Trio of bills addresses justice reform, crowded North Dakota jails
Exterior of the North Dakota State Penitentiary on Feb. 4, 2025. Bills under consideration by state lawmakers aim to address crowding at state prisons and jails. (Michael Achterling/North Dakota Monitor)
When parole and probation officers have to try to collect fees from people on supervised release, 'it puts both parties in a difficult situation,' said Colby Braun, director of the North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.
Eliminating those fees, and the time and effort that goes into collecting them, has been identified as one way to help keep low-level criminals out of North Dakota's crowded jails and prison system.
Lawmakers on Wednesday heard from Braun and others advocating for three bills addressing jail overcrowding and keeping people from getting caught in a revolving door of legal trouble.
House Bill 1425 focuses on diversion and deflection, keeping people out of jail with mental health and substance abuse service. It would establish a pilot program in three counties.
House Bill 1417 would eliminate fees for people on supervised release. Not paying those fees can lead to a return to jail. The fees are also seen as a burden for low-income people.
House Bill 1549 would create a grant program for local jails for programs that help people adjust after being released from jail, referred to as reentry. It would also study barriers to reentry, such as housing, access to Medicaid, and maintaining a valid driver's license or getting some other identification. It would also study why Blacks and Native Americans are incarcerated at higher rates than other populations.
'As a package, these proposals promote public safety through an intentional focus on reentry, recovery and rehabilitation that will improve the lives of people exiting the justice system and reduce the likelihood that they find their way back into the system,' Rep. Lawrence Klemin, R-Bismarck, the sponsor of the bills, told the House Judiciary Committee. 'This is a better use of our tax dollars, correctional space and the smart approach to maintaining public safety in our state.'
The bills address issues identified by a Reentry Study Work Group. They also address the lack of beds available in North Dakota jails, which also is in need of a short-term fix, Gov. Kelly Armstrong has said. Armstrong, a former defense attorney, also voiced support during his budget address for investments in behavioral health and other steps to reduce reliance on jails and prisons.
In committee work later Wednesday, Rep. Jeff Hoverson, R-Minot, spoke against all three bills.
'If we continue to think that the government is the answer to behavioral health, we're going to be going down into a bottomless pit,' Hoverson said.
The Judiciary Committee did not act on the bills, with Klemin indicating the committee will take them up Monday. Monday is the deadline for House committees to act on bills that must go to the Appropriations Committee.
The bill on fees removes a $55 per month supervision fee charged to people on supervised release. The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation bills about $6 million in supervision fees per biennium, with a collection rate of only about 25%.
Braun said that does account for the time officers spend trying to collect fees. 'There's no bang for the buck,' Braun said.
He said being able to provide positive reinforcement with people is much more effective.
Sister Kathleen Atkinson, who operates Ministry on the Margins in Bismarck, said some people will choose going back to jail and using state resources rather than paying fees.
The diversion bill would allow state's attorneys in each county to create their own program that could lead to the dismissal of charges if a defendant uses mental health or substance abuse treatment.
While not specified in the bill, Klemin said it is intended for low-level charges.
Legislative hearing at North Dakota State Penitentiary highlights rehabilitation programs
The bill also calls for a pilot project in three counties, to be determined later, working with the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.
'Pick me,' Cass County State's Attorney Kim Hegvik said Wednesday, testifying in favor of the bill.
Hegvik said Cass County had a diversion program but did not have the resources to provide the supervision that people in the program needed.
'This is a great place to spend our resources,' she said.
There was no negative testimony presented Wednesday, but there was opposition testimony submitted by Ward County State's Attorney Rozanna Larson. She said she feared the bill would not provide the mental health support that many people need and instead create more work for prosecutors and law enforcement.
The bill would also study the effectiveness of pretrial services, which Larson said is not meeting expectations.
