Dublin Airport expecting 120k passengers per day this summer
Air operator daa has said that it predicts it will be a record breaking summer for the airport with 10million people set to pass through the airport from June to August.
More than 2,600 flights will depart from the airport from 43 different airlines.
Recent feedback shows that passengers wanted more seating, food and drink choices along with a cleaner airport.
Officials said that these issues have been addressed and improvements have been made for the busy holiday season.
Security and Parking
The aim is also to get people through security in under 20 minutes. However, there are different rules for different Terminals when it comes to whether liquids and technology stay in bags during security screening.
In T2, passengers can keep the tech in their bags, but will have to take liquids out for scanning at security.
Both tech and liquids will also have to be taken out in T1.
Kenny Jacobs, daa CEO said that he's confident that "we're very, very close to a new ruling by the EU that liquids can stay in the bags".
For those who are driving to the airport, the advice for passengers is to book in advance due to demand.
Extra spaces made available by a private company have been welcomed.
Sarah Ryan, Director of Communications with daa said it's "great news" that the Quick Park carpark has re-opened.
"That's not operated by Dublin Airport but it is available so that does bring some extra capacity" she said.
Changes
There will be three new children entertainment areas at terminal one and two which brings the total number to five.
Twenty three new water refill stations have been introduced and an additional one thousand seats in the terminals have been installed.
Security staff numbers have also increased by more than one thousand.
A new Dublin Airport App has also been launched which features real-time flight updates for arrivals and departures, security wait times and details about gate numbers and check-in areas.
US Pre-Clearance
Mr Jacobs said that the advice hasn't changed for US pre-clearance and passengers should arrive three hours before their transatlantic flight.
He said that they have seen an increase in Europeans choosing to come through Dublin airport when flying to the United States.
He indicated that this it may be for a short journey home for passengers if they are denied entry to the United States due to stricter border betting.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Agriland
3 hours ago
- Agriland
Former farm leaders oppose Mercosur deal at Tullamore Show
Former leaders of two of the country's leading farm organisations joined forces at the 2025 Tullamore Show and FBD National Livestock Show to opposed the EU-Mercosur Trade Agreement. Former Irish Farmers' Association (IFA) president John Dillon and former Irish Creamery Milk Suppliers' Association (ICMSA) president Pat O'Rourke – now a political and agriculture adviser to MEP Ciaran Mullooly - made a joint effort at the event on Sunday (August 10) to warn about the deal. The two men said that said the Mercosur deal will have a "devastating impact" on Irish beef farmers. If ratified by EU member states, the deal would grant significantly increased access for South American beef into the European market. Speaking at the show, the two former farm leaders highlighted what they called a "massive price gap" between Brazilian and Irish beef, which they said was driven by a differences in production standards. Dillon claimed: "The farmgate price for beef in Brazil is just €3.20/kg. In Ireland, it's €9.50/kg. That difference is explained by the lower animal welfare standards, use of growth hormones, and weaker environmental protections in Mercosur countries. "The structural disadvantages for Irish farmers are equally stark. While farms in Mercosur countries can be as large as 15,000ha, the average Irish family farm is just 34ha. 'Irish farmers cannot and will not be able to compete on price with beef produced under vastly different rules and on an industrial scale. If the government is serious about backing Irish farmers, there's only one option – say no to Mercosur," O'Rourke said. The two men jointly called on the government to take a firm stand against the deal in upcoming EU negotiations, warning that its ratification would undermine the Irish beef sector, threaten rural livelihoods, and reward production systems that fail to meet the high standards demanded of EU farmers. The Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade, Simon Harris, recently said he had discussed international trade developments, including the Mercosur agreement, with his counterparts from France and Germany, among others. He said: "The government is committed to supporting free, fair and open trade. Indeed, recent developments in the global trading environment have highlighted the importance of market diversification via an expanded set of EU free trade agreements. "We have always been clear, that such agreements must defend our most vulnerable sectors and that our farmers' livelihoods must not be undermined through weak or ineffective environmental standards in other countries." "Our position is clearly outlined in the Programme for Government, which states that the government will work with like-minded EU countries to stand up for Irish farmers and defend our interests in opposing the current Mercosur trade deal," the Tánaiste said.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Cairn Homes refused permission for 280 new homes in south west Dublin
