'Limbs in the loch' killer makes new freedom bid 25 years after he raped and killed teenage boy before cutting up his body
William Beggs, 62, was convicted of luring Barry Wallace back to his Kilmarnock home in 1999 where he then killed him, dismembered his corpse and dumped his remains in Loch Lomond.
Mr Wallace's head was later found washed up on Barassie beach. Beggs was jailed for life in 2001 and told he would have to serve a minimum of 20 years behind bars before being considered for parole.
This was after he was found guilty of stabbing Gary Oldham, 28, to death in Yorkshire in 1987 and leaving his mutilated body on the moors. Though, his conviction was overturned on a technicality 18 months into his life sentence and he was freed.
His lawyers now claim the Parole Board's decision not to release Beggs in February 2024 was incorrect and have asked judge Lady Drummond to quash the decision.
They have also requested the board convene a tribunal of new members to reconsider Northern Ireland-born Beggs' latest bid for freedom.
Mark Lindsay KC told Ms Drummond that Parole Board officials had acted lawfully by refusing Beggs' parole.
He said: 'There's no merit in the grounds of appeal advanced on behalf of the petitioner. I invite your lady to dismiss the petition.'
Police divers found the severed limbs of the teenage supermarket worker in Loch Lomond a few days after he disappeared on December 5 1999
Beggs observed some of the proceedings from prison via a webcasting app.
His lawyers claim Parole Board officials considered his conviction for murdering student Gary Oldham in 1987 as part of his hearing. However, Beggs had successfully appealed that conviction.
On Monday, Mr Lindsay said the Parole Board had simply considered evidence which related to the level of risk posed by Beggs to the public.
He added: 'They looked at the lack of insight and they looked at the lack of insight focused work on the part of the petitioner.
'They were entitled to conclude that the level of risk posed by the petitioner cannot be, at this time, managed within the community.'
Beggs will have another chance to secure parole later this year.
Having moved to Scotland after his conviction for murdering Gary Oldham was overturned, Beggs – who was working in a call centre in Edinburgh – lured 18-year-old Barry Wallace from Kilmarnock to his home.
The teen had been leaving a Christmas party before Beggs raped and murdered him. He used a saw and kitchen knife to hack his body into eight pieces.
North Yorkshire Police recently attempted to find fresh evidence that might link Beggs to the murder of Mr Oldham, with a view to possibly bringing the case back to court.
Police Scotland handed over a blood-stained razor they found in Beggs' home – anticipating that DNA tests would link it to the Yorkshire case.
However the blood was not a match for Beggs, Mr Wallace or Mr Oldham. A source at North Yorkshire Police said: 'The murder of Barry Oldham is unusual in that Beggs was convicted and there seemed no doubt about his guilt.
'Even with the changes to the double-jeopardy law now well-established, it would take significant fresh evidence to give us any chance of charging Beggs afresh.
'We hoped the blood on the razor might provide that calibre of evidence and we were happy to assist Police Scotland in that enquiry.
'Mr Oldham's dad, Albert, was still alive at that time and we were able to obtain his DNA for comparison, but there was no match.
'This suggests there might be another victim of a bloody assault by Beggs out there. If there's little hope of justice for Barry Oldham, perhaps the razor offers hope for another.'
The hearing continues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Calls for smacking ban in England grow as 8 in 10 adults say punishment is 'unacceptable'
Demands for a smacking ban in England are growing as a poll revealed eight in ten adults think the punishment is 'unacceptable'. Parents are still allowed to use 'reasonable punishment' against their children despite the practice being outlawed in Scotland and Wales. In both nations, any type of corporal punishment, including smacking, hitting, slapping and shaking, has been illegal for at least three years. Polling for children's charity NSPCC, carried out by YouGov, surveyed 3,800 adults across England – of whom 749 were parents with a child under 18 and 198 were aged 18 to 24. It found 82 per cent of adults aged between 18 and 24 believe it is unacceptable for a parent to use force, however slight, against a child – up from 64 per cent in 2023. And 81 per cent of parents with children under 18 felt the same, a slight increase from 80 per cent last year. Of all adults surveyed, 71 per cent said they believe physical punishment against a child is unacceptable, up from 67 per cent in 2023. Earlier this year, leading health experts urged parliamentarians to give children the 'fundamental right to safety and protection' by backing a smacking ban. Children's doctors and psychiatrists said decades of research showed the 'detrimental effects of physical punishment'. NSPCC chief executive Chris Sherwood said: 'Parents and young people are telling us loud and clear that they don't want physical punishment to be a part of anyone's childhood. File image: Parents are still allowed to use 'reasonable punishment' against their children despite the practice being outlawed in Scotland and Wales 'Parents know their children and what works best for them. It is therefore crucial their experiences and opinions are not ignored or undermined.' In June, as part of debate on the Bill, Conservative peer Lord Jackson of Peterborough warned that introducing a smacking ban in England would be 'disproportionate and heavy-handed'. He argued 'reasonable chastisement' was harmless and it risked 'criminalising good and caring parents, as well as overloading children's services departments'. But in the wake of the murder of ten-year-old Sara Sharif in 2023 by her father – who had claimed in a call to police after fleeing England that he 'did legally punish' his daughter and that he 'beat her up too much' – the UK's four children's commissioners jointly called for a wholesale smacking ban. The commissioners insisted 'loving, well-meaning' parents have no need to be concerned about a change in the law. The Government, which has previously said it has 'no plans to legislate at this stage', was contacted for comment.