The reentry study would include looking at programs specifically designed for Native Americans and drawing on Native culture. Braun noted the implementation of Akisni Warrior Lodge program targeted at Natives at the James River Correctional Center as an example.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
29 minutes ago
- Axios
Poll: Rep. Gabe Evans' approval lags behind Trump's
Republican U.S. Rep. Gabe Evans' favorability rating five months into the job is lower than President Trump's among registered voters in the congressman's district, according to a poll released Tuesday. Stunning stat: Evans' favorability (40%) lagged behind Trump's (45%) in Colorado's 8th District, which stretches from the suburbs north of Denver toward Greeley. The big picture: More than half of registered voters in the state's most competitive congressional district would be less likely to vote for a candidate who voted to cut Medicaid funding, per a poll released by Healthier Colorado, a nonprofit that supports expanding the federal safety net program. Why it matters: The poll comes as a major warning for Evans, who's gunning for reelection next year while staunchly defending the "big, beautiful bill" calling for historic reductions in Medicaid spending. Context: The poll, conducted from May 29 to June 4, included 404 registered 8th District voters, per Healthier Colorado. The survey had a margin of error of +/- 4.87% at the 95% confidence interval. State of play: A majority of 8th District voters (53%) share a favorable view of the safety net program, the poll shows, citing the health care access it provides to low-income and vulnerable people. Less than a quarter of respondents (23%) hold an unfavorable opinion of Medicaid. Between the lines: Republicans like Evans are framing the federal spending proposal as a measure to curb fraud and waste in the federal safety net program — but most voters aren't buying that, Healthier Colorado CEO Jake Williams said during a Tuesday press call. What they're saying:"Republicans' plan increases Medicaid spending every single year and makes the program more efficient by cutting out fraud, waste, and abuse," Delanie Bomar, a spokesperson for Evans' reelection campaign, said in a statement.
Gizmodo
43 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Elon Musk's Moment of Regret
On March 15, 2021, a rather unusual detail emerged in a Tesla filing with the SEC: Elon Musk's official title was listed as 'Technoking of Tesla.' The billionaire later clarified this whimsical change as a humorous jab at corporate formalities. Yet, beyond the jest, it perfectly encapsulated his audacious approach: deeply unconventional, unconcerned with tradition, and utterly dismissive of decorum. His self-assigned mission has always been to farcically upend established norms and forcefully impose his unique vision on the world. This distinctive style manifests as an unapologetic infusion of private-sphere behaviors into the corporate realm. Musk, for instance, has never shied away from engaging in heated arguments on social media, often employing colorful language and pointed insults that would undoubtedly lead to a CEO's swift dismissal or at least a stern warning from their board. He routinely uses X (formerly Twitter), the 'public town square' he acquired in late 2022, to settle scores. 'Gates is a huge liar,' he famously declared on May 8, referring to philanthropist and Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates. Gates's perceived transgression? Daring to criticize the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a brainchild of the Trump administration. Trump had tasked Musk with streamlining the federal government by slashing spending and reducing costs, and DOGE, the agency specifically created for Musk's oversight, quickly alienated nearly every other government member, becoming a lightning rod for public dissatisfaction with the administration. Musk had previously posted an insulting meme targeting Gates, whose 'great sin,' in Musk's eyes, was allegedly shorting Tesla stock years prior, effectively betting on its decline. Throughout these episodes, Tesla's board of directors, largely composed of loyalists and close associates, remained conspicuously silent. Millions of fans on X, however, cheered him on, further solidifying his image as a 'king' adored by his subjects. He largely ignored the few dissenting voices. As his financial power swelled, Musk's sense of invincibility grew. Donald Trump's return to the White House, a victory to which Musk contributed over $290 million according to filings with the Federal Election Commission, ultimately granted him the political influence he had previously lacked. He found himself wielding a rare trifecta of power: immense wealth, political sway, and control over crucial social media platforms (X and xAI). However, on June 5, the tech mogul discovered that even his immense power had its limits. He escalated his criticism of the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' Trump's signature budget bill, which includes cuts to Medicaid and