Fact check: ‘Asylum hotels', employment data and ‘enhanced customs monitoring'
Earlier this week, amid concern about unrest outside a hotel in Epping used to house asylum seekers, shadow housing secretary Sir James Cleverly MP claimed in a broadcast interview: '[Labour] are opening up asylum hotels, they are increasing the use of asylum accommodation around the country'.
It is true that under Labour the number of asylum seekers housed in hotels has increased, as our Government Tracker explains. According to the latest available data, 32,345 asylum seekers were housed in hotels at the end of March 2025, up from 29,585 at the end of June 2024, just before Labour came into office.
The data also showed there were 71,339 asylum seekers living in other types of non-hotel accommodation at the end of March 2025, compared with 67,057 at the end of June 2024. The majority were in 'dispersal accommodation', which is longer-term temporary accommodation managed by providers on behalf of the Home Office, with others housed in 'initial accommodation', which is typically shared accommodation while an asylum seeker is having their claim for support assessed.
The Home Office told us that 210 asylum hotels are currently in use as of July 23, and that they expected more to close. On March 3 2025, Dame Angela Eagle MP, minister for border security and asylum, said that in July 2024 there were 213 hotels in operation, suggesting the number of hotels in use is currently slightly lower than when Labour first came into office.
According to the Home Office's latest accounts, 'the total number of contracted hotels reduced by 71 across 2024-25', although it did not specify the starting or end totals, and this time period also includes figures from when the Conservatives were in office.
It is worth noting however that while the overall number of hotels in use appears to have come down slightly, there have been recent reports of new hotels being intended to house asylum seekers. It is possible this is what Sir James meant when he said Labour was 'opening up' hotels.
We have contacted Sir James for comment.
Unemployment and jobs: what has happened under Labour?
In recent weeks we have seen contrasting claims being made about the labour market – in particular, on how unemployment has changed since Labour came into Government in July 2024.
There are a number of different sources of statistics on the labour market. These datasets all measure slightly different things, and as a result debate on employment, unemployment and jobs can often be confusing – for example, we regularly see seemingly contradictory claims on these topics made during Prime Minister's Questions (PMQs), when in fact each side is referring to completely different data.
For instance, during some recent sessions of PMQs, both the Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner have claimed that 384,000 jobs have been created under Labour.
These claims have been challenged by the Conservative party and others, who have pointed out that under Labour unemployment has risen.
This confusion is likely because Sir Keir and Ms Rayner are referring to workforce jobs data, which includes both employed and self-employed jobs and does indeed show a 384,000 increase in the number of jobs between June 2024 and March 2025 (the latest month for which figures are available).
But these figures look at the number of jobs and are not comparable with data on actual employment (or unemployment), which looks at the number of people who are (or are not) working, as some people have more than one job.
Going abroad four times a year will not flag you to HMRC for 'enhanced customs monitoring'
We have seen a number of social media posts claiming that the Government is introducing a new system called 'enhanced customs monitoring' on August 4 to 'track UK residents who leave the country more than three times within a 12-month period' to check they are living within their means. But this is not true, and no such system exists.
Videos circulating online claim that on someone's fourth trip abroad, an automatic alert will be sent to the 'mobility oversight unit', said to be a new branch under HMRC and the Home Office, which will check whether people's 'declared income, employment status and tax residency match [their] lifestyle'.
The videos claim this new system was revealed after a leaked briefing was reported by the Guardian newspaper.
They go on to say this includes both holidays and work trips, and all modes of travel.
A spokesperson for HMRC confirmed the information is untrue and told Full Fact that 'this video is disinformation, designed to cause undue alarm and fear'. They added: 'Anyone wanting information on rules around taxation should go to Gov.uk or seek advice from a tax professional.'
