Stop Buying MQ-1C Gray Eagle Drones Army's Top Leadership Decrees
Procurement of the MQ-1C Gray Eagle for the U.S. Army may end as part of a wide-ranging force-structure overhaul, which raises questions about whether the service may look to retire the fleet sooner than expected. This comes as the drone's manufacturer continues to develop modernized versions of the Gray Eagle, as well as add new equipment and capabilities.
Plans for the fate of future MQ-1C acquisitions are made clear in a joint memo from Army Chief of Staff Gen. Randy George and Army Secretary Dan Driscoll, released yesterday.
'We will cancel procurement of outdated crewed attack aircraft such as the AH-64D… and obsolete UAVs like the Gray Eagle,' the pair stated.
'Our Army must transform now to a leaner, more lethal force by infusing technology, cutting obsolete systems, and reducing overhead to defeat any adversary on an ever-changing battlefield,' George and Driscoll state.
Other assets that the Pentagon wants to cut under the Army Transformation Initiative (ATI) include various ground combat systems, among them the HMMWV (High Mobility Multi-purpose Vehicle, better known as the Humvee) and the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV).
In response, C. Mark Brinkley, a General Atomics spokesman, told TWZ: 'When we talk to actual Gray Eagle operators with experience using the aircraft in combat, and infantry soldiers who have brought them to bear on the adversary, the universal feedback is that the Army needs more, not less.'
Nevertheless, the joint memo from George and Driscoll comes on the heels of an April 30th memo from U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. This had called for the Army to divest 'outdated, redundant and inefficient' programs in favor of new priorities, including long-range precision munitions and air and missile defense. However, Hegseth's order does not mention specific platforms, but does also call for the 'end [of] procurement of obsolete systems' including 'outdated UAVs.'
Derived from the Air Force's Predator, the basic MQ-1C — originally known as the Warrior — was tailored for warfare in the Middle East, using a heavy-fuel piston engine instead of a turboprop, and was intended to be operated by a cadre of enlisted soldiers.
The MQ-1C, which first started entering Army service in the late 2000s, is a medium-altitude, long-endurance drone. Designed to perform intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) and attack missions, the uncrewed aircraft has a sensor turret under the nose equipped with electro-optical and infrared cameras and can carry munitions and other stores, including advanced sensor systems, on up to four hardpoints, two under each wing. The Army employs Gray Eagles independently, as well as in crewed-uncrewed teams with AH-64E Apache Guardian attack helicopters.
As of 2019, the Army had acquired at least 204 MQ-1Cs, 101 of which were delivered in the enhanced Extended Range configuration.
Noteworthy is the fact that GA-ASI has already made efforts to ensure that the MQ-1C is better able to meet the demands of a future conflicts, which could include an expeditionary peer confrontation rather than a counterinsurgency fight.
Continued efforts produced the Gray Eagle 25M version, first flown in December 2023. A first order for the new drone was placed for the Army National Guard only last year.
Among the new features of the Gray Eagle 25M are an improved heavy-fuel engine, increased onboard power, significantly reduced maintenance requirements, and the Expeditionary Ground Control System. Designed to reduce the footprint of both personnel and materials, this system allows soldiers to fly missions from tents, buildings, or mobile shelters, making it easier to rapidly relocate or deploy to remote sites without traditional infrastructure.
The Gray Eagle 25M also has an improved flight computer, with five times more processing capacity, and a modular open-system architecture to ensure new capabilities can be integrated quickly and relatively cheaply. According to GA-ASI, these might include new weapons and long-range sensors.
The Gray Eagle 25M has also been at the forefront of GA-ASI experiments involving air-launched effects. This has also been conducted with a view to increasing effectiveness and survivability, for example, using the drone to lob air-launched effects toward enemy air defense systems on a large contested battlefield. At the same time, the Gray Eagle 25M can transmit data gathered by those smaller drones to other friendly elements, be they aircraft, long-range fires, or other platforms. Gray Eagle is also being tested as a drone interceptor, which you can read more about here.
