Chief Justice Funke's first ‘State of the Judiciary' lauds probation services, calls for more funds
LINCOLN — In his first annual address to lawmakers Tuesday, Nebraska's new Supreme Court chief justice called for more funding for court areas such as language interpreters, cybersecurity, veterans' courts and an 'archaic' case document filing and management system.
Chief Justice Jeffrey Funke, in his 'State of the Judiciary' address, praised several parts of the state court system, saying its probation services for adults and juveniles are considered national models.
Yet, he said, that Nebraska continues to have some of the nation's most crowded prisons and, despite a drop in the state's crime rate, rates of incarceration have increased.
Successes of the Judicial Branch are impaired, Funke said, by funding holes in integral areas including the 'JUSTICE' system that manages cases for judges, attorneys, staff and the public.
Reflecting back, he noted that JUSTICE was implemented in 1994 — 'the same year Ben Nelson was Nebraska's governor and the Cornhuskers won a national championship in football.'
Said Funke: 'We can no longer operate in the past.'
The Nebraska City native, elevated to the post in October, called for additional funding from the Legislature to augment a $1.7 million grant aimed at creating 'Justice 2.0.' He said modernization will enable judges, attorneys, court staff and the public to navigate cases more efficiently.
We have done what you have asked. It is essential that the Judicial Branch receive adequate funding for the next biennium to sustain the progress we have made.
– Chief Justice Jeffrey Funke
Another concern underscored in the half-hour talk to the public and state senators in the Legislative Chambers: the lack of behavioral health services — an area Funke said must be prioritized.
While largely outside the direct purview of the judicial system, mental health challenges lead many Nebraskans into crime and abuse and neglect of children, Funke said.
'The lack of treatment options means that our citizens are not getting the care they need, which reduces their chances of stability and recovery,' he said.
Last year, more than 6,000 people participated in financial assistance programs for behavioral health services under probation services. Still, Funke said, health organizations report a significant shortage of available providers. He said reimbursement rates are not keeping pace with the costs of delivering services.
As a result, options are limited for judges at sentencing times and for officials leading probation services, problem-solving courts and post-release supervision.
Another top need Funke addressed is salary increases so the Judicial Branch can retain and compete for talent. He said the high court sought funds from the Legislature in 2023 to raise pay for interpreters, to add an adult drug court for Platte County, a veterans' treatment court in Sarpy County and three additional IT staff members for cybersecurity and cloud-based IT management.
While the Legislature supported those efforts by increasing personnel spending limits, it did not direct any new funds. Funke said existing dollars soon will be exhausted — and he said more are needed.
'We have done what you have asked,' said Funke, joined in the chambers by fellow members of the State Supreme Court. 'It is essential that the Judicial Branch receive adequate funding for the next biennium to sustain the progress we have made.'
Organizations including the civil rights organization, ACLU Nebraska, weighed in. Legal director Rose Godinez said she heard from Funke a 'keen understanding of the importance of strengthening diversion and reentry programs to achieve better outcomes for us all.'
'His acknowledgment of Nebraska's costly overcrowded prisons, his support for growing problem-solving courts, and his commitment to access to justice — including language access — were all on target,' Godinez said. 'We look forward to continued partnerships with the judicial branch to help advance our shared goals.'
Giving the annual address may be new to Funke, appointed by Gov. Jim Pillen to replace former Chief Justice Mike Heavican of Lincoln, who retired in October after having been the second-longest serving Chief Justice, at 18 years.
But Funke, appointed as an associate justice in 2016, said he is familiar with the 'excellent work' of judicial branch staff to help ensure that Nebraskans have a forum to resolve disputes.
He said the core functions of courts have been expanded over the years, with new and innovative ways to administer justice, sometimes increasing public safety and saving taxpayer dollars.
'More work is to be done.'
Other highlights of Funke's speech:
In the area of Adult Probation, the Chief Justice noted 2014 and 2021 criminal justice reform efforts aimed at reducing high costs of incarceration and diverting less serious felons from prison to probation.
Today, he said, adult probation officers supervise more than 14,000 people across Nebraska, and the recidivism rate for those successfully completing probation 'is an exceptional 19%.' That's the percentage that relapsed into crime within three years of release.
In June, the Supreme Court approved the first-ever strategic plan for adult probation services. Funke said a goal is to ensure that Nebraska probation remains a 'national model' of sentencing alternatives for courts.
The average cost to imprison a person in Nebraska Is $41,000 per year, he said, compared to $3,500 per person annually for probation.
Post-release supervision came about after the 2014 justice reforms showed that Nebraska's felony sentencing system failed to provide adequate supervision upon an individual's release from prison. On a daily average, 1,300 individuals are supervised under the program and must comply with court-ordered conditions including maintaining a job, participating in behavioral health services and keeping away from crime.
