Carney says Canada will meet 2% NATO spending target by March
Saying that the era of the United States' dominance on the world stage is over, Prime Minister Mark Carney committed his government on Monday to meeting the NATO benchmark target of two per cent of the country's gross domestic product by the end of the current fiscal year in March.
The prime minister outlined his vision of Canada moving more closely toward European allies in a speech in Toronto.
"We stood shoulder to shoulder with the Americans throughout the Cold War and in the decades that followed, as the United States played a dominant role on the world stage. Today, that dominance is a thing of the past," Carney told an audience of foreign policy thinkers, national security officials and defence industry business leaders on Monday morning.
Carney said the world is at a turning point — a hinge moment — and that it's time for Canada to chart its own path."The United States is beginning to monetize its hegemony: charging for access to its markets and reducing its relative contributions to our collective security," Carney said.
"In parallel, the world's trade routes, allegiances, energy systems and even intelligence itself are being rewired. Rising great powers are now in strategic competition with America. A new imperialism threatens. Middle powers compete for interests and attention, knowing that if they are not at the table, they will be on the menu."
Carney reiterated pledges made during the election campaign to rearm the Canadian military with new submarines, armoured vehicles, drones and other technology. He provided no additional specifics during the speech.
Much of the new $9.3 billion in defence spending is foundational, allowing the military to increase recruitment, give current soldiers a pay raise and set the stage for major equipment purchases — as well as an expansion of the Canadian defence industry.
WATCH | Carney's full speech:
There was speculation that the Liberal government would fold the Canadian Coast Guard entirely into the Department of National Defence — something other countries do. The coast guard is currently a special operating agency under the Fisheries Department with an annual budget of $2.5 billion.
At a technical briefing for the media, senior defence officials said the coast guard would remain where it was and there would be no need to arm the civilian agency. However, senior federal officials insisted a more fundamental reorganization of the service would take place.
One of the biggest questions on the minds of the opposition parties, whom Carney called to support the plan, was how the dramatic increase would impact the federal budget. Carney said the government would not raise taxes, but acknowledged some cuts would be made elsewhere within the federal government.Even more fundamental, defence expert Dave Perry said, is that the Defence Department has had trouble in the past being able to spend additional money.
"I think the Government of Canada now has to actually try to come to grips with whether or not it can actually move this money that the prime minister talked about this morning," said Perry, president of the Canadian Global Affairs Institute, who's spent more than decade tracking defence spending.
"If bureaucracy proceeds like normal, the way it has been over the past decade and a bit, this money is unlikely to be spent. We're going to have to actually see concrete change across the Canadian government."
Federal ministers have been quietly signalling the pathway to a two per cent commitment for the last couple of weeks.
The former head of NATO, George Robertson, speaking on CBC's Rosemary Barton Live on June 1, said Industry Minister Mélanie Joly had assured him that Canada would reach the alliance goal, which was first agreed upon in 2014, by the end of the year.
Last week, at NATO headquarters in Brussels, Defence Minister David McGuinty signalled Carney would address Canada's defence spending targets before the upcoming leaders' summit in The Hague.Hitting the two per cent NATO target would require an investment of between $18 billion and $20 billion.
In his speech, Carney said Canada will sign on to NATO's defence industrial pledge. Last year, NATO said it wanted its members to develop national plans to bolster the capacity of their individual defence industry sectors, a concept Canada has struggled with — or avoided outright — for decades.
"Our goal is tangible commitments from our allies to provide NATO with the necessary resolve to deter aggression and protect against all adversaries in all domains," Carney said. "Our goal is to protect Canadians, not to satisfy NATO accountants."
Canada under former prime minister Justin Trudeau faced regular criticism from allies for not meeting NATO's current target of two per cent of GDP.
