logo
Capitol agenda: Thune's megabill teeters on the brink

Capitol agenda: Thune's megabill teeters on the brink

Politico5 hours ago

Senate Majority Leader John Thune is scrambling to quell the Medicaid-fueled mutiny that's threatening to derail the megabill on both sides of the Capitol.
In the Senate, 'Medicaid moderates' are rejecting Finance's opening offer of $15 billion for a stabilization fund for rural hospitals to help offset paring back the provider tax in expansion states from 6 percent to 3.5 percent.
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) called it 'inadequate' and warned that even if leadership goes up to the $100 billion she's seeking, 'that doesn't solve' her issues with the bill. Thune closed the door to $100 billion soon after.
Multiple senators are threatening they won't vote to open floor debate on the megabill without more clarity on Medicaid changes. That includes Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), who warned colleagues behind closed doors Wednesday that 'you won't have a member from North Carolina sitting at this table after next year' unless the Senate changes course, Jordain scooped. (Reminder, fellow North Carolina Sen. Ted Budd isn't up for reelection until 2028.)
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) later posted on X that he spoke with Donald Trump and the president wants the Senate to 'stay with the House' on Medicaid. Look for whether Trump issues further instructions Thursday: Several GOP senators are expected to head to the White House for a 4 p.m. event to tout the 'big, beautiful bill.'
Over in the House, wary moderates are also rejecting the rural hospital fund; one told POLITICO it's 'bullshit.'
Speaker Mike Johnson is trying to calm nervous members by telling them he expects the Senate Medicaid language will move closer to the House's. House GOP leaders and moderates believe the provider tax will end up between 4 percent and 5 percent, according to four people granted anonymity to describe private conversations. Some House Republicans are prepared to swallow that. Others are protesting.
Those numbers aren't currently under serious consideration in the Senate, two people granted anonymity told POLITICO, where there's general skepticism that rank-and-file Republicans across the Capitol have a good read on the negotiations. (Johnson and Thune are in close contact, though; the Senate leader stepped out of Wednesday's lunch on the phone with his House counterpart.)
But a Senate shift could end up happening if Thune's members force his hand. Asked Wednesday about softening the provider-tax language, Thune didn't completely close the door. 'This all comes down to what the traffic will bear,' he told POLITICO.
Other outstanding megabill issues:
— Feeling less salty?: Blue-state House Republicans expected to receive two options in writing for a potential deal on the state-and-local tax deduction. Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.) said the SALT Republicans' Wednesday meeting with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) involved a 'productive conversation.'
— Public-lands push and pull: POLITICO obtained Sen. Mike Lee's (R-Utah) scaled-back plan to sell off millions of acres in public lands, which he's shipped off to the parliamentarian for review. It could still face GOP pushback.
— Inside RonJohn's White House talks: Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) told POLITICO the White House is working with him to establish a budget review panel through reconciliation. He's not a 'yes' on the megabill yet, though.
What else we're watching:
— Iran briefing: Senators will huddle at 2 p.m. for their rescheduled briefing on the Iran conflict. As of late Wednesday night, the potential speaker list included Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Joint Chiefs Chair Dan Caine, but Senate aides cautioned the list could change.
— Leg Branch markup: House appropriators will mark up the Legislative Branch funding bill Thursday — and there is a lot they want to see changed on Capitol Hill, according to their committee report released Wednesday. The panel had thoughts on member security, designated parking spaces, food service that accommodates more allergies and celiac disease, elevator outages and dome tours ahead of Thursday's markup.
James Bikales, Josh Siegel and Katherine Tully McManus contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ted Cruz Stumbles on a Source of Monetary Madness
Ted Cruz Stumbles on a Source of Monetary Madness

Wall Street Journal

time14 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Ted Cruz Stumbles on a Source of Monetary Madness

Talk about the right debate for the wrong reason. A relatively obscure bit of financial regulation has become a projectile in the Capitol Hill food fight over a five-course budget bill. Alas, the thrower of this missile is missing the target. At issue is the central bank's practice of paying interest to commercial banks on the reserve balances they deposit at the Federal Reserve. Sen. Ted Cruz (R., Texas) tried to launch a debate about this earlier in June when he suggested that if Congress barred these interest payments in its budget bill, it would save the government $1 trillion over 10 years. Many voters might be surprised to discover the Fed is making such large payments to banks. When Congress in 2006 authorized the central bank to pay interest on reserve balances as of 2011, it seemed like an academic matter. The theory was that to satisfy regulatory reserve requirements, banks must forgo the income they otherwise would earn from that capital. That lost revenue constitutes a form of tax, and the Fed could soften the blow by paying interest on those reserve balances. The stakes appeared low. Before the 2007-08 panic, reserve balances tended to be relatively small, and one could argue that the 'tax' was a fair price for banks to pay for access to Fed support in times of trouble.

