logo
Japan MP Hamada protests Moonies' deprival of religious freedom

Japan MP Hamada protests Moonies' deprival of religious freedom

Asia Times21-04-2025

On March 25, a Tokyo district court issued a ruling ordering the dissolution of a religious organization called the Family Federation of World Peace and Unification, formerly called the Unification Church.
Japan's powerful Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology – Monbusho – had sought the Family Federation ruling over what the ministry alleged were illegal solicitations of high-denomination donations by the church.
The predecessor of the Family Federation of World Peace and Unification was founded in South Korea by Moon Sun-myung. Moon and his followers, often termed Moonies, long exercised outsized influence over conservative politicians and political parties in South Korea, Japan and the United States.
While the Japanese government claimed it sought the dissolution ruling out of concern for citizens who had lost money to the Family Federation, the truth is more complicated. In July 2022, a lone gunman, Tetsuya Yamagami, is alleged to have assassinated former prime minister Shinzo over Abe's ties to the beleaguered church.
Yamagami claimed, according to police reports, that his mother had donated large sums of money to the World Federation, bankrupting the family. Abe's support for the church apparently pushed Yamagami to take out his anger with the religious group on the group's political ally.
In the subsequent media frenzy, it was discovered that many other members of Japan's ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) had been using church connections for fundraising and to get out the vote on election day. Confronted with its ties to a religious group originating in South Korea, the LDP scrambled to distance itself from the World Federation church – in part by portraying it as a dangerous organization akin to a mafia organziation or violent cult.
Because the LDP had been content to use the church until it became a political liability to do so, the party's efforts to quash the World Federation to many seemed to be inspired more by political calculation than by a desire to help Japanese citizens reclaim lost monies.
There is also considerable speculation in Japan over the extent to which Yamagami's motives for targeting Abe really stemmed from Yamagami's dissatisfaction with the World Federation church.
What has gone largely unreported in the media is that there is a ring of anti-World Federation lawyers and activists in Japan who have made a name for themselves by ginning up hatred against the church and its members.
Also missing from media reports in Japan is the fact that some of these activists have kidnapped church members and held them captive until the members have been 'deprogrammed' from believing in what the anti-church activists insist is a 'cult.'
Did Yamagami plot Abe's death in isolation, or was Yamagami goaded into violence by hateful anti-church rhetoric?
Although the issue involving the World Federation church, the LDP and the assassination of former PM Abe has been covered at length in Japan, there has been very little substantial debate on the issue among politicians or in the news media.
The silence about anti-church human rights abuses in the midst of the media and political frenzy over the Abe assassination has become an issue in its own right. With such core principles as religious freedom and freedom of association on the line as the Japanese government exercises unilateral power to dismantle a religious organization, we have been struck by how little concern media and political leaders have shown over the controversy.
We spoke with House of Councilors member Satoshi Hamada, a member of a minority political party, NHK Kara Kokumin o Mamoru To (Protect the People from NHK Party). To our knowledge, Hamada is the only national politician to speak out against the LDP's attempts to shut down a religious group for a crime that appears to amount to causing embarrassment for the LDP.
We first learned about your free speech activism in a recent book put out by a World Federation publication, a newspaper called Sekai Nippo. In the book, you question the one-sided media coverage of the World Federation. What sparked your interest?
The vice-director of Shokyo Rengo [International Federation for Victory over Communism; IFVOC – a political movement organized under the aegis of the World Federation] approached me for a consultation. Members of parliament are able to present the executive branch of government, the Naikaku , with formal written questions on government policy and actions. I submitted questions concerning matters related to the World Federation and received an official response in about a week.
One of the questions I asked was about the order that the government sought: to dissolve the World Federation as a religious organization. I wanted to know why the government – which had long held that the World Federation ought to be dissolved on the grounds that it had engaged in criminal activity – later, under the Fumio Kishida administration, changed the scope of its interpretation of World Federation activities and included civil offenses as well.
It was while I was working with the IFVOC representative on the preparation of the formal questions and then receiving the government's response that I first became interested in issues involving the World Federation.
Thereafter, I had the opportunity to speak with someone from the World Federation. It is true that, in the past, there were problems with large-sum donations to the Unification Church. In 2009, however, the organization issued a statement vowing strict adherence to all governing rules and regulations.
