Belgian Grand Prix delayed due to rain
The drivers completed a formation lap behind the safety car at Spa-Francorchamps before the red flag was waved.
An FIA spokesperson said: 'Most drivers have reported poor visibility during the formation lap, hence the red flag.'
Pole-sitter Lando Norris was asked to report on the conditions. He said: 'They are not ideal. I can't see a lot behind the safety car so I can't imagine what it is like for everyone else.'
🔴 RED FLAG 🔴
It's very wet out there and visibility is poor. The drivers will head back to the pit lane to wait for conditions to improve #F1 #BelgianGP pic.twitter.com/gVpZV2FO10
— Formula 1 (@F1) July 27, 2025
The FIA has issued no update as to when the 13th round of the season will get under way.
The 2021 race in here in Belgium was abandoned after two laps behind the safety car – the shortest race in Formula One history.
Four-time world champion Max Verstappen took aim at the decision to suspend the start of the race.
'That's a bit silly,' said Verstappen on the radio. 'We should just run, like chillax. Jesus.
'They're way too cautious. And now the rain is coming, the heavy rain. It's going to be a three-hour delay.'
Championship leader Oscar Piastri was warned of a lengthy delay.
'In about 10 minutes, they expect rain to be heavy, as it was in the last batch,' said Piastri's race engineer, Tom Stallard.
'Then a 30 to 40 minute delay while we wait for that. (McLaren sporting director) Randy (Singh) and the FIA expect we will have to wait for that 30 to 40 minutes before we get going.'
An FIA spokesperson later said: 'We anticipate the rain to stop at 16:00 (15:00 BST). We will then target a start as soon as the standing water has been cleared from the track.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
31 minutes ago
- BBC News
Does FIA need to rethink approach to wet race conditions? - F1 Q&A
Oscar Piastri led Lando Norris to a McLaren one-two at the Belgian Grand Prix, extending his drivers' championship lead by 16 points. Formula 1 heads to Hungary for round 14 next weekend before the summer break. BBC Sport F1 correspondent Andrew Benson answers your latest questions. In both races this weekend, it almost seemed to be a disadvantage to qualify on pole because of the slipstream on such a long straight. Is there anything that can be done on this specific track to ensure pole is actually an advantage? - TomIt's true that both the pole winners at the Belgian Grand Prix last weekend lost the lead on the run up to Les Combes on the first lap, and that lost the them the race - Oscar Piastri to Max Verstappen in the sprint, and Lando Norris to Piastri in the Grand though, they were two different sprint was a standing start in the dry. Piastri did all he could, but Verstappen followed him through Eau Rouge and slipstreamed past him up the knew before the race that this was a likely eventuality. That's partly because of the layout of the track, but also partly because Verstappen was running lower downforce than Piastri and so had an advantage on the straight was visible thereafter in the sprint, when Piastri, despite a quicker car and a significant advantage in the middle sector of the lap, could never get close enough to have a go at Grand Prix was different. It was wet, and it was a rolling start. That should have made it a lot easier for Norris to keep the there are questions about his restart, which were even raised by McLaren team principal Andrea Norris went early, and Piastri went with him, so Norris did not have the lead over the start line that would have been helpful in keeping his Norris made a mistake at La Source and that allowed Piastri to get even closer, which pretty much guaranteed Norris was a sitting duck. Piastri then guaranteed he'd pass by going as fast as he dared - faster than Norris dared - through Eau Rouge."Oscar deserved it," as Norris it's not a given that the pole-winning driver will lose the lead at Spa at Les Combes - Charles Leclerc managed to retain it last year, for example. It depends on the for the remark about pole, yes, it's meant to be an advantage conferred on a driver as a reward for qualifying fastest. But it's no more than that. It does not mean the driver who secures it has a divine right to lead at the end of the first lap. Of course they don' why should anything be done about this at Spa in particular? Doing so would mean changing a historic, charismatic and demanding layout. And no one wants to lose that. Safety should and will be always be paramount in F1, but do you feel the FIA needs to recalibrate how to manage wet race conditions? Do you think the FIA's overly-conservative