Congressman calls on Noem, Dr. Oz with plan to 'swiftly remove' 1.4 million illegal migrants on Medicaid
Congressman calls on Noem, Dr. Oz with plan to 'swiftly remove' 1.4 million illegal migrants on Medicaid

Fox News

time16 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Congressman calls on Noem, Dr. Oz with plan to 'swiftly remove' 1.4 million illegal migrants on Medicaid

Wesley Hunt, R-Texas, sent letters to two key agency heads with a plan to "swiftly" remove roughly 1.4 million illegal immigrants currently receiving Medicaid in the US. "While Democrats in Congress continue to peddle falsehoods and fear-mongering over so-called 'Medicaid cuts,' they conveniently ignore a staggering truth: over 1.4 million illegal aliens are receiving Medicaid benefits, an unsustainable burden on the American taxpayer," Hunt told Fox News Digital. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz were both recipients of Rep. Hunt's letter this week, which proposed a task force to "identify" and remove the illegal migrants on Medicaid. "I've formally requested the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish a task force to identify those unlawfully exploiting our healthcare system and ensure they are swiftly removed from our country," Hunt added. The Texas Congressman's comments come as President Donald Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill," which includes a provision stripping illegal migrants from taxpayer-funded healthcare, faces last-minute changes in the Senate. Fox News Digital obtained a document from the Congressional Budget Office sent to two GOP committee chairmen this week with information regarding the "One Big Beautiful Bill" that reads: "About 1.4 million would be people who do not meet citizenship and immigration status requirements for Medicaid enrollment but who would be covered under current law in programs funded by the states." On Thursday, the Senate Parliamentarian moved to strike out current language in the legislation that would exclude illegal immigrants from Medicaid eligibility, but sources close to negotiations tell Fox News Digital that those portions of the bill are actively being re-drafted in an attempt to ensure they are included in the final draft of the bill. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-South Dakota, also addressed the parliamentarian's decision to remove the portions about Medicaid to reporters Thursday morning. "These are speed bumps along the way. We anticipated those and so we have contingency plans," Thune explained. "Obviously, you have to adjust the timing and schedule a little bit, but we're moving forward." Regardless of whether Medicaid is removed from the "One Big Beautiful Bill," Congressman Hunt says that being able to identify the free healthcare-receiving illegal migrants alone is enough reason to remove them from the US. "Through coordinated efforts between DHS and CMS, we can develop an effective approach to identify people based on financial data, residence, or medical records, and then take appropriate action against those violating our immigration laws," Hunt's letter to Noem and Dr. Oz reads. "We must protect American resources for American citizens. End of discussion." Preston Mizell is a writer with Fox News Digital covering breaking news. Story tips can be sent to and on X @MizellPreston

Federal lawsuit adds to allegations of child sexual abuse in Maryland youth detention centers

time18 minutes ago

Federal lawsuit adds to allegations of child sexual abuse in Maryland youth detention centers

BALTIMORE -- A federal lawsuit could open a new chapter in an escalating legal battle in Maryland, where officials are struggling to address an unexpected onslaught of claims alleging child sexual abuse in state-run juvenile detention facilities. With thousands of similar claims already pending in state court, the litigation has raised questions about how Maryland will handle the potential financial liability. The new federal suit, filed Wednesday on behalf of three plaintiffs, seeks $300 million in damages — an amount that far exceeds caps imposed on claims filed in state court. It alleges Maryland juvenile justice leaders knew about a culture of abuse inside youth detention facilities and failed to address it, violating the plaintiffs' civil rights. A message seeking comment was left Thursday with the state's Department of Juvenile Services. The department generally doesn't comment on pending litigation. The Maryland Office of the Attorney General declined to comment. An estimated 11,000 plaintiffs have sued in state court, according to the attorneys involved. Maryland Senate President Bill Ferguson said Wednesday that he believes negotiations for a potential settlement are ongoing between attorneys for the plaintiffs and the attorney general's office. Officials have said the state is facing a potential liability between $3 billion and $4 billion. Lawsuits started pouring in after a state law passed in 2023 eliminated the statute of limitations for child sexual abuse claims in Maryland. The change came in the immediate aftermath of a scathing investigative report that revealed widespread abuse within the Archdiocese of Baltimore. It prompted the archdiocese to file for bankruptcy to protect its assets. But Maryland leaders didn't anticipate they'd be facing similar budgetary concerns because of claims against the state's juvenile justice system. Facing a potentially enormous payout, lawmakers recently passed an amendment to limit future liabilities. The new law reduces caps on settlements from $890,000 to $400,000 for cases filed after May 31 against state institutions, and from $1.5 million to $700,000 for private institutions. It allows each claimant to receive only one payment, instead of being able to collect for each act of abuse. Suing in federal court allows plaintiffs to sidestep those limits. 'Despite Maryland's recent unconstitutional legislative efforts to insulate itself from liability for the horrific sexual brutalization of children in its custody, Maryland cannot run from liability under Federal law,' plaintiffs' attorney Corey Stern said in a statement. 'The United States Constitution was created for all of us, knowing that some would need protection from the tyranny of their political leaders.' The three plaintiffs in the federal case allege they were sexually abused by staff at two juvenile detention centers. While other lawsuits have mainly presented allegations of abuse occurring decades ago, the federal complaint focuses on events alleged to have happened in 2019 and 2020. The plaintiffs were 14 and 15 years old. The victims feared their sentences would be extended if they spoke out, according to the complaint. They accuse state officials of turning a blind eye to a 'culture of sexual brutalization and abuse.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store