This is a Hindu that is proud of Bharat's ancient civilisation, and is not unnecessarily enamoured by alien concepts of 'secularism" and the complete elimination of dharma from politics. This is a Hindu that realises that the establishment of Raj Dharma is critical to India's journey ahead. Modi's legacy is deeply entwined with this achievement. He has taken a site of historical pain—a wound that festered through decades of legal battles and communal strife—and transformed it into a symbol of unity. His leadership shows that India can honour its traditions without being shackled by them, that it can build a modern state while nurturing its soul. The temple's construction is a marvel of collective effort. Artisans laboured alongside engineers, their hands shaping stone while cranes hummed overhead. Local communities, from shopkeepers to farmers, rallied to support the influx of workers and pilgrims. The project's funding, drawn from donations across India and the diaspora, reflects a shared stake in its success. This was not the work of one man or one government but of a civilisation pooling its energies toward a singular goal. The result is a structure that feels both timeless and immediate, its carvings telling stories of ancient sages while its very existence speaks to India's modern resolve. First Published: June 05, 2025, 12:13 IST News opinion Opinion | Ayodhya & Beyond: How Ram Mandir Defines Modi's Civilisational Legacy
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
"Impeachment Not One Party's Agenda": Kiren Rijiju On Judge In Cash Row
Quick Read Summary is AI generated, newsroom reviewed. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said the impeachment motion against Justice Yashwant Varma, linked to judicial corruption, requires bipartisan support. Allegations of burnt cash found at his house prompted calls for collaborative action. New Delhi: The planned impeachment motion against high court judge Justice Yashwant Varma in the cash-at-home matter is linked to corruption in the judiciary, and is not the agenda of one political party, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said today, explaining why all political parties should jointly move the motion. The Supreme Court had formed an inquiry committee following allegations of "burnt cash" found at a storeroom of Justice Varma's house when he was a judge of the Delhi High Court. "With regards to the impeachment motion against the high court judge [Justice] Yashwant Verma, I have initiated discussion with political parties. Most of the major political parties have already been told and we have sought a collaborative effort where all the political parties should come together and jointly move the motion," Mr Rijiju said today. "The government feels that the matter is related to corruption, and this is a matter related to corruption of a high court sitting judge, so this is not one party's political agenda. It is the stand of every political party to fight against the menace of corruption, whether it is a judicial or any other space," the parliamentary affairs minister said. "So the government would like to take all political parties on board and then initiate the impeachment motion. I will reach out to some remaining smaller parties also so that everybody is on board on this important matter," he added. The in-house inquiry committee submitted its report on the issue last month, which has since been forwarded to the Prime Minister and the President. On May 4, a panel of judges tasked with conducting an internal inquiry into allegations of cash being discovered at Justice Varma's house submitted its report to the then Chief Justice of India, Sanjiv Khanna. According to an official communication from the Supreme Court, the three-member committee comprising Justice Sheel Nagu, Chief Justice of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana; Justice GS Sandhawalia, Chief Justice of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, and Justice Anu Sivaraman, judge of the High Court of Karnataka, concluded its investigation and presented its findings in a report dated May 3. Justice Varma was sworn in as a judge of the Allahabad High Court under unusual and contentious circumstances on April 5. The monsoon session of parliament will begin on July 21 and run till August 12. It will also be the first parliament session following Operation Sindoor. The Opposition leaders have been seeking a special session of parliament upon the arrival of the all-party delegations sent to other nations to present India's views on Pakistan's state-sponsored terrorism.