The dispute became public at last year's leaders' summit in Washington when members of the U.S. Congress from both sides of the aisle called out Canada for not having a plan to meet the goal, unlike all other allies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
40 minutes ago
- USA Today
Southern Baptists vote to seek repeal of historic same-sex marriage ruling
Southern Baptists vote to seek repeal of historic same-sex marriage ruling Show Caption Hide Caption The Southern Baptist Convention in 2025: The key issues The Southern Baptist Convention is the nation's largest Protestant denomination denomination. It is headquartered in Nashville. The resolution approved seeks to reverse Obergefell v. Hodges as the historic U.S. Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriage. The June 10 vote by the nation's largest Protestant denomination represents a doubling down on issues of gender and sexuality. DALLAS − The Southern Baptist Convention passed a resolution supporting a concerted effort to reverse Obergefell v. Hodges as the historic U.S. Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriage approaches its 10-year anniversary. The June 10 vote by the nation's largest Protestant denomination represents a doubling down on issues of gender and sexuality as the predominant group of evangelical Christians continues to move sharply to the right and signals the SBC's hopes of replicating the successful campaign to overturn Roe v. Wade. Whether the latest vote will move the needle on gay marriage, a right backed by a strong majority of Americans, remains to be seen. Last year, the SBC passed a resolution condemning the use of in-vitro fertilization, only to see President Donald Trump sign an executive order earlier this year seeking to protect IVF access and reduce its out-of-pocket and health plan costs. Related: He was at the center of a Supreme Court case that changed gay marriage. Now, he's worried. Reversing the Obergefell ruling is one of numerous issues related to sex, gender and marriage encompassed by the resolution. Among other things, the resolution affirms that there are only two genders, defines marriage as between a man and a woman, says families are designed for procreation and that human life is sacred 'from conception to natural death.' The measure describes these declarations not just as Christian convictions but as 'universal truths' 'essential for a healthy, just and free society.' 'Our culture is increasingly rejecting and distorting these truths by redefining marriage, pursuing willful childlessness which contributes to a declining fertility rate, ignoring and suppressing the biological differences between male and female, encouraging gender confusion, undermining parental rights, and denying the value and dignity of children,' the resolution says. The resolution also opposes commercial surrogacy and normalization of 'transgender ideology,' saying policies that deny the 'biological reality of male and female' are legal fictions. It opposes laws and policies compelling people 'to speak falsehoods about sex and gender' and calls for the permanent defunding of Planned Parenthood. Last year, the convention narrowly rejected a constitutional ban on female pastors, a measure that required a two-thirds majority to pass. The SBC has disfellowshipped seven churches – including Southern California's megachurch Saddleback Church – for embracing egalitarian views on women in ministry as opposed to the complementarian position espoused by the convention, which holds that men and women have different roles. The Supreme Court's rightward swing and the election of President Donald Trump have emboldened the convention's more conservative factions and Christian political activists, who see the moment as ripe for a shift in American jurisprudence. 'It's time for us to take back our nation,' said Chad Connelly of Faith Wins, an organization focused on getting out the Christian vote. 'I believe we've been given an opportunity and the time is now.' Resolutions are non-binding statements expressing the convention's views on social and cultural issues. Other resolutions at past SBC annual meetings have reasserted Southern Baptist opposition to LGBTQ+ rights, though this year's resolution was the most forceful articulation of their rebuke of the Supreme Court precedent protecting same-sex marriage. Delegates, called messengers, overwhelmingly approved the resolution after little debate on its language. A strongly traditionalist voice in the SBC, Denny Burk, proposed the language in the resolution that messengers ultimately approved. Burk is the president of Louisville-based Council for Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, an advocacy group that was behind two well-known, cross-evangelical statements opposing LGBTQ+ rights. The first statement was the Danvers Statement in 1987 and the second was the Nashville Statement in 2017. 'It is sinful to approve of homosexual immorality or transgenderism and that such approval constitutes an essential departure from Christian faithfulness and witness,' the Nashville Statement said. 'Approval of homosexual immorality or transgenderism is a matter of moral indifference about which otherwise faithful Christians should agree to disagree.' The new resolution approved by the SBC is another iteration of the Nashville Statement, but more forcefully attacks the U.S. jurisprudence protecting the LGBTQ+ rights that evangelicals oppose. Contributing: Liam Adams of The Tennessean This is a developing story. Check back for updates.
