logo
Based on some WV Republicans' idea of ‘important' work, we have different definitions of the word

Based on some WV Republicans' idea of ‘important' work, we have different definitions of the word

Yahoo18-03-2025

A bill on the way to Gov. Patrick Morrisey's desk would ban foods containing certain artificial dyes in West Virginia, like Red No. 40, which is in Jell-O hot dogs, ketchup and cereals. (Leann Ray | West Virginia Watch)
'This is probably the most important bill that we will vote on in our entire careers here,' Republican Sen. Laura Wakim Chapman said a couple of weeks ago before the state Senate passed a bill 31-2.
Now what was this important legislation?
New regulations to make sure all West Virginians have clean water?
A solution to funding the West Virginia Public Employees Insurance Agency, ensuring that all public employees have affordable health care?
Perhaps more funding for public schools that most children attend or maybe raises for their teachers?
No. It was a bill banning some artificial dyes in food.
House Bill 2354 was passed by both the House and Senate, and now heads to the governor's desk for consideration.
The bill also bans several food dyes from foods served in public schools, like Red No. 40, which is in Jell-O, cereals, hot dogs and ketchup; Blue No. 1, found in canned peas and packaged soups, and Green No. 3, an ingredient in canned vegetables and Jell-O. This ban is scheduled to take effect on Aug. 1.
While 11 other states are considering similar legislation, West Virginia would be the first state in the United States to implement a sweeping food dye ban if Gov. Patrick Morrisey approves the legislation.
I don't know exactly how this bill will work — and it's likely our lawmakers don't either. They regularly pass bills without any thought of how to fund or implement them. For example, House Bill 2515, which would require counties to create alternative learning centers for chronically disruptive students, has advanced to the Senate. The bill, however, has no proposed funding included in it to build the centers or staff them.
If the food dye ban was passed by Congress, obviously it would be a nationwide ban and all food manufacturers would have to stop using the dyes in food sold in America.
But will the Wrigley Company start making natural color Skittles for just West Virginia? Will Mountain Dew Code Red be banned within state lines? Will the Bigley Piggly Wiggly have to stop using rainbow frosting on their cakes?
Some food and drink manufacturers have been speaking out. You can't turn on the radio without hearing an ad from Americans for Food & Beverage Choice — the group spent more than $19,000 on ads in the last week — speaking out against HB 2354.
And outside of affecting the food available on our grocery store shelves, the bill comes with other serious potential ramifications that seemingly undermine the Legislature's vow to improve West Virginia's economy.
The local Pepsi and Coca Cola plants could face layoffs if the bill is passed, according to Donnie Perdue, vice president of the Teamsters local 175 union.
'Both Pepsi and Coke have said the dye bill would cause a 50% decrease in their current inventory levels,' he said. 'There has been no economic analysis done to actually see what the impact would be if all these drinks and food is banned from West Virginia … The states that border West Virginia will be the only winners with this bill as West Virginians travel to their state to get their favorite drinks and food because we no longer have them.'
I'm not against the dyes being banned — in January, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration banned Red No. 3 from food because it causes cancer in rats, and almost 35 years ago it was banned from cosmetics for the same reason. Food manufacturers have until Jan. 2027 to stop using Red. No. 3, and drug manufacturers have until Jan. 2028. I just don't understand logistically how this ban on other dyes can work when only one state has banned them.
Chapman explained the bill is important because it will make available foods healthier for families, citing the state's high obesity rate and a lack of grocery stores.
Some West Virginians don't have local grocery stores and must shop at Dollar General or Dollar Tree for food. People don't necessarily want to buy food that's unhealthy — they're buying what they can afford.
Will this bill do anything to drop grocery prices on healthier foods, or increase residents' buying power at the grocery store? Well, no. Quite the opposite, actually.
'This is a law that would impact six in 10 grocery store items, effectively making them illegal. It will lead to higher prices, fewer choices and empty shelves,' said Stacie Rumenap, spokesperson for Americans for Food & Beverage Choice. 'The alternative ingredients simply don't exist to scale.'
Sen. Jason Barrett, R-Berkeley, has argued that the grocery chain Aldi has banned synthetic colors in its store-brand items, and the store sells its own version of Pop-Tarts without dyes and the product is cheaper than the Kellogg option.
Aldi is a great grocery chain — but there's only 16 locations in West Virginia. It also carries much fewer options — and name brands — than Kroger, Walmart or Piggly Wiggly.
This bill is a way for lawmakers to make it look like they care about the health of West Virginians without addressing the actual reasons for poor health — poverty, food insecurity, food deserts and expensive health care.Until legislators address those problems, West Virginia will remain the 'unhealthiest' state in the country.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Right-wing Colombian presidential candidate, senator shot during campaign rally
Right-wing Colombian presidential candidate, senator shot during campaign rally