An Coimisiún Pleanála (ACP) has rejected a planning application by Cairn Homes for 280 new homes in Newcastle South in Co Dublin following a three-year process. The proposed 8.5 hectare development, consisting of 128 houses, 116 apartments and 36 duplex units, was made directly to the planning commission as a strategic housing development in June 2022. The houses, if granted, would have been two-storey units, 94 of which would have been three-bedroom homes. The remainder would have been made up of eight two-bedroom units, 25 four-bedroom homes and a single five-bedroom property. The apartments would be spread across two five-storey buildings, with the duplex apartments located across three buildings each with three-storeys. READ MORE A total of 423 parking spaces were planned, alongside provision for 370 bicycles with open, green spaces and amenity assets planned. [ Strong first-time buyer demand supports Cairn revenue Opens in new window ] The seven-year planning permission application was refused on a number of grounds. During the three-year period, Cairn Homes had two other applications approved in the area. The direction issued by ACP's planning commissioner Paul Caprani noted 'that the baseline environment as set out in the EIAR [Environmental Impact Assessment Report] and the NIS [Natura Impact Statement] is inaccurate' leading to the documentation in the application being 'fundamentally flawed'. This, he said, was due to a 'large portion' of the site currently being under construction as part of a separate residential development project. He said that granting permission for the proposed development in line with the submitted plans would, 'result in alterations to the layout which would necessitate changes and demolition of dwellings'. The demolition of homes would be contrary to the South Dublin County Council Development Plan goal of prioritising retrofitting buildings instead of demolition and reconstruction. The direction notice further notes that the architectural variety in the two apartment blocks was inadequate and would 'adversely impact' the visual and residential amenity of the area. Local councillors, when the plans were presented in mid-2022, noted 'serious concern in relation to the growth of Newcastle', the ACP inspectors report noted, with a number of public bodies being consulted in the process. Cairn Homes was contacted for comment.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Taxpayer expected to make €2m profit from developing a site for housing but instead was left with €61,000 tax bill
A taxpayer who said that he once expected to make a profit of €2 million from building and 'flipping' a few houses to 'big spenders' on a 4.5 acre site has been left with a tax bill of €61,281. This follows the failure of his appeal at the Tax Appeals Commission (TAC) against a Revenue assessment for that amount. The man purchased the site for €330,000 funded by way of a loan in 2005 and claimed trading losses of €168,120 from 2008 to 2015. However, Revenue disallowed the losses after concluding that the man was not carrying on any trade to qualify for such losses. Appeals Commissioner Simon Noone upheld the Revenue assessment. READ MORE In his findings, Mr Noone concluded that 'the appellant's claim for trading losses on his income tax returns was based on the incorrect and inaccurate basis that he had been engaged in trade'. [ Farmer loses Revenue appeal over €351,545 capital gains tax bill Opens in new window ] In evidence at the TAC, the man said he purchased the site with a view to building and 'flipping' a few houses. At the TAC hearing, he said that he believed it would be attractive to 'big spenders' and he anticipated achieving a €500,000 profit on the first house, which would enable him to build the second, and so on and he expected total profit of around €2 million. He said that there was a good chance of three to five houses, with a possibility of more. The appellant stated that he did not buy the site to build a house for himself and stated that the current status of the site was that 'it's still there'. He did not register for VAT because 'I figured nothing had happened yet'. When it was put to the appellant at the hearing that he abandoned his plans in 2007 to develop the land, he stated that 'the plans abandoned me…the environment changed,' referring to the property crash. Mr Noone found that the evidence suggested a distinct lack of urgency on the part of the appellant to progress the development of the site. He said that he was satisfied that the appellant never intended to engage in the trade of land development. Mr Noone said that prior to 2005, the appellant had no experience in land development, did not obtain funding to build the homes, never applied for planning permission for the homes and the land remains zoned as agricultural.