What is most important, to my mind, is that some members of the World Federation church have been forced out of the church. The way this has often been accomplished has been to abduct a church member and hold him or her against his or her will until the person vows to leave the church. The number of people who have been so abducted and held captive is quite high – in the several thousands.
This is, of course, an extremely important fact, but I had known nothing about the abductions and detentions. I came to understand that something of great consequence was unfolding, and that the people of Japan ought to be informed about these things. I therefore brought this up in the Japanese national assembly.
There's another grave problem, namely people called 'dakkaiya,' or those who specialize in forcing people to give up their religious beliefs. The most well-known of these so-called dakkaiya is a man named Takashi Miyamura.
Miyamura has been in communication with an attorneys' group working for the Constitutional Democratic Party (CDP) of Japan. I also asked about this in my formal question to the government, as it was brought to my attention by the World Federation side during their visit with me.
The gist of this aspect of the issue is that a nationally recognized political party is aligned with those who use force and imprisonment against people who believe in a certain religion. I found this problematic.
Are there any other members of parliament who have said that they share your concerns?
No.
Are there other members who speak out in public about the importance of religious freedom?
As of now, none.
What about the Japanese people? Do they have an interest in religious freedom?
It seems that such people are in the minority. Some public intellectuals and political commentators are speaking up about it, but their numbers are still few as well. The news media have a very big effect on what the public thinks, and the mainstream media in Japan are still attacking free-speech advocates in a very aggressive way.
The abduction of innocent people and the interference in religious beliefs with the backing of a part of the government are indeed serious problems. And yet, the Japanese news media have spent very little, if any, time covering these matters. Do you see the media and the government as working together?
Each television station will have its own political stance, of course. In Japan, many television stations are sympathetic to the Constitutional Democratic Party.
Also, because the World Federation is allied with a political group dedicated to overcoming communism, the IFVOC, the World Federation is greatly disliked by the Japanese Communist Party.
The Japan Communist Party and the Constitutional Democratic Party get along very well, and both are in very good standing with the Japanese media. Therefore, many stations will not run reports on people who have been forced to abandon their religious beliefs or on the dakkaiya who are effecting these forced abandonments. However, many media outlets have covered extensively the connections between the LDP and the World Federation.
Recently, I have said publicly that I attend World Federation events and speak there, and that I do so as a current member of parliament. I have questioned out loud why the media do not go into a frenzy over this, or why the media seem not to cover it at all. I have invited the media to contact me at any time, saying that I will be happy to answer questions and do interviews. But nobody contacts me.
The media have been portraying the World Federation as a cult. Do you think it's troubling that the media seem uninterested in covering World Federation issues from more than one predetermined angle?
The media have engaged in one-sided coverage of the World Federation, showing almost nothing but bad things about the organization.
Article Four of the Japanese Broadcasting Act (Hoso Ho) calls for fairness in covering political topics. However, the media's coverage of the World Federation has been very far from fair, such as in not covering the thousands of abductions of World Federation members, and in not reporting that the number of negative cases involving the World Federation has decreased dramatically following the 2009 initiative to enforce stricter compliance on donations from members.
And then there is the incomprehensible order that the World Federation be disbanded. There are many problems with the media and the government.
The LDP often partners with Komeito, a political party that works closely with the Buddhist-themed religious group Soka Gakkai. The media also do not cover this apparent contradiction.
Komeito has long been part of the ruling coalition with the LDP and will most likely go on in this position of power into the future. Komeito surely must have known from long ago that the LDP might order another religious organization to disband, and so therefore must be aware of its own tenuous position.
Hence, Komeito's silence as the World Federation, another religious group with ties to politics, was killed off by Komeito's political partner, the LDP. Komeito will therefore, undoubtedly, be even more eager than before to stay in the LDP's good graces and hold on to its position of power.
That said, there have been reports in the past of large-sum donations to Soka Gakkai, just as had happened in the World Federation. So it's conceivable that Soka Gakkai could meet the same fate as the World Federation. At this point, though, the media do not seem interested in covering this issue at all. Komeito still has many members in the Diet and so still has political power.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Recommitting to Japan-South Korea cooperation amid uncertainty
Recommitting to Japan-South Korea cooperation amid uncertainty

