Bremont MB Meteor Revives The Titanium Orange
Bremont has introduced the MB Meteor, the latest evolution of its long-standing partnership with Martin-Baker, the British ejection seat manufacturer. For 16 years, the MB series has been an important collection for the brand, known for its rugged durability and aviation pedigree, with each model undergoing the same extreme testing used on ejection seats.
Orange barrel
The MB Meteor features a slimmer Trip-Tick case construction crafted from lightweight Grade 2 titanium, improving its wearability. It is available with either a black or silver dial, both designed for improved legibility. A key visual element makes a welcome return: the vivid orange central barrel, developed through extensive R&D to match the original MB tone. This colour is applied using a Cerakote ceramic coating over titanium, chosen for its strong adhesion, thermal stability and resistance to wear.
As with all MB models, the Meteor undergoes testing protocols created in partnership with Martin-Baker. These include live ejection tests, high-impact vibration testing, and exposure to extreme temperature cycles, assuring its credibility as a true aviation-grade tool watch.
MB Dial
Inside, the MB Meteor is powered by a chronometer-rated automatic movement with a 38-hour power reserve. The 43 mm titanium case offers 100 meters of water resistance and is fitted with a screw-down crown for additional security. Anti-reflective sapphire crystal protects the dial, while a solid titanium case back completes the lightweight yet robust construction.
The MB Meteor represents a refined balance of Bremont's British engineering approach and practical tool-watch execution. Two dial options, both framed by the distinctive orange barrel, link the new model back to the earliest MB designs and the bold aesthetics of the original collaboration.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Atlantic
39 minutes ago
- Atlantic
This Year Will Be the Turning Point for AI College
A college senior returning to classes this fall has spent nearly their entire undergraduate career under the shadow—or in the embrace—of generative AI. ChatGPT first launched in November 2022, when that student was a freshman. As a department chair at Washington University in St. Louis, I witnessed the chaos it unleashed on campus. Students weren't sure what AI could do, or which uses were appropriate. Faculty were blindsided by how effectively ChatGPT could write papers and do homework. College, it seemed to those of us who teach it, was about to be transformed. But nobody thought it would happen this quickly. Three years later, the AI transformation is just about complete. By the spring of 2024, almost two-thirds of Harvard undergrads were drawing on the tool at least once a week. In a British survey of full-time undergraduates from December, 92 percent reported using AI in some fashion. Forty percent agreed that 'content created by generative AI would get a good grade in my subject,' and nearly one in five admitted that they've tested that idea directly, by using AI to complete their assignments. Such numbers will only rise in the year ahead. 'I cannot think that in this day and age that there is a student who is not using it,' Vasilis Theoharakis, a strategic-marketing professor at the Cranfield School of Management who has done research on AI in the classroom, told me. That's what I'm seeing in the classes that I teach and hearing from the students at my school: The technology is no longer just a curiosity or a way to cheat; it is a habit, as ubiquitous on campus as eating processed foods or scrolling social media. In the coming fall semester, this new reality will be undeniable. Higher education has been changed forever in the span of a single undergraduate career. 'It can pretty much do everything,' says Harrison Lieber, a WashU senior majoring in economics and computer science (who took a class I taught on AI last term). As a college student, he told me, he has mostly inhabited a world with ChatGPT. For those in his position, the many moral questions that AI provokes—for example, whether it is exploitative, or anti-intellectual, or ecologically unsound—take a back seat to the simple truth of its utility. Lieber characterized the matter as pragmatic above all else: Students don't want to cheat; they certainly don't want to erode the value of an education that may be costing them or their family a small fortune. But if you have seven assignments due in five days, and AI could speed up the work by tenfold for the cost of a large pizza, what are you meant to do? In spring 2023, I spoke with a WashU student whose paper had been flagged by one of the generally unreliable AI detectors that universities have used to stem the tide of cheating. He told me that he'd run his text through grammar-checking software and asked ChatGPT to improve some sentences, and that he'd done this to make time for other activities that he preferred. 'Sometimes I want to play basketball,' he said. 