Auditor general to study hiring, promotion of public servants with disabilities
Documents obtained by The Canadian Press through Access to Information indicate that the audit is expected to be tabled in the spring.
Claire Baudry, a spokesperson for the Office of the Auditor General of Canada, said in an email that while auditor general Karen Hogan expects to table the report in Parliament in 2026, the audit is in the planning phase and any comment on its scope or timelines now would be 'premature.'
Hogan's office sent a letter to Secretary of the Treasury Board Bill Matthews on March 7 notifying him of the upcoming study.
The most recent employment equity report for the public service says that since March 2020, the number of people with disabilities has increased steadily in the core public service — the federal government departments and agencies that fall under Treasury Board.
But that number remains below the rate of 'workforce availability' — the metric used by the government to measure the share of the national workforce that is eligible for federal public service work.
As of 2024, 21,089 people with disabilities were working in the federal public service, up from 17,410 in 2023, 14,573 in 2022 and 12,893 in 2021.
The report also found that representation of people with disabilities among government executives was above the rate of workforce availability. As of March 2024, 9.7 per cent of federal executives were people with disabilities, up from 4.6 per cent in March 2019.
The employment equity report also looked at promotions in the core public service. It found that 2,517 federal public servants with disabilities were promoted in 2024.
The report also tracked 1,642 promotions of Indigenous public servants, 1,788 promotions of Black employees, 8,115 promotions of members of visible minorities and 19,578 promotions of women in the core public service.
Nathan Prier, president of the Canadian Association of Professional Employees, said he hopes the report will take into account the impact of the government's return-to-office mandate on people with disabilities.
The government has gradually increased the number of days public servants must be in the office since the end of the pandemic. As of last fall, most public servants are expected to work in-office at least three days per week, while executives are required to be there at least four days per week.
'We hope to see from the report a snapshot before and after the forced return to office took place to see how many workers with disabilities are leaving the federal public sector and taking their expertise with them, while other workers struggle with increasing workload and now cuts — all when we had an easy and workable solution in front of us this whole time,' Prier said.
'During the pandemic we saw on a large scale how telework worked well for so many workers with disabilities, and we've been disappointed to see that, since the forced and mismanaged return to office, those same people have not been getting accommodations or have been made to jump through hoops in a long, drawn-out process,' he said.
Rola Salem, a spokesperson for the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, said in an email that the Government of Canada has committed to building an accessible and inclusive public service and, in 2024, exceeded its goal of hiring 5,000 people with disabilities.
Salem said the secretariat welcomes the opportunity to work with the Office of the Auditor General on the planned audit.
The Employment Equity Act defines 'persons with disabilities' as people who have a long-term or recurring physical, mental, sensory, psychiatric or learning impairment and who consider themselves to be disadvantaged in employment or believe that an employer is likely to consider them disadvantaged.
The definition also includes people whose limitations have been accommodated in the workplace.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 26, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
6 minutes ago
- CTV News
Voters in Alberta byelection to use adapted ballots due to high number of candidates
An example of a ballot for the riding of Carleton, where Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre was running for re-election, the subject of a protest by the Longest Ballot Committee, a group calling for electoral reform, is seen at the Elections Canada Distribution Centre on the day of the federal election, in Ottawa, on Monday, April 28, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Justin Tang CAMROSE, ALTA. — Elections Canada says voters in the upcoming Battle River-Crowfoot byelection will be required to write out the name of their preferred candidate given the unusually high number of people running and past challenges with long ballots. More than 200 people were registered to run as of Monday, which was also the last day to sign up for candidacy. The list includes Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, Liberal candidate Darcy Spady, the NDP's Katherine Swampy and dozens more sponsored by the Longest Ballot Committee, a protest group bringing attention to the issue of electoral reform. The advocacy group also targeted Poilievre's former Ottawa riding of Carleton in the April general election, which he lost, by registering some 91 candidates, making the ballot bulky and requiring a number of folds to submit. Elections Canada says voters will be given a complete list of candidates in Battle River-Crowfoot's Aug. 18 vote and every adapted ballot that clearly names a candidate, and not a party, will be counted in front of a witness. The byelection was called last month after Conservative Damien Kurek, who handily won the seat in the April vote, stepped down so Poilievre could run. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 28, 2025.