Asia Times

time4 hours ago

  • Asia Times

Recommitting to Japan-South Korea cooperation amid uncertainty

This article, originally published by Pacific Forum, is republished with permission. As President Lee Jae-myung takes office in South Korea, his new government is poised to begin rebuilding domestic trust and setting forth a new foreign policy agenda. South Korea has been in political limbo for the past six months since former president Yoon Suk Yeol briefly declared martial law in December 2024 – and in the meantime the international arena has been thrown into chaos. As South Korea reemerges into this new global context, it faces some difficult decisions about how to manage its relationships with its key economic and security partners. Precisely because of this uncertain outlook, now is a critical time for the governments in South Korea and Japan to recommit to further strengthening their bilateral relations to deal with shared problems. Prior to the recent period of limbo, Japan-South Korea ties had improved markedly as part of a push by former President Yoon, former Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida and former US President Joe Biden to strengthen trilateral relations among their countries. Since the trilateral Camp David Summit in August 2023, over 80 US-Korea-Japan dialogues have been convened to promote collaboration in areas ranging from economics to security to people-to-people exchange. However, with recent changes in political leadership, there are questions as to how Japan-South Korea relations will evolve in the coming months under the Shigeru Ishida and Lee administrations as the two leaders begin to engage. Why should the governments of Japan and South Korea recommit to cooperation now? To begin with, the two governments face worsening security threats. Both Japan and South Korea harbor long-standing concerns about China, as well as about North Korea's nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programs. Concerns about North Korea have been compounded by deepening cooperation between Pyongyang and Moscow in the war in Ukraine and the likelihood that Russia is rewarding North Korea's support with the transfer of military technologies. In addition, Japan and South Korea depend heavily on an international economic order that is currently in crisis. For years, the World Trade Organization has been stalled by disagreements among developed and developing countries and challenged by the practices of China's state-led economic system. Now, the trade system is under immense strain as the United States imposes unilateral tariffs that undermine the 'most favored nation' principle, and escalating trade war looms as a possibility. Japan and South Korea share an interest in stabilizing the existing economic order, maintaining relatively free flow of goods and services and strengthening their own economic security and national resilience. Moreover, Japan and South Korea must deal with a mutual US ally that is increasingly a source of disruption rather than stability. Both countries run significant trade surpluses with the US, which has made them top targets for tariffs. Japan and South Korea currently face reciprocal tariffs of 24% and 25% respectively, as well as Section 232 tariffs on autos, auto parts, steel, and aluminum. Japanese and Korean companies are being asked to invest more in the US. The two governments are also facing US pressure to boost their defense spending and host nation support and to increase other kinds of alliance burden-sharing at the same time as the US is considering reducing its military presence. In general, the return of an 'America First' approach to US foreign policy throws traditional alliances and institutions into question, leaving Japan and South Korea in a more vulnerable position. How can Japan and South Korea work together to address these challenges? The first step is to maintain the positive progress that has been achieved over the last two mechanisms have been established, and plans have been set in motion to start addressing many of the common concerns mentioned previously. Some initiatives will need to be reexamined under new national leadership, but they constitute an important baseline that should not be lost. Although the Trump administration has reaffirmed support for trilateral US-Japan-South Korea cooperation so far, Tokyo and Soul may need to push forward bilaterally without Washington in some cases. Second, Japan and South Korea may benefit from consulting with one another regarding their respective bilateral negotiations with the US on trade and security issues. In some cases, they may even find creative ways to coordinate their efforts. For example, SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won recently proposed that South Korea and Japan could respond to US pressure by jointly purchasing liquefied natural gas from the US, 'to increase deal size and leverage greater buying power to secure lower prices.' This type of approach could be applied in other areas. Tokyo and Seoul could also quietly consult on their respective bottom lines, to avoid one government taking a 'bad' deal with the US that sets a negative precedent for the other. Third, Japan and South Korea can build upon the foundation of the last two years to cultivate more widespread support for improving bilateral ties among their domestic stakeholders including legislators, civil society organizations, scholars and the general public. There have already been modest improvements in the two countries' public sentiment toward each other, and now is the time to build on this momentum. The more stakeholders who see Japan-South Korea ties as valuable, the more resilient their relationship will be to negative episodes in the future. There are also likely to be opportunities to build ties in the trilateral context; for example, the US House of Representatives recently introduced bipartisan legislation to establish an inter-parliamentary dialogue among elected politicians in the US, Japan and South Korea. Fourth, Japan and South Korea will benefit from embedding their bilateral cooperation in broader regional and international coalitions. Most of the problems that these two countries face cannot be solved through bilateral cooperation alone; instead, Tokyo and Seoul must partner with other governments in the Indo-Pacific, Europe, and elsewhere to address transnational security and economic challenges. For example, Lee, the new president, has already announced that he will be attending the June summit of the G7, which is an important venue for South Korea to consult with other like-minded countries as a guest. Japan and South Korea can continue to strengthen their cooperation with NATO as part of the 'Indo-Pacific 4.' The two countries should also explore ways to shore up the international economic system through broader trade initiatives. For example, they could work together to revitalize discussions on the Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific at the APEC summit in Gyeongju in November, and South Korea could considering joining the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership as well as the WTO's Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement. Participation in such minilateral initiatives will help further reinforce and stabilize Japan-South Korea bilateral efforts. The path ahead will not be easy. Internal politics in both countries are complex, and leaders will have to balance competing domestic and foreign policy priorities moving forward. The grievances that haunt Japan-South Korea relations cannot simply be ignored, and it will require careful, sustained effort to find mutually acceptable resolutions. However, taking steps now to put Japan-South Korea relations on a more resilient footing will help to facilitate these difficult conversations – and the costs of not cooperating will increase if the international system becomes more unstable. Kristi Govella ( is an associate professor of Japanese politics and international relations at the University of Oxford and senior advisor and Japan chair at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).