'Sometimes I want to work out.' His attitude might have been common among large-language-model users during that first, explosive year of AI college: If a computer helps me with my paper, then I'll have more time for other stuff. That appeal persists in 2025, but as these tools have taken over in the dorms, the motivations of their users have diversified. For Lieber, AI's allure seems more about the promise of achievement than efficiency. As with most students who are accepted to and graduate from an elite university, he and his classmates have been striving their whole life. As Lieber put it, if a course won't have 'a tangible impact on my ability to get a good job,' then 'it's not worth putting a lot of my time into.' This approach to education, coupled with a ' dismal ' outlook for postgraduate employment, justifies an ever more ferocious focus on accomplishment. Lieber is pursuing a minor in film and media studies. He has also started a profitable business while in school. Still, he had to network hard to land a good job after graduation. (He is working in risk management.) Da'Juantay Wynter, another rising senior at WashU who has never seen a full semester without AI, told me he always writes his own essays but feels okay about using ChatGPT to summarize readings, especially if he is in a rush. And like the other students I spoke with, he's often in a rush. Wynter is a double major in educational studies and American-culture studies; he has also served as president of the Association of Black Students, and been a member of a student union and various other campus committees. Those roles sometimes feel more urgent than his classwork, he explained. If he does not attend to them, events won't take place. 'I really want to polish up all my skills and intellect during college,' he said. Even as he knows that AI can't do the work as well, or in a way that will help him learn, 'it's always in the back of my mind: Well, AI can get this done in five seconds.' Another member of his class, Omar Abdelmoity, serves on the university's Academic Integrity Board, the body that adjudicates cases of cheating, with AI or otherwise. In almost every case of AI cheating he's seen, Abdelmoity told me, students really did have the time to write the paper in question—they just got stressed or preoccupied by other things, and turned to AI because it works and it is available. Students also feel the strain of soaring expectations. For those who want to go to medical school, as Abdelmoity does, even getting a 4.0 GPA and solid MCAT scores can seem insufficient for admission to the best programs. Whether or not this is realistic, students have internalized the message that they should be racking up more achievements and experience: putting in clinical hours, publishing research papers, and leading clubs, for example. In response, they seek ways to 'time shift,' Abdelmoity said, so they can fit more in. And that's at an elite private university, he continued, where the pressure is high but so is the privilege. At a state school, a student might be more likely to work multiple jobs and take care of their family. Those ordinary demands may encourage AI use even more. In the end, Abdelmoity said, academic-integrity boards such as the one he sits on can only do so much. For students who have access to AI, an education is what you make of it. If the AI takeover of higher ed is nearly complete, plenty of professors are oblivious. It isn't that they fail to understand the nature of the threat to classroom practice. But my recent interviews with colleagues have led me to believe that, on the whole, faculty simply fail to grasp the immediacy of the problem. Many seem unaware of how utterly normal AI has become for students. For them, the coming year could provide a painful revelation. Some professors I spoke with have been taking modest steps in self-defense: They're abandoning online and take-home assignments, hoping to retain the purity of their coursework. Kerri Tobin, an associate professor of education at Louisiana State University, told me that she is making undergrads do a lot more handwritten, in-class writing—a sentiment I heard many times this summer. The in-class exam, and its associated blue book, is also on the rise. And Abdelmoity reported that the grading in his natural-science courses has already been rejiggered, deemphasizing homework and making tests count for more. These adjustments might be helpful, but they also risk alienating students. Being forced to write out essays in longhand could make college feel even more old-fashioned than it did before, and less connected to contemporary life. Other professors believe that moral appeals may still have teeth. Annabel Rothschild, an assistant professor of computer science at Bard College, said she's found that blanket rules and prohibitions have been less effective than a personal address and appeal to social responsibility. Rothschild is particularly concerned about the environmental harms of AI, and she reports that students have responded to discussions about those risks. The fact that she's a scientist who understands the technology gives her message greater credibility. It also helps that she teaches at a small college with a focus on the arts. Today's seniors entered college at the tail end of the coronavirus pandemic, a crisis that once seemed likely to produce its own transformation of higher ed. The sudden switch to Zoom classes in 2020 revealed, over time, just how outmoded the standard lecture had become; it also showed that, if forced by circumstance, colleges could turn on a dime. But COVID led to little lasting change in the college classroom. Some of the students I spoke with said the response to AI has been meager too. They wondered why faculty weren't doing more to adjust teaching practices to match the fundamental changes wrought by new technologies—and potentially improve the learning experience in the process. Lieber said that he wants to learn to make arguments and communicate complex ideas, as he does in his film minor. But he also wonders why more courses can't assess those skills through classroom discussion (which is hard to fake) instead of written essays or research papers (which may be completed with AI). 