logo
Based on some WV Republicans' idea of ‘important' work, we have different definitions of the word

Based on some WV Republicans' idea of ‘important' work, we have different definitions of the word

Yahoo18-03-2025
A bill on the way to Gov. Patrick Morrisey's desk would ban foods containing certain artificial dyes in West Virginia, like Red No. 40, which is in Jell-O hot dogs, ketchup and cereals. (Leann Ray | West Virginia Watch)
'This is probably the most important bill that we will vote on in our entire careers here,' Republican Sen. Laura Wakim Chapman said a couple of weeks ago before the state Senate passed a bill 31-2.
Now what was this important legislation?
New regulations to make sure all West Virginians have clean water?
A solution to funding the West Virginia Public Employees Insurance Agency, ensuring that all public employees have affordable health care?
Perhaps more funding for public schools that most children attend or maybe raises for their teachers?
No. It was a bill banning some artificial dyes in food.
House Bill 2354 was passed by both the House and Senate, and now heads to the governor's desk for consideration.
The bill also bans several food dyes from foods served in public schools, like Red No. 40, which is in Jell-O, cereals, hot dogs and ketchup; Blue No. 1, found in canned peas and packaged soups, and Green No. 3, an ingredient in canned vegetables and Jell-O. This ban is scheduled to take effect on Aug. 1.
While 11 other states are considering similar legislation, West Virginia would be the first state in the United States to implement a sweeping food dye ban if Gov. Patrick Morrisey approves the legislation.
I don't know exactly how this bill will work — and it's likely our lawmakers don't either. They regularly pass bills without any thought of how to fund or implement them. For example, House Bill 2515, which would require counties to create alternative learning centers for chronically disruptive students, has advanced to the Senate. The bill, however, has no proposed funding included in it to build the centers or staff them.
If the food dye ban was passed by Congress, obviously it would be a nationwide ban and all food manufacturers would have to stop using the dyes in food sold in America.
But will the Wrigley Company start making natural color Skittles for just West Virginia? Will Mountain Dew Code Red be banned within state lines? Will the Bigley Piggly Wiggly have to stop using rainbow frosting on their cakes?
Some food and drink manufacturers have been speaking out. You can't turn on the radio without hearing an ad from Americans for Food & Beverage Choice — the group spent more than $19,000 on ads in the last week — speaking out against HB 2354.
And outside of affecting the food available on our grocery store shelves, the bill comes with other serious potential ramifications that seemingly undermine the Legislature's vow to improve West Virginia's economy.
The local Pepsi and Coca Cola plants could face layoffs if the bill is passed, according to Donnie Perdue, vice president of the Teamsters local 175 union.
'Both Pepsi and Coke have said the dye bill would cause a 50% decrease in their current inventory levels,' he said. 'There has been no economic analysis done to actually see what the impact would be if all these drinks and food is banned from West Virginia … The states that border West Virginia will be the only winners with this bill as West Virginians travel to their state to get their favorite drinks and food because we no longer have them.'
I'm not against the dyes being banned — in January, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration banned Red No. 3 from food because it causes cancer in rats, and almost 35 years ago it was banned from cosmetics for the same reason. Food manufacturers have until Jan. 2027 to stop using Red. No. 3, and drug manufacturers have until Jan. 2028. I just don't understand logistically how this ban on other dyes can work when only one state has banned them.
Chapman explained the bill is important because it will make available foods healthier for families, citing the state's high obesity rate and a lack of grocery stores.
Some West Virginians don't have local grocery stores and must shop at Dollar General or Dollar Tree for food. People don't necessarily want to buy food that's unhealthy — they're buying what they can afford.
Will this bill do anything to drop grocery prices on healthier foods, or increase residents' buying power at the grocery store? Well, no. Quite the opposite, actually.
'This is a law that would impact six in 10 grocery store items, effectively making them illegal. It will lead to higher prices, fewer choices and empty shelves,' said Stacie Rumenap, spokesperson for Americans for Food & Beverage Choice. 'The alternative ingredients simply don't exist to scale.'
Sen. Jason Barrett, R-Berkeley, has argued that the grocery chain Aldi has banned synthetic colors in its store-brand items, and the store sells its own version of Pop-Tarts without dyes and the product is cheaper than the Kellogg option.
Aldi is a great grocery chain — but there's only 16 locations in West Virginia. It also carries much fewer options — and name brands — than Kroger, Walmart or Piggly Wiggly.
This bill is a way for lawmakers to make it look like they care about the health of West Virginians without addressing the actual reasons for poor health — poverty, food insecurity, food deserts and expensive health care.Until legislators address those problems, West Virginia will remain the 'unhealthiest' state in the country.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nvidia and AMD Stocks Face Fresh Risk as Democrats Oppose Trump's China Chip Deal
Nvidia and AMD Stocks Face Fresh Risk as Democrats Oppose Trump's China Chip Deal