Additional development has produced the Gray Eagle STOL, or Short Takeoff and Landing variant. This incorporates technology that was first demonstrated on the company-funded Mojave demonstrator, a heavily armed drone descended from the Gray Eagle and tailored for operations from remote or austere locations with rough strips and limited logistical support.
While the Pentagon's leadership may have gone cold on the MQ-1C, at least for now, General Atomics insists that the drone still has an important role to play, including in peer conflicts.
'The Army's RSTA [reconnaissance, surveillance, and target acquisition] mission is not going away in the future, and nor should its ability to conduct those operations without getting soldiers killed,' GA-ASI's Brinkley told TWZ.
Brinkley also noted that the modernized Gray Eagle 25M, Gray Eagle STOL, and EagleEye radar were all developed by the company 'despite low funding priority and an unclear vision from the U.S. Army that has forced Congress and others to make bold moves on behalf of America's soldiers.'
At the same time, Brinkley appeared to acknowledge that there is a considerable capability and performance gap between the original MQ-1C and the Gray Eagle 25M and Gray Eagle STOL now being offered.
Coincidentally, the memo from George and Driscoll was published the same day as General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc. (GA-ASI) announced details of the MQ-1C's participation in the Army's Project Convergence event, billed as a modernization experiment and based out of Fort Irwin, California, and surrounding ranges.
An MQ-1C Gray Eagle Extended Range (GE-ER) version participated in Project Convergence Capstone 5 (PC-C5), which ran throughout March. The drone in question was equipped with commercially available next-generation long-range sensors that were operated by the Army throughout the event.
According to GA-ASI, the drone 'flew unimpeded by the employed electronic threats and generated targets of interest at Multi-Domain Operations (MDO)-relevant ranges for the 82nd Airborne Division and participating units.'
The full sensor fit for the MQ-1C involved in PC-C5 comprised modernized communications intelligence (COMINT), electronic intelligence (ELINT), synthetic aperture radar/moving target indicator (SAR/MTI), and Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) radios, all of which make use of the drone's open architecture.
'The GE-ER was operated at an altitude and range that negated kinetic threats and utilized the long-range sensors to effectively detect, identify, and target threat emitters and vehicles,' GA-ASI said in a media release.
That the MQ-1C is potentially vulnerable even when faced by lower-end adversaries has been amply demonstrated by the scale of losses suffered by the still-growing number of shootdowns of U.S. MQ-9 Reaper drones by Iranian-backed Houthi militants in Yemen.
The growing vulnerabilities of the MQ-9 Reaper — the larger cousin of the Army's MQ-1C — saw the U.S. Air Force abruptly announce its desire to stop buying those drones, citing concerns about growing vulnerabilities. The service has also said in the past that it could retire the drones for good by 2035, but has continued to take deliveries of new examples in the meantime.
According to General Atomics, new versions of the Gray Eagle are 'similar to [the original MQ-1C] in name only, just as the rifles today's soldiers carry are nothing like the rifles of the Continental Army. Without these aircraft, tomorrow's U.S. Army faces an uphill battle that quadcopters and other low-endurance, low-capability gadgets cannot hope to overcome in a future fight. Backpack drones have a place on the battlefield, but they cannot replace the force multiplication of Gray Eagle.'
This final point reflects the focus on new kinds of drones as outlined in Hegseth's memo, which calls for prioritization of 'inexpensive drone swarms capable of overwhelming adversaries.
At this stage, the cuts proposed under the Army Transformation Initiative remain a Pentagon recommendation, and any major divestments of equipment and disbandment of units are likely to face plenty of pushback. Nevertheless, the call to step away from the MQ-1C does provide useful insight into the kinds of aerial platforms the Pentagon wants to see the U.S. Army operating in its future force structure.
