Fresh megabill text overnight: what's in and what's out
The Senate megabill has gone through what Republicans hope will be its final 'Byrd bath' — and the chamber will be working through the weekend as Republicans hustle to get their domestic policy bill to President Donald Trump's desk by July 4.
The latest text of the measure, which Senate leaders are hoping to start procedural votes on Saturday afternoon, was released just before midnight. The latest text reflects rulings by the parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, after she warned Republicans that several pieces of the bill didn't meet strict budget reconciliation rules that allow the bill to pass along party lines.
Between Byrd rule compliance and senators' own concerns about impacts of certain cuts and policies, there were a deluge of changes in the latest text.
Here's a roundup of some of what's new:
Health care: Senate Republicans are planning to provide a $25 billion stabilization fund for rural hospitals over five years. That's a significant increase from the $15 billion offer Senate GOP leadership had made to a group of Medicaid moderates earlier. The new package also delays cuts to provider taxes that fund state obligations to Medicaid, with the drawdown beginning in 2028.
SALT: The new Senate text keeps House Republicans' plan to increase the deduction from $10,000 to $40,000. But it would snap back to current levels after 2029. The change is expected to shave at least $100 billion from the approximately $350 billion price tag of the House plan.
SNAP: Alaska and Hawaii could be temporarily exempted from the requirement for cost-sharing for the nation's largest anti-hunger program under the new language. The bill grants the Agriculture secretary authority to waive the two states' cost-share requirement for up to two years if they are 'actively implementing' a plan to lower their payment error rates for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Both states would also be eligible for waivers to bypass the new SNAP work requirements for able-bodied adults without dependents, if the Agriculture secretary deems they are making a 'good faith effort' to comply with the requirements.
Energy: The new text would require solar and wind generation projects seeking to qualify for the Inflation Reduction Act's clean electricity production and investment tax credits to be placed in service — or plugged into the grid — by the end of 2027. That's much more restrictive than an earlier version that tied eligibility to when a project begins construction. It would also deny wind and solar leasing arrangements to residential customers from accessing the climate law's clean electricity investment and production tax credits.
The bill has more energy changes, including:
Land sales: The bill would order the sale of up to 0.5 percent of Bureau of Land Management land across 11 states. Eligible lands would have to fall within five miles of a population center, and protected lands excluded. The new text would set aside money from each sale for hunting, fishing and recreational amenities. The parliamentarian has yet to rule on the new framework, after flagging a previous version.
Federal pensions: The new text eliminates a proposal to hike federal employees' required retirement contributions and charge unions for time spent engaging in organizing activities, after the parliamentarian ruled that several of the GOP's civil service provisions violated the chamber's reconciliation rules.
Education: Gone from the new bill language are provisions to expand the Pell Grants to short-term workforce training programs outside of the accreditation system and at for-profit programs. The change came after the Senate parliamentarian warned that it ran afoul of the chamber's strict reconciliation rules.
Also stripped out was language that blocked doctors and dentists from having their student loan payments during residency count toward Public Service Loan Forgiveness. The new language would delay — rather than repeal — Biden era regulations that made it easier for student borrowers to have federal loans forgiven if schools either defrauded them or closed for 10 years.
Immigration: At the recommendation of the parliamentarian, the latest version of the bill does not include language that would have limited the ability of federal courts to issue preliminary injunctions or temporary restraining orders against the U.S. if a bond had not been posted.
Jordain Carney, Juan Perez Jr., Hailey Fuchs, Kelsey Tamborrino, James Bikales, Timothy Cama, Kelsey Brugger, Garrett Downs, Manuel Quiñones, Lawrence Ukenye, Benjamin Guggenheim and Samuel Benson contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
Updated Senate bill slashes wind and solar incentives – and adds a new tax
An updated draft of the Senate's megabill text slashes tax incentives for wind and solar energy – and adds a new tax on future wind and solar projects. The initial draft released by Senate Republicans earlier this month cut the credit for any wind and solar projects that did not 'begin construction' by certain dates, while the latest version bases incentives on when projects actually begin producing electricity — a much higher bar to clear. The first draft gave any project that began construction this year full credit, any project that began construction next year 60 percent credit and any project that began construction in 2027 20 percent of the credit, before they were phased out thereafter. The new legislation instead says that the credits will only apply to facilities that begin producing electricity before the end of 2027. In addition, it imposes a new tax on some wind and solar projects that are placed in service after 2027. The projects that will be taxed if a certain percentage of the value of their components come from China. The Democrats' 2022 Inflation Reduction Act included hundreds of billions of dollars in tax credits for low-carbon energy sources, including renewable energy. These subsidies were expected to massively reduce the U.S.' planet warming emissions. The GOP's cuts to the credits are expected to severely curtail those gains. If they pass, the cuts represent a win for the party's right flank, which has pushed for major cuts to the credits, and a loss for it's more moderate wing which has called for a slower phaseout. The renewables lobby slammed the changes as hampering the sector. 'In what can only be described as 'midnight dumping,' the Senate has proposed a punitive tax hike targeting the fastest-growing sectors of our energy industry. It is astounding that the Senate would intentionally raise prices on consumers rather than encouraging economic growth and addressing the affordability crisis facing American households,' Jason Grumet, CEO of the American Clean Power Association, said in a written statement. 'These new taxes will strand hundreds of billions of dollars in current investments, threaten energy security, and undermine growth in domestic manufacturing and land hardest on rural communities who would have been the greatest beneficiaries of clean energy investment,' he added.
