UK government working on contingency plans after ruling on Epping migrant hotel
UK ministers are now bracing for further legal challenges from councils across the country.
Advertisement
UK security minister Dan Jarvis told Times Radio on Wednesday: 'We're looking at a range of different contingency options following from a legal ruling that took place yesterday, and we'll look closely at what we're able to do.'
Asked whether other migrant hotels have the proper planning permission, Mr Jarvis said: 'Well, we'll see over the next few days and weeks.
'Other local authorities will be considering whether they wish to act in the same way that Epping (Forest) District Council have.
A STATEMENT FROM NIGEL FARAGE
This is a victory for the parents and concerned residents of Epping. They do not want their young women being assaulted on the streets.
This community stood up bravely, despite being slandered as far right, and have won. They represent the vast…
— Nigel Farage MP (@Nigel_Farage)
August 19, 2025
'I think the important point to make is that nobody really thinks that hotels are a sustainable location to accommodate asylum seekers.
Advertisement
'That's precisely why the Government has made a commitment that, by the end of this Parliament, we would have phased out the use of them.'
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has indicated that councils run by his party will consider their own legal challenges.
However, a number of these councils do not have responsibility for planning permission, which may limit their ability to launch legal challenges.
Mr Farage also called for peaceful protests outside hotels housing asylum seekers to put pressure on local authorities to take the same route as Epping Forest.
Advertisement
Writing in The Telegraph, he said: 'Now the good people of Epping must inspire similar protests around Britain.
'Wherever people are concerned about the threat posed by young undocumented males living in local hotels and who are free to walk their streets, they should follow the example of the town in Essex.
'Let's hold peaceful protests outside the migrant hotels, and put pressure on local councils to go to court to try and get the illegal immigrants out; we now know that together we can win.'
On Tuesday, a High Court judge ruled the former Bell Hotel in Epping must stop housing asylum seekers by September 12th.
Advertisement
Epping Forest District Council had asked a judge to issue an interim injunction stopping migrants from being accommodated there.
The hotel has been at the centre of a series of protests in recent weeks after an asylum seeker who was staying there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl.
Our work with international partners is vital to stopping small boat crossings to the UK.
A joint intelligence unit involving the
@NCA_UK
and French counterparts has helped dismantle at least 52 organised immigration crime gangs operating in France.
— Home Office (@ukhomeoffice)
August 17, 2025
The UK Home Office had warned the judge that an injunction could 'interfere' with the department's legal obligations, and lawyers representing the hotel's owner argued it would set a 'precedent'.
Now, Conservative-run Broxbourne Council in Hertfordshire has said it was taking legal advice 'as a matter of urgency' about whether it could take similar action to Epping Forest District Council, which is also run by the Tories.
Advertisement
The latest Home Office data showed there were 32,345 asylum seekers being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March.
This was down 15 per cent from the end of December, when the total was 38,079, and 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier.
New figures – published among the usual quarterly immigration data release – are expected on Thursday, showing numbers in hotels at the end of June.
Figures for hotels published by the Home Office date back to December 2022 and showed numbers hit a peak at the end of September 2023 when there were 56,042 asylum seekers in hotels.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
18 minutes ago
- The National
Ross Greer pitches alternative Scottish independence strategy
The Scottish Greens MSP said he intends to publish it in full if he becomes one of his party's new co-leaders later this month, telling The National that it involves using existing powers effectively, as well as pushing the limits of devolution and picking more fights with the UK Government. The First Minister put forward his plans for Scottish independence last month, saying getting a second referendum could only be achieved if the SNP win a majority in Holyrood. It has been met by much opposition from SNP members, with at least 43 SNP branches backing a rival proposal, and a separate rebel meeting to be held in September ahead of the party's conference in Aberdeen in October. 'It's quite obviously a strategy to try and get the SNP re-elected without advancing the cause of independence,' Greer said of Swinney's proposal. READ MORE: Two charged after alleged 'gangland firebombing' of Edinburgh taxi firm 'We all know that having a clear majority in the Scottish Parliament is an essential prerequisite. But, in and of itself, that's not enough." He went on: 'What is essential to us actually achieving independence is building and sustaining majority support for it. And on a wider level, making the people of this country actually feel optimistic about Scotland's future.' The Scottish Greens MSP said that his strategy involves building support by 'maximising the good that we can do with the powers of evil'. 