Contact the author: thomas@thewarzone.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UK to build 12 nuclear submarines in preparation for potential war with Russia
The United Kingdom has announced plans to build 12 new nuclear submarines in preparation for potential armed aggression from Russia. Source: The Sunday Times Details: According to The Sunday Times, the UK is planning to construct 12 new nuclear attack submarines to replace the seven existing Astute-class submarines equipped with conventional weapons and to complement the four Trident nuclear missile strategic submarines that form the sea-based component of the UK's nuclear deterrent. The new submarines are expected to enter service by the late 2030s. They will be part of the AUKUS trilateral security pact signed between the UK, the US and Australia in 2021. The alliance provides for the sharing of military technology and intelligence and the joint development of submarines. The total number of submarines ordered under AUKUS will reach 20. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer will also promise to invest £15 billion (around US$20 billion) in a nuclear warhead development programme. The Sunday Times noted that this is the first time the UK has revealed both the number of nuclear attack submarines to replace the Astute class and the scale of investment in warhead development programmes. Details about the rearmament of the British forces are expected to be outlined in the UK government's strategic defence review, which will be published on Monday 2 June. Defence Secretary John Healey said that the UK must be ready for armed attack from Russia and that the review will send a "message to Moscow" about the country's readiness for combat. The 130-page document will also recommend putting the UK armed forces on a state of combat readiness in response to the "immediate and pressing" threat from Russia. Background: Prior to that, The Sunday Times reported that the UK government is negotiating with the Pentagon to purchase US F-35A Lightning stealth fighters capable of launching tactical nuclear weapons. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How Britain's biggest companies are preparing for a Third World War
The year is 2027 and a major global conflict has erupted. Perhaps China has launched an attempted invasion of Taiwan, or Russian forces have crossed into the territory of an eastern European Nato country. Whatever the case, Justin Crump's job is to advise big companies on how to respond. And with tensions rising, a growing number of chief executives have got him on speed dial. The former Army tank commander, who now runs intelligence and security consultancy Sibylline, says his clients range from a top British supermarket chain to Silicon Valley technology giants. They are all drawing up plans to keep running during wartime, and Crump is surprisingly blunt about their reasoning: a global conflict may be just two years away. 'We're in a world which is more dangerous, more volatile than anything we've seen since the Second World War,' he explains. There are lots of crises that can happen, that are ready to go. 'Chief executives want to test against the war scenario, because they think it's credible. They want to make sure their business can get through that environment.' He rattles off a series of smouldering international issues – any one of which could ignite the global tinderbox – from Iran's nuclear ambitions, to China's threats to Taiwan, to Vladimir Putin's designs on a Russian sphere of influence in Ukraine and beyond, as well as Donald Trump's disdain for the post-1940s 'rules-based international order'. Against this backdrop, planning for war is not alarmist but sensible, Crump contends. With all these issues building, 2027 is viewed as the moment of maximum danger. 'The worst case scenario is that all these crises all overlap in 2027,' he explains. 'You've got the US midterms, which will have taken place just at the start of that year, and whatever happens there will be lots of upset people. It's also the time when a lot of the economic disruption that's happening now will have really washed through the system, so we'll be feeling the effects of that. And it's also too early for the change in defence posture to have really meant anything in Europe.' Putin and Xi Jinping, the president of China, are acutely aware of all this, he says, and may conclude that they should act before the US and Europe are more fully rearmed in 2030. 'In their minds now, the clock is ticking,' he adds. He also points to major British and Nato military exercises scheduled to take place in 2027, with American forces working to a 2027 readiness target as well. 'There's a reason they're doing it that year – because they think we have to be ready by then,' Crump says. 'So why shouldn't businesses also work off the same thinking and plan for the same thing?' He is not alone in arguing that society needs to start expecting the unexpected. In 2020, the Government established the National Preparedness Commission to ensure the UK was 'significantly better prepared' for the likes of floods, power outages, cyber attacks or wars. It has urged households to keep at least three days' worth of food and water stockpiled, along with other essential items such as a wind-up torch, portable power bank, a portable radio, spare batteries, hand sanitiser and a first aid kit. 