US Immigration Budget Now Bigger Than Israel's Military Spending
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The Senate has passed a bill making Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) the U.S.'s largest interior law enforcement agency with funding for Donald Trump's immigration enforcement agenda higher than most of the world's militaries, including Israel's.
Pending its passage in the House of Representatives, Trump's bill could mean a massive increase in ICE funding as part of an immigration enforcement agenda worth $150 billion over four years.
This image from June 12, 2025 shows U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents at Delaney Hall, a migrant detention facility, in Newark, New Jersey.
This image from June 12, 2025 shows U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents at Delaney Hall, a migrant detention facility, in Newark, New Jersey.Why It Matters
If passed by Congress, Trump's 1000-page bill could reshape the U.S. immigration system with a significant increase in funding for expanding law enforcement and detention network while increasing costs to legally immigrate to the U.S.
What To Know
A revised version of Trump's bill was narrowly voted through the Senate on Tuesday. The estimated price tag of the legislation is around $150 billion between now and 2029—an annual average of $37.5 billion, which is higher than the military expenditure of all but 15 countries.
This figure is more than the annual military budget of Italy, which at $30.8 billion, is the world's 16th highest defense spender for this year according to tracker Global Fire Power.
It is also higher than military spending for Israel, ($30 billion), the Netherlands ($27 billion) and Brazil ($26.1 billion).
Different news outlets have broken down in different ways. The National Immigration Law Center said that ICE's detention budget would increase to $45 billion to build immigration jails for single adults and families, a price tag 13 times more than ICE's 2024 detention budget.
The bill also allocates $29.9 billion in additional funding for ICE activities, including hiring new agents and securing transportation contracts to move migrants between detention centers and facilitate deportations, according to Migrant Insider.
Meanwhile an assessment by Detention Watch Network said the bill set aside $59 billion to militarize the border which included wall construction, CBP agents and vehicles, and border surveillance technology.
It also said that there was $10 billion for grants to reimburse states who enact anti-immigrant policies and another $1 billion to the Department of Defense to deploy military personnel to the border and to detain migrants.
What People Are Saying
House Speaker Mike Johnson wrote on X that the bill "provides the ESSENTIAL funding needed to secure our nation's borders."
Silky Shah, Executive Director of Detention Watch Network said in a statement: "This bill skyrockets ICE's budget to never before seen funding levels and will make it the largest law enforcement agency in the country."
"ICE will now have 13 times its current fiscal budget for detention, which is already operating at a historic high, on top of the funding in ICE's annual budget that Congress sets each year."
Adam Isacson, a researcher with human rights advocacy organization WOLA per the AP, "One thing about this bill, these sections are super vague...there's no real specificity in the bill about how it's going to be spent."
What Happens Next
Trump's bill returns to the House of Representatives on Wednesday after a revised version was narrowly voted through the Senate on Tuesday. The president has set Congress a loose deadline of July 4 but further opposition is expected.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
29 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump says deal for ceasefire in Gaza is closer after Israel agrees on terms
CAIRO (AP) — U.S. President Donald Trump says Israel has agreed on terms for a new 60-day ceasefire with Hamas and that Washington would work with both sides during that time to try to end more than 20 months of war in Gaza. Neither side has accepted the proposal announced Tuesday by Trump, who has admonished Hamas that if the militant group does not buy into the offer, its prospects will get worse. It's not clear what conditions Israel agreed to. The efforts to reach a truce are unfolding in the wake of powerful Israeli and American strikes on nuclear sites in Iran, which has long supported Hamas, and just days before Trump is scheduled to meet with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Washington. Here's a look at the situation and the challenges it might present. Details of the proposed ceasefire are just beginning to emerge. But rather than being completely new, the potential deal seems to be a somewhat modified version of a framework proposed earlier this year by Trump's Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff. Trump said Tuesday in a social media post that Qatar and Egypt have been working on the details and would deliver a final proposal to Hamas. An Egyptian official involved in the ceasefire talks told The Associated Press that the proposal calls for Hamas to release 10 more hostages during the two-month period — eight on the first day and two on the final day. During that period, Israel would withdraw troops from some parts of Gaza and allow badly needed aid into the territory. The war began on Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas-led militants attacked southern Israel, killing 1,200 people and taking roughly 250 hostages. The group is believed to still have some 50 hostages, with fewer than half of them thought to be alive. The Egyptian official, speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to talk to reporters, said a sticking point over how aid would be