EU, NATO chief back Ukraine ahead of Trump-Putin summit – DW – 08/10/2025
European leaders continue to push to have Ukraine involved in the negotiations between the United States and Russia, ahead of talks between presidents Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump.
Putin and Trump are to meet in the US state of Alaska on August 15 to try to bring an end to the three-year war.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has repeatedly stated a peace deal without his country's input would not be possible.
Europe has insisted that Kyiv and European powers should be part of any deal to end the conflict, with EU foreign ministers set to discuss the next steps for the bloc in a meeting by video link on Monday together with their Ukrainian counterpart.
"The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine," leaders from Germany, France, Italy, Poland, Britain and Finland and EU Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen said in a joint statement.
The statement was followed by the heads of eight Nordic-Baltic nations jointly reaffirming their support for Ukraine too.
The leaders of Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, and Sweden said they "Reaffirm the principle that international borders must not be changed by force."
Expressing their belief that peace could only come through consistent pressure being put on the Russian Federation to halt its "unlawful" war, the Nordic-Baltic countries added that they would continue to uphold and impose restrictive measures against Russia.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz told local broadcaster ARD on Sunday he assumed Zelenskyy will attend the summit between Trump and Putin.
"We hope and assume that the government of Ukraine, that President Zelenskyy will be involved in this meeting," Merz said in an interview with ARD.
"We cannot accept in any case that territorial questions are discussed or even decided between Russia and America over the heads of Europeans and Ukrainians. I assume that the American government sees it the same way."
Meanwhile, top EU diplomat Kaja Kallas expressed her belief that US should use its power to "force" Russia to bring an end to the war.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
"President Trump is right that Russia has to end its war against Ukraine. The US has the power to force Russia to negotiate seriously. Any deal between the US and Russia must have Ukraine and the EU included, for it is a matter of Ukraine's and the whole of Europe's security," Kallas said.
Adding to the calls for Trump to exert his diplomatic powers, NATO head Mark Rutte told ABC's This Week broadcast that "Next Friday will be important because it will be about testing Putin, how serious he is on bringing this terrible war to an end."
However, unlike many European leaders, Rutte said it was a reality that "Russia is controlling some of Ukrainian territory" and suggested a future deal could acknowledge this.
Seperately, US Vice President JD Vance used a recorded interview with US conservative broadcaster Fox News to repeat that the North American country's plans to withdraw financially from supporting Ukraine.
"I think the president, and I certainly think that America, we're done with the funding of the Ukraine war business. We want to bring about a peaceful settlement to this thing," Vance said in the interview that was recorded several days ago.
"But if the Europeans want to step up and actually buy the weapons from American producers. We're okay with that, but we're not going to fund it ourselves anymore," Vance asserted.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
a minute ago
- Int'l Business Times
US Denounces Europe On Speech In Pared-down Rights Report
The United States on Tuesday alleged that human rights were worsening in Western Europe due to internet regulations, in a pared-down annual global report that spared partners of President Donald Trump such as El Salvador. The State Department's congressionally required report historically has offered extensive accounts of all nations' records, documenting in dispassionate detail issues from unjust detention to extrajudicial killing to personal freedoms. For the first report under Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the State Department trimmed sections and took particular aim at countries that have been in the crosshairs of Trump, including Brazil and South Africa. On China, which the United States across administrations has identified as a top adversary, the State Department report said that "genocide" was ongoing against the mostly Muslim Uyghur people, whose plight Rubio took up as a senator. But the report also took striking aim at some of the closest allies of the United States, saying that human rights had worsened in Britain, France and Germany due to regulations on online hate speech. In Britain, following the stabbing deaths of three young girls, authorities took action against internet users who falsely alleged that a migrant was responsible and urged revenge. The State Department report described the British efforts as officials having "repeatedly intervened to chill speech" and said that the close US ally had experienced "credible reports of serious restrictions on freedom of expression." The criticism comes despite Rubio moving aggressively in the United States to deny or strip visas of foreign nationals over their statements and social media postings, especially student activists who have criticized Israel. Trump is an avid social media user who frequently berates opponents in personal tones. His administration has repeatedly taken on Europe over restrictions on social media platforms, many of which are US-based. In February, Vice President JD Vance used a visit to Germany to champion the far-right AfD party after the country's spy agency called it extremist. The report also said that rights deteriorated in 2024 in Brazil, where Trump has pressed against prosecution of former president Jair Bolsonaro, his ally accused of a coup attempt with echoes of the January 6, 2021 riot at the US Capitol by Trump's supporters. Brazil, the report said, has "undermined democratic debate by restricting access to online content deemed to 'undermine democracy,' the report said. The State Department said that rights "significantly worsened" in South Africa, where Trump has embraced the cause of the white minority. The report accused the post-apartheid government of taking "substantially worrying steps towards land expropriation" of Afrikaners and other minorities. By contrast, the State Department said there were "no credible reports of significant human rights abuses" in El Salvador and noted a "historic low" in crime. President Nayib Bukele has unleashed a sweeping crackdown on crime in which rights groups say many innocent people have wound up in detention. Bukele took in migrants sent from the United States in Trump's mass deportation drive, some of whom have since reported mistreatment during nearly round-the-clock confinement in a maximum-security prison, which took place after the time covered by the report. Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, who the Trump administration admits was wrongly deported, filed a lawsuit alleging severe beatings, sleep deprivation and inadequate nutrition in El Salvador's CECOT prison. The latest report trimmed down its section on Israel, the West Bank and Gaza. It acknowledged cases of arbitrary arrests and killings by Israel but said that authorities took "credible steps" to identify officials responsible. In a letter earlier this year, Democratic senators led by Jeanne Shaheen, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, voiced alarm over changes to the report that they said damaged US credibility. "When the United States conveniently wields human rights principles as a political cudgel against our adversaries, but does not apply those same standards to our allies, countries like China and Russia are quick to point out such hypocrisy, and American influence on the world stage drops precipitously," they wrote.
