
INTERVIEW: 'Don't let fear deter you from new life in Germany,' minister urges
A decade ago in 2015, as the civil war in Syria grew into even more brutal and bloody conflict, Germany opened its door to hundreds of thousands of refugees. At train stations in cities like Munich and Berlin, groups of people waited to greet the new arrivals, bearing offers of support and shelter, along with water and chocolate bars.
For Dr. Andreas Philippi, Lower Saxony's Minister for Labour and Integration and chair of the German Integration Ministers' Conference, this moment marked a high point for Germany. Faced with those fleeing war and persecution, he said, the country experienced a collective "wave of empathy".
"You may remember the Chancellor (Angela Merkel) saying, 'We can do this,' and it worked wonderfully because we were a strong country that had built itself up over decades," he told The Local. "We had many resources, we embraced the situation, and we also had a history."
Ten years later, however, the tone on immigration has shifted dramatically. The far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) achieved record results in February's election, and the public debate is dominated by anger, resentment and fear. This is despite the fact that the demographics in Germany are shifting, and around 26 percent of the population now has a migration background.
"Fear in people's minds remains," said Philippi. "Fear of foreigners, fear of change. Before the federal election, there were several attacks involving migrants - some were mentally ill, some stateless - and the media coverage reinforced this primal fear of the 'other'."
According to the SPD politician, the attacks and their subsequent media coverage has whipped up a far more widespread distrust of migrants - despite the fact that the perpetrators represent just a tiny proportion of foreigners in Germany.
"It results in the entire group being judged by the actions of a minuscule few - something like '0.00003' percent. That's one reason why we've struggled, for example, to convince people in Eastern Germany that the AfD's fear-based policies are wrongfully targeted at minorities and newcomers,' Philippi added.
'As we saw during the election campaign, the focus wasn't on unity, but rather on spreading fear. Politicians like Friedrich Merz took clear positions -
even getting support from the AfD
at one point - despite knowing their demands weren't compatible with European or international law.'
READ ALSO:
How German media reveals its bias when foreigners commit crimes
In contrast to Merkel's famous phrase -
"Wir schaffen das"
- the current CDU-led government has focused on pulling up the drawbridge to stop the influx of migrants. Just days after taking office, Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt (CSU)
ordered police to step up checks at all of Germany's land borders
and reject almost all asylum seekers trying to enter the country.
Advertisement
Vital for prosperity
When Germany's state integration ministers gathered in Göttingen in April for the annual Integration Ministers Conference, they were swimming against this anti-migrant tide.
The ministers looked at measures to help foreigners find their feet in the country, learn German and enter the workplace successfully.
Andreas Philippi (SPD) is seen behind a globe placed on the table at a press conference at the end of the two-day Integration Ministers' Conference (IntMK). Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Bernd Wüstneck
According to the Institute for Labour Research (IAB), Germany requires at least 400,000 workers to move to the country per year in order to maintain its supply of labour. This will be vital for ensuring growth and shoring up the country's welfare and pensions system.
"From a labour market perspective, we see that the balance between working and non-working populations only remains stable because of immigration," said Philippi. "Without it, we'll face a shortage of 33 percent of the workforce in the next 20 to 30 years. That would mean Germany will no longer be able to maintain its prosperity as we have done, through work and through taxation."
Currently, the most urgent need for workers is in four key sectors: healthcare, logistics, construction and hospitality. However, the Lower Saxony Labour Minister says there is a demand for workers everywhere.
With such an urgent need for new talent, integrating foreigners into work and society becomes a vital part of Germany's economic success.
Advertisement
As part of this long-term goal, Germany rolled out its
new digital visa portal
at the start of the year, with the aim of making the application process far quicker and more efficient. In places like India and Indonesia, where waiting times for an appointment can stretch up to nine months, this work is still ongoing.
However, for Philippi, the most important part of the process begins after arrival.
"Integration doesn't begin with the journey here; it starts once people are here, once they have their papers and decide to stay,' he explained. That was one of the primary lessons of the Syrian refugee crisis, he added.
Concrete steps
Despite the perceptible lurch to the right in German politics, there have been several steps forward over the last decade when it comes to welcoming foreigners.