'We make it really clear to people that when powers are held here in Scotland, they're used to materially improve their lives,' Greer added. 'If we don't use the powers that we've already got to their full potential, it is very hard to sell people on the idea that giving our parliament more powers will solve their problems.' He then said that his strategy also involves going into the 'grey areas between what's devolved and reserved' and 'essentially dare the UK Government to stop us'. (Image: Fraser Bremner) 'If they want to step in and stop the Scottish Government from doing something that is popular and beneficial to the people who live here, that's not going to hurt the independence cause,' Greer said. He went on: 'And where we hit those limits, and there's something else that we need – specific powers that are currently reserved – we should be challenging the UK Government to devolve those too. We should at the very least make them say why they don't believe the Scottish Parliament should be able to exercise that power.' Asked for some examples of where he'd like to see the Scottish Government push the limits of devolution, Greer said there is 'much more' that could be done in the space of drugs policy and workers rights. 'There's much more we could do to crack down on exploitative and unscrupulous employers. There are conditions that we can attach to procurement – so, whether or not you get a public sector contract or to the grants that hundreds of thousands of businesses across Scotland receive from the Scottish Government and its agencies. 'We can attach conditions to crack down on really poor employment practices like banning unpaid trial shifts.' READ MORE: Scottish Labour councillor jailed for sex offences involving young girl He added: 'We can crack down on companies making workers here redundant and offshoring those jobs then receiving further public contracts. 'There are all sorts of ways in which we can really push the limits of devolution with employment law that will make a really tangible improvement in the lives of people in this country.' The Scottish Greens – when the party was in government as part of the Bute House Agreement – spearheaded legislation to introduce Scotland's own deposit return scheme. Despite the UK Government initially allowing devolved nations to design their own scheme, it refused to provide the Scottish Government with an exemption from the Internal Market Act, particularly in relation to the inclusion of glass in the scheme. This led to it being scrapped in 2023, with the Scottish Government now facing a £166m legal claim from Biffa Waste Services, which had been hired to collect recycled containers. With that being an example of the Scottish Government pushing the limits of devolution and facing a brick wall, The National asked Greer how this strategy would navigate such challenges. Greer responded by saying that the UK Government has been 'much smarter' when it comes to picking fights over devolution. 'The three most obvious examples are the deposit return scheme, gender recognition reforms, and banning traps to improve animal welfare,' he said. 'The vast majority of people in Scotland support some kind of deposit return scheme. [But] it's an issue that very few people care so deeply about that it's going to change how they vote on the constitution.' Greer added: 'Gender recognition reform is an incredibly important issue. But it's also very divisive within both Yes and No, so it's not the kind of issue that moves people from one side to the other. "And glue traps would also fit under the category of being something that the vast majority of people, if asked, would want to ban for the sake of animal welfare. But again, it's not going to shift how they vote.' He added: 'It was absolutely right to hold the line on gender recognition reform, both because that was a modest reform that would have improved the lives of trans people, and also because it was outrageous for the UK Government to step into what was unquestionably a devolved area like that. 'But if we can pick fights over areas that are unquestionably popular and where people could see the benefit of Holyrood winning the fight. That is either going to result in our success – we're then able to deliver that policy and improve people's lives – or the UK Government steps in and vetoes it, which makes it even clearer to people that these are the kind of powers they need to set here, not at Westminster.' He gave the example of powers over introducing a wealth tax in Scotland, which is currently limited by devolved powers. 'We can tax wealth. That is effectively what the council tax is. It's a tax on the most common form of wealth, which is property. But it's not what people are really talking about most of the time when they refer to a wealth tax,' Greer said. 'If that power were to be a wider power over taxation, we would be able to address the scandal that the top 2% of people in this country have more wealth than the bottom 50%. We would be able to tackle that inequality, invest in our public services, materially improve the lives of people who live here right now, and build that sense of hope and optimism that this country is improving – that it's getting better, that it's moving forward." He added: 'We know that wealth taxation and fair taxes on the super rich are overwhelmingly popular. 'And again, if the UK Government really wants to step in to defend the interests of the super rich and deprive the Scottish NHS of more funding then they're welcome to do that, but at that point they are once again making the argument for independence for us.'