Business Insider

time13 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Nvidia and AMD Stocks Face Fresh Risk as Democrats Oppose Trump's China Chip Deal

Top Senate Democrats are urging President Trump to rethink his plan that allows artificial intelligence chip sales to China. In an open letter, they warned that the deal could contradict U.S. national security goals. The policy gives chip makers Nvidia (NVDA) and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) the right to sell advanced AI chips to China if they share 15% of sales revenue with the U.S. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. The Senators said that any move which gives China more access to high-grade chips could strengthen its AI sector. They pointed out that such an outcome could hurt U.S. defense and tech goals. Therefore, they urged Trump to pause and weigh the risks before moving forward. The letter reflects rising concern in Washington about the role of AI chips in both global trade and military use. What It Could Mean for the Companies and Investors For investors, the core issue is whether this letter leads to a policy shift. If Trump does not change course, the deal stands, and both Nvidia and AMD keep access to China, the largest global chip market. However, if Trump rethinks the move and imposes new curbs, the financial hit could be sharp. Nvidia earns most of its revenue from selling chips designed for data centers, particularly those used in AI. China has been a major market for these products, accounting for nearly a quarter of Nvidia's revenue even after earlier trade restrictions. If new rules cut off those sales, the company could lose billions in annual revenue. Such a setback could weigh heavily on Nvidia's growth outlook and its share price. As for AMD, it has a smaller share of the AI chip space, but its plans depend on growth in this market. If it loses China sales, the company may fall short of its targets for data center gains. In turn, this could slow its race with Nvidia and limit returns for investors who are betting on strong AI growth. As a result, the open letter marks a sign of ongoing tension that could hit chip makers in real ways. While the outcome of the policy fight is not set, the risk for both Nvidia and AMD is that a large source of demand may shrink at a time when growth in AI is key to their value story. By using TipRanks' Comparison Tool, we've compared Nvidia and AMD to gain a broader look at both companies' financials and overall sentiment.

Former Utah National Guard commander retiring with sizable rank demotion — from 2-star general to lieutenant colonel
Former Utah National Guard commander retiring with sizable rank demotion — from 2-star general to lieutenant colonel

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Former Utah National Guard commander retiring with sizable rank demotion — from 2-star general to lieutenant colonel

The former adjutant general of the Utah National Guard — who was placed on administrative leave two years ago following allegations of 'an inappropriate relationship with a subordinate' — is retiring with a sizable rank demotion. Former Maj. Gen. Michael J. Turley has retired as a lieutenant colonel — a U.S. Army officer's rank (O-5) three steps below his highest military rank (O-8), according to a Task & Purpose report. 'An Army Inspector General investigation substantiated the allegation that Maj. Gen. Michael J. Turley engaged in an inappropriate relationship with a subordinate,' said Army spokeswoman Cynthia O. Smith. 'He will retire as a lieutenant colonel, which was determined the last grade in which he honorably served. We consider this matter closed.' Turley is retiring at the lower rank following an assessment by the Army Grade Determination Review Board, Keith Garner, deputy director of public affairs for the Utah National Guard, told Task & Purpose. On Aug. 17, 2023, Utah Gov. Spencer Cox issued a statement that Turley had been placed on administrative leave from his command position of the Utah National Guard because he was under investigation by the Department of the Army Inspector General. In a statement provided to Military Times days later, Turley denied 'any improper relationship.' In 2023, Cox was asked if he knew about the ongoing investigation before Turley was placed on leave. Cox said he became aware of the investigation in 2022 but the Army Inspector General would not share ongoing details, so he 'was left with insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations,' according to KSL-TV. Turley became adjutant general of the Utah National Guard on Nov. 7, 2019, assuming command of 7,600 soldiers and employees. Just a week before being placed on administrative leave — on Aug. 9, 2023 – Turley joined local leaders in greeting President Joe Biden as he arrived at the Roland R. Wright Air National Guard Base in Utah. And earlier that same year, then-Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, chose Turley as his featured guest at Biden's State of the Union Address. Romney's office said he was unaware Turley was under a long-running investigation at the time, USA Today reported. Cox appointed Brig. Gen. Daniel Boyack as the new adjutant general of the Utah National Guard — a position he still holds under the rank of major general. A rare — but not unheard of — retirement demotion When officers are demoted, it is customary that defense officials announce their ranks have been lowered to the last grade that they served honorably or satisfactorily, according to Task & Purpose. This practice is typically used in cases in which service members try to retire and facts and evidence of misconduct earlier in their careers come to light, retired Air Force Lt. Col. Rachel VanLandingham, a former military attorney, told Task & Purpose. 'Their misconduct, then, taints everything they did afterwards,' said VanLandingham, a law professor at Southwestern Law School in Los Angeles. Such demotions are rare but not unheard of, she said. 'It allows for the Pentagon to say: Hey, look, you don't deserve to have this rank in perpetuity in retirement, and you don't deserve the pay,' VanLandingham said. 'It's a huge pay cut for the rest of your life in your pension because you did not honorably serve.' Solve the daily Crossword