Among the most significant was the traffic-light coalition's landmark reform of citizenship, reducing residence requirements to five years from eight and ending a ban on dual nationality. This, along with the introduction of new language and integration courses and moves to speed up recognition of qualifications, was seen as major win for the integration ministers.
READ ALSO:
Germany's dual citizenship law to remain under future CDU/SPD coalition
But Philippi believes there's still work to do.
Advertisement
One concrete example of this work is
Adelante Colombia
: a collaborative project between Lower Saxony's Work and Social Ministry and the Chamber of Industry and Commerce. The initial goal is to recruit 50 young people from Colombia, where the unemployment rate is 25 percent, to train in Germany's struggling healthcare and life sciences industries.
"We've selected young people who are learning German and are motivated to train in healthcare-related jobs," Philippi explained. "We'll ensure they get passports, visas, and places to continue their training here in Germany. They'll arrive in communities where there are already Spanish-speaking networks, which will ease integration. We call the concept: work together, live together."
Beyond projects to recruit workers from abroad, integration ministers also want to dismantle hurdles that workers can face on arrival. This includes expanding Welcome Centres - a first port of call to help foreigners navigate German bureaucracy and settle into the country.
Federal President Frank-Walter Steinmeier visits a welcome centre for Ukrainian refugees in Romania which shows what such centres in Germany could looks like. Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Bernd von Jutrczenka
It also involves improving the clunky and fragmented process of
getting foreign qualifications recognised
- not only by speeding up administration but also by lowering the bar.
"Our goal is quick recognition," said Philippi. "In less complex professions, it's better to get people into companies early, where they'll learn the language faster.
"We should also reconsider how difficult the exams are. German is a tough language - I met four Moroccan men who were great practical workers but failed because the test questions were too hard. We might need to ease up in some areas."
Another way of simplifying the process is to apply less-rigid criteria, he added: "Not just checking curriculums or exam results, but also conducting competency assessments to see what applicants actually know."
Advertisement
Speeding up processes
In future, the goal is to give applicants a preliminary decision within four weeks, with the vast majority receiving full recognition within three months - or six in the most complicated cases. This would mark a major improvement on current waiting times, which can stretch up to a year.
Philippi believes a similar goal should be in place for citizenship applications, which can take a notoriously long time to process. With naturalisation offices chronically understaffed and overwhelmed with applications - many of them from former Syrian refugees - eligible candidates can find themselves waiting years to finally receive an answer.
READ ALSO:
Which German cities have the longest waiting times for citizenship?
"As politicians, we have a strong interest in improving bureaucratic efficiency - either by hiring more staff or reducing bureaucracy itself," he said. "If someone has submitted everything and is eligible, it absolutely shouldn't take two years. Once everything is in order, it should not take longer than three months to make a decision - and even that feels too long."
Despite the integration ministers' best efforts, however, some fear that the anti-immigrant tone in Germany will still be off-putting to foreigners. While pulling up the drawbridge for asylum seekers, the very skilled workers Germany wants to attract may well decide to go elsewhere.
READ ALSO:
'Slap in the face' - Applicants blast Germany's plan to scrap citizenship reform
"Of course, some will choose a liberal country like Canada over a right-leaning Germany, especially if they fear discrimination because of their skin colour - that worries me deeply," Philippi said. "But we can only urge people: don't let fear deter you."
Advertisement
While the headlines may be dominated by anti-migrant rhetoric, the work of making it easier to settle in Germany will continue quietly in the background - with local leaders like Philippi striving to improve the system step by step.