'People go to a discussion-based class, and 80 percent of the class doesn't participate in discussion,' he said. The truth is that many professors would like to make this change but simply can't. A lot of us might want to judge students on the merits of their participation in class, but we've been discouraged from doing so out of fear that such evaluations will be deemed arbitrary and inequitable —and that students and their parents might complain. When professors take class participation into account, they do so carefully: Students tend to be graded on whether they show up or on the number of times they speak in class, rather than the quality of what they say. Erin McGlothlin, the vice dean of undergraduate affairs in WashU's College of Arts & Sciences, told me this stems from the belief that grading rubrics should be crystal clear in spelling out how class discussion is evaluated. For professors, this approach avoids the risk of any conflicts related to accommodating students' mental health or politics, or to bureaucratic matters. But it also makes the modern classroom more vulnerable to the incursion of AI. If what a student says in person can't be assessed rigorously, then what they type on their computer—perhaps with automated help—will matter all the more. Like the other members of his class, Lieber did experience a bit of college life before ChatGPT appeared. Even then, he said, at the very start of his freshman year, he felt alienated from some of his introductory classes. 'I would think to myself, What the hell am I doing, sitting watching this professor give the same lecture that he has given every year for the last 30 years? ' But he knew the answer even then: He was there to subsidize that professor's research. At America's research universities, teaching is a secondary job activity, at times neglected by faculty who want to devote as much time as possible to writing grants, running labs, and publishing academic papers. The classroom experience was suffering even before AI came onto the scene. Now professors face their own temptations from AI, which can enable them to get more work done, and faster, just as it does for students. I've heard from colleagues who admit to using AI-generated recommendation letters and course syllabi. Others clearly use AI to write up their research. And still more are eager to discuss the wholesome-seeming ways they have been putting the technology to use—by simulating interactions with historical authors, for example, or launching minors in applied AI. But students seem to want a deeper sort of classroom innovation. They're not looking for gimmicks—such as courses that use AI only to make boring topics seem more current. Students like Lieber, who sees his college education as a means of setting himself up for his career, are demanding something more. Instead of being required to take tests and write in-class essays, they want to do more project-based learning—with assignments that 'emulate the real world,' as Lieber put it. But designing courses of this kind, which resist AI shortcuts, would require professors to undertake new and time-consuming labor themselves. That assignment comes at the worst possible time. Universities have been under systematic attack since President Donald Trump took office in January. Funding for research has been cut, canceled, disrupted, or stymied for months. Labs have laid off workers. Degree programs have cut doctoral admissions. Multi-center research projects have been put on hold. The ' college experience ' that Americans have pursued for generations may soon be over. The existence of these stressors puts higher ed at greater risk from AI. Now professors find themselves with even more demands than they anticipated and fewer ways to get them done. The best, and perhaps the only, way out of AI's college takeover would be to embark on a redesign of classroom practice. But with so many other things to worry about, who has the time? In this way, professors face the same challenge as their students in the year ahead: A college education will be what they
Business Insider
15 hours ago
- Business Insider
Billionaire Investor George Soros Bets Big on Nvidia (NVDA)
Billionaire investor George Soros has bet big on chipmaker Nvidia (NVDA) in recent months. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. The latest 13F regulatory filing of Soros Fund Management shows that the legendary investor boosted his stake in Nvidia considerably during this year's second quarter. Soros' holding of NVDA stock rose from 17,500 shares in this year's first quarter to 103,000 shares at the end of June. The current stake is valued at $18.5 million based on Nvidia's share price. However, Soros also holds bullish call options on NVDA stock, which are bets that the share price will rise. Add in the call options, and Soros' stake in Nvidia is up an astounding 1,600% from the first quarter. Nvidia is one of the biggest technology bets made by Soros Fund Management. Other Bets However, Nvidia wasn't the only tech bet made in Q2 by George Soros, who famously made $1 billion betting against the British currency in the early 1990s. The famed investor also loaded up on artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure company Broadcom (AVGO), another chipmaker. Soros raised his holdings of AVGO stock to 37,000 shares from 11,000 shares previously. Soros Fund Management also added to its financial technology exposure through Fiserv (FI), increasing its stake to 31,000 shares from just 15,000 shares in Q1 of this year. Fiserv is a financial technology company that helps to facilitate transactions at banks. It is using AI in fraud detection and other areas of banking. Is NVDA Stock a Buy? The stock of Nvidia has a consensus Strong Buy rating among 38 Wall Street analysts. That rating is based on 35 Buy, two Hold, and one Sell recommendations issued in the past three months. The average NVDA price target of $191.26 implies 6.56% upside from current levels.