approach is hampering F1 drivers truly demonstrating their all-weather driving abilities? - HarjThere was a feeling after the Belgian Grand Prix that the race director had erred on the side of caution a little too much in deciding when the race should be Verstappen said he felt the race could have been run on schedule at 3pm local time, and that there was no need to red-flag it if they had just let the cars run for a couple more laps to clear some water from the he had a vested interest because Red Bull had changed his car to have more downforce than the McLarens and Leclerc's Ferrari exactly because they were anticipating Lewis Hamilton said he felt that even after the delay they could have started all the drivers acknowledged that they had asked race officials not to start a wet race too early, after an incident at Silverstone where they after a safety-car restart, Racing Bulls' Isack Hadjar smashed into the back of Kimi Antonelli's Mercedes at Copse simply because he could not see it before he hit also have to factor in the dangers of Spa, and the incidents that killed Anthoine Hubert in 2019 and Dilano van t'Hoft in 2023 in junior category of them crashed and then bounced back on to the track, where they were hit at high speed by another car, suffering fatal Piastri put it after the race: "Maybe we could have done one less formation lap. But in the grand scheme of things, if that's one lap too early, is it worth it? No." Is Lewis Hamilton's drop in performance caused by trying too hard and overthinking everything in the whole organisation? Surely there's only so much one person can do? - EdLewis Hamilton's Belgian Grand Prix weekend was actually an anomaly in what had been an encouraging run of form in recent a difficult start to the season, his average qualifying deficit to team-mate Charles Leclerc has been just 0.05 seconds since the Miami Grand Prix in May, and he had out-qualified Leclerc in three of the previous four by Hamilton's own admission, his driving in both qualifying sessions in Spa was "unacceptable".There were, though, extenuating circumstances. There were new braking characteristics on his car in Spa which Leclerc had been running since Canada, and Hamilton had chosen not to until Belgium. And Ferrari introduced a new rear suspension aimed at allowing them to run the car changes to car behaviour caught Hamilton out when he braked hard for the Bus Stop chicane in sprint also had a new data engineer, someone he had previously worked with at Mercedes, last weekend."It's not easy to switch engineers within the middle of a season," Hamilton said. "It's someone that I've known for years. He was actually on my previous team with me. But not in that position. So we're getting used to each other. Having to learn super, super quick."The changes that we had really caught both of us out."And he simply made a misjudgement in just exceeding track limits at Raidillon in qualifying for the grand prix. There was nothing wrong with his pace - he was within a smidge of Leclerc on that lap before it was nothing bigger behind the events of last weekend than that. If Red Bull's new engine next year is clearly down on performance and not likely to be a front-runner that season, how long will Max Verstappen hang around? When will we be able to form an impression of what next year's engine might be able to give him? - GeoffThe first thing to say here is that there is simply no way for anyone to know whether Red Bull's 2026 engine is "clearly down on performance".What can be said is that the F1 grapevine suggests Mercedes have a small advantage over the other manufacturers on their internal combustion engine performance for 2026 so manufacturers are working in isolation, and they will reject any suggestion they might be behind, figures creep out in various even if that's true, next year is not just about internal combustion engine performance. There is the electrical part of the engine, which provides about 50% of the total power output, and the new sustainable fuels, which will also have a significant relative performance levels will only become apparent next are also questions about Red Bull's car design group, of course, after their slump in form in the past 18 months following Adrian Newey's for Verstappen's future, you can pretty much take it as read that he will be staying at Red Bull in 2026. My sources tell me he doesn't want to leave, for a whole raft of given the above explained uncertainty, the logical decision anyway is to stay. That way, Verstappen can see how the land lies in 2026, and if Red Bull are struggling it will be contractually easier to move in that case as well.