Lindsey Graham threatens bill designating Russia state sponsor of terror over kidnapping of Ukrainian children
Lindsey Graham threatens bill designating Russia state sponsor of terror over kidnapping of Ukrainian children

New York Post

time35 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Lindsey Graham threatens bill designating Russia state sponsor of terror over kidnapping of Ukrainian children

President Trump ally Sen. Lindsey Graham threatened to champion bipartisan legislation designating Russia a state sponsor of terrorism over the kidnappings of Ukrainian children unless Moscow returns them. Throughout its brutal war on Ukraine, Russia has been accused of abducting over 20,000 Ukrainian children and putting some of them up for adoption, with the goal of raising them to be Russian. 'I intend to push the return of these children until I can't push anymore,' Graham vowed on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures.' Advertisement 'If they do not return these children to Ukraine, the 19,000, then I'm going to push legislation to make Russia a state sponsor of terrorism under U.S. law,' the South Carolina Republican said, warning such a move would make Russia 'radioactive.' Estimates of the children abducted by Russia vary, with some Ukrainian officials pegging it closer to 35,000. 3 Sen. Lindsey Graham demanded that Russia release the thousands of Ukrainian children it has allegedly abducted. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement 3 Russian leader Vladimir Putin met with President Trump in Alaska on Friday to discuss the war in Ukraine. The Kremlin was vexed back in 2014 during Ukraine's Revolution of Dignity, in which protesters ousted its pro-Russia President Viktor Yanukovych and shifted towards the West. Russia's demented kidnapping of Ukrainian children appears to be part of a broader strategy to remold Ukraine into a Russian sphere of influence over the long term. In some instances, the abducted children have been put on the battlefield to fight against Ukraine, according to top officials in Kyiv and nongovernmental organizations. Advertisement Ahead of President Trump's meeting with Russian strongman Vladimir Putin on Friday, the White House stressed that the mass abduction of Ukrainian children 'remains a concern.' Trump handed Putin a letter from the first lady pushing him to pursue peace and warning about the negative toll war has on children, without explicitly delving into the kidnapping issue. Graham argued that Russia deserves to be labeled a state sponsor of terrorism to tarnish its image abroad for its actions. 3 The issue of abducted Ukrainian children looms large over President Trump's efforts to secure peace in Ukraine. Advertisement 'They should be a state sponsor of terrorism, Russia, until they return the children. So any peace deal must include the return of the kidnapped children by Russia to Ukraine,' Graham said. 'If you don't do, that's not a just end of the war. And if Putin doesn't return these kids, he should be a state sponsor of terrorism designation under U.S. law. And that makes Russia radioactive.' Graham has also introduced a bipartisan sanctions bill alongside Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) So far, Trump has indicated he wants to act unilaterally to slap secondary tariffs and sanctions against Russia, rather than the bill. Graham and Blumenthal have some 85 co-sponsors. 'The way to end this war is to make Russia believe that, if they don't end it, we're going to destroy their fossil fuel economy,' Graham said. 'I'm going to let him [Trump] determine that,' Graham said about the timing of when that sanctions bill might get passed. 'I trust his judgment. I can't think of a better person to be in the room with Putin than President Trump.' Graham also said that he's 'cautiously optimistic we will get' to an end of the war. Trump is set to welcome Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to the White House on Monday and will also meet with a group of European leaders backing Ukraine.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store