Axios
41 minutes ago
- Axios
Starbucks taps into health trends with protein coffee test
LAS VEGAS — Starbucks is tapping into the growing demand for protein-packed drinks as consumers seek to boost their intake for health and wellness. Why it matters: The world's largest coffee chain unveiled Tuesday that it is testing protein in its cold foam as part of its "Back to Starbucks" plan. CEO Brian Niccol is trying to reverse a decline in foot traffic and sales by returning to its roots. The big picture: Protein is hot and having a moment beyond social media influencers sharing order hacks. Restaurant brands like Dutch Bros Coffee and Smoothie King have added more protein to their products to cater to changing consumer appetites. Eating a high-protein diet is important to maintain muscle for people taking appetite-suppressing injectable treatments like Ozempic and Wegovy, research shows. Nearly 18 million Americans are expected to be taking versions of GLP-1 drugs by 2029, according to investment bank UBS. Zoom in: Niccol told Axios in an interview Tuesday that the protein cold foam being tested is for a number of different consumer groups including 20-year-old males, 50-year-old females and people taking GLP-1s. "I was watching people coming to our stores, they would get three shots of espresso over ice," Niccol said. "And in some cases, they pull their own protein powder out of their bag, or in other cases, they have a protein drink, like a Fair Life and they'd pour that into their drink." "I'm like, well, wait a second, we can make this experience better for them," he said. "The good news is now I think we're right on trend, and we can do it I think arguably better than anybody else." Flashback: Starbucks had protein smoothies in the past and launched its Vivanno shakes in 2008. They were discontinued in 2018. The company also launched a protein drink in the U.K. last year. The intrigue: Starbucks said the protein powder should be able to be added to any of its cold foam flavors. What's next: Starbucks is testing protein cold foam in five locations in the U.S. under its Starting Five model.
Politico
41 minutes ago
- Politico
There's one vice RFK Jr. isn't talking about
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has made it his mission to remind Americans that they need to get off the couch and lay off the junk food. But there's one vice he's not talking about: smoking. That's troubled anti-smoking activists, researchers who focus on the diseases tobacco causes and Democrats in Congress who point out that smoking, despite a marked decline in recent years, still leads to more preventable deaths than anything else. Even so, Kennedy didn't mention the health impacts of smoking once in last month's Make America Healthy Again report assessing the biggest threats to Americans' health. That marks a turning point from the priorities of public health officials going back decades, including the Biden administration's, which targeted smoking as part of a moonshot plan to halve cancer death rates. Anti-tobacco advocates fear deemphasizing the dangers of tobacco could slow or even halt progress in driving down smoking rates. 'Attempting to combat chronic disease without tobacco control is like attempting a triathlon without a bicycle,' said Brian King, whom Kennedy pushed out of his job as the Food and Drug Administration's top tobacco regulator in April. 'You're destined for failure before leaving the starting line.' Since President Donald Trump's inauguration, his health agencies appear to have shelved two moves King planned to combat smoking, banning the last remaining legal cigarette flavoring, menthol, and requiring companies to reduce the amount of nicotine in their products. Nicotine is what makes cigarettes addictive. But an HHS spokesperson said the department 'remains steadfast in its mission to protect and promote public health,' adding that the MAHA report is not an 'exhaustive inventory of every HHS program or public health challenge.' 'HHS agencies continue to carry out their responsibilities, including work on tobacco control, with the highest level of integrity and commitment to the American public,' the spokesperson said. A sustained public health campaign to educate Americans about smoking's risks over decades has driven a huge decrease in use. In the 1960s, more than 4 in 10 adults smoked cigarettes. Now it's fewer than 1 in 8. And the public health success among kids is even starker. Fewer than 1 in 26 now smoke cigarettes, according to an analysis of federal data. The negative health impacts of tobacco use are well-studied and vast. For years it has been the top preventable cause of death in the United States, contributing to cancer, heart disease and stroke. But when Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) quizzed Kennedy about that during a budget hearing last month, asking him to name the 'No. 1 cause of preventable death in America today,' Kennedy was stumped. 'I'm not sure what you're talking about,' he said. Kennedy's apparent lack of interest in combating smoking — the word 'tobacco' appears in the MAHA report only within the context of his concerns about food marketing while 'smoking' and 'cigarettes' are never mentioned — also suggests this Trump administration won't be like the first. Then, Trump's FDA commissioner, Scott Gottlieb, put the menthol ban and the limits on nicotine on the table, drawing applause from anti-smoking activists. Congress permitted the agency to make those moves in a 2009 law. That law banned flavorings except menthol — which is a cash cow for Marlboro cigarette maker Philip Morris, whose support helped get the law passed — but gave the FDA the power to decide whether to ban it. It also gave the agency the power to force cigarette companies to reduce nicotine levels. The Obama administration didn't do so. President Joe Biden proposed limiting nicotine levels after the 2024 election but never finalized the rule. A Biden plan to ban menthol cigarettes in 2022 was also not finalized. Menthol is popular among Black smokers and some Democrats feared a ban could alienate crucial voters in a presidential election year. Jerome Adams, who was surgeon general during the first Trump term, said he wants Kennedy to prioritize the tobacco regulations laid out in Gottlieb's tobacco regulation plan — an effort he said would benefit youth and marginalized communities that are disproportionately impacted by menthol cigarettes. 'These proposed regulations align with the MAHA movement's focus on preventing chronic diseases,' Adams said. The tobacco industry spent heavily on Trump's 2024 campaign — and already has a lot to show for it. Trump pledged to 'save' vaping on his social media site, Truth Social, in September after meeting with Vapor Technology Association Executive Director Tony Abboud. The Trump administration pushed King — whom the tobacco industry had criticized for years — out of his job leading the FDA's Center for Tobacco Products. Job dismissals led by Trump's Department of Government Efficiency also gutted the CDC Office on Smoking and Health, which oversees federal smoking cessation programs and studies. The Trump administration also slashed funds the National Institutes of Health disburses to research facilities, which scientists say could imperil tobacco smoking studies. Asked about the industry's contributions to the Trump campaign, White House spokesperson Kush Desai wrote in an email, 'the only special interest guiding the Administration's decision-making is the best interest of the American people.' Tobacco-control advocates say Trump's early moves could undermine the country's progress diminishing smoking and the diseases it causes. 'These levels are decreasing because we have made such a commitment over the past few decades to enact things to work to get these levels down,' said Catharine Young, a Biden administration official who worked on his cancer moonshot initiative. 'But if you stop that or if you don't increase that effort, they're not going to continue to go down. They're either going to flat line, or they're going to start rising again.' Both Democratic and Republican administrations have hesitated to use all the regulatory authorities the 2009 law granted them. After Gottlieb resigned in March 2019, the agency's efforts to advance his 2017 tobacco plan were snuffed out. 'With his resignation, we lost the champion for the 2017 plan, and some months after he resigned, I was literally ordered by political appointees at FDA to stop talking publicly about menthol and nicotine,' said Mitch Zeller, who led the FDA's Center for Tobacco Products before King. Ultimately, Zeller wasn't able to implement a menthol ban or nicotine limits during any of the three administrations he served. During Biden's administration, then-FDA Commissioner Robert Califf enlisted allies outside the government to lobby the White House after agency efforts to ban menthol cigarettes were held up at the Office of Management and Budget. But the final rule was not published before Biden left office. 'They caved to political pressure from cigarette companies,' Zeller said. The FDA estimated the plan to limit nicotine levels in cigarettes proposed during the Biden administration would avert 4.3 million deaths and prevent 48 million youth and young adults from starting habitual cigarette smoking by the end of the century if implemented. And banning menthol cigarettes in the U.S. would cut 324,000 to 654,000 smoking-attributable deaths by 2060, according to modeling studies cited in the 2022 proposal. Luis Pinto, a spokesperson for Reynolds American, the maker of Lucky Strike, Camel and Newport cigarettes, said the company has not yet met with Trump's FDA commissioner, Marty Makary. Pinto said the company is opposed to a menthol cigarette ban because it believes there are 'more effective and sustainable ways to help adult smokers transition away from combustible cigarettes.' 'Rather than setting a nicotine standard, the focus should be on expanding access to a diverse and innovative portfolio of potentially reduced-risk products,' Pinto said. 'Tobacco harm reduction, not prohibition, is the most effective path forward in reducing the health impacts of smoking.' On Capitol Hill, Kennedy has rarely discussed tobacco despite his focus on preventing chronic disease, disappointing lawmakers like Durbin, the second ranking Democrat in the Senate. In an interview with POLITICO, Durbin emphasized the tobacco industry is still a threat to public health, especially as it markets more novel forms of nicotine exposure like vaping, which has become popular among younger Americans. 'The tobacco companies have not given up. Their basic approach is to addict children to their product, and so now they're using vaping and [other] devices to get … high schoolers in America addicted to forms of nicotine,' Durbin said, referring to Gottlieb as a hero. 'I just don't think you can credibly say you're addressing public health in America and ignore tobacco and vaping.' King, who's now with the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, an anti-smoking group, is still hoping to convince Trump officials that going after tobacco needs to be part of the MAHA agenda. And he says he sees hope in the FDA's crackdown on illegal e-cigarettes, which he interprets as a sign the government is looking to snuff out unapproved vaping products. 'We have seen the decimation of tobacco control infrastructure,' King said. 'It's important you have the resources and the people.'