New York Post

time22 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Right-wing Colombian presidential candidate, senator shot during campaign rally

Colombian Senator Miguel Uribe was shot in Bogota on Saturday, according to the government and his party, and local media reported that he was in a local hospital in serious condition. The 39-year-old senator, who is running for the presidency in 2026, is a member of the opposition conservative Democratic Center party founded by former Colombian President Alvaro Uribe. The two men are not related. Senator Miguel Uribe looks on after the Senate voted against the government labor reform referendum promoted by Colombia's President Gustavo Petro in Bogota on May 14, 2025. AFP via Getty Images According to a party statement condemning the attack, the senator was hosting a campaign event in a public park in the Fontibon neighborhood in the capital on Saturday when 'armed subjects shot him in the back.' The party described the attack as serious, but did not disclose further details on Uribe's condition. Colombia's Defense Minister Pedro Sanchez said a suspect had been arrested in the shooting and that authorities were investigating whether others were involved. Sanchez said he had visited the hospital where Uribe was being treated. Police officers cordon off the area where Colombian Senator Miguel Uribe Turbay of the opposition Democratic Center party, was shot during a campaign event, in Bogota, Colombia, June 7, 2025. REUTERS Colombia's presidency issued a statement saying the government 'categorically and forcefully' rejected the violent attack, and called for a thorough investigation into the events that took place. Uribe is from a prominent family in Colombia, with links to the country's Liberal Party. His father was a businessman and union leader. His mother, journalist Diana Turbay, was kidnapped in 1990 by an armed group under the command of the late cartel leader Pablo Escobar. She was killed during a rescue operation.

San Antonio mayor live election results: Gina Ortiz Jones leads
San Antonio mayor live election results: Gina Ortiz Jones leads

Axios

timean hour ago

  • Axios

San Antonio mayor live election results: Gina Ortiz Jones leads

Gina Ortiz Jones is leading the race to be San Antonio's new mayor, edging out Rolando Pablos in early election results posted Saturday. Why it matters: The mayoral election, the city's first in 16 years without an incumbent on the ballot, has evolved into an unusually partisan race for a nonpartisan seat, drawing money and influence from across the state and nation. Neither Ortiz Jones nor Pablos have held elected office before, and San Antonio has not elected a mayor who hasn't served on the City Council since Phil Hardberger in 2005. The latest: Early vote results as of 7pm Saturday showed Ortiz Jones with 52% of the vote, with 48% for Pablos. State of play: Ortiz Jones served as an Air Force undersecretary in the Biden administration and was twice the Democratic nominee for the 23rd Congressional District. Pablos is a former Texas secretary of state who has served as a senior adviser to Republican Gov. Greg Abbott. During the runoff campaign, both leaned on their families' immigrant backgrounds. Ortiz Jones spoke of being raised by a single mother who immigrated from the Philippines and Pablos of his family moving from Mexico to El Paso when he was 8 years old. Follow the money: Pablos and his supporters appeared to both outraise and outspend Ortiz Jones in the runoff election, campaign finance reports show. Pablos raised nearly $333,000 and spent more than $275,000 from late April through May 28. He got a big boost from the Texas Economic Fund, a political action committee run by Abbott's former political director, which raised $1.35 million and spent over $623,000 during that time. Ortiz Jones raised nearly $249,000 and spent over $133,000 in the same period. She had help from Fields of Change, a national Democratic PAC, which spent more than $160,000 for her campaign. The big picture: The new mayor will lead San Antonio at a pivotal time, as officials seek to gain public support for a new downtown Spurs arena that could be surrounded by a sports and entertainment district. They will also lead the city through the remaining years of the Trump administration, under which San Antonio has lost millions of dollars in federal funding. The city is also expecting a budget deficit. Catch up quick: Mayor Ron Nirenberg reached his term limits after eight years in office, making him the city's longest-serving mayor since Henry Cisneros in the 1980s. San Antonio's next mayor will serve for four years after voters approved increasing term length from two years. They will work alongside several new City Council members. Flashback: Nirenberg's departure left a rare opening that drew a crowded 27-candidate field to replace him. Four sitting City Council members struggled to break through the noise as traditional backers in local elections, like the police union, sat out the first round of voting.