The National
19 minutes ago
- The National
Fishing leaders demand stop to offshore wind farm expansion
The Scottish Fishermen's Federation (SFF) said Scottish Government plans to install up to 40GW of offshore wind capacity by 2040 are 'far too high'. It said achieving the target will cause irreversible damage to the marine environment and displace fishing fleets from grounds they have worked for generations. The call is included in the SFF's official responses to two major Scottish Government consultations: the updated Offshore Wind Policy Statement and the draft Sectoral Marine Plan for Offshore Wind Energy. The Scottish Government outlines that offshore wind could ensure Scotland meets its net zero target by 2030 and provide scores of green jobs as part of the just transition away from dependency on oil and gas. READ MORE: UK inflation rate rose 'more than expected' in July Last month, First Minister John Swinney visited Scotland's newest wind farm – Neart na Gaoithe (NnG) off the coast of Fife. During his visit he said offshore wind is 'one of Scotland's greatest modern success stories'. He said: 'Driving economic growth and tackling the climate emergency are two of my Government's priorities, and NnG is a shining example of how these priorities can work hand-in-hand to reshape Scotland's future for the better.' The UK Government has also expressed support for the expansion of Scotland's wind farms. It announced in March that the Port of Cromarty Firth in the Highlands will be a major hub for the UK's world-leading floating offshore wind industry, and it awarded more than £55 million for its expansion. Elspeth Macdonald, chief executive of the SFF – which is Scotland's biggest fishing industry body – said: 'This isn't a plan – it's a stampede. The Government is charging ahead without the faintest idea how to protect the people and places that will be trampled in the rush. 'We've been telling them for years these plans will seriously damage our industry, but they haven't listened. Now their own assessments show the harm that will be done to fishing, and the environment on which it depends. 'Until they can prove our industry and our seas will be safeguarded, the only responsible choice is to slam on the brakes.' The SFF said current mitigation measures are almost non-existent and there is no credible plan to compensate fishing businesses for the losses they will face. READ MORE: Labour 'lose control' as gilt yields rise above worst of Liz Truss era It also says the Government's updated Offshore Wind Policy Statement published in June made repeated references to economic benefits but failed to mention the climate crisis. Macdonald added: 'Fishing is one of Scotland's original green industries. The Scottish fleet has been putting healthy, renewable and sustainable food on plates for generations. 'But we're being shoved aside for projects that feel like a last gamble for a Government to revive an ailing Scottish economy.' Fishing leaders say the cumulative impact of existing and emerging marine conservation policies, renewable energy projects alongside fishing being expected to offset environmental impacts of offshore wind developments, is leaving the industry at 'breaking point'. Macdonald said: 'The Scottish Government's approach is picking winners and losers, and fishing seems to lose every time. 'We need ministers to step up and support our industry with positive action. 'Renewable food cannot be the price to be paid for renewable energy. Betting the house – and Scotland's fishing industry – on offshore wind that is far from 'clean' and where all the evidence points to both known and not yet fully known environmental damage is a very high-risk strategy.' The Scottish Government has been approached for comment.
Glasgow Times
37 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Majority of public back housing and developments in their area
The poll of 2,005 people conducted by Public First in July found that 55% of respondents would 'generally support new buildings or developments or buildings being built in my local area'. The research found that Labour backers (72%) and young people aged 25-34 (67%) were most likely to be 'Yimby' (yes in my backyard). Reform backers (44%) and people in the East of England (44%) were the most likely groups to say that they generally oppose development in their locality, the poll found. Overall, 33% of people said that they would generally oppose development. Sir Keir Starmer has pledged to put 'builders not blockers first' and 'overhaul the broken planning system'. In December, the Prime Minister announced new mandatory targets for councils when it comes to housebuilding. He said at the time: 'Our plan for change will put builders not blockers first, overhaul the broken planning system and put roofs over the heads of working families and drive the growth that will put more money in people's pockets.' In its report, The Quiet Yes, released on Thursday, Public First argued that a 'more representative planning system' is needed. The policy research organisation recommended that councils bring in changes to surveys and research on public opinion on building plans and questions about how residents would want councils to spend certain money earmarked for development. Jack Airey, director of housing and infrastructure at Public First, said: 'Most people instinctively support new development, yet their voices go unheard. 'Our research finds the public understand the housing shortage and back new homes, but the planning system doesn't reflect that reality. 'Councils and Government should build on this majority view, creating a representative planning system that unlocks support for new homes and the infrastructure communities need.' Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary Angela Rayner has said that Labour are 'overhauling the broken planning system'. She said: 'With investment and reform, Labour is delivering the biggest boost to social and affordable housing in a generation, unleashing a social rent revolution, and embarking on a decade of renewal for social and affordable housing in this country.'