Less than 10% of those under post-release supervision returned to prison due to a probation revocation — a sign, Funke said, that the program has prevented crime.
Nebraska's problem-solving courts provide highly supervised treatment for military veterans and those battling substance abuse and mental illness. Participation is at nearly 800 people, and Funke has called for more funds to expand the programs to more parts of the state.
He said the recidivism rate for those who successfully graduate from a problem-solving court is 24%. Today, adult drug courts are in every judicial district. Trial court judges have implemented four veterans treatment courts, two reentry courts, one young adult court, a mental health court and a DUI court. Juvenile court judges have implemented two family treatment courts and a juvenile drug court. Nebraska judges volunteer to preside over the labor-intensive courts.
Juvenile Probation, on any given day, serves nearly 2,700 youths. Funke described the program as a 'nationwide leader' with an all-time low of 17% of the youths returning to crime after a year of completing the program.
However, he said, juveniles who commit violent crime remain a priority focus.
'Though this population comprises only 3% of the total juveniles on probation, it requires our full attention,' he said, noting a new effort with the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services to better transition young offenders back into communities.
As part of an effort to improve 'access to justice,' Nebraska developed a pilot project in Douglas County to help self-represented litigants file and process documents in their cases. The goal, Funke said, is to expand statewide, especially in rural areas and for low-income court users.
He said the state also began collaborating with foreign consulates to produce videos in languages beyond English to detail court processes and the role of interpreters.
The court system expanded services for those with hearing loss, and nearly every courtroom in the state is equipped with infrared assistive listening devices at no expense to county governments.
'Regarding remote access, our trial court judges have made significant strides in using technology to enable communication, document sharing and teamwork between courthouses,' Funke said.
He said technology advancements have opened virtual courtrooms and allowed remote hearings that reduce travel and enhance scheduling flexibility.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
41 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Leaked California redistricting maps show where Democrats would draw new lines
SACRAMENTO — California Democrats would appear to have a shot at flipping several congressional seats next year under a leaked draft map KCRA published Friday. The maps appear to make significant changes to many districts currently held by Republicans. Districts represented by Reps. Doug LaMalfa, R-Chico, and Kevin Kiley, R-Rocklin, change dramatically, making them possible Democratic pickups. Swing districts held by Reps. Adam Gray, D-Turlock; Josh Harder, D-Stockton; and George Whitesides, D-Santa Clarita, appear to become easier to hold for Democrats. The maps appear to also pack more Democrats into the districts of Rep. David Valadao, R-Bakersfield — already a difficult seat for Republicans to hold — and Rep. Darrell Issa, R-San Diego, making it a possible Democratic target. The maps were still being debated on Friday, KCRA reported. Nick Miller, a spokesperson for Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas, said he had not seen KCRA's maps when asked to confirm their authenticity. Democrats intend to imperil at least five Republican incumbents, Gov. Gavin Newsom and legislative leaders have said. The maps represent the centerpiece of Newsom's plan to counter efforts in Texas and other Republican-dominated states to redraw their congressional districts to further favor the GOP. In Texas and most other states, congressional maps are drawn by state lawmakers and can be manipulated by whichever party is in power. But in California, maps are drawn by an independent redistricting commission that includes equal numbers of Democrats and Republicans. The proposed ballot measure would replace the commission's maps with the new ones released by the Legislature. They would be in effect for the 2026, 2028 and 2030 elections. After that, the independent commission would draw new maps based on the 2030 census. That argument has not assuaged opponents, particularly in the Republican Party. 'No matter how you slice it, he is undermining the will of the voters,' Assembly Republican Leader James Gallagher, R-Yuba City, told the Chronicle ahead of the maps' release. He said he thinks the independent commission has drawn fair maps and that he worries new maps drawn to benefit Democrats will diminish the voting power of people in rural parts of the state. Gallagher said he supports an effort by Rep. Kevin Kiley, R-Rocklin, who previously served in the state Assembly, to bar all states from engaging in mid-decade redistricting. That could halt efforts in California as well as in Texas, though Gallagher stopped short of criticizing Texas Republicans for their redistricting push, saying that was not his role. LaMalfa said he opposes Kiley's bill because he doesn't think the federal government should trample on states' rights to run their own elections. But he also opposes efforts in both California and Texas to redistrict mid-decade. 'Two wrongs don't make a right,' LaMalfa said in response to Newsom's argument that Texas' redistricting forced his hand. Under the draft map, LaMalfa's district seems to change dramatically, shedding ruby-red northern counties like Modoc, Siskiyou and Shasta. Instead, it gains somewhat less-red Plumas County, but it will also extend south and west to include parts of much bluer Mendocino, Lake, and Sonoma counties along the Highway 101 corridor — including, apparently, much of the North Bay city of Santa Rosa. Amy Thoma Tan, a spokesperson for the campaign opposing Newsom's ballot measure, said it was inappropriate for state lawmakers, some of whom are actively running for Congress, to draw new maps. 'These maps were drawn by politicians and party insiders behind closed doors with no transparency and no input from the public,' she wrote in a statement. 'Californians deserve district lines that are drawn in the open, by our citizens' independent commission.' 'Californians oppose Newsom's stunt because they won't let a self-serving politician rig the system to further his career,' he wrote in a statement. 'The NRCC is prepared to fight this illegal power grab in the courts and at the ballot box to stop Newsom in his tracks.


Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
California Dems release map drawn to oust 5 House Republicans
California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks during a news conference Thursday, Aug. 14, 2025, in Los Angeles. | Marcio Jose Sanchez/AP By Blake Jones and Melanie Mason 08/15/2025 07:29 PM EDT SACRAMENTO, California — California Democrats on Friday finalized their plan to snatch five GOP House seats next year by redrawing the state's congressional lines, according to a copy of the new House map submitted to the Legislature on behalf of the DCCC. The new lines, which voters would need to approve in a Nov. 4 special election, adds registered Democratic voters to districts held by Republicans and frontline Democrats, while making some safe blue districts slightly more competitive. State legislators are expected next week to place the new district lines on the statewide ballot, sparking a furious campaign to override the work of the state's independent redistricting commission for the next several election cycles. California's bold and risky play, led by Gov. Gavin Newsom and senior members of the state's congressional delegation, is designed to cancel out Republicans' bid to flip five Democratic-held House seats in Texas — a tactic urged by President Donald Trump to retain the House majority.


San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
The next steps in California Democrats' plan to counter Texas Republicans' redistricting push
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California is the first Democratic-led state to wade into a brewing national redistricting fight after President Donald Trump urged Texas Republicans to draw new maps to maintain the party's slim U.S. House majority after the 2026 midterm elections. The Texas plan was temporarily stalled when minority Democrats left the state to stop the Legislature from passing any bills, but some lawmakers said they'll return to Texas now that California is moving forward with its counter act. Both parties hope to add five seats for their side. Here's what happens next in California: Legislative approval Lawmakers will return to the Capitol on Monday after summer break and plan to immediately take up the partisan plan. State Democrats hold supermajorities in both chambers — enough to act without any Republican votes — and Newsom has said he's not worried about winning the required support from two-thirds of lawmakers to advance the maps. Lawmakers will hold hearings on Tuesday and Wednesday on a package of bills to establish the new congressional map, declare a Nov. 4 special election and authorize to reimburse local government for the costs. Elections committees in both houses are asking for public feedback on the proposed map, but it's unlikely any changes would be made after the bills are officially introduced Monday. Amendments to any legislation would require a 72-hour wait before a vote. That would jeopardize Democrats' plan to approve the package by Thursday to give elections officials enough time to prepare ballots for a statewide election in November. State leaders already have blown past deadlines designed to give local officials adequate time for organizing an election. Special elections are costly California sends every voter a mail-in ballot roughly a month before each election. That means local officials have less than two months to prepare and print ballots. They're already preparing. On Friday, a coalition of county officials urged the Legislature to provide money in advance, because many counties are cash-strapped, and officials worry they won't have enough money to administer the election. A 2021 special election cost over $200 million to conduct. State Republicans this week estimated this year's would cost $235 million. Democrats chose Nov. 4 for the election because Los Angeles County and others are already holding local elections that day. An intense campaign Newsom is leading the campaign in favor of the maps. He and Democrats signaled Thursday they'll make the effort a referendum on Trump and tie it to the future of American democracy. Perhaps the most prominent opponent will be former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who championed the state's independent redistricting commission during his time in office. On Friday, he posted a photo of himself lifting weights on social media wearing a T-shirt that called to 'terminate gerrymandering,' a nod to his role in the "Terminator' movies. Republican donor Charles Munger Jr., who spent tens of millions to support the California ballot initiative that gives redistricting power to an independent commission, also plans to 'vigorously defend' nonpartisan redistricting, his spokesperson said. State Republicans say the move is a power grab by Democrats and some have vowed to go to court. Steve Hilton, a Republican candidate for governor, earlier this month paid for a legal opinion that says redistricting outside of the normal process and cycle violates the California Constitution. The new map wouldn't be fair because state lawmakers are relying on outdated population data, he said. Common Cause, a good governance group that supports independent redistricting, initially opposed California's effort but this week reversed its stance. The group said it won't challenge partisan redistricting in California if the effort is approved by voters, among other criteria. A temporary change California voters in 2010 gave the power to draw congressional maps to an independent commission, with the goal of making the process less partisan. The commission last redrew maps following the 2020 census, and the maps were in place for the 2022 and 2024 U.S. House elections.