The Guardian
12 hours ago
- The Guardian
Racing in the rain is a heady spectacle but tragic history at Spa weighs heavy
Having been a mainstay in Formula One since the championship's inaugural world championship year in 1950, no one is taken by surprise by the capricious nature of the weather at the Spa-Francorchamps circuit. Yet once again this weekend it was the climate that held court at the Belgian Grand Prix, leaving the sport divided over a circuit where the appeal of racing in the rain on a track of such fearsome risk and reward makes for difficult decisions. The race on Sunday, ultimately a somewhat pedestrian affair, was won by McLaren's Oscar Piastri after the start had been delayed for an hour and 20 minutes owing to the rain that swept in across the Ardennes mountains. This was not an unusual occurrence. In 2021 the meeting here ended in farce as all but two laps were completed behind a safety car when an afternoon deluge continued until a 'result' was declared, as unedifying and insulting to the fans as it was. A midsummer day in July guarantees nothing in Spa. Cycling to the track on Sunday morning there were vast stair rods of precipitation yet by the descent into Francorchamps the sun was shining again. The past is a foreign country across 10 minutes in the Ardennes. By the time the race was ready to go the weather was similarly fickle. The downpour that swamped the grid had largely stopped when the formation lap began but the circuit was still wet. The rain was not the real problem however. Spray from these ground-effect cars is huge. The regulations were designed to improve overtaking by channelling the dirty air in their wake upwards. But it also ensures that in the wet the water is similarly channelled and hurled vertically with enormous force. This spectacular plume of liquid then promptly comes down on all the following cars and makes for very low visibility. This was the problem on Sunday, not whether the tyres were able to cope with a wet track. The intermediate rubber was fine with the conditions in Spa, which did not even require the full wet tyres. Indeed of late it is almost always visibility not grip that prevents racing, suggesting full wet tyres are now all but pointless. Were they ever to be used the conditions would be such that racing would surely not commence because of visibility problems. As it was, after the delayed start, it was only seven laps in when Lewis Hamilton decided the track was already dry enough for slick tyres. He was right and the field followed him in. The reaction afterwards ranged from Max Verstappen – whose car was set up for a wet race – arguing that classic wet racing was in danger of disappearing because of the FIA's caution, to George Russell bluntly stating it would have been 'stupidity' to start on time given the conditions when the race was supposed to begin. The majority appeared to concur with Russell given Spa is such a challenging track. Quite apart from its historic legacy in the old configuration that claimed so many drivers' lives, it is still a formidable and unforgiving test. In recent years both Anthoine Hubert, in 2019, and Dilano van 't Hoff, in 2023, were killed here. Sign up to The Recap The best of our sports journalism from the past seven days and a heads-up on the weekend's action after newsletter promotion As Charles Leclerc noted: 'On a track like this with what happened historically, I think you cannot forget about it. For that reason, I'd rather be safe than too early.' It was an opinion echoed by Fernando Alonso and Piastri among other drivers. The problem it highlighted for F1 is that many drivers and fans alike want to see racing in the rain. It is a great leveller, where mechanical and aerodynamic advantage are negated and the seat of the pants feel and touch of a driver counts for so much. The call at Spa by the FIA feels like the right one, to err on the side of safety, but as the sport heads into new regulations for 2026 it was a reminder that it might try to find a way to allow the contest everyone wants to see, even when the heavens open.
Daily Mirror
14 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri told by McLaren F1 boss what will decide title fight
McLaren pair Oscar Piastri and Lando Norris continued their extraordinarily tight Formula 1 title battle at the Belgian Grand Prix with the Aussie edging out his team-mate at Spa McLaren team principal Andrea Stella has told his title-chasing drivers exactly what factors will decide the outcome of their battle for individual glory. McLaren have been so dominant this year that the constructors' championship already looks like little more than a formality. They are 268 points ahead of nearest challengers Ferrari after only 13 rounds of the 24-race season. There is still a long way to go but, with most teams now focused on developing their 2026 cars for the new regulations, only a far-fetched series of events will stop them now. But there is still plenty to be decided in the hunt for the drivers' title. Max Verstappen is slipping further back and seems highly unlikely to make it five in a row now, and so it is down to the two McLaren drivers to beat each other to individual honours. Lando Norris looked to have been building momentum heading towards the summer break. His back-to-back wins in Austria and at Silverstone, in front of his home fans, saw him narrow the gap to Oscar Piastri above him in the championship to just a single-figure amount. But then the balance of power shifted again at Spa-Francorchamps. Norris got pole but it was Piastri who flew through on the first lap to take the lead and control of Sunday's Grand Prix and, from there, he controlled it with the finesse and calm for which the young Aussie has become so well respected during his still relatively short time in Formula 1. What is clear is that both drivers are operating at an astonishing level, no doubt being pushed to those heights by one another. The points gap between them has been very narrow for some time now and it looks likely to be the case for much of the rest of the year if they can both keep up this standard. Their boss Stella thinks their can and believes it will be the finest of margins which decides who will be the drivers' champion by the end of the year. He said: "There is very, very little between our two drivers, and this is because the two drivers are racing at a very, very high level. "We are lucky at McLaren to have two drivers that deservedly are fighting for the World Championship. I think the difference will be made by the accuracy, the precision, the quality of the execution. We saw in Silverstone that an issue, a sporting issue for Oscar during the Safety Car restart, and the consequent penalty cost him the race. And here we saw that somehow related to the circuit characteristic, like you said before, like it would have always been very difficult for Lando to keep the position, starting first, at the same restart. At the same time, I think Lando didn't help himself. So I think the execution is what is going to make the main difference. "We as a team, we will try and make sure that from a reliability point of view, from team operation point of view, we are as good as possible such that you will be the drivers deciding their own outcome in terms of competing for the Drivers' World Championship."