'In recent years a series of high-impact events have demonstrated how easily our established way of life can be disrupted by major events,' the commission's website says – pointing to the coronavirus pandemic, recent African coups, Russia's invasion of Ukraine and turmoil in the Middle East. Britain is also secretly preparing for a direct military attack by Russia amid fears that it is not ready for war. Officials have been asked to update 20-year-old contingency plans that would put the country on a war footing after threats of attack by the Kremlin. All of this has led major businesses to conclude that perma crisis is the new normal, Crump says. In the case of Ukraine, Western sanctions on Russia forced companies to choose between continuing to operate heavily-constrained operations in Russia, selling up, or walking away entirely. Crump recalls speaking to several clients including a major energy company in the run-up to Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. He and his colleagues urged the business to evacuate their staff, at a point when it was still received wisdom that Putin wouldn't dare follow through with his threats. 'I had almighty arguments with some people in the run-up, because I was very firmly of the view, based on our data and insights, that the Russians were not only invading, but they were going for the whole country. But other people in our sector were saying, 'No, it's all a bluff'. 'Their team came to me afterwards and said: 'After that call, we were convinced, and we got our people out'. They got a lot of grief for that at the time, from people who were saying it was all nonsense. 'But then on the day of the invasion, they told me they got so many calls actually saying 'thank you for getting us out'.' Yet even in Ukraine, much of which remains an active war zone, life must go on – along with business. 'I've been to plenty of war zones,' says Crump. 'And people are still getting on with their lives, there's still stuff in supermarkets, and things are being made in factories – but that certainly all gets a lot more difficult.' In the case of a major British supermarket, how might executives plan for, say, a Chinese invasion of Taiwan? The first question is how involved the UK expects to be, says Crump. But if Britain, as might be expected, sides with the US at least in diplomatic terms, 'we're not buying anything from China'. That immediately has implications for a company's supply chains – are there any parts of the supply chain that would be crippled without Chinese products? But as the recent cyber attack on Marks & Spencer has demonstrated, attacks on critical digital infrastructure are also a major risk to supermarkets in the event of a war with China or Russia. 'If you look at a retailer, the vulnerability is not necessarily whether or not they can transport stuff to the shop, even in a war zone,' says Crump. 'The problem becomes when you can't operate your systems. 'If you can't take money at the point of sale, or if you have no idea where your stock is because your computer system has been taken down, you've got major problems and you can't operate your business.' In a scenario where Britain becomes involved in a war itself, Crump says employers may also suddenly find themselves with gaps in their workforces. He believes things would need to get 'very bad indeed' for the Government to impose conscription, which applied to men aged 18-41 during the Second World War. But he points out that the calling up of British armed forces reservists would be very likely, along with the potential mobilisation of what is known as the 'strategic reserve' – those among the country's 1.8 million veterans who are still fit to serve. There are around 32,000 volunteer reservists and an undisclosed number of regular reserves, former regular members of the armed forces who are still liable to be called up. 'There's a big pool of people we don't tap at the moment who are already trained,' explains Crump. 'But there would be consequences if the entire reserve was called forward, which would have to happen if we entered a reasonably sized conflict. It would certainly cause disruptions. 'The medical services are hugely integrated with the NHS, for example, and we saw the effects of them being called forward with Iraq and Afghanistan.' The sort of supermarket chaos that erupted during the Covid-19 pandemic would also return with a vengeance if a significant conflict broke out. During that crisis, grocers had to limit how many packs of loo rolls and cans of chopped tomatoes shoppers were allowed to take home, among other items, because of supply chain problems. 'If we're in a conflict, that sort of supply chain activity would increase,' notes Crump. 'So you don't necessarily have rationing imposed, but there might be issues with food production, delivery, payment and getting things to the right place. 'In a world where we don't have our own independent supply chains, we're reliant on a lot of very interconnected moving parts that have been enabled by this period of peace. 