Amy Coney Barrett Decision Gives Libs Win in Shock SCOTUS Ruling
In Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board v. Drummond, the Supreme Court rejected the proposal for St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School to receive direct government funding in a 4-4 split ruling on Thursday. In instances where the justices are evenly split, the lower court ruling—in this case, the Oklahoma Supreme Court—stands.
'The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court,' the one-page ruling simply said. It did not note how each justice had voted.
The lower court ruled that plans to open the nation's first-ever government-funded religious charter school were prohibited by the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution, which prohibits the government from establishing a religion or favoring one faith over another. While the split means the lower-court ruling stands, it does not set a precedent for other courts across the country to follow.
It was not immediately clear why Justice Coney Barrett—whom President Donald Trump appointed in 2020—recused herself from the case, which meant she did not take part in oral arguments or the final ruling.
The New York Times speculated that Coney Barrett's decision could have stemmed from her close relationship with Nicole Stelle Garnett, who was previously an adviser for the Oklahoma school.
Coney Barrett and Garnett worked together at the Supreme Court in the 1990s before becoming colleagues at Notre Dame Law School.
Coney Barrett has fallen out of the MAGA crowd in recent months after siding with her liberal counterparts in some high-profile cases.
In one of those decisions in March, she sided with the court's liberal wing to block the White House's effort to freeze almost $2 billion in foreign aid.
The decision Thursday prompted some MAGA supporters to label Coney Barrett a 'DEI pick,' referring to 'diversity, equity, and inclusion.'
MAGA influencer Mike Cernovich wrote: 'She is evil, chosen solely because she checked identity politics boxes... Another DEI hire. It always ends badly.'
The proposed St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School was set to be run by the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City and the Diocese of Tulsa. It would have been the first school to teach Catholicism to students while receiving taxpayer funds.
The original proposal for the school was approved in June 2023; Oklahoma's Statewide Virtual Charter School Board voted to approve the school in a tight 3-2 ballot after a nearly three-hour meeting.
But the state's attorney general, Gentner Drummond, sued over the decision in a bid to prevent the school from opening.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
11 minutes ago
- New York Post
California park ranger fired after helping hang transgender pride flag on popular Yosemite monolith
A non-binary park ranger was fired by Yosemite National Park after they were caught hanging a transgender pride flag from the park's famous El Capitan rock formation in May. Shannon 'SJ' Joslin, 35, was first hired as a ranger and wildlife biologist at the park in 2021 — their dream job that they said was stripped away in a violation of their First Amendment right. 5 Shannon 'SJ' Joslin was fired from the Yosemite National Park after they helped hang a transgender pride flag on El Capitan rock. Miya Tsudome Advertisement Joslin claimed that a temporary deputy superintendent fired them on Aug. 12 for 'failing to demonstrate acceptable conduct' within their capacity as a wildlife biologist for the park. 'I want my rights and I want my career back,' Joslin wrote on Instagram. Joslin noted that they hung the flag in their 'free time, off-duty, as a private citizen.' Advertisement 5 Joslin was with the park for four and a half years. Instagram / shannonekj 'NOTHING about it had anything to do with my work,' they fumed. Joslin highlighted all that they've done for the National Parks Service over the years, including willingly stacking overtime hours and accepting a lower-paying job when they could easily be 'making a lot more money in Silicon Valley' with their bioinformatics PHD. 'I'm devastated. We don't take our positions in the park service to make money or to have any kind of huge career gains. We take it because we love the places that we work,' Joslin told NBC News. Advertisement 5 Joslin said that they hung the flag in opposition to the Trump administration's policies. Instagram / shannonekj The axed ranger said that the inspiration for their stunt came in the spring after President Trump issued an executive order barring transgender women from competing in women's sports. 'I was really hurting because there were a lot of policies coming from the current administration that target trans people, and I'm nonbinary,' Joslin told The Associated Press. The flag only flew for two hours before park officials ordered climbers to remove it, never once mentioning any overt violations that it posed, Joslin told NBC News. Advertisement The day after their stunt, the NPS issued a new rule banning the hanging of large flags in wilderness areas. 5 Joslin plans on fighting the park's decision. Instagram / shannonekj Then, a week later, Joslin said a criminal investigation into the flag's display was launched. Their firing came at the end of the three-month investigation. Joslin asserted that they — and two other NPS employees under investigation for helping hang the flag — are the only people to ever be punished for draping a flag on El Capitan. The NPS, however, is apparently working on 'pursuing administrative action against multiple National Park Service employees for failing to follow National Park Service regulations,' a spokesperson for Yosemite National Park told the outlet. 5 Two other National Park Service employees are also being investigated for hanging the flag. Instagram / shannonekj The spokesperson did not elaborate on what regulations the employees allegedly violated. A spokesperson for the NPS added that it is currently taking administrative actions against several employees and even 'possible criminal charges against several park visitors who are alleged to have violated federal laws and regulations related to demonstrations' in tandem with the Justice Department. Advertisement The Post reached out to the NPS for comment. Joslin plans on fighting the park's decision through the use of an executive order penned on Trump's inauguration seeking to restore the First Amendment and 'end federal censorship.' The NPS is a government bureau within the US Department of the Interior overseen by former North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum. 'Preservation has been my life's work—of Yosemite, the wildlife, the land, recreation, of peoples rights and safety, of community and acceptance, and now the Constitutional First Amendment,' Joslin wrote.