Medicare, increased national debt, and the elimination of subsidies for green cars. This time, he directly and personally attacked Trump, bemoaning the former president's 'ingratitude,' claiming Trump wouldn't have won without his support. He went so far as to express support for Trump's impeachment, controversially linking it to the Epstein Files, a fixation within far-right and MAGA circles. A prevalent conspiracy theory among these groups suggests that Jeffrey Epstein, the sex offender who died by hanging in prison in 2019 while facing charges of sexually abusing underage girls, was allegedly murdered to prevent him from revealing a list of powerful clients, many of whom are believed to be prominent liberals. The fact that Epstein died during Trump's presidency is conveniently disregarded by proponents of this theory. This public showdown between the world's richest man and arguably the most powerful man in the world sent shockwaves through right-wing circles, where the alliance between the two had previously been lauded. Unlike his past skirmishes, Musk did not receive the expected and hoped-for support from his legion of followers. Instead, he faced significant criticism, even from Joe Rogan, a long-time friend who had publicly asserted for months that America owed Musk a great deal. This time, however, Rogan believed Musk had overstepped. 'I understand, he owns Twitter,' Rogan commented on Musk during a June 5 episode of The Joe Rogan Experience, his popular podcast. 'I think it's bad for your mental health. Posting things publicly all day and arguing with people constantly is bad for you.' For many, Rogan's sentiment was simply playing the world's smallest violin for a man whose self-inflicted wounds were becoming increasingly apparent. It is within this unprecedented context that Musk did something entirely uncharacteristic: he issued a mea culpa. In a short, ironic post, he engaged in self-criticism, signaling a surprising moment of personal introspection. 'It's outrageous how much character assassination has been directed at me, especially by me,' he posted on the night of June 8. The post quickly garnered over 44 million views as of the time of writing. Musk's statement seems to suggest that he is the primary architect of the criticism he faces, acknowledging that he is, in essence, his own worst enemy. This reveals a rarely seen, vulnerable side of the billionaire, starkly contrasting with the public image of an untouchable figure who believes he can do no wrong. But is this genuine self-criticism, or a strategic move born out of necessity after burning bridges? Indeed, on June 7, Trump informed NBC that he had no desire to mend his relationship with Musk and threatened the billionaire with 'serious consequences' should he fund Democratic candidates against Republicans who voted for the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' in the upcoming midterms. California Congressman Ro Khanna, who has known Musk for many years, extended an olive branch to the billionaire, calling for his party to embrace him. 'Having Elon speak out against the irrational tariff policy, against the deficit-exploding Trump bill, and the anti-science and anti-immigrant agenda can help check Trump's unconstitutional administration,' Khanna said in an interview with Semafor. 'I look forward to Elon turning his fire against MAGA Republicans instead of Democrats in 2026.' However, it is uncertain whether Democrats will heed Khanna, as Musk has become persona non grata, particularly among the party's left wing. Musk has stated he voted Democratic until Joe Biden's election. Beyond SpaceX, which holds numerous government contracts, Tesla itself is an easy target for Trump, who views the powers of the presidency as inherently personal. Tesla's net profit, in fact, plummeted 71% in the first quarter to $409 million compared to the previous year, primarily due to a sharp decline in vehicle sales. The automaker is also grappling with protests outside its stores globally, with demonstrators denouncing Musk's actions through DOGE in the U.S. and his perceived support for far-right ideologies worldwide. This erosion of goodwill is expected to continue. Initial data for the current second quarter shows a sustained decline in Tesla sales across China and Europe. Sales fell 45% in the UK in May, even as the overall EV market grew by 28%. In Germany, home to Tesla's only European factory, the decline was 36%, contrasting sharply with a 45% jump in the local market. Further demonstrating this trend, Tesla sales are down 67% in France, 54% in Sweden, 20% in Italy, 48% in Denmark, and 29% in Germany. These figures strongly suggest that Musk's reputation has been severely damaged among liberals, who constituted Tesla's core customer base due to their embrace of climate change initiatives and environmental concerns. For them, Tesla once symbolized the quintessential 'green' car. Tesla executives have been working to reassure worried investors since April. Musk himself has indicated a desire to reduce his role within the Trump administration. More significantly, he has promised that in the coming months, self-driving Teslas would be widely available in many cities thanks to advancements in FSD (Full Self-Driving), the software enabling autonomous driving. Unsupervised FSD, he implies, would make people forget this current rough patch and repair his tarnished reputation. 