READ ALSO:
'A fifth of voters hate me' - How do foreigners in Germany feel about far-right surge?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
10 hours ago
- DW
US image takes a blow in many nations — study
The United States is seeing a marked drop in popularity in many countries during the second term of President Donald Trump, according to a study by the nonpartisan Pew Research Center released on Wednesday. The survey, carried out in 24 countries, showed overall ratings of the US falling in 15 countries since last spring, with Mexico, Sweden, Poland and Canada displaying the biggest increase in negative views. Respondents were asked about overall views on the US and the state of its democracy as well as about their opinion of Trump, both with regard to his personal traits and his ability to handle major global issues. Most of the interviews were conducted after the notorious meeting between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on February 28 and before Trump announced tariffs on countries around the world on April 2. Widespread decline in US image Mexico and Sweden were the two countries where the opinion of the US suffered most, with drops of 32 percentage points in positive ratings (from 61% to 29%) in the first and 28 percentage points (47% to 19%) in the second in comparison with 2024. US popularity among adults in Poland and Canada fell by more than 20 percentage points over the year in both countries. The fall in US popularity in Germany was also marked: from 49% to 33% (16 percentage points). Opinions about the US in the UK, Greece, Hungary, South Africa, Argentina and India showed little change. People in three countries — Israel, Nigeria and Turkey — became slightly more likely to give the US good marks. Israelis are US fans, Swedes are not Israel was the country with the highest percentage (83%) of people with a positive assessment of the US. Sweden had the most people who view the US unfavorably (79%). Despite the increase in popularity in Turkey, the country still has one of the most unfavorable opinions of the US, with just 25% of adults having a positive view of the country. In Germany, 66% had a negative view of the US. Generational, ideological divides Younger people (35 and below) in most countries surveyed had a more positive view of the US than those aged 50 and above. This was particularly noticeable in Brazil, with 73% of younger adults giving a positive assessment compared with 37% of older adults who have an unfavorable view. Political ideologies also played a large role in peoples' opinions. Among the 51% of people in Israel who say they are ideologically rightist, 97% had a favorable view of the US. Australia also displayed a wide gap between those on the right, of whom 60% viewed the US positively, and those on the left, where the number dwindled to 12%. In Germany, supporters of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party were far more likely to have positive opinions of the US (63%) than those who do not back the party (25%). Trump a major factor The US president received mostly negative ratings in the survey, with more than half of adults in 19 of the countries saying they had little or no confidence in Trump's ability to lead world affairs. This is despite the fact that majorities in 18 countries viewed him as a "strong leader." The survey showed that a median of 34% of adults have a lot or some confidence in Trump's ability to give good leadership in world affairs, while 62%) have little or no confidence in him. His highest ratings came from Nigeria (79% confidence), Israel (69%), Kenya (64%), Hungary (53%) and India (52%). Adults in Mexico had the least confidence (8%), followed by Sweden (15%), Turkey (16%), Germany (18%) and Spain (19%). Low marks for Trump on climate change In 17 countries, men have more confidence in Trump than women, with this difference most marked in Sweden, Poland, and the UK. In Germany, the gender gap was 11 percentage points. Those on the right of the political spectrum also see him more positively. In all, 13 nations gave lower ratings for Trump than they did for his predecessor, Joe Biden, in 2024, but they are higher in six countries. Just 33% thought he could resolve the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and 29% the "conflicts between Israel and its neighbors."


DW
15 hours ago
- DW
Poland: PM Tusk's pro-EU government wins confidence vote – DW – 06/11/2025
Tusk's call for a confidence vote came after right-wing nationalist Karol Nawrocki was elected president, narrowly beating the Tusk-backed candidate. The opposition had said the lost election would be Tusk's downfall. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk won a parliamentary vote of confidence in his pro-European government on Wednesday, just days after a stinging presidential election defeat. The confidence vote, called by Tusk himself, came as right-wing nationalist Karol Nawrocki, backed by the opposition Law and Justice (PiS) party, narrowly beat his candidate Rafal Trzaskowski. Nawrocki also has the backing of US President Donald Trump. Announcing the vote, Tusk said his party is prepared for the challenge, understands the stakes, and does not "intend to take a single step back." "The vote of confidence should be a new opening," Tusk said. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk calls no-confidence vote To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video PM battled to deliver on key reforms Behind the call for a confidence vote is Tusk's aim to rally support for his pro-European coalition. Tusk's governing coalition has sought to reverse the previous PiS government's judicial reforms, which the European Union said undermined democracy and the rights of women and minorities. However, the outgoing President Andrzej Duda blocked those efforts, and Nawrocki is expected to maintain this position. This inability to deliver on key reforms — which also includes abortion rights — despite holding a parliamentary majority, has been a dark cloud over Tusk's government. Critics point out that since coming to power in December 2023, little change has been seen under Tusk's government. Will Tusk survive? In Poland, the prime minister, chosen by parliament, holds most day-to-day power, while the president, as the head of state, can influence foreign policy and veto legislation. Now Tusk finds himself in the same position with Nawrocki as he did with Duda, whose veto power blocked the PM from fulfilling his promises. So, while Tusk has framed the vote as a "new beginning" and promised a cabinet reshuffle in July, negotiations with his coalition also loom. Opposition leaders have seized the moment to signal Tusk's downfall. Former Justice Minister Zbigniew Ziobro told reporters, "The lost presidential election is the end of Donald Tusk. His fate is already sealed." Edited by: Kieran Burke


DW
16 hours ago
- DW
German court to rule on banned right-wing extremist magazine – DW – 06/10/2025
The right-wing extremist magazine Compact was outlawed in 2024, but it's available on newsstands again after winning an appeal. Now, Germany's Federal Administrative Court in Leipzig will have the final word. In July 2024, then Interior Minister Nancy Faeser banned Compact magazine. She justified the move, saying: "It's a central mouthpiece for the right-wing extremist scene. This magazine incites against Jews, people with ethnic migrant backgrounds and against our parliamentary democracy in the most abhorrent way." Compact sees itself as part of 'resistance movement' A 2023 report from the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV), Germany's domestic intelligence agency, features an entire page dedicated to Compact — a magazine and multimedia company headquartered in Falkensee, on the outskirts of Berlin. According to the BfV, the magazine's publisher says it sells 40,000 print copies a month. The number of subscribers to the Compact YouTube channel is significantly higher, at 513,000 as of June 10, 2025. "Compact sees itself as part of what it calls the resistance movement, and it is seen by other actors among the so-called new right as part of the scene," the BfV wrote. "The main feature of many of its published articles is agitation against the federal government and against the current political system." Ties to extremist Identitarian movement Examples cited by the BfV include abstruse conspiracy theories used to agitate against state institutions and pluralist society. "Historic revisionist content and antisemitic narratives round out the agenda," it added. Moreover, the report said, the outfit maintains ties with right-wing extremist groups like the German Identitarian movement (IBD) and the eastern German regional party the "Freie Sachsen," or Free Saxons. Former Interior Minister Nancy Faeser banned Compact in July 2024 Image: AFP Faeser said the message was clear — we will not allow anyone to define who does and does not belong in Germany by their ethnicity. "Our constitutional state protects all those who have been attacked because of their religion, their origins, their skin color or their desire to live in a democracy," she said last July. Faeser wanted to send a signal Faeser leaned heavily on the constitution, Germany's Basic Law, in calling for the right-wing extremist publication to be banned. Article 9 of the Basic Law, which regulates freedom of assembly, reads: "Associations whose aims or activities contravene the criminal laws or that are directed against the constitutional order or the concept of international understanding shall be prohibited." Compact's editor-in-chief, Jürgen Elsässer, is a suspected right-wing extremist who belonged to the far left as a young man. Now in his 60s, Elsässer was once a member of the Communist Youth Wing and wrote for the newspaper, Arbeiterkampf (The Workers' Fight). He later worked as a reporter for other left-wing media, including Neue Deutschland (New Germany), which was a key news organ for the socialist East German government when the country was still partitioned. Elsässer (right) was joined in Leipzig by CompactTV boss Paul Klemm Image: Jan Woitas/dpa/picture alliance Compact can publish until final verdict Elsässer and other plaintiffs fought the ban on his media operations before the Federal Administrative Court in Leipzig. He was partially successful in August 2024 when it was determined that he could continue publishing Compact until a final verdict had been handed down. In granting its stay, the court said the outcome of the case remained unclear as it had yet to be determined whether Compact had acted against the constitutional order. The court did, however, immediately find evidence of violations of human dignity in which citizens with migrant backgrounds were demeaned. Notwithstanding, it also voiced doubt as to whether that was enough to justify a ban. For that would represent the most serious intervention possible regarding speech and press freedoms guaranteed in Article 5 of the Basic Law. Where does press freedom begin and end? Still, Article 5 does put some limits on speech, saying, "These rights shall find their limits in the provisions of general laws, in provisions for the protection of young persons and in the right to personal honor." The trial to define where press freedoms in Germany begin and end will start on June 10. It's unclear when a decision will be handed down. What are Germany's limits on free speech? To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video This text was originally written in German.