Fox News
15 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump golfs with Republican senators Schmitt, Graham and Paul ahead of 'Big, Beautiful Bill' vote
President Donald Trump played a round of golf with Republican leaders on Saturday. The president was joined by Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo., Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-SC., Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., and CIA Director John Ratcliffe, sources confirmed to Fox News. The outing comes as Republican senators look to pass the "Big Beautiful Bill" by Saturday afternoon. The bill has a self-imposed deadline of July 4. In a memo sent on Saturday to Senate offices, the White House endorsed the latest revisions to the bill and called for its passage, while warning that failure to approve the budget "would be the ultimate betrayal". Graham shared the golf outing in a post on social media, expressing optimism over the bill's vote. Graham revealed the stitched-together text of the colossal bill late Friday night. Republican leaders, the White House and disparate factions within the Senate and House GOP have been meeting to find middle ground on other pain points, such as tweaking the caps on state and local tax (SALT) deductions. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent hammered on the importance of passing Trump's bill on time. He met with Senate Republicans during their closed-door lunch and spread the message that advancing the colossal tax package would go a long way toward giving businesses more certainty in the wake of the president's tariffs. "We need certainty," he said. "With so much uncertainty, and having the bill on the president's desk by July 4 will give us great tax certainty, and I believe, accelerate the economy in the third quarter of the year." Follow Fox News Digital's sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.
Boston Globe
16 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Senate Republicans revise Trump's policy bill, scrounging for votes to pass it
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Republican leaders in the Senate are rushing to shore up support for the legislation so they can quickly pass it and send it to the House for final approval in time to meet the July 4 deadline Trump has set. An initial vote in the Senate could come later Saturday. Advertisement Party leaders are trying to appease two flanks of their conference. Some, including Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, said they could not support it without greater reassurances that the Medicaid cuts it contains would not hurt rural hospitals in their states. And fiscal hawks, including Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, have said they do not want to back legislation that would only increase the deficit. Advertisement The core of the bill remains the same. It would extend tax cuts passed by Republicans in 2017 and add some new ones Trump campaigned on, while slashing spending on safety-net programs, including Medicaid and food assistance. The biggest tax cuts and the biggest changes to those anti-poverty programs remained intact. Taken together, the bill would likely increase federal debt by more than $3 trillion over the next decade, though lawmakers are still shaping the bill and waiting on an official estimate from the Congressional Budget Office. With Trump demanding quick action, Republicans in Congress have intensified their efforts to push it through to enactment even as many of them — including several who voted for it in the House — have been open about their reservations about a measure they are concerned could be a political loser. The revisions released early Saturday were designed to allay some of those concerns. Senators, including Tillis and Susan Collins, R-Maine, had pressed for the inclusion of a rural hospital fund to help health care providers absorb the impact of a provision that would crack down on strategies that many states have developed to finance their Medicaid programs. Despite their pushback, that provider tax change remains in the bill, though lawmakers have delayed its implementation by one year. It is unclear whether a $25 billion compensation fund will be enough to win their votes. Collins had suggested that she wanted to provide as much as $100 billion to ensure that rural hospitals, which operate on thin margins, were not adversely affected. Advertisement But it appeared to be enough to win over at least one Republican holdout who had expressed concern about the Medicaid cuts — Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri, who said he would vote for the bill and was confident that changes benefit his state at least in the short term. A new provision allowing 'individuals in a noncontiguous state' to be exempt from enforcing new work requirements imposed on SNAP, formerly known as food stamps, appeared aimed at mollifying Murkowski of Alaska. Her state would be hit with billions of dollars in nutrition assistance costs as a result of the legislation, and she had cited the provision as one of her chief concerns. The bill also includes new health provisions designed to benefit Alaska, as well as new tax benefits for fishers in the state's waters. Some of the changes were aimed at appealing to members of the House, where Republicans from high-tax states like New York have threatened to sink the bill if it does not include a substantial increase in the state and local tax deduction, currently capped at $10,000. Senate Republicans, skeptical of the deduction, still ultimately decided to match the House plan to lift the cap to $40,000. But while the House made the increase permanent, the Senate keeps it for only five years, allowing it to snap back to $10,000 in 2030. The newest draft makes even sharper cuts to subsidies for wind and solar power, something that Trump and other conservatives had explicitly called for this past week. It remains to be seen whether those changes could cause friction with Republicans who have publicly supported green energy credits, including Tillis, Murkowski and Sen. John Curtis of Utah. Advertisement Previously, the Senate proposed allowing companies that were building wind and solar farms to claim a tax credit worth at least 30% of their costs if they started construction this year, with a phaseout over two years. But the revised bill would require companies place their projects 'in service' by the end of 2027 to claim the tax break. The bill would also impose additional taxes on renewable energy projects that receive 'material assistance' from China, even if they don't qualify for the credit. Because China dominates global supply chains, those new fees could affect a large number of projects. The new Senate measure would more quickly end tax credits for electric vehicles, doing away with them by Sept. 30. It would also slow the phaseout of a lucrative tax credit to make hydrogen fuels, allowing such projects to qualify if construction were started by the end of 2027, instead of by the end of this year. The bill also includes a provision written by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, to sell as much as 1.225 million acres of federal land across the American West in order to build housing. Earlier versions of that proposal that would have auctioned off even more acreage had drawn fierce opposition from conservative hunters and outdoorsmen, and Republican senators from Montana and Idaho had said they would not vote for it. This article originally appeared in