DW
24 minutes ago
- DW
Putin-Trump Ukraine summit: What's on the cards? – DW – 08/12/2025
Russian President Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart Donald Trump will meet in Alaska to discuss the Ukraine war. What do they expect to get out of the summit? Russian President Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart Donald Trump have agreed to meet in Alaska on August 15 to discuss the war in Ukraine. The meeting was announced shortly before Trump's ceasefire ultimatum was set to expire. Although experts doubt the summit will deliver any major breakthroughs, some factors could force Putin to agree to a ceasefire. The upcoming meeting is the first time both leaders are coming together since US President Trump's reelection. In mid-July, Trump said he was disappointed with Putin over Russia's bombing of the Ukrainian capital Kyiv, but also said that he was "not done with him yet." The White House and Kremlin announced the meeting after US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff visited Putin in the Kremlin on August 6, though it is unclear what exactly will be discussed in Alaska. We do know that the talks will focus on Ukraine, but the country itself will not be represented at the meeting. Washington and Moscow are not planning for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to attend the summit. All experts DW interviewed about the upcoming summit expect it will primarily benefit the Russian president. "Putin has always been keen to ensure that he and the US president — whoever holds that office — decide the fate of the world, and that corresponding images are broadcast around the world," Russia's former prime minister Mikhail Kasyanov told DW. Russian exiled opposition politician Dmitry Gudkov told DW the Alaska meeting would provide a unique opportunity for Putin to shake hands with one of the leaders of the West. "The mere fact that Putin has the chance to meet Trump is already a huge plus" for the Russian president, Gudkov said. "Trump is basically legitimizing a war criminal and allowing Putin to participate in negotiations with the West." If it weren't for Trump, Gudkov said, no Western leader would be negotiating with Putin. It became clear in late July that Trump was annoyed by Putin's unwillingness to end the fighting in Ukraine. Trump declared that he was no longer interested in talks with Putin and gave him an ultimatum of 50 days to find a peaceful solution to the Ukraine war, which he later shortened to just ten days. Experts told DW they believe that the realization that Trump is losing patience may have prompted the Kremlin to agree to the upcoming talks. Kirill Rogov, a political analyst who heads the Russian-language online media outlet which publishes analyses by Russian scientists, says a number of factors may compel Putin to seek an end to the Ukraine war. Rogov points to the weakened Russian economy, the sluggish advance of Russian forces in Ukraine and secondary US sanctions that could harm Russia. "Putin also hopes to extract the highest possible price for his approval at this moment. By the end of the year, Putin could be in an even worse position if it turns out that the Russian offensive has had little effect and the battlefield situation remains unchanged," Rogov said. Further US sanctions could also cause Russia to lose India as a buyer of its crude oil, and force it to prepare for yet another offensive in Ukraine for the third year in a row. Last week US news outlet published a report citing anonymous sources indicating that the Kremlin had realized that Steve Witkoff's Russia visit represented the last opportunity to reach an agreement with Trump. said the Kremlin may now offer an airspace ceasefire by way of a concession. Gudkov, however, believes this approach, coordinated with the Trump administration, would primarily benefit Moscow rather than Kyiv. Gudkov said Ukraine has carried out "effective" counterattacks against Russia, which resulted in the temporary closure of Russian airports on numerous occasions. He said Ukraine had also struck weapons depots, military equipment and oil refineries in Russia. This, he added, was important from a psychological point of view, making Russians understand the war is raging close to home, not far away, solely playing out on their televisions. "If these [Ukrainian] air strikes stop, Putin will calmly continue his advance on land, where he has the advantage," Gudkov told DW. Yet Russian President Putin may not face any serious consequences, even if both leaders fail to make any significant progress during the upcoming Alaska talks, says political analyst Rogov. "Putin can count on Trump to be lenient with him because Trump's attitude toward Putin has always been special," Rogov told DW. "Trump always avoids situations where direct pressure is exerted on Putin. And every time pressure seems inevitable, Trump declares that a new opportunity to reach an agreement has risen and therefore no real pressure is needed." He cites talks between Putin and Trump against the backdrop of the expired ceasefire ultimatum as one such example. Gudkov believes that there are no real means left to put pressure on Russia. For example, despite sanctions, hundreds of tankers continue to transport Russian oil across the world's oceans. Gudkov thinks a quick ceasefire is more likely to result from domestic factors that could put pressure on the Kremlin rather than external factors. The longer the war lasts, Gudkov says, the harder it will be for Putin to sell it as a Russian victory. "At some point, Russians won't care whether Ukraine is in NATO or how this war ends — they will only care about it ending," Gudkov said.