Full Fact could not find any results for 'enhanced customs monitoring' or a 'mobility oversight unit' on UK Government websites, or on the Guardian website.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
a minute ago
- BBC News
Rutland County Council leader survives no confidence vote
The leader of Rutland County Council has survived a confidence vote held during a special meeting of the Waller, a Liberal Democrat who has led the council since elections in 2023, was the subject of a vote of no confidence brought by the Conservative vote came amid an uncertain future for the authority, with upcoming local government changes potentially threatening its existence.A total of eight councillors voted in favour of the motion of no confidence at Tuesday's meeting, while 14 voted against and two members abstained. 'Continuity and stability' An overhaul of local government proposed by Labour could see smaller district councils merged with county councils to create single bodies, known as unitary authorities, representing populations of about 500, only has a population of about 40,000, meaning it could lose its independent status if the changes are issue has been the subject of a number of public meetings, some arranged by Rutland and Stamford's Conservative MP Alicia told the meeting she is in "further discussions" with neighbouring councils about what their plans are and how it would affect Rutland. County councillor Lucy Stephenson, who brought the no-confidence motion, said she and her colleagues were "using our constitutional rights to speak out".She said Waller "has persisted in her position" without consulting constituents, and called for Rutland residents to have a say in the county's future."Local government reorganisation will impact how our services are designed and delivered," she said."The independence of Rutland could be lost - it must not be confused with devolution."As well as discussing the future of the county, councillors clashed over how they felt the leader was running denied ignoring residents, but said the decision on the county's future was out of their hands, and said she had to base her actions on advice from council defended her record, claiming her Lib Dem-led administration had improved the authority's finances to a point where they may be able to freeze council tax for the first time in a told the meeting residents would be best served by her remaining in position."Negotiations with our neighbours are continuing, and so at this delicate time it would be an advantage for Rutland to have continuity and stability," she said."Make no mistake, the white paper and subsequent bill gives neither Rutland councillors nor Rutland residents any say as to what happens to us."The decision and the power lies with ministers - all any of us can do is to try and influence that decision."
BBC News
a minute ago
- BBC News
Rwanda take up to 250 migrants deported from the US, spokesperson tells the BBC
Rwanda has said it will accept up to 250 migrants from the US in a deal agreed with President Donald Trump's the scheme the deportees would be given "workforce training, health care, and accommodation to jump start their lives in Rwanda", government spokesperson Yolande Makole confirmed to the BBC.A condition of the agreement was that Rwanda would have "the ability to approve each individual proposed for resettlement", she White House has not commented on the deal directly but told the BBC it was constantly talking to countries "willing to assist us in removing the illegal aliens that [ex-President] Joe Biden" had allowed to "infiltrate" the US. Since Trump came back into power in January, he has focused on a sweeping mass deportation scheme to remove undocumented migrants from the US quickly, a key election promise. Destination: Africa - is it legal for US to deport foreign criminals to the continent?Is Rwanda a land of safety or fear?Murmurs of a deal between Rwanda and the US came out in May, after US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Washington was "actively searching" for a country to take some of what he described as the "some of the most despicable human beings".The Trump administration has been courting several African countries to accept deported migrants whose home countries have refused to take them back. Eswatini and South Sudan have recently accepted some, including some deportees who are convicted Makolo told the BBC that Rwanda had gone ahead with the deal with the US because "nearly every Rwandan family has experienced the hardships of displacement". She added that Rwandan society values were founded "on reintegration and rehabilitation".This echoed comments from May when Rwanda's foreign affairs minister said the country, which went through a genocide in the mid-1990s, was led in the "spirit" of giving "another chance to migrants who have problems across the world".Under a deal agreed with the UN refugee agency and African Union six years ago, nearly 3,000 refugees and asylum seekers trapped in Libya were evacuated to Rwanda between September 2019 and April 2025. The UN says many of these people have subsequently been resettled had a deal with the UK, agreed with the Conservative government in 2022, to accept asylum the UK scrapped the scheme, which faced numerous legal challenges, after Sir Keir Starmer's Labour government took office in July last year. The UK had paid Rwanda £240m ($310m), even building places to house the asylum seekers. It is not clear what has happened to these Reuters news agency reported that an unnamed Rwandan official had said the US would give Kigali an unspecified grant as part of the deal, but this has not been Makolo told the BBC that more details would be provided once they had been worked rights experts have raised concerns that removals to a nation that is not a migrant's place of origin - known as a third country - could violate international has previously been criticised for its human rights record, including the risk that those sent to the East African nation could be deported again to countries where they may face Rwanda's government maintains it can provide a safe place for country has also come under fire for backing the M23 rebel group embroiled in the conflict in neighbouring Democratic Republic of Congo - an accusation it has denied. In June, a ceasefire deal was signed in Washington by Rwanda and DR Congo as part of an ongoing peace process aimed at ending three decades of instability in the reporting from the BBC's Barbara Plett Usher in Nairobi and Bernd Debusmann Jr at the White House You may also be interested in: Hope Hostel in Rwanda, where migrants from UK were destined to stayWhat happened when Israel sent its refugees to RwandaRefugees sent to Rwanda from remote UK island speak to BBCThe rapid remaking of a nation, in 100 daysHow Trump wants the US to cash in on mineral-rich DR Congo's peace dealWhich other countries send asylum seekers overseas? Go to for more news from the African us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