distributed had been resolved with Israel. He said both sides have agreed that the United Nations and the Palestinian Red Crescent would lead aid operations and that the Israeli- and U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Fund would also continue to operate. The unraveling of Iran's regional network of proxies, capped by the blow inflicted on Iran during the recent 12-day war with Israel, has left Hamas weaker and more isolated in the region. Iran was a key backer of the militant group, but its influence has waned, and it's now preoccupied with its own problems. At the same time, Trump has made it clear to Israel that he wants to see the Israel-Hamas war end soon. While he has been supportive of Netanyahu, Trump had tough words for Israel in the opening hours of last week's ceasefire with Iran, when he pressured Israel to scale back its response to an Iranian missile attack. That could help persuade Hamas to embrace a deal. A diplomat briefed on the talks said there is now a 'big opportunity' to reach an agreement. 'The indications we're getting are people are ready.' He said Trump's harsh talk toward Israel has 'given a bit of confidence to Hamas' that the U.S. will guarantee any future deal and prevent a return to fighting. The diplomat spoke on condition of anonymity because he was discussing behind-the-scenes diplomatic contacts. The Egyptian official said Israel has not yet agreed to a proposal to withdraw its forces to positions held in early March after a previous ceasefire officially expired. Since then, the Israeli army has seized large swaths of Gaza to put pressure on Hamas, and it's not clear whether Israel is ready to return to those same positions. An Israeli official characterized the agreement as a 60-day deal that would include a partial Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and a surge in humanitarian aid to the territory. The mediators and the U.S. would provide assurances about talks on ending the war, but Israel is not committing to that as part of the latest proposal, said the official, who was not authorized to discuss the details of the deal with the media and spoke on condition of anonymity. The Egyptian official said Hamas will have to review the proposal with other factions before submitting an official response. One point that does seem to have been ironed out is the question of who will administer Gaza. Israel has said Hamas cannot run the territory, and the Egyptian official said the proposal would instead put Gaza under a group of Palestinians without political affiliations known as the Community Support Committee once a ceasefire is reached. Potentially complicating the effort, Netanyahu reiterated his hard-line position Wednesday, vowing that 'there will be no Hamas' following the 60-day ceasefire plan. A previous ceasefire agreed to in January established three phases, but the two sides never made it past phase one. During that time, however, there were multiple exchanges of Hamas-held hostages for prisoners held by Israel, and critical humanitarian aid was able to reach Gaza. When phase one expired on March 1, Israel sought to extend it while Hamas argued that phase two should go ahead as planned. The second phase would have compelled Hamas to release all the remaining living hostages in exchange for more Palestinian prisoners, a lasting ceasefire and a full Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip. That was always seen as difficult, because it would have forced Israel to choose between its two main war goals — the safe return of the hostages and the annihilation of Hamas. On March 18, Israel broke the ceasefire with new airstrikes and resumed hostilities. In Gaza, residents expressed hope that this time, a ceasefire will bring an end to the war. 'We are seriously tired,' said Asmaa al-Gendy, who has been living in a tent camp in Deir al Balah with her two children. The family has been displaced and starved and endured 'every form of torture in the world.' ___ Rising reported from Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Associated Press writers Josef Federman in Jerusalem and Wafaa Shurafa in Deir al Balah, Gaza Strip, contributed to this report.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senate's ‘big beautiful' bill trims popular tax breaks — 4 ways it could impact your taxes
The Senate's version of the massive tax bill squeaked through on a 51-50 vote on Tuesday and, while it largely matches the tax bill that passed the House in May, there are some key differences that could pose problems for House Republicans, who must now either vote on the Senate's version 'as is' or face drawn-out negotiations that would put their hoped-for July 4 deadline for passage out of reach. The Senate version of the bill adds much deeper cuts to Medicaid than the House version does. And, while the Senate did bow to House Republican pressure and raised its annual cap on the state and local taxes deduction to $40,000 from $10,000, the Senate extended that cap for just five years, until 2030. (The so-called SALT deduction is a key tax provision for many taxpayers who itemize their deductions in high-tax states such as California, New York and New Jersey.) 