Two Chinese aircraft carriers seen in Pacific for first time, Japan says
Two Chinese aircraft carriers seen in Pacific for first time, Japan says

HKFP

time17 hours ago

  • HKFP

Two Chinese aircraft carriers seen in Pacific for first time, Japan says

Japan said Tuesday that two Chinese aircraft carriers had been seen operating in the Pacific for the first time as Beijing boosts its military capability in far-flung areas. On Monday, China's Shandong carrier and four other vessels, including a missile destroyer, sailed inside the Japanese economic waters surrounding the remote Pacific atoll of Okinotori, Tokyo's defence ministry said. Its fighter jets and helicopters conducted take-offs and landings there, the ministry said. The fleet of five warships was also seen sailing on Saturday 550 kilometres (340 miles) southeast of Miyako Island near Taiwan, it added. China's other operational aircraft carrier Liaoning and its fleet entered Japan's exclusive economic zone (EEZ) in the Pacific over the weekend, before exiting to conduct drills involving fighter jets, Tokyo previously said. 'This is the first time two Chinese aircraft carriers were spotted operating in the Pacific at the same time,' a defence ministry spokesman told AFP on Tuesday. 'We believe the Chinese military's purpose is to improve its operational capability and ability to conduct operations in distant areas,' he said. China's use of naval and air assets to press its territorial claims has rattled the United States and its allies in the Asia-Pacific region. Japanese and US defence officials say China wants to push the American military out of the so-called 'first island chain' from Japan down through the Philippines. Eventually, its strategy is to dominate areas west of the 'second island chain' in the Pacific between Japan's remote Ogasawara Islands and the US territory of Guam, they say. The Liaoning's recent cruise eastwards marked the first time the Japanese defence ministry has said a Chinese aircraft carrier had crossed the second island chain. In September, the warship sailed between two Japanese islands near Taiwan and entered Japan's contiguous waters, an area up to 24 nautical miles from its coast. At the time, Tokyo called that move 'unacceptable' and expressed 'serious concerns' to Beijing. Under international law, a state has rights to the management of natural resources and other economic activities within its EEZ, which is within 200 nautical miles (370 kilometres) of its coastline.

Chinese aircraft carrier enters Japan's economic waters, Tokyo says
Chinese aircraft carrier enters Japan's economic waters, Tokyo says

HKFP

time2 days ago

  • HKFP

Chinese aircraft carrier enters Japan's economic waters, Tokyo says

A Chinese aircraft carrier group entered Japan's economic waters over the weekend, before exiting to conduct drills involving fighter jets, Tokyo's defence ministry said Monday. The Liaoning carrier, two missile destroyers and one fast combat supply ship sailed around 300 kilometres (190 miles) southwest of Japan's easternmost island of Minamitori on Saturday, a ministry statement said. It was the first time a Chinese aircraft carrier had entered that part of Japan's exclusive economic zone (EEZ), a Japanese defence ministry spokesman told AFP. 'We think the Chinese military is trying to improve its operational capability and ability to conduct operations in distant areas,' the spokesman said. China's growing military clout and use of naval and air assets to press disputed territorial claims have rattled the United States and its allies in the Asia-Pacific region. Tokyo's chief cabinet secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi told reporters on Monday that the government had 'conveyed an appropriate message to the Chinese side' without saying it had lodged a formal protest. After the Liaoning and its accompanying vessels exited Japan's EEZ, fighter jets and helicopters conducted take-offs and landings on Sunday, the ministry statement said. Japan deployed its warship Haguro to the area to monitor the situation, it added. Last month, the Liaoning sailed between two southern Japanese islands within the EEZ, from the East China Sea into the Pacific while conducting take-offs and landings on deck, the ministry said. The carrier in September last year sailed between two Japanese islands near Taiwan and entered Japan's contiguous waters, an area up to 24 nautical miles from its coast. At the time Tokyo called the move 'unacceptable' and expressed 'serious concerns' to Beijing. Under international law, a state has rights to the management of natural resources and other economic activities within its EEZ, which is within 200 nautical miles (370 kilometres) of its coastline. Late last month, Tokyo accused Beijing of conducting unnotified maritime scientific research within its EEZ, near the remote Pacific atoll of Okinotori.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store