Washington Post
16 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Oregon city at heart of Supreme Court homelessness ruling to ensure camping spaces under settlement
PORTLAND, Ore. — The Oregon city at the heart of a major U.S. Supreme Court homelessness ruling has agreed to ensure camping spaces for at least 150 people as part of a settlement reached with a disability rights group that sued the city over its camping rules. Disability Rights Oregon, which sued Grants Pass in January, said Friday that it had reached a settlement agreement. The advocacy group accused the city of discriminating against people with disabilities and violating a state law requiring cities' camping regulations to be 'objectively reasonable.'
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Trump administration revokes security clearances of 37 current and former government officials
Many of the officials who were targeted left the government years ago after serving in both senior national security positions and lower-profile roles far from the public eye. Some worked on matters that have long infuriated Trump, like the intelligence community assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election on his behalf. And several signaled their concerns about Trump by signing a critical letter in 2019 that was highlighted on social media last month by right-wing provocateur and close Trump ally Laura Loomer. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The action is part of a broader Trump administration campaign to wield the levers of government against perceived adversaries, and it reflects the president's continued distrust of career intelligence officials he has long seen as working against his interests. Advertisement The revocation of clearances has emerged as a go-to tactic for the administration, a strategy that critics say risks chilling dissenting voices from a national security community accustomed to drawing on a range of viewpoints before formulating an assessment. 'These are unlawful and unconstitutional decisions that deviate from well-settled, decades-old laws and policies that sought to protect against just this type of action,' Mark Zaid, a national security lawyer whose own clearance was revoked by the Trump administration, said in a statement. Advertisement He called it hypocritical for the administration to 'claim these individuals politicized or weaponized intelligence.' Gabbard on Tuesday defended the move, which she said had been directed by Trump. 'Being entrusted with a security clearance is a privilege, not a right,' she wrote on X. 'Those in the Intelligence Community who betray their oath to the Constitution and put their own interests ahead of the American people have broken the sacred trust they promised to uphold.' The security clearance suspension comes amid a broader effort by Gabbard and other Trump administration officials to revisit the intelligence community's assessment on Russian election interference, including by declassifying a series of years-old documents meant to cast doubt on the legitimacy of its findings. Multiple government investigations have reached the same conclusion that Russia interfered in the 2016 election in sweeping fashion, including through a hack-and-leak operation of Democratic emails and a social media campaign aimed at sowing discord and swaying public opinion. But Trump has long resisted the assessment that Russian President Vladimir Putin interfered in his favor, and his Justice Department has authorized a grand jury investigation that could bring fresh scrutiny to Obama-era officials. Security clearances are important not only for current government workers but also former ones whose private-sector jobs require them to retain access to sensitive information. Stripping clearances from such employees could make it hard for them to do their jobs. On his first day of office, Trump said he would revoke the security clearances of the more than four dozen former intelligence officials who signed a 2020 letter saying that the Hunter Biden laptop saga bore the hallmarks of a 'Russian information operation.' Advertisement He's also revoked the clearances of former President Joe Biden and former Vice President Kamala Harris, and he attempted to do the same for lawyers at a spate of prominent law firms but was rebuffed by federal judges. Some of those who were targeted in the latest action were part of Biden's national security team. Many only learned of the Gabbard action from news reports Tuesday, said two former government officials who were on the list. Both spoke on the condition of anonymity as they ponder whether to take legal action.