'I'm confident that it will be available in many cities in the US by the end of this year,' he told investors during the quarterly results presentation conference on April 22. However, this ambitious timeline hinges on regulatory approval, particularly from federal agencies. Given the increasingly fractured relationship with Trump, this green light is no longer as guaranteed as it might have seemed just a fortnight ago. The path forward appears considerably less smooth. Whether this mea culpa arrives too late remains uncertain. And Trump is never one to apologize. What is clear, however, is the division among X users. 'To err is human, to forgive is divine,' one user commented on Musk's post. 'The courage to realize that you have erred, apologize, and make amend is protecting the true essence of human to human interaction.' Conversely, another self-proclaimed Trump supporter commented, 'Shouldn't have said the things you did Elon. Burning bridges is something you shouldn't do. and you should know better. everybody took you in and this is how you get back wat everybody when you don't get your way.' For a man who almost never admits he's wrong, the slightest confession that he has painted himself into a corner is significant, though it's just a small blip in the flood of posting he engages in day-to-day. Even his own fans didn't seem to take it as an earth-shattering moment from a man they expect to deliver interplanetary leaps. As it so happens, around the same time last week, physicists at Loughborough University in England were getting their hands dirty with real advancements in nanotechnology and laying the groundwork for the world's tiniest violin. Measuring in at just 35 microns long and 13 microns wide, Musk's haters and boosters picked it up and played a sorrowful tune in his honor.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Three dozen House Republicans urge Senate GOP against ‘budget gimmicks,' deficit increases
More than three dozen House Republicans are warning Senate GOP leaders against approving additional deficit increases or using 'budget gimmicks' to count additional savings in the 'one big beautiful bill' of President Trump's tax cut and spending priorities. 'As the Senate considers changes, we remain unequivocal in our position that any additional tax cuts must be matched dollar-for-dollar by real, enforceable spending reductions,' the 37 members, led by Rep. Lloyd Smucker (R-Pa.), said in a Tuesday letter to Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), adding that the principle is the 'cornerstone' of the budget resolution framework passed by the House and is the 'minimum standard for our support.' The letter further asserted that the members would consider 'genuine savings only' as established by that House resolution. 'Offsets must come from permanent reforms that make the budget more sustainable, not timing shifts or other budget gimmicks,' the letter said. Among the signatories are House Budget Committee Chair Jodey Arrington (R-Texas), House Republican Conference Vice Chair Blake Moore (R-Utah), and many members of the House Freedom Caucus, including its chairman Andy Harris (R-Md.). The Senate is currently considering and expected to make changes to the House-passed megabill that includes extension of tax cuts that Trump signed into law in 2017; boosts to border, deportation, and defense funding; and new restrictions on Medicaid and food assistance programs that are project to result in millions of individuals losing their health insurance. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated the proposed tax cuts in the plan would decrease revenues by more than $3.6 trillion over a decade, while measures to cut federal spending — including reforms to Medicaid and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program —would reduce outlays by $1.2 trillion over the same period, resulting in a net deficit increase of $2.4 trillion. Several matters under consideration in the Senate would add to the deficit impact of the bill. Some GOP senators are unhappy with provisions to terminate clean energy tax breaks, while others are objecting to the around $800 billion in cuts to Medicaid through provisions like increased work requirements and $267 billion in cuts to food assistance through provisions like making states share the cost of the program for the first time. 'A reconciliation bill that relaxes fiscal discipline reflected in the House-passed bill would invite higher borrowing costs and undermine the economic growth that Americans need to maximize opportunity,' the 37 House GOP members said in the letter. 'We urge Senate leadership to keep the reconciliation measure compatible with the House framework while seizing every opportunity to deepen savings.'