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Officer who misled murdered banker's family in line for promotion
The family of a murdered banker have told of their anger after discovering a senior police officer who was found to have misled them was being lined up for a major promotion. Relatives of Alistair Wilson, who was shot dead on his doorstep in Nairn 21 years ago by an unknown assailant, were told a suspect would be arrested on May 15 last hoped the arrest would bring a breakthrough in the long-running, unsolved case but only learnt that it had not taken place owing to a last-minute decision when they later contacted a police liaison officer. Detective Chief Superintendent Paul Livingstone denied being aware that a date had been identified for the arrest, but an investigation by Police Scotland concluded this was not truthful and he was found guilty of misconduct. Despite this, he has now been selected for a prestigious training course and is reported to be in the process of being groomed to become assistant chief constable. A source close to the Wilson family told the Daily Mail they felt they had been 'betrayed'. 'They are deeply concerned but it is more a sense of outrage,' they said. 'The police claim their relationship with the family is a priority — but this proves it obviously isn't. After years of delays and a failure to make any breakthroughs, this feels like another betrayal for them.' • Murdered banker's son 'still has nightmares' about doorstep shooting Their concerns were echoed by Douglas Ross, the former Scottish Conservative leader. 'Eyebrows will be raised at the prospect of this officer potentially getting promoted for a senior leadership role, despite his previous conduct,' the Highlands & Islands MSP said. Ross added that 'instead of being held to account, it seems like those at the top of Police Scotland want to reward him'. He claimed that the move 'only risks adding insult to injury for a family desperate for answers'. Wilson, 30, a married father of two, was killed on the evening of November 28, 2004. A man called at the family's home and spoke to his wife, Veronica, who had answered the door, and asked for her went to speak to the man and was handed a blue envelope with 'Paul' written on it. He went inside and was shot when he returned to the gun used, a Haenel Suhl pistol from the 1930s, was missed in the first police search and was recovered from a nearby drain by a council worker ten days by Northern Constabulary in 2004 and Police Scotland in 2013 failed to make any significant progress or establish a motive. A reinvestigation was ordered last September after more than 150 'concerns' were highlighted in a review of the evidence gathered in the police inquiry into the killing. Crown Office officials ordered a fresh 'cold case' inquiry, involving a new police team. Jo Farrell, the chief constable, has now given Livingstone her backing to take part in the elite 19-week course, which, if completed, would pave the way for him to significantly increase his salary to more than £150,000. The executive leaders programme, run by the College of Policing, is a course which 'offers support and learning to build your personal resilience, boost your confidence and enhance your capabilities'. A police insider said: 'It's almost guaranteed that he will become an assistant chief constable once this course is completed.' Police Scotland declined to comment on Livingstone's participation in the course. Commenting on the investigation, Chief Superintendent Suzanne Chow said: 'Our relationship with Alistair's family is a priority and we are determined to bring those involved in Alistair's murder to justice.'