Sky News
27 minutes ago
- Sky News
Delay biometric visa checks for 80 Gaza students, dozens of MPs urge UK government
More than 70 MPs have signed a letter asking the government to delay biometric checks for 80 students from Gaza so they can study in Britain, Sky News can reveal. Labour MPs Abtisam Mohamed and Barry Gardiner are leading the charge, asking Home Secretary Yvette Cooper to defer the requirement, so the students can take up their university places in September. However, shadow home secretary Chris Philp says the biometric checks should not be deferred, arguing they are "an essential part of our security arrangements". In order to obtain a UK visa, applicants must provide a photo of their face, as well as their fingerprints. The Home Office guidance says these data points "play a significant role in delivering security and facilitation in the border and immigration system". In the letter, the MPs raise the case of a Haia Mohamed, who they describe as a "young poet in Gaza", who has won a scholarship to Goldsmiths College in London. But neither she nor 79 other successful applicants to UK universities are able to travel to the UK because providing the required biometric data is "all but impossible". They write: "Even before the war, leaving Gaza to pursue higher education was a complex process. The ongoing siege and restrictions made travel extremely difficult, but in the current state of constant bombardment, shootings at aid sites, and an IPC-declared famine, this process has become all but impossible." In an email to MPs asking them to sign the letter, Mohamed and Gardiner are far more blunt, saying: "Unless the government makes rapid progress with offering visas and coordinating evacuations over the next week, students who should be starting university next month in the UK will be among those who are being shot dead at aid sites, bombed in displacement camps, or starving as famine spreads deeper in Gaza." The UK did have an authorised centre in Gaza that was able to process biometric data, but it was closed in October 2023 after the 7 October Hamas attack, and as Israel's war in response to the atrocity got under way, according to The Guardian. As result, they are asking the home secretary to "defer biometric data screening for student visa applicants based in Gaza and open a safe passage to enable these young people to fulfil their academic dreams", pointing out that other countries in Europe "have taken proactive steps to ensure safe evacuation routes for students bound for their countries". 3:05 Students are 'the future of Palestine' Speaking to Sky News on Tuesday, one of the writers of the letter, Barry Gardiner MP, pointed out that the government has been able to find a way for injured children from Gaza to receive care in the UK, and exemptions have been made in the past, and so the same should be done in this case, and "quickly" because the academic year starts next month. The Brent West MP also said that this is about "giving the state of Palestine the possibility of a future". 2:00 "These young people are the future of Palestine. They are the young talent, and it doesn't matter whether they're constructing a road network, or a sewage system, or they're town planners or, as in the case of Haia Mohamed, astonishingly profound poets - the state of Palestine will need everything from classical musicians right the way through to town planners," he said. "And these youngsters are coming over here with that full range of study potential, with the express intention of going back and building their nation." He added that the fact they have been able to win scholarships to, in many cases, the UK's top universities "shows extraordinary resilience, extraordinary courage, extraordinary ability, and we should facilitate that". 2:44 Checks 'essential part of security arrangements' But Conservative MP and shadow home secretary Chris Philp told Sky News in a statement: "We should not be deferring biometric checks. These are an essential part of our security arrangements, and they should not be waived or delayed until arrival in the UK - by which time it is too late." Earlier this month, a student from Gaza reportedly left France after being ordered to leave following the discovery of alleged antisemitic social media posts. Her lawyer said she "firmly denies the accusations made against her", according to France24. Mr Gardiner told Sky News: "Anyone who breaks the law in that way must be dealt with as the law requires. But what you don't do is you don't say, 'somebody might break the law, so we're not going to allow anybody to come'." The UK requires that biometric data be submitted in advance of the visa being approved in order to: • Establish a person's identity by joining the applicant's biographical data with their biometric data; • Verify an individual "accurately against an established identity"; • Check they are not on a watchlist, for example, to ensure they are eligible to come to the UK. Exemptions from the requirement to provide biometric data have been given in rare circumstances. It was waived for Ukrainians fleeing to the UK following Russia's invasion in January 2022. However, it was not waived for Afghans fleeing the Taliban in August 2021. But a judge later ruled that a family in hiding in the country did not have to provide the data in order to join British family members in the UK, which was thought to also apply to around 100 other families.