State of Crypto: How Crypto Legislation Is Advancing
State of Crypto: How Crypto Legislation Is Advancing

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

State of Crypto: How Crypto Legislation Is Advancing

The House Financial Services Committee might mark up market structure legislation next week, while the Senate seems close to passing its stablecoin bill. You're reading State of Crypto, a CoinDesk newsletter looking at the intersection of cryptocurrency and government. Click here to sign up for future editions. Here's what's clear: There are bills and they will probably get votes next week. Here's what's unclear: What all lawmakers might need to get enough votes to actually advance these bills, and if they're there already or not. The crypto industry has waited for years for Congress to pass legislation giving it some sort of regulatory clarity. Congress has taken a number of key steps this year already, but next week might see quite a few of these steps happen. Logistical details first. There will be markups in the House Financial Services Committee and the House Agriculture Committee on the market structure bill, the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (otherwise known as just the Clarity Act) on Tuesday. That markup will likely end with lawmakers voting to advance the bill to the broader House of Representatives (it's possible the vote will fail, but it currently seems unlikely). On the Senate side, lawmakers might hold a series of votes as early as Monday on the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins of 2025 Act (otherwise known as GENIUS) to advance it. Senator Ruben Gallego, the Arizona Democrat who spearheaded a pause in the bill's advancement, said in an interview on Thursday that he expects a massive bipartisan vote in favor of the legislation. It'll need 60 votes to clear cloture (this is a second cloture vote) and a simple majority afterward to pass the Senate entirely. After that, it's on to the House. "We've worked in a very honest, earnest manner with our Republican colleagues. We think that they've been also doing the same," he said. "They adopted a lot of the amendments, most of the amendments that we're we've been adding, and they've been continuing to work with some other Democrats who have some other concerns, but we believe that if all the changes are made, it's going to be a very solid, comprehensive bill that I think we could all be proud to vote for." In other words, by the end of next week it's possible the House of Representatives will have both a market structure bill to consider, amend and vote on and a stablecoin bill (the House Financial Services Committee version of GENIUS, the STABLE Act, already passed out of that committee a while ago). Whether both bills will make it to U.S. President Donald Trump's desk by the August recess is an open question. Policymakers in Washington, D.C. this week seemed skeptical that both bills would be passed by that deadline, though stablecoin legislation is likely to clear the House and Senate by then. One theory flying around is that the GENIUS Act in the Senate might get tagged onto the House's Clarity Act, letting the House vote on both its market structure bill and stablecoin bill at once and sending both back to the Senate. To be clear, this isn't a firm plan, just something various individuals have suggested is a possibility. However, I've heard that there will likely be pushback from both House and Senate lawmakers should this path be pursued. The other, more likely possibility seems to be that market structure legislation will just take longer — perhaps through the end of the year. This is despite Democrats' ongoing concerns that Trump is enriching himself through his various crypto ventures. Just this week, Trump's media firm, Truth Social, filed for a spot bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) with Yorkville America and NYSE Arca. Assuming this product is approved, it'll open another avenue for a Trump-affiliated entity to benefit from interest in the industry. Further reading from this week: Trump's Crypto Ties at Forefront as U.S. Lawmakers Weigh Crypto Market Structure Bill Senate Stablecoin Bill Likely to Win Massive Bipartisan Support, Dem Lawmaker Says House Dems Get Bonus Hearing on Crypto Market Structure, Assail Trump Conflicts : Circle went public, with shares initially trading at $69 but surging to $100 after initially being priced at $31. Shares closed at $83 on Thursday. : NYSE Arca and Yorkville America Digital in partnership with Trump Media filed for a spot bitcoin exchange-traded fund called the Truth Social Bitcoin ETF, with Foris DAX Trust Company as the custodian. Both the 19b-4 and S-1 documents have been submitted, meaning as soon as the Securities and Exchange Commission acknowledges the filings, the 240-day clock is on. : Get Trump Memes plans to launch a TRUMP crypto wallet in partnership with Magic Eden, but President Donald Trump's kids say they don't know anything about it. World Liberty Financial, the Trump-linked project that does other crypto stuff, also plans to issue a wallet, and reportedly sent a cease-and-desist to Magic Eden. : French authorities arrested 25 different people tied to kidnapping attempts of various crypto executives and their family members. : The group of 25 individuals allegedly had a ringleader who Moroccan police arrested. : House Financial Services Committee Democrats say they haven't gotten much technical assistance from regulators on the Clarity Act. : U.S. authorities seized 145 darknet and internet domains tied to a market called BidenCash. : Very straightforward here. Tuesday 17:00 UTC (1:00 p.m. ET) House Financial Services Committee Chair French Hill said the House and Senate's respective stablecoin bills are close but need some work to be fully aligned with each other. Wednesday 14:00 UTC (10:00 a.m. ET) The House Financial Services Committee and House Agriculture Committee each held a hearing to discuss the Clarity Act, the new House market structure bill. Friday 13:00 UTC (9:00 a.m. ET) Democrats on the House Financial Services Committee held another hearing focused on President Donald Trump's crypto tie-ups, as well as the market structure bill introduced by House Republicans last week. (It's not on the calendar above because I am on the road this week and the calendar was made before the hearing was announced). () President Donald Trump and Elon Musk had a very public social media spat on Wednesday and Thursday. If you've got thoughts or questions on what I should discuss next week or any other feedback you'd like to share, feel free to email me at nik@ or find me on Bluesky @ You can also join the group conversation on Telegram. See ya'll next week! Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store