Calgary Herald
3 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Federal liberals in ‘honeymoon' with Alberta — for now
Mark Carney's liberal government is still enjoying a 'honeymoon' with Alberta's business community, but industry groups warn the clock is ticking for the prime minister to back his words up with action. Article content Executives in the oil and gas industry are waiting to find out if the Carney government will fast-track a new pipeline as part of its nation-building agenda. Article content Article content Until they get that clarity, they are still dealing with significant policy uncertainty from Ottawa, according to the Business Council of Alberta, which outlined potential actions to improve investment in a recent report. Article content Article content 'There (are) still lots of concerns and lots of issues to deal with, but there's more reason to be hopeful now than we've seen in a long time,' said Mike Holden, the council's chief economist. Article content A federal bill that would speed up natural resource and infrastructure projects that are deemed in the national interest has drawn cautious optimism from the energy sector, amid concerns from Indigenous peoples and environmental groups. Article content In its wish list for Ottawa, Holden's group wants the government to repeal or reform policies that have held back investment in the oilpatch, including a tanker ban on the West Coast and a proposed oil and gas emissions cap. Article content Article content However, there is hope among many businesses that Ottawa could fast-track major projects — namely pipelines — by overriding some of these controversial policies. Article content Article content 'I think this is the honeymoon with Carney,' Holden said. Article content Industry and the federal government are having important discussions about increasing Canada's ability to export and develop natural resources, according to Deborah Yedlin, chief executive of the Calgary Chamber of Commerce. Article content 'There's a sense of optimism that I have not sensed from an energy standpoint in 10 years,' Yedlin said. Article content Federal Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Tim Hodgson has met regularly with those in the energy sector since he was sworn in, she said.
National Observer
6 hours ago
- National Observer
Pipelines won't unite Canada. Clean energy will
Canada doesn't need more fossil fuel infrastructure. In the wake of the Building Canada Act's adoption, pipelines and fossil fuel infrastructure are being proposed as national interest projects, even though they are costly, risky and out of step with public opinion, especially in Quebec. The province has long rejected fossil fuel supply projects and opted for a smarter future with renewable energy. Ironically enough, it is precisely here that yet another new project concept for an LNG plant is being touted. In a letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney and government ministers, more than 100 organizations illustrated how an east-west electricity grid could serve national interests by prioritizing renewable energy and Indigenous rights. This united call is aligned with Quebecers' long-standing opposition to fossil fuel proposals running through the Saint Lawrence River and their communities. In May, hundreds of groups and individuals called on federal and Quebec politicians to oppose new pipelines. Earlier this year, in February, within a week of the media's renewed interest in fossil fuel projects, such as Energy East and GNL Quebec — and following US President Donald Trump's return to the White House — a coalition of 100 Quebec organizations and experts from environment, labour, student, urban planning and academia also issued an unequivocal statement reiterating that Quebec civil society wants to maintain its long-standing opposition to fossil fuel project expansion. A Leger survey showed that, when presented with a choice between investments in renewable energy or fossil fuels, three out of four Quebecers would choose the former, further indicating that pipelines are a challenge to so-called Canadian unity. This public consensus against fossil fuel development wasn't formed lightly but rather through decades of mobilization, culminating in 2022 when Quebec adopted legislation prohibiting oil and gas exploration. This secured the province an appointment as co-president of the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance, a global group of jurisdictions committed to phasing out fossil fuels and implementing policies to do so. Any new oil and gas pipeline or facility project will face a fundamental reality: the lack of market need. Europe's demand for natural gas may already have peaked, in part due to aggressive efforts to accelerate electrification and expand renewable resources. Even without taking into account the fact that an east-west pipeline would be useless for Asian markets, with the continent's energy needs being met by a mix of renewables, electrification, efficiency and nuclear energy; Canadian gas can't compete in the Asian market dominated by the United States and Qatar. Betting, once again, on the same fossil-fuel horse might be what keeps Canada from becoming the energy superpower it could be, write Andréanne Brazeau and Charles-Édouard Têtu Building massive infrastructure to carry fossil fuels is a mistake in the face of global market volatility. Fossil fuel expansion and profiteering are primary drivers of inflation and the cost-of-living crisis. New pipelines are an investment in yesterday's energy model while the world rapidly shifts to renewables. As the global energy transition accelerates, they could easily become costly 'stranded assets.' Federal financing of the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion should serve as an example. Not only did the cost skyrocket from $4.5 billion to $34 billion to cover a fourth of the distance of a west-east project, but it is also still not achieving full capacity. Furthermore, fossil fuel pipelines are notorious for taking years before becoming operational. Trans Mountain was approved in 2019 and started transporting fuel in 2024. Projects such as Energy East and GNL Québec would not be different and aren't a 'quick fix' to uncertainty around trade. It's also important to note that even if Energy East were operational today, it could not close the capacity gap needed for full energy autonomy. Uncertain times require policy-makers to act fast, but that doesn't mean forgetting the basics of economics and business by wasting, yet again, public money in sectors that have no future. Canada should take inspiration from the European Union's response following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Launched in 2022, the REPowerEU initiative aims to stop the EU's dependence on Russian gas by investing in renewables and energy efficiency, which has already helped reduce demand for Russian gas by 18 per cent, with an aim of 26 per cent by 2030. Betting, once again, on the same fossil-fuel horse might be what keeps Canada from becoming the energy superpower it could be if it were to finally get serious about phasing out oil and gas and focus on solutions that will work in tomorrow's economy. Building a new deal of Canada's own to answer the crisis, while also answering the country's energy needs, will only work if public money supports projects aligned with our climate goals. As the US administration becomes more unpredictable in its climate and trade policies, Canada must invest in its resilience. A real nation-building project is a strong national grid that will increase our economic competitiveness, create lasting jobs, support our climate commitments and shield Canadian households from rising fossil fuel costs.