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
How a cowboy builder ripped off his customers – and got away with it
When the BBC exposed Russell McMaster as a cowboy builder last year, angry clients demanded he be 64-year-old had accepted about £220,000 from seven customers to complete home improvements over a two-year he left his customers tens of thousands out of pocket with half-built extensions and week, Ayrshire-based McMaster was due to face trial over an allegation he had defrauded a customer by pretending he would carry out construction work at his home four years he was acquitted on Wednesday when the Crown dropped the case. McMaster, it emerged, had handed back £3,000 he was alleged to have taken by did this happen – and what remedies do customers really have when left at the mercy of rogue traders? Retired social worker Jim McGinley reported McMaster to police in late 2022 after waiting more than a year for work to start at his home in Uddingston, North had paid the builder £3,000 to "secure his services" for internal a months-long wait for planning consent, Jim says that McMaster became "evasive" and stopped returning pair eventually fell out after Jim left a negative online review about his business, VJL that he had been "the victim of a con", he contacted said: "Police were very diligent and seemed very keen to present it at court… They felt that he was a fraudster, a bogus builder."McMaster – full name Alexander Russell McMaster – was charged with fraud, accused of obtaining the £3,000 by pretending he would carry out construction work at Jim's when the case called for trial at Hamilton Sheriff Court, prosecutors announced the case would be discontinued because McMaster had repaid the money in the weeks before said he had agreed to drop the case after discussions with the Crown."The reason we went to court was because we wanted to stop this happening to other people," he said."On discussion with the procurator fiscal, it became clear that perhaps taking the money was the best option. But in truth we felt, and it seems crazy, that we'd let people down." Customers left out of pocket This wasn't the first time McMaster, from Irvine, had been reported to least two of his former customers contacted Police Scotland in were among seven clients who contacted the BBC about McMaster, who traded under the company names VJL Builders and Alex McMaster those cases, customers who had contacted police were told their complaints were a "civil matter" and directed to trading Ayrshire trading standards confirmed it had received seven complaints about McMaster's businesses in of those complaints came from Chris we first interviewed him in the autumn of 2023, his loft space was a building site with exposed beams and tarpaulin covering roof we went back to his house in Bridge of Weir last week, not much had changed. Chris said McMaster was paid more than £30,000 for a loft conversion but abandoned the job midway through, leaving the Jardine family with a hole in the he also reported the matter to police and trading standards. He also had assurances from McMaster via his lawyer that he would be repaid £15, payment was made, and the loft remains as it – who is married with two children – took out extra loans to try and finish the work and said the affair had "crippled" his family's finances."It's hard to quantify how much money he owes us, because of the extra damage he did," he said."He has taken food out my kids' mouths. That's what really annoys me. It will affect us long-term because everything I do will be to pay back the debt he has left us with."Another customer, Grant Kilpatrick, told BBC Scotland News that McMaster left him with a half-finished extension and was owed between £15,000 and £20, said he reported McMaster to police and was also told it was a civil Scotland said each case was assessed on its own merits and that it provided "suitable advice" to both the Jardines and the Kilpatricks.A spokesperson said that in Grant Kilpatrick's case, inquiries had been carried out and no criminality was established. Civil action 'not always easy' The Jardines and Kilpatricks had both hired a company called VJL Builders in July 2022. The business was registered at Companies House a month both were pursuing the company, VJL was dissolved in January 2024. It had never filed Knowles, senior project lead for Advice Direct Scotland, said tackling rogue trade was challenging and that "civil action is not always easy"."Rogue traders frequently dissolve their companies to avoid liability leaving consumers with little recourse," she said."Consumers do have rights, including the ability to cancel contracts and claim refunds if they've been misled or pressured."They may also be entitled to compensation for distress - but these rights are only effective if consumers act quickly and seek advice."We urge anyone affected to report rogue trading to us and to contact their bank if money has been lost."Dr Nick McKerrell, senior law lecturer at Glasgow Caledonian University, said there was a greater chance of a successful prosecution where it could be shown that there was no intention or ability to carry out the work, something which could be seen as a "dishonest misrepresentation".However, it was more complicated if some work was done, because it becomes more difficult to show that the builder was never going to finish the said it was not a fair fight in many of the legal cases."It's an individual against a business organisation which can adopt a number of tactics to avoid private law actions," he said. McMaster has a string of businesses listed on Companies House under different variations of his name – most of them reporting by the Daily Record newspaper in 2006 and 2013 revealed how his old businesses left customers in debt after closing Alex McMaster Builders remains active. A note on the Companies House website states that a strike-off action had been temporarily suspended after someone objected to the attempt to dissolve the BBC attempted to contact the builder between December 2023 and February to answer allegations he was a rogue did not respond until he sent a text messages stating that he was "unavailable".However, we managed to approach McMaster in person outside court this asked whether he planned reimburse his other customers and whether he shut VJL Builders down to avoid paying them away with a friend, he made no comment.