DW
31 minutes ago
- DW
Putin-Trump Ukraine summit: What's in the cards? – DW – 08/12/2025
Russian President Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart Donald Trump will meet in Alaska to discuss the Ukraine war. What do they expect to get out of the summit? Russian President Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart Donald Trump have agreed to meet in Alaska on August 15 to discuss the war in Ukraine. The meeting was announced shortly before Trump's ceasefire ultimatum was set to expire. Although experts doubt the summit will deliver any major breakthroughs, some factors could force Putin to agree to a ceasefire. The upcoming meeting is the first time both leaders are coming together since US President Trump's reelection. In mid-July, Trump said he was disappointed with Putin over Russia's bombing of the Ukrainian capital Kyiv, but also said that he was "not done with him yet." The White House and Kremlin announced the meeting after US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff visited Putin in the Kremlin on August 6, though it is unclear what exactly will be discussed in Alaska. We do know that the talks will focus on Ukraine, but the country itself will not be represented at the meeting. Washington and Moscow are not planning for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to attend the summit. All experts DW interviewed about the upcoming summit expect it will primarily benefit the Russian president. "Putin has always been keen to ensure that he and the US president — whoever holds that office — decide the fate of the world, and that corresponding images are broadcast around the world," Russia's former prime minister Mikhail Kasyanov told DW. Russian exiled opposition politician Dmitry Gudkov told DW the Alaska meeting would provide a unique opportunity for Putin to shake hands with one of the leaders of the West. "The mere fact that Putin has the chance to meet Trump is already a huge plus" for the Russian president, Gudkov said. "Trump is basically legitimizing a war criminal and allowing Putin to participate in negotiations with the West." If it weren't for Trump, Gudkov said, no Western leader would be negotiating with Putin. It became clear in late July that Trump was annoyed by Putin's unwillingness to end the fighting in Ukraine. Trump declared that he was no longer interested in talks with Putin and gave him an ultimatum of 50 days to find a peaceful solution to the Ukraine war, which he later shortened to just ten days. Experts told DW they believe that the realization that Trump is losing patience may have prompted the Kremlin to agree to the upcoming talks. Kirill Rogov, a political analyst who heads the Russian-language online media outlet which publishes analyses by Russian scientists, says a number of factors may compel Putin to seek an end to the Ukraine war. Rogov points to the weakened Russian economy, the sluggish advance of Russian forces in Ukraine and secondary US sanctions that could harm Russia. "Putin also hopes to extract the highest possible price for his approval at this moment. By the end of the year, Putin could be in an even worse position if it turns out that the Russian offensive has had little effect and the battlefield situation remains unchanged," Rogov said. Further US sanctions could also cause Russia to lose India as a buyer of its crude oil, and force it to prepare for yet another offensive in Ukraine for the third year in a row. Last week US news outlet published a report citing anonymous sources indicating that the Kremlin had realized that Steve Witkoff's Russia visit represented the last opportunity to reach an agreement with Trump. said the Kremlin may now offer an airspace ceasefire by way of a concession. Gudkov, however, believes this approach, coordinated with the Trump administration, would primarily benefit Moscow rather than Kyiv. Gudkov said Ukraine has carried out "effective" counterattacks against Russia, which resulted in the temporary closure of Russian airports on numerous occasions. He said Ukraine had also struck weapons depots, military equipment and oil refineries in Russia. This, he added, was important from a psychological point of view, making Russians understand the war is raging close to home, not far away, solely playing out on their televisions. "If these [Ukrainian] air strikes stop, Putin will calmly continue his advance on land, where he has the advantage," Gudkov told DW. Yet Russian President Putin may not face any serious consequences, even if both leaders fail to make any significant progress during the upcoming Alaska talks, says political analyst Rogov. "Putin can count on Trump to be lenient with him because Trump's attitude toward Putin has always been special," Rogov told DW. "Trump always avoids situations where direct pressure is exerted on Putin. And every time pressure seems inevitable, Trump declares that a new opportunity to reach an agreement has risen and therefore no real pressure is needed." He cites talks between Putin and Trump against the backdrop of the expired ceasefire ultimatum as one such example. Gudkov believes that there are no real means left to put pressure on Russia. For example, despite sanctions, hundreds of tankers continue to transport Russian oil across the world's oceans. Gudkov thinks a quick ceasefire is more likely to result from domestic factors that could put pressure on the Kremlin rather than external factors. The longer the war lasts, Gudkov says, the harder it will be for Putin to sell it as a Russian victory. "At some point, Russians won't care whether Ukraine is in NATO or how this war ends — they will only care about it ending," Gudkov said.