'Some members of the Senate GOP want to restrain components of the tax breaks approved by the House, and a moving target appears to be the so-called SALT deduction,' says Mark Hamrick, senior economic analyst at Bankrate. Here are some of the key tax provisions in the Senate-approved bill — and how it could affect your bottom line if the bill becomes law. Keep in mind that both proposed bills would maintain the lower income tax rates and higher standard deduction initially set by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 — provisions that are set to expire at the end of 2025 unless Congress acts. The state and local tax (SALT) deduction has long been a sticking point in the GOP's tax bill. Some House Republicans from high-tax states initially stalled the bill from advancing unless the current $10,000 SALT cap was increased. The House bill would allow taxpayers to claim up to $40,000 annually in SALT deductions ($20,000 if married filing separately), with the tax break phasing out for taxpayers with income of $500,000 or more ($250,000 or more if married filing separately). That compromise was enough to win over Republican holdouts. The Senate's version of the bill takes a different stance: It would hike the SALT cap to $40,000 but only for five years, at which point the cap would drop back to $10,000. It remains to be seen whether House Republicans will accept the temporary status of the $40,000 cap. The $10,000 SALT cap was originally enacted under the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) and expires at the end of 2025 unless Congress acts. Under the current law, the cap applies to most taxpayers, while those who file as married filing separately are limited to a $5,000 cap, regardless of income. Prior to the TCJA, there was no cap on claiming state and local taxes as an itemized deduction. Get matched: Find a financial advisor who can help you maximize your investments As part of the tax bill, the House proposed an increase to the child tax credit — from the current $2,000 to $2,500 per child under the age of 17. But the Senate's version scales back the increase, raising the credit to only $2,200 per child starting this year. Under the Senate's bill, the child tax credit would increase starting in 2025 and continue through 2028. The plan would also make the current income thresholds permanent, allowing families to qualify if their modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) doesn't exceed $400,000 for married couples filing jointly and $200,000 for single filers. The Senate's version of the bill would adjust the amount of the credit for inflation annually. If Congress doesn't act, the value of the child tax credit will revert back to $1,000 per child and lower income thresholds would apply — $110,000 for married couples and $75,000 for all other filers. Trump campaigned on the promise that he would eliminate taxes on tips and overtime pay. Both the House and Senate versions of the bill carry out his promise, but in different ways. The House version of the bill includes a provision to exclude qualified tips from income taxes, with a phaseout starting at $160,000 of modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) for all taxpayers. A similar measure applies to overtime pay. However, the Senate's version provides a much different picture. It would allow a deduction worth up to $25,000 for qualified tips and $12,500 for qualified overtime pay, creating two new deductions, which would be available from 2025 through 2028. These provisions would gradually phase out for taxpayers with MAGI exceeding $150,000 for single filers and $300,000 for joint filers. Some experts argue that while both proposals could offer some tax relief to millions of Americans, few would see a significant benefit. Fully 40 percent of U.S. households that report tip income would not see any tax break from the proposal, according to a report by the Tax Policy Center, a nonpartisan research organization. Of those households making less than $33,000 a year, just 1.4 percent of households would benefit from no tax on tips, and for those households, their average tax cut would be $450 a year. Learn more: No tax on tips or overtime: What workers should know Along with the previously mentioned tax provisions, the Senate takes a different stance on several key tax-related measures. The Senate's version of the bill modifies the House-approved version as follows: Car loan interest deduction: The House bill includes a tax deduction for interest paid up to $10,000 for interest paid on both new and used vehicles. The Senate version narrows the benefit, allowing the deduction for new vehicles only. Standard deduction for seniors: The Senate increases the additional standard deduction for seniors to $6,000, compared with $4,000 in the House bill. Read more: New bonus tax deduction worth up to $6,000 may come soon for older Americans. Qualified business income (QBI) deduction: While the House proposal boosts the QBI deduction from 20 percent to 23 percent, the Senate bill keeps it at 20 percent. 'The differences in the House and Senate where the GOP prevails may translate to potentially protracted negotiations,' Hamrick says. 'It appears Congress and the president are content with further fueling the federal debt and deficits, even though it is generally understood the situation is not sustainable in the long-term.' Learn more: The average tax refund each year, and how tax refunds work
E&E News
37 minutes ago
- E&E News
House hard-liners threaten to tank megabill procedural vote
A band of House conservative hard-liners is threatening to defeat a procedural vote on the Republican megabill and demands further negotiations over President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' Rep. Andy Harris, chair of the hard-line House Freedom Caucus, said he was opposed to the Senate-passed version of the GOP megabill and called on Trump to order senators back to town for further negotiations. Rep. Eric Burlison (R-Mo.), another Freedom Caucus member, said he planned to vote against the 'rule' setting up final floor consideration of the bill and 'start discussions where we can get back into' a fiscal framework hard-liners had negotiated with Speaker Mike Johnson. Advertisement Harris and Johnson spoke on the floor Wednesday as a preliminary vote was held open with more than a dozen GOP members not voting. With full attendance and Democrats uniformly opposed to the megabill, it takes only four GOP defections to tank the effort.