Time Business News
a day ago
- Time Business News
Car Mats Volvo V40: The Essential Choice for Swedish Automotive Perfection
Choosing the correct car mats volvo v40 is important to car owners who take vehicular protection seriously. Your Volvo V40, as a representative of Swedish engineering sophistication, utilizes quality materials and unique attributes that require specialist interior care. The correct car mats volvo v40 offer protection as well as retaining the quality aesthetic that separates a Volvo ownership experience from the rest. We know at Volvo Car Mats, that buyers of car mats volvo v40 seek engineered protection to the same quality level that their vehicles offer. Our business exclusively concentrates on quality protection engineered specifically for Volvo vehicles. Car mats volvo v40 are premium and ultimately reflect superior quality engineering, offering thorough protection against the daily wear and damage that can develop materials within a vehicle's interior. All of our car mats volvo v40 have been manufactured to precision and quality standards that reflect our commitment of excellence, as well as ensuring durability that is consistent with the engineering heritage of Volvo vehicles. Every mat set undergoes extensive design development to achieve seamless integration with your Volvo V40's interior architecture. Regardless of your specific model year, our car mats volvo v40 deliver that crucial snug fit, preventing dangerous movement while maintaining the polished, customized appearance expected from premium automotive accessories. This model-year precision ensures perfect compatibility whether you drive an early model or contemporary release, with each car mats volvo v40 set designed to enhance your vehicle's aesthetic appeal through Swedish-quality engineering principles and meticulous attention to detail. In the UK there are unique car interior protection challenges that are not something standard car accessories are meant to handle. The unpredictable climate of Britain means that you can face any variety of weather which is typically never dry, and constant exposure to winter weather leads to a demand for specific car mats volvo v40 which can withstand continuous moisture while still working. The application of road salt in the winter months on UK roads exposes factory cars carpets and the floors below, to risk exceptionally. Metropolitan driving introduces additional challenges through continuous traffic patterns, elevated pedestrian activity, and moisture accumulation that quickly overwhelms inferior protection systems. Countryside driving presents different protection requirements—seasonal mud, agricultural contamination, and periodic flooding demand robust car mats volvo v40 capable of managing extreme protection scenarios. These demanding conditions necessitate advanced materials and construction methodologies specifically developed for British automotive environments. Annual weather cycles require adaptable protection strategies throughout different seasons. Spring conditions bring mud and organic debris, summer introduces dust and storm-related challenges, autumn delivers leaf matter and persistent dampness, while winter presents combined salt exposure, snow accumulation, and continuous moisture that tests inadequate protection systems. Our car mats volvo v40 collection embodies professional sophistication, dramatically enhancing your vehicle's interior presentation while preserving original factory materials. These protection systems maintain your vehicle's luxurious character while providing customization flexibility, enabling personalization that reflects individual taste preferences and practical requirements. Extensive customization possibilities ensure perfect aesthetic harmony with personal style choices and interior design elements. Featuring comprehensive color ranges and trim specifications, these car mats volvo v40 transcend basic accessory functionality—they represent strategic investments in long-term interior preservation and enhanced visual appeal. These are unbelievable mats, they balance luxury and utility, and provide a high standard of driving comfort without compromising an overall professional look and finish. Made from premium quality products, they will add durability in all circumstances, and an elegant level of refinement to the aesthetics of an interior. High-performance materials establish the foundation for effective car mats volvo v40 protection, incorporating advanced manufacturing processes that resist environmental staining, structural cracking, and temperature-related degradation. These materials maintain operational flexibility during extreme cold while providing exceptional durability throughout intense summer conditions. Carpet material options enhance interior aesthetics while delivering superior comfort characteristics, utilizing premium construction techniques ensuring long-term performance reliability. Alternative rubber materials provide practical durability with robust environmental protection, demonstrating exceptional resilience against challenging conditions while maintaining weatherproof performance throughout severe climatic exposures. Both material types provide great combinations of functional use, strength, and aesthetics, creating a big improvement for driving experiences while allowing for complete interior protection. Quality car mats volvo v40 streamline interior maintenance through intelligent engineering features and simplified installation procedures. Installation processes require no specialized equipment—simply position mats appropriately and ensure correct floor engagement for secure, stable positioning throughout vehicle operation. Each protection set includes necessary fixings ensuring perfect integration within your vehicle's footwell design without requiring professional installation services. This user-friendly approach delivers immediate protection while preserving the refined appearance standards expected from premium automotive protection systems. Ongoing maintenance preserves both operational effectiveness and visual quality. Carpet variants respond well to regular vacuuming combined with periodic intensive cleaning, while rubber alternatives can be efficiently maintained using conventional automotive cleaning products and standard water-based cleaning methods. Investing in premium car mats volvo v40 provides comprehensive interior preservation against routine wear patterns, environmental contamination, and weather-related deterioration. This protection strategy preserves interior aesthetics while maintaining critical resale values through systematic floor preservation methodologies. High-quality building materials will provide a long service life ensuring high returns on your investment and constant protection during your ownership experience. As well as looking good and providing protection you get value for money because the value extends way beyond your purchase price. Professional installation recommendations and detailed care instructions will maximize your investment potential, allowing car mats volvo v40 to yield the best performance while protecting your cars interior from the driving obstacles you may drivers demanding superior interior protection solutions, Volvo Car Mats provides precision-engineered car mats volvo v40 combining Swedish engineering excellence with British practicality, guaranteeing your V40's interior remains showroom-fresh throughout diverse driving conditions. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