'We've never been in a conflict during a time where we've had 'just in time' systems.' Crump brings up the recent blackouts in Spain and Portugal. British grocers initially thought their food supplies would be completely unaffected because truck loads of tomatoes had already made their way out of the country when the problem struck. But the vehicles were electronically locked, to prevent illegal migrants attempting to clamber inside when they cross the English Channel and could only be unlocked from Spain – where the power cuts had taken down computer systems and telecoms. 'People in Spain couldn't get online, so we had locked trucks full of tomatoes sitting here that we couldn't open because of technology,' Crump says. 'No one had ever thought, 'But what happens if all of Spain goes off the grid?' And I'm sure the answer would have been, 'That'll never happen' anyway.' This tendency towards 'normalcy bias' is what Crump tries to steer his clients away from. While it isn't inevitable that war will break out, or that there will be another pandemic, humans tend to assume that things will revert to whatever the status quo has been in their lifetimes, he says. This can mean we fail to take the threat of unlikely scenarios seriously enough, or use outdated ways of thinking to solve new problems. 'We've had this long period of peace and prosperity. And, of course, business leaders have grown up in that. Military leaders have grown up in it. Politicians have grown up in it. And so it's very hard when that starts to change. 'People have grown up in a world of rules. And I think people are still trying to find ways in which the game is still being played by those old rules.' Unsurprisingly, given his line of work, Crump believes businesses must get more comfortable contemplating the unthinkable. 'Go back a decade and most executives did not want to have a crisis because a crisis is bad for your career, so they didn't want to do a test exercise – because you might fail,' Crump adds. 'But the whole point is that you can fail in an exercise, because it's not real life.' At least, not yet. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Nassau DA warns of Albany push to approve early parole for violent convicts
The Democratic-run New York state legislature could rush through a series of bills to give convicts early parole and prevent law enforcement from keeping dangerous criminals off the streets, Nassau County District Attorney Anne Donnelly warned Sunday. In recent years, Democrats clawed back controversial cashless bail and discovery laws after serial criminals were let loose, triggering massive political blowback. 'These bills undercut everything we work for every day — building strong cases, securing convictions, and ensuring justice is served,' Donnelly, a Republican up for re-election this fall, told The Post. Advertisement 3 Nassau County District Attorney Anne Donnelly. Brigitte Stelzer 'When prosecutors do the hard work of putting violent offenders behind bars, we should be backed by laws that protect that progress — not laws that allow those same criminals to return to our communities years before their sentences are complete,' added Donnelly, who is holding a press conference Monday announcing her opposition to the bills. Among the bills drawing concern is the Elder Parole bill — which would require inmates aged 55 and older who have served at least 15 years of their sentence to be considered for early release, regardless of the seriousness of the crime committed. Advertisement The measure is sponsored by Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal (D-Manhattan) and Assemblywoman Maritza Davila (D-Brooklyn). Another bill, the Earned Time Act, would make most violent felons eligible for time allowance credits, potentially slashing their prison sentences in half, Donnelly said. The earned time bill is sponsored by Sen. Jeremy Cooney (D-Rochester) and Assemblywoman Anna Kelles (D-Ithaca). 3 Madeline Brame's son, Hason Correa, was murdered in a scuffle outside a Harlem apartment building seven years ago. Steven Hirsch Advertisement A third bill — the Second Look Act — would permit prisoners to petition the courts for a sentence reduction after serving 10 years, including inmates convicted of violent crimes. The legislation is promoted by Sen. Julia Salazar (D-Brooklyn) and Assemblywoman Latrice Walker (D-Brooklyn). GOP Long Island lawmakers oppose the early parole bills, including Assemblyman Edward Ra and Sen. Jack Martins. 3 The New York State Capitol building. Hans Pennink for the NY Post Advertisement Crime victims' advocate Madeline Brame, whose Army Sergeant son Hason Correa was murdered in a scuffle outside a Harlem apartment building seven years ago, expressed outrage at the proposals to give violent cons a break. 'These proposals completely disregard the pain and effort that go into holding criminals accountable,' she said. 'We need to help prosecutors put violent offenders behind bars — not give criminals new ways to get out early.' Gov. Kathy Hochul toyed with early release proposals in April as a way to try to alleviate the prison population amid an illegal prison guard strike and a staffing shortage. She was forced to bring in the National Guard to staff the prisons. She proposed opening eligibility for merit time in the state budget, then backed down after it was revealed doing so could lead to people who were in for violent crimes to be released early. Donnelly was among those who raised the alarm. Inmate advocates have pushed for early parole and other reforms after prisoners were allegedly killed at the hands